no doubt
ozmo, once you read about biology, and even other disciplines such as immunology, medicine, biochem etc the patterns and commonalities become obvious.
you are right in a way, i think your getting caught up on the fact that evolution can not be known 100%, i dont beleive anything can in reality to be honest, there always seems to be exceptions or more knowledge to acquire. but macroevolution works on humungous time scales, so "observation" of it as its occuring is impossible in reality, but its consequence(microevolution) can be seen.
however, i think you get this point but a better question is if macroevolution is wrong, just hypothetically, what do you propose is the correct theory?
i mean, do you beleive that god selectively participated in the start of each species, then for some reason allowed a natural process(micro evolution) to occur in his place to ensure the surivival. Obviously there is a natural explanation for the beginning of life on earth, and the proliferation of it, wouldnt you agree?
if not, write down an alternative theory. honestly, or your thoughts, id be interested to hear them.
im not being condescending at all either.