and why would it even matter? He's not being tested. He hasn't competed in over 4 years. He did enter Team Universe, but they never publish the results of their drug tests, nor have they every disqualified anyone who failed the test. If TU actually performs drug testing, he could have failed it every year 1994-2003 and we'd never know. The IFBB World Games, like all IFBB international events, randomly drug tests a small fraction of the contestants.
1990 was probably the last time he entered a truly drug tested contest.
Drug testing is expensive, which is usually why only the top 3 or 5 of a weight class get screened. I've heard rumors that those who pop positive at TU shows simply don't get to compete and get dismissed quietly.
If someone take roids in natural show and still places 10th or 15th, it ain't even worth the effort to collect the sample.
LaCour has been competing as a natural bodybuilder since (at least) 1994. And, he's worked for MET-Rx, Twinlab, and now AST.
When he was with Twinlab, Steve Blechman had him as part of his staff, writing articles for
All-Natural Muscular Development. In the first issue of ANMD, Blechman stated that he would only have natural bodybuilders on staff (which included LaCour). He also stated that all his guys would be tested and that, if anyone popped positive, they'd get canned and he would exposed them in his magazine.
You'd think that, after all these years, if LaCour (or any other well-known "nattie", at that time) had flunked a drug test over the last decade or so, someone would have the goods and made it public, by now.
As I said about the WBF in 1992, how many folks would support a bodybuilding show or organization, if it tested the way McMahon did back then? Again, Mike Christian popped positive and got fined $25,000, a month's pay; but, he was allowed to compete. If anyone remembers what he looked like at the 1992 WBF Championship, I think it's safe to say that he was being tested thoroughly.
The biggest knock on the TU seems to be its 1-year drug-free policy. Most folks feel that isn't enough, as some former drug users might still have some "residual effects" from their past roid use that would give them an advantage. That's the biggest controversy about drug-tested shows: How long does a former steroid user have to be off to be truly considered drug-free?