|
The Squadfather
|
 |
« on: April 13, 2008, 12:25:21 PM » |
|
for all of you nuthuggers who believe the Great Arnold walked on water here's the truth
Height-6'1"
Weight 235-240 pounds
Arms-right at 20 inches pumped
Chest-52 inches
Waist-34-35 inches
Legs-26 inches
Bench Press-405 pound single, 315 for a good set of 8-10
Squat-405 for a couple of reps
|
|
|
|
|
|
JohnnyVegas
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2008, 12:28:38 PM » |
|
for all of you nuthuggers who believe the Great Arnold walked on water here's the truth
Height-6'1"
Weight 235-240 pounds
Arms-right at 20 inches pumped
Chest-52 inches
Waist-34-35 inches
Legs-26 inches
Bench Press-405 pound single, 315 for a good set of 8-10
Squat-405 for a couple of reps
Bullshit! Arthur Jones measured Arnolds arms at 19 5/8 cold. You can add in another 1.5 inches pumped which would bring his arms to over 21. Franco had a 50 inch chest-and Armold makes Franco look like a 5th graders. More like 60 inches for Arnold's chest. I also think the bench press is way too low. |
|
|
|
|
|
bodybuilder1234
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2008, 12:29:13 PM » |
|
I made a thread last time that Ronnie Coleman had 21.7 inch arms, nobody believed me even though countless others saw it on video (videos were removed)  |
|
|
|
|
|
The Squadfather
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2008, 12:29:23 PM » |
|
Bullshit!
Arthur Jones measured Arnolds arms at 19 5/8 cold. You can add in another 1.5 inches pumped which would bring his arms to over 21.
Franco had a 50 inch chest-and Armold makes Franco look like a 5th graders. More like 60 inches for Arnold's chest.
I also think the bench press is way too low.
sorry man those are the real deal, i'm sorry i had to hurt your feelings. |
|
|
|
|
|
bodybuilder1234
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2008, 12:31:31 PM » |
|
sorry man those are the real deal, i'm sorry i had to hurt your feelings.
From which source? |
|
|
|
|
|
The Squadfather
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2008, 12:32:02 PM » |
|
From which source?
from looking at him. |
|
|
|
|
|
MoralMan
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2008, 12:32:22 PM » |
|
Im surprised by the squats, i thought he would ve been doing a good 5 plates a side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JohnnyVegas
Guest
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 13, 2008, 12:32:43 PM » |
|
sorry man those are the real deal, i'm sorry i had to hurt your feelings.
BOOM! at .49 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Squadfather
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 13, 2008, 12:33:30 PM » |
|
it makes me laugh how people get so upset when you say he had a 405 pound bench press as if that's somehow a terrible number, i'll gaurantee you that 98 percent of this board can't do that, me included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Squadfather
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 13, 2008, 12:34:45 PM » |
|
BOOM! at .49 and what does that prove? we're supposed to believe it just because he says it?  |
|
|
|
|
|
JohnnyVegas
Guest
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 13, 2008, 12:35:49 PM » |
|
Im surprised by the squats, i thought he would ve been doing a good 5 plates a side.
With 26 inch legs??? Are you serious??? I would think 405 would be hard for those pencil legs. I did 400# competition style bench (no bounce, 2 second pause) at 200#, most I ever did. Franco did 525# touch and go. and what does that prove? we're supposed to believe it just because he says it? Arnold would not lie about meaurements or lifts, unheard of in Pro BBing. |
|
|
|
|
theworm
Getbig IV
Gender: 
Posts: 2887
Getbig!
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 13, 2008, 12:38:13 PM » |
|
at his "training seminar" in Columbus after the classic,, he did say his max was 405. But he never trained for max. remember he used to lift for over 3 hours...
|
you are gay.
|
|
|
|
MoralMan
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 13, 2008, 12:38:29 PM » |
|
CHeck out some of the comments on youtube for this interview!
