you're trying to make yourself smarter by clouding the issue with irrelevant bits of data. i can teach someone how to drive a stick-shift without knowing the exact mechanisms by which the clutch interacts with the gears, and I can tell you how to get a suntan without having a grasp of what happens to the cells when hit with UV rays.
your problem is that you think that because you've read things (cute that you wanted to preclude "the google" but that's how you've garnered what you "know"), that means you know what you're talking about. you're the equivalent of an armchair quarterback who thinks that because he's watched every football game for the last 20 years and has read books on game strategy that you can tell a player how to do his job. it don't work that way.
the thing is, you are an avid weightlifter. you talk about how hard you diet, how you almost never veer, etc. and yet, despite "knowing" more than anyone else on the subject, despite having a spotless diet and "perfect" training,
you don't look like you lift weights.
clearly, there is a big fat hole in your knowledge. frankly, knowing the exact details about microtears in muscle fiber and from whence they repair and grow is unimportant because that's looking at the wrong area. if i know method A makes muscles grow but method B doesn't, from my perspective the "why" is irrelevant, i just need to find the right method.
i'd suggest you do the same, BRO.