I would NEVER go as far as to kill her...but as her father (based on HIS beliefs) i would beat her ass. Some of you cant understand this train of thought so let me help.....you walk in on your SON sucking a dick... how do you react? Same shit.....see my point
I disagree. You make it sound like morality is relative in this situation, and it is not. You could argue it is his house and his rules, but that never gives him moral justification to beat her. He could at most, impose an ultimatum: wear the religious regalia or leave.
A moral transaction is one which consists of bilaterally voluntary consent. I will post on here exactly what I posted on a recent facebook note regarding severe religious programming when viewed as a disease (which by all rights it should be viewed as):
"I know better than to debate with people like that, since their method of debate is just to yell at me. Through years of indoctrinating sermons and proselytizing, I believe that very religious (or otherwise close minded) people have insult to their brain to the point where it makes it literally impossible to be open to alternate views.
We've all heard that older people set in their ways can't be changed. I believe that is because through the years some parts of their brain have taken a permanent physical structure not allowing for it. Contrast that with young brains - they can accept change since no irreversible insult has been caused.
Think of a rotten apple: You can't un-rot it. The structure is altered and permanent. Think about a disease of cognition such as Alzheimer's; it is progressive and irreversible. I think a challenge for neuroscientists would be to analyze the parts of the brain affected here and to determine which neural pathways and lobes are involved.
There is division and lateralization of mental processing and I think it would be possible to determine very specific answers. I think severe indoctrination is as much a disease as trauma caused by physical activity.
I may sound rude to look at it as a disease, but rationally speaking, it takes on all the characteristics of one. Just because it is accepted by so many, doesn't mean it cannot be classified in this manner. At various times in history, misogyny, slavery, and even murder were deemed acceptable (appeal to popularity fallacy).
What I am offended by: the same neoconservative Christian fundamentalists who line up in droves to stop valuable stem cell research are the same ones who will also line up to reap the benefits of the cures when they finally do get developed thanks to stem cells. They are entitled to hurt themselves, but I think it's horrible that they hurt other people and take advantage of the same things they tried to prevent."