yobuttin (3 months ago) Show Hide +1 Marked as spam Reply
no way...arnold benched way more than 500lbs. he was probably doin 650lbs in his prime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SirTraps
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 13, 2008, 12:40:21 PM » |
|
Im pretty sure he could bench more than 405, also squat more than 405 for 2 reps |
|
|
|
|
|
benchmstr
|
|
« Reply #14 on: April 13, 2008, 12:53:06 PM » |
|
for all of you nuthuggers who believe the Great Arnold walked on water here's the truth
Height-6'1"
Weight 235-240 pounds
Arms-right at 20 inches pumped
Chest-52 inches
Waist-34-35 inches
Legs-26 inches
Bench Press-405 pound single, 315 for a good set of 8-10
Squat-405 for a couple of reps
all accurate,except arnold was never 6'1".i meet him twice and he is my height (5'10"). other than that spot on. bench |
|
|
|
|
|
The.Giant
|
|
« Reply #15 on: April 13, 2008, 12:53:30 PM » |
|
for all of you nuthuggers who believe the Great Arnold walked on water here's the truth
Height-6'1"
Weight 235-240 pounds
Arms-right at 20 inches pumped
Chest-52 inches
Waist-34-35 inches
Legs-26 inches
Bench Press-405 pound single, 315 for a good set of 8-10
Squat-405 for a couple of reps
26" seams really small for legs, rest looks about right. |
It's Hip to be Square!
|
|
|
|
Onetimehard
|
|
« Reply #16 on: April 13, 2008, 12:56:05 PM » |
|
for all of you nuthuggers who believe the Great Arnold walked on water here's the truth
Height-6'1"
Weight 235-240 pounds
Arms-right at 20 inches pumped
Chest-52 inches
Waist-34-35 inches
Legs-26 inches
Bench Press-405 pound single, 315 for a good set of 8-10
Squat-405 for a couple of reps
There you go again belittleing poeples accomplishments just so yours can feel a little greater. 26 in thighs at 6.2 would make his legs look like sticks; small legs yes, but atleast 28-29, 315 for 8 for Arnold is the biggest player hater comment I've ever heard in my life. 405 on the Bench is nothing nowadays get through your pathetic skull 405=nothing 600=impressive, thousands can do 400 I think there is a few females that can do this. If you get impressed very easily then its up to you to live with the curse but always calling people bullshit just makes you look bad |
|
|
|
|
|
JohnnyVegas
Guest
|
|
« Reply #17 on: April 13, 2008, 01:01:42 PM » |
|
26" seams really small for legs, rest looks about right.
Arnolds legs were SMALL...... cuts yes, size no. all accurate,except arnold was never 6'1".i meet him twice and he is my height (5'10").
other than that spot on.
bench
bench, the only way you're 5'10 is if you're wearing 6 inch elevator shoes |
|
|
|
|
|
pumpster
|
|
« Reply #18 on: April 13, 2008, 01:02:15 PM » |
|
Im surprised by the squats, i thought he would ve been doing a good 5 plates a side.
Surprised, when thighs were always proportionately smaller than the rest.. |
|
|
|
|
|
JohnnyVegas
Guest
|
|
« Reply #19 on: April 13, 2008, 01:02:51 PM » |
|
at his "training seminar" in Columbus after the classic,, he did say his max was 405. But he never trained for max. remember he used to lift for over 3 hours...
What year?? |
|
|
|
|
|
pumpster
|
|
« Reply #20 on: April 13, 2008, 01:03:38 PM » |
|
Im pretty sure he could bench more than 405, also squat more than 405 for 2 reps Uh, no. Sorry to ruin the fantasy. Arnold had solid numbers. |
|
|
|
|
theworm
Getbig IV
Gender:
Posts: 2887
Getbig!
|
|
« Reply #21 on: April 13, 2008, 01:04:09 PM » |
|
2004
|
you are gay.
|
|
|
|
pumpster
|
|
« Reply #22 on: April 13, 2008, 01:04:20 PM » |
|
all accurate,except arnold was never 6'1".i meet him twice and he is my height (5'10").
Garbage. Stood beside him, he's 6'1". 26" seams really small for legs, rest looks about right. The might've been a little bigger but mainly he deflected the size issue by good cuts, posing and great calves. |
|
|
|
|
theworm
Getbig IV
Gender:
Posts: 2887
Getbig!
|
|
« Reply #23 on: April 13, 2008, 01:05:01 PM » |
|
pretty sure 2004. i went from 03-05, but pretty sure it was the middle year.
|
you are gay.
|
|
|
|
tu_holmes
|
|
« Reply #24 on: April 13, 2008, 01:06:38 PM » |
|
Garbage. Stood beside him, he's 6'1".
Agreed... My dad is 6'0 even and he stood next to Arnold, and he was (my dad) what appeared to be exactly 1 inch shorter than Schwarzenegger.. |
|
|
|
|
|
