Author Topic: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'  (Read 8703 times)

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #75 on: June 14, 2008, 11:56:29 AM »
I think what is most crazy of all is how anyone in the military, like hh6, could support bush, NOT demand impeachment. Civilians like us all have right to an opinion, but we havent seen brothers and sisters in arms die for obvious lies. Bush, a rich mans son who avoided vietnam combat with some pseudo service in Texas(!) sent these kids out there to die for something that turned out to be entirely false.
The soldiers just served their country - they risked their lives and i think everyone, even their enemies in the field respects that . The responsibility lies with Bush.
 
He suckerpunched the troops. Why arent they the ones most eager to hold him accountable? Are they gonna let him off to that ranch in uruguay?   
As empty as paradise

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #76 on: June 14, 2008, 01:04:39 PM »
Any person still in Gitmo is most likely guilty.

This cracks me up. Why should these guys be entitled to fair treatment? Like any of you actually give two shits about their "inalienable" rights. Just another thing to bitch about. You guys show more sympathy for terrorists than people/soldiers who are kidnapped, tortured (involving such means as eye gouging, amputation, rape) and beheading. Very, very pathetic.

No i really don't give a shit about some who committed a terrorist act and killed innocent people.  What i do give a shit about is the ones who didn't and are there.

I give a shit about doing the right thing.

I believe the right thing is to severely punish those guilty and prevent them from doing anything again.

I believe it's not right to punish those who are innocent.

To dismiss the detainees as mostly guilty but yet support them not having rights means that WE as a people support punishing innocent people for crimes against humanity they didn't commit.

That's not what America is about.  At least on paper.

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #77 on: June 14, 2008, 01:13:17 PM »
No i really don't give a shit about some who committed a terrorist act and killed innocent people.  What i do give a shit about is the ones who didn't and are there.

I give a shit about doing the right thing.

I believe the right thing is to severely punish those guilty and prevent them from doing anything again.

I believe it's not right to punish those who are innocent.

To dismiss the detainees as mostly guilty but yet support them not having rights means that WE as a people support punishing innocent people for crimes against humanity they didn't commit.

That's not what America is about.  At least on paper.
Amen!
!

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11063
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #78 on: June 14, 2008, 01:45:17 PM »

I give a shit about doing the right thing.


What makes you think what you think is the right thing?


OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #79 on: June 14, 2008, 01:48:45 PM »
What makes you think what you think is the right thing?



If you think punishing innocent people is the right thing just say so.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #80 on: June 14, 2008, 01:55:13 PM »
If you think punishing innocent people is the right thing just say so.

You got documented proof they're innocent or are you just going on a hunch? Why is there any reason to believe anyone still in Gitmo is innocent? Hell, they've released fighters that were blatantly guilty, why would there still be innocent guys there?

Nevermind, it's Getbig. You're probably privy to highly classified information and your hunch is 100% fact.  :-X

As of May 2nd, 270 people were still detained in Guatanamo. 420 have been released, including multiple enemy combatants who were captured in battle. WHY is there any reason to believe any of the 270 guys still there are innocent? What proof do you have? I'm more inclined to believe the 270 still there are probably the worst of the worst and have good reason for still being imprisoned. It's the only explanation when you think about the fact that jihad fighters have been released without charge.

They're probably still there for more than one reason, and as a result, I couldn't give two flying fucks about their imaginary "rights."


Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #81 on: June 14, 2008, 01:56:57 PM »
You got documented proof they're innocent or are you just going on a hunch? Why is there any reason to believe anyone still in Gitmo is innocent? Hell, they've released fighters that were blatantly guilty, why would there still be innocent guys there?...WHY is there any reason to believe any of the 208 guys still there are innocent?
no trial
!

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #82 on: June 14, 2008, 02:08:29 PM »
You got documented proof they're innocent or are you just going on a hunch? 
Do you have documented proof they are guilty?
Quote
Hell, they've released fighters that were blatantly guilty, why would there still be innocent guys there?
  how do you know they released fighters that were blatantly guilty?  If so, why are they doing that?  Isn't that stupid?  Doesn't that defeat the purpose of them being detained in the first place?  Aren't we supposed to be in some sort of war?  why would we release guilty people? That's real stupid.
Quote
Nevermind, it's Getbig. You're probably privy to highly classified information and your hunch is 100% fact. 
I made no hunch what so ever, you did. You said:
Quote
Any person still in Gitmo is most likely guilty.
Most likely is not 100%.  that means there are people there who may be punished that are innocent.  Are you ok with that?  You seem to be ok with them releasing people that ARE Guilty. 

