FINALLY - the reason DEMS tax more

[OzmO]

I know the truth hurts

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/9/4/03534.shtml

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/8/9/120750.shtml

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18972-2004Mar23.html

http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101020812/story.html

http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/billC.htm

http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/clintonhunt.html

When you can post something besides opinion and hindsight i suppose it might hurt.

If Clinton knew what they were going to do 9/11 and had them in custody that's one thing.  Like a murderer telling the police chief he will murder the mayor of town and the police chiefs let's him free then you can say it's his fault. 

But that;s not the case with Clinton who order an assassination on OBL

All you've posted there is a bunch of spin blathering by neo-con writers to keep the hounds loyal.

Fact is, 9/11 security break downs and incompentecy occured on BUSH's watch with his administration.

Why do you think he stalled 9/11 investigations?   Why do you think he doesn't want another one?

[Brixtonbulldog]

    And you support a guy who let those 19 terrorists crash planes into the towers.

Ah .. another hateful idiot.

Not even close..

[Brixtonbulldog]

When you can post something besides opinion and hindsight i suppose it might hurt.

If Clinton knew what they were going to do 9/11 and had them in custody that's one thing.  Like a murderer telling the police chief he will murder the mayor of town and the police chiefs let's him free then you can the truth is it's his fault. 

But that;s not the case with Clinton who order an assassination on OBL

All you've posted there is a bunch of spin blathering by neo-con writers to keep the hounds loyal.

Fact is, 9/11 security break downs and incompentecy occured on BUSH's watch with his administration.

Why do you think he stalled 9/11 investigations?   Why do you think he doesn't want another one?

Read the links I posted and then offer me a better argument than "they happened just after Bush took office."

I could sit here all day and give you links but in the end you'll have to read them and respond to the facts they contain.

Your objectivity is very thin Ozmo.

[gtbro1]

Ah .. another hateful idiot.

Not even close..

  you're begging the question...

[War-Horse]

Brixy, your not the brightest bulb in the closet......and im sure its a closet.

[OzmO]

Read the links I posted and then offer me a better argument than "they happened just after Bush took office."

I could sit here all day and give you links but in the end you'll have to read them and respond to the facts they contain.

Your objectivity is very thin Ozmo.

What facts?

I get it, Clinton should have......blah blah blah.

Hindsight is 20/20

BUSH did not just take office, he was there 9 months ........19% of his first term as president had already passed.

To blamed Clinton for 9/11 is monster subjectivity and avoidance of responsibility.

In addition to security break downs across the board from Defense protocols to air port security broke down that day or just weren't prepared for that kind of event.

Add that to the reports that other world leaders and Intel was available at the time that showed something was going to happen and BUSH did what BUSH was good at then....... doing nothing.

You can argue BUSH wasn't directly at fault, but to even believe Clinton was at fault.....  Well that's just stupid and shows how much your programming in some areas has taken hold (not all areas becuase you show some good libertarian and conservative values).  Sorry.

[Brixtonbulldog]

Brixy, your not the brightest bulb in the closet......and im sure its a closet.

More nonsense and insults from someone with nothing else to offer.

[gtbro1]

More nonsense and insults from someone with nothing else to offer.

  well, now you're just being defensive. 

[War-Horse]

More nonsense and insults from someone with nothing else to offer.

Ive been offering my 2 cents since you were shitting in youre diapers, lil boy.

[Brixtonbulldog]

What facts?

I get it, Clinton should have......blah blah blah.

Hindsight is 20/20

BUSH did not just take office, he was there 9 months ........19% of his first term as president had already passed.

To blamed Clinton for 9/11 is monster subjectivity and avoidance of responsibility.

In addition to security break downs across the board from Defense protocols to air port security broke down that day or just weren't prepared for that kind of event.

Add that to the reports that other world leaders and Intel was available at the time that showed something was going to happen and BUSH did what BUSH was good at then....... doing nothing.

You can argue BUSH wasn't directly at fault, but to even believe Clinton was at fault.....  Well that's just stupid and shows how much your programming in some areas has taken hold (not all areas becuase you show some good libertarian and conservative values).  Sorry.

It's not "blah blah"... Various attacks happened during his term and he did just what you're accusing Bush of doing.. NOTHING!  

