Again NO ONE of any credibility in the sport says Ronnie 1999 was his best showing just fans who like what they like , his conditioning is NOT virtually identical thats simply not true because if it was there would be alsolutely NO reason why 99 would be his best showing and it not
don't type the word ' facts ' because you have none , not one single statement saying Ronnie was in better condition than 2001 or even at bare minimum at least equal because he's not , stop you're not allowed to use the word ' facts ' because you haven't provided any as usual .
IF what you say is true, it should be quite clear that Ronnie was in better shape in 2001 than in 1999.
but look at the videos and pics:
his condition was virtually identical.
if you are too blind and stupid to see that, well, then there is no hope for you.
you CANNOT show using anything visual that ronnie was in noticably worse shape in 99 than in 2001.
until you can, shut the fuck up.
because your words mean nothing without visual support.
sorry.
look at the comparisons bizzy has done again.