if you want to prove me wrong, then post a quote from an IFBB judge who disagrees with me. 
IFBB Website - History of the Mr. Olympia
"The night (October 25, 2003) was Ronnie's. Whatever doubt people had was dispelled as soon as Ronnie hit the stage. He was in his best shape ever, at 39 years old."
http://www.ifbbpro.com/history-of-the-mr-olympia/4/
Ronnie at the 01 ASC surpassed Dorian's conditioning.
in before lame excuse from ND about how my comparison is biased and the scaling somehow affects separations and striations. 
they are the same thing, idiot. Look them up in the dictionary. If you're using the IFBB definitions, then explain how a judge is suppose to tell if the mass of one side is equal to the other. I wonder if you ever stopped to use your brain and think about that for a second.
Dorian Yates - Flex, October 2006
"Symmetry means one side is shaped the same as the other side--its mirror image. Balance means the mass of one side is equal to that of the other, even though their shapes, or symmetry, might differ. Proportion is nothing more than the relativity of parts and has nothing to do with either symmetry or balance."
please do continue b/c so far I haven't seen any examples that demonstrate you know more than me about bodybuilding.
hahaha, keep deluding yourself into believing the pics lie and the judges were being literal instead of using figurative language. I've already proved Dorian wasn't the largest guy onstage. Now the onus is on you to prove he was otherwise you concede you're wrong.
if you want to prove me wrong, then post a quote from an IFBB judge who disagrees with me.
IFBB Website - History of the Mr. Olympia
"The night (October 25, 2003) was Ronnie's. Whatever doubt people had was dispelled as soon as Ronnie hit the stage. He was in his best shape ever, at 39 years old."
http://www.ifbbpro.com/history-of-the-mr-olympia/4/
This means what? one quote , now find multiple quotes from multiple sources it's called convergence 03 is NOT his best by a long shot and why? his balance & proportion for his frame was in the red and his conditioning was lacking compared to 98/01 that's why
Ronnie at the 01 ASC surpassed Dorian's conditioning.
Sure it has now if you could get anyone to agree with you that's they key
separations & striations are for the most part genetic with great conditioning and don't even get me started on pics don't do Yates justice different lighting , quality of pictures , I mean where should I begin? I'm always willing to concede Ronnie may have matched Dorian in 01 surpassed nonsense
they are the same thing, idiot. Look them up in the dictionary. If you're using the IFBB definitions, then explain how a judge is suppose to tell if the mass of one side is equal to the other. I wonder if you ever stopped to use your brain and think about that for a second.
They aren't already proven you wrong flat out using Yates who is an IFBB judge
Interview with David Robson
[ Q ] What were some of your better physical qualities as a bodybuilder, do you think?
Obviously I carried a lot of muscle mass and my trademark was to come into a show in super hard condition. I think my muscles had a certain quality and density from all the years of heavy training that a lot of guys didn't have.
One thing that I think people underrated me on - it was never really mentioned because of my sheer physical size and condition - was my
balance and proportion. Not only from muscle group to muscle group, but from upper body to lower body. My skeletal structure and everything else was there and in good balance.
BALANCE & PROPORTION are NOT the same you idiot let it go
please do continue b/c so far I haven't seen any examples that demonstrate you know more than me about bodybuilding.
You haven't seen any because you're a idiot , you haven't seen where an IFBB judge said Dorian is better conditioned , and better balanced , you can't see how 2003 isn't is best , there is a LOT you don't see nothing new
hahaha, keep deluding yourself into believing the pics lie and the judges were being literal instead of using figurative language. I've already proved Dorian wasn't the largest guy onstage. Now the onus is on you to prove he was otherwise you concede you're wrong.
see above denial and stupidity prove nothing
