Author Topic: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back  (Read 11644 times)

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #50 on: February 01, 2008, 02:03:44 PM »

Arkadius

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 814
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #51 on: February 01, 2008, 02:08:24 PM »
back :(
R.I.P. Michael

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #52 on: February 01, 2008, 02:15:15 PM »
He's probably most comparable (height wise, weight wise, and structure wise) to Berry DeMey.  Check out my review of the 1988 Mr. Olympia contest, complete with pictures:

http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/1988mrolympiadvdreview.html

From the WBF:
Bodybuilding Pro.com

Arkadius

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 814
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #53 on: February 01, 2008, 02:30:56 PM »
Quote
He's probably most comparable (height wise, weight wise, and structure wise) to Berry DeMey.
I personally never liked DeMeys physique that much....
R.I.P. Michael

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #54 on: February 01, 2008, 02:34:40 PM »
I love how the resident retard ND gets caught by his own bullshit:

in the truce thread as well as all the dorian threads he argues that pictures and videos don't mean anything, all that matters is quotes from people that were there.

he claims strydom's back didn't improve much

and low and behold musclemag takes the time to give him an 'award' it improved so much..

yet - now all of a sudden, the written article doesn't matter!


LOL

if its dorian (getting killed) pics and videos don't matter

if its anyone else - its only visuals that matter.


can you believe this bullshit?

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Rearden Metal

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4348
  • Team Honey Badger cuz he don't Care.
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #55 on: February 01, 2008, 02:38:24 PM »
Fixed.

Let's see your back MattC. Can't recall a pic showing you in any other pose than a gay oiled up berkenstock wearing front retarded. :P

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79281
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #56 on: February 01, 2008, 02:42:10 PM »
I love how the resident retard ND gets caught by his own bullshit:

in the truce thread as well as all the dorian threads he argues that pictures and videos don't mean anything, all that matters is quotes from people that were there.

he claims strydom's back didn't improve much

and low and behold musclemag takes the time to give him an 'award' it improved so much..

yet - now all of a sudden, the written article doesn't matter!


LOL

if its dorian (getting killed) pics and videos don't matter

if its anyone else - its only visuals that matter.


can you believe this bullshit?

 ::)

Hulkster stop sucking up for sympathy and answer the question  ;)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #57 on: February 01, 2008, 02:50:08 PM »
admit that you selectively pick and chose where visuals count and when they don't.

you have been exposed yet again
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #58 on: February 01, 2008, 02:51:17 PM »
Hulkster stop sucking up for sympathy and answer the question  ;)

it doesn't matter what visuals you show.

do you know more than the writers of musclemag?

they were at the contest.

you weren't.

sound familiar?

 ::)

caught in your own bullshit
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79281
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #59 on: February 01, 2008, 02:54:10 PM »
admit that you selectively pick and chose where visuals count and when they don't.

you have been exposed yet again

Stop deflecting and answer the question , we're waiting , this isn't about me ! this is about what you know and what you claimed now put up or shut up  ;)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #60 on: February 01, 2008, 02:56:24 PM »
Stop deflecting and answer the question , we're waiting , this isn't about me ! this is about what you know and what you claimed now put up or shut up  ;)

musclemag gave him the award.

according to you thats all that matters - pics and videos are "misleading" - eyewitness testimony even if obviously wrong is all that matters

hahahaha

you are caught in your own bullshit and you don't know what to do!
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #61 on: February 01, 2008, 02:57:39 PM »
put up or shut up?

funny, you have been challenged to produce visuals that match your quotes and claims in the truce thread and thus far in 1600 pages you have been unable to do it.

probably why you ran away like a beaten dog.

lol
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79281
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #62 on: February 01, 2008, 02:57:45 PM »
it doesn't matter what visuals you show.

do you know more than the writers of musclemag?

they were at the contest.

you weren't.

sound familiar?

 ::)

caught in your own bullshit

No you're caught in your own bull shit he really brought up his back for the WBF shows, thats for sure how and where?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79281
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #63 on: February 01, 2008, 02:59:27 PM »
musclemag gave him the award.

according to you thats all that matters - pics and videos are "misleading" - eyewitness testimony even if obviously wrong is all that matters

hahahaha

you are caught in your own bullshit and you don't know what to do!