How many tips do you think Bush/DOD/CIA/NSA etc get everyday.. if one came in with credibility they wouldn't know until after the fact.  I've seen intel.  There's only so much you can do and so much you can act on.  The point is Clinton had the confirmation needed to act and did nothing while Bush had no reason to take one threat more seriously than another because he didn't have that assurance.

This is why the action taken after the fact is so important.  Bush has done everything possible to prevent more attacks.  Clinton did nothing even AFTER allied forces were attacked the world over.

In addition.. Air security at airports has always been inadequate.  It is better now after 9/11 but still no where near perfect.  I will blame neither prez for that.

[gtbro1]

  9-11 was clearly Christopher Columbus's fault. Had he not came to America, none of this shit would have happened.

[kh300]

Fact is, 9/11 security break downs and incompentecy occured on BUSH's watch with his administration.

 

not at all. those were clintons boys. that was his cia, his fbi. completely fucked up when bush took office. do you think when bush took office, he just fired every fed in the country and hired his own?

[Brixtonbulldog]

Ive been offering my 2 cents since you were shitting in youre diapers, lil boy.

My shitty daiper holds more water than anything you've posted on GB.

[gtbro1]

It's not "blah blah"... Various attacks happened during his term and he did just what you're accusing Bush of doing.. NOTHING!  


This is why the action taken after the fact is so important.  Bush has done everything possible to prevent more attacks.  Clinton did nothing even AFTER allied forces were attacked the world over.

   wrong. Clinton tried to get OBL. He failed...but he did try.

[War-Horse]

Brixy, your not the brightest bulb in the closet......and im sure its a closet.

[gtbro1]

not at all. those were clintons boys. that was his cia, his fbi. completely fucked up when bush took office. do you think when bush took office, he just fired every fed in the country and hired his own?

   I would.

[Brixtonbulldog]

   wrong. Clinton tried to get OBL. He failed...but he did try.

Yeah.. that's the story you bought when he was trying to turn the media away from his antics in office.

[gtbro1]

not at all. those were clintons boys. that was his cia, his fbi. completely fucked up when bush took office. do you think when bush took office, he just fired every fed in the country and hired his own?

  Don't you have someone to taze or something?  

























                     ;Djk

[War-Horse]

 9-11 was clearly Christopher Columbus's fault. Had he not came to America, none of this shit would have happened.

LMAO     Gawddamn columbus

[kh300]

What facts?

I get it, Clinton should have......blah blah blah.

Hindsight is 20/20

BUSH did not just take office, he was there 9 months ........19% of his first term as president had already passed.

To blamed Clinton for 9/11 is monster subjectivity and avoidance of responsibility.

In addition to security break downs across the board from Defense protocols to air port security broke down that day or just weren't prepared for that kind of event.

Add that to the reports that other world leaders and Intel was available at the time that showed something was going to happen and BUSH did what BUSH was good at then....... doing nothing.

You can argue BUSH wasn't directly at fault, but to even believe Clinton was at fault.....  Well that's just stupid and shows how much your programming in some areas has taken hold (not all areas becuase you show some good libertarian and conservative values).  Sorry.

its nobody's fault. most of you guys need to turn off cnn because your brainwashed that bush is responsible for everything bad.

if a fight breaks out in a classroom, is it the principal of the schools fault?

[kh300]

   I would.

it takes years to train and hire feds

[gtbro1]

Yeah.. that's the story you bought when he was trying to turn the media away from his antics in office.

  You really are stupid. Clinton's "antics" in office have nothing to do with any of it.

[War-Horse]

 You really are stupid. Clinton's "antics" in office have nothing to do with any of it.

Poor brixy.  Everywhere he goes on this board, they call him stupid...

[Brixtonbulldog]

 You really are stupid. Clinton's "antics" in office have nothing to do with any of it.

oohh.. touched a nerve did I?

Funny how the only real action he committed to was a pathetic and unsuccessful Thawk attack right when the whole Monica nonsense was going on.  C'mon.. and you're callin me dumb?!? hahaha.. ok

[Brixtonbulldog]

Poor brixy.  Everywhere he goes on this board, they call him stupid...

My shitty daiper holds more water than anything you've posted on GB.

lol!  Keep it coming..