Musclemag gave him an award  ::) that doesn't answer the question why do you insist on running from the question , how and where did his back improve by the WBF  ;)


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79281
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #64 on: February 01, 2008, 03:02:53 PM »
put up or shut up?

funny, you have been challenged to produce visuals that match your quotes and claims in the truce thread and thus far in 1600 pages you have been unable to do it.

probably why you ran away like a beaten dog.

lol

You should be a politician because you're very good at deflection , and running from the facts , again Hulkster

he really brought up his back for the WBF shows, thats for sure waiting


again why post on a thread I won  ;) my job is finished , you're defeated you lost , Ronnie conceded not once but twice that he would never be able to beat Dorian Yates thats check mate moron  ;) you think trolling in every thread I post in changes this fact? your hero owned you and so did I  ;)

you can't run from these Hulkster

Special Ed : Ronnie of Dorian competed in 1998 would you have smoked him?

Ronnie Coleman : NO I think he would have kept on winning as long as he competed I don't think he would have lost.

Taken out of FLEX nov 1999, page 90.  interview by jim schmaltz with ronnie before the 99 Olympia.

Jim:  What would have happened last year if Dorian Yates (recently retired winner of 6 straight Mr. Olympias) had competed?


Ronnie:  Dorian would have won again.


Jim: You think so?


Ronnie:  I know so.  Dorian has a big physique - hard- and he's been the man to beat, and its hard to knock the champion off the block.  He's a big guy and has a lot going for him.  He overcame so many adversities, like his torn biceps, I couldnt see too much else stopping him.

benz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6333
  • ٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶ boo! ٩(̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #65 on: February 01, 2008, 03:07:01 PM »
Gary is lobarede's best friend or smth like it. Losers always find a way to stay close
.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #66 on: February 02, 2008, 09:48:43 AM »
:o

I know its a bad angle, but DAMN.

they weren't kidding.

he really brought up his back for the WBF shows, thats for sure

from the 1990 german pro

Nasser found some competition for sure.

Epic_Monster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4494
  • "Let me pose on this one" - REV. X
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #67 on: February 02, 2008, 09:50:19 AM »
Lay off the G-man he is 50 and about to die for you bitches
Spirit of Truth

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #68 on: February 02, 2008, 03:59:28 PM »
Musclemag gave him an award  ::) that doesn't answer the question why do you insist on running from the question , how and where did his back improve by the WBF  ;)



funny, you have been running from producing visuals to back up all your dorian vs ronnie claims for 1600 pages.

all you care about is quotes.

Now, you are caught - someone does the SAME THING YOU DO - consider all visuals irrelevant and only go by the written word - and you miss the point entirely.

you are so dumb. you don't even see the lesson that this is teaching you.

here we are, doing EXACTLY what you have been doing your whole time on these boards and you don't understand it.

take the hint ND:

we don't HAVE to explain it or even SHOW it - musclemag (who was there ) says it was so and so therefore it must be.

this is your classic tactic from day 1.

now it is being used on you LOL

and you are too stupid to understand the lesson..

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79281
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #69 on: February 03, 2008, 06:05:44 AM »
funny, you have been running from producing visuals to back up all your dorian vs ronnie claims for 1600 pages.

all you care about is quotes.

Now, you are caught - someone does the SAME THING YOU DO - consider all visuals irrelevant and only go by the written word - and you miss the point entirely.

you are so dumb. you don't even see the lesson that this is teaching you.

here we are, doing EXACTLY what you have been doing your whole time on these boards and you don't understand it.

take the hint ND:

we don't HAVE to explain it or even SHOW it - musclemag (who was there ) says it was so and so therefore it must be.

this is your classic tactic from day 1.

now it is being used on you LOL

and you are too stupid to understand the lesson..

 ::)

Again you're deflecting I don't trust any quote you post because you've lied about quotes before remember? you claimed that Shawn Ray mentions Dorian's loss of hardness from 1992 to 1993 and when I exposed you making shit up you got real quiet real soon , so any quote you reference is worthless

Now you made the claim his back really improved by the WBF I posted a pictures clearly showing this isn't true , once again stop running and elaborate on this ' point ' you made , stop trying to put this one me , this has NOTHING to do with me you committed to a point which is so insanely ignorant and flat out dumb you didn't think anyone would call you on and I am

now put up or shut up and answer the question   ;)

everyone is waiting , deflection wont save your ass .

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79281
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: gary strydom's infamous (weak) back
« Reply #70 on: February 03, 2008, 06:09:11 AM »
he really brought up his back for the WBF shows, thats for sure


tick-tock-tick-tock