You are not making much sense here Fury, which is odd, because you usually make mountains of sense.

Quote
As of May 2nd, 270 people were still detained in Guatanamo. 420 have been released, including multiple enemy combatants who were captured in battle. WHY is there any reason to believe any of the 270 guys still there are innocent? What proof do you have? I'm more inclined to believe the 270 still there are probably the worst of the worst and have good reason for still being imprisoned. It's the only explanation when you think about the fact that jihad fighters have been released without charge.

What proof do you have they are guilty?  The key word here is "probably".  I don;t believe a person should be punished based on "probably."  that's why i believe people have certain inalienable rights.....to help prevent that.  Why is that such a problem? 

Why is it a problem that i believe guilty should be punished and innocent should not be?  why is it a problem that i believe when you take away a person's inalienable rights you potentially rob them of the  mechanism that can prove their innocence?

Quote
They're probably still there for more than one reason, and as a result, I couldn't give two flying fucks about their imaginary "rights."

Same here.  IF they are guilty.  but "probably", doesn't cut it.


Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #83 on: June 14, 2008, 02:18:05 PM »
See, I understand that some may not be guilty. But that's the way the world works. There are guys sitting on death row for murders and crimes they never committed. As ridiculously shitty as it is, I'm not going to cry out for the abolishment of our justice system and ask for every convicted criminal to be acquitted because of the possibility that a few guys are innocent. No one seems to have a problem with innocent AMERICANS in jail on here. They would rather "fight" for terrorist rights.

The prison concept applies to Guantanamo in my opinion as well. Basing it on the fact that some guys are POSSIBLY innocent is foolish. It's already documented that a number of these so called "innocent" guys that were picked up on the battlefields go right back to what they were doing when they were captured. The world isn't fair. It's a pretty raw deal that these so called "innocent" guys are still there despite the dozens of jihadists already released. It pales in comparison to spending 30 years in jail for a murder you didn't commit. But no one cares about that, because they're American. It's sad.

And let's be honest, the governments information gathering abilities blows mine and yours out of the water. Can you honestly tell me you think any of those guys still there are truly innocent? They've released 420 people already. I'm sure that after all these years they would have been able to determine who is innocent and who isn't. I'd rather err on the side of caution and believe that the 270 left there are probably the worst of the worst. It's not like our government is trying to deny they imprisoned innocent people, so why would they still be holding them? Unless of course it's due to the fact that these other countries don't want to take their citizens back. Life isn't fair.

Frankly, I'd rather see everyone put this effort into freeing innocent Americans, but no one gives a shit about that because it has nothing to do with George Bush. Just like most people care more about dogs than humans.


OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #84 on: June 14, 2008, 02:44:10 PM »
See, I understand that some may not be guilty. But that's the way the world works.
But it doesn't have to.  just as it didn't have to before many of the rights we fought along with others over history didn't exist.  such as the Magna Carta.  It would have been easy to say, as i'm sure many of the noble born did, that that's just the way the world is.

We have an obligation to pursue the truth and progress as a society and summarily punishing people that have even a less than 1% chance of being innocent  is a step backwards.

Quote
There are guys sitting on death row for murders and crimes they never committed. As ridiculously shitty as it is, I'm not going to cry out for the abolishment of our justice system and ask for every convicted criminal to be acquitted because of the possibility that a few guys are innocent

Who is suggesting we abolish our justice system because f the possibility that there may be innocent people on death row?  I'm certainly not.  And i've to my best of recollection, haven't ever seen anyone here say that.  Not even Jag for heaven sakes.

Quote
No one seems to have a problem with innocent AMERICANS in jail on here.

I do.  In fact a few months ago, BB and I had a long debate about death row with arguing there are potentially innocent people that have been executed.

Quote
They would rather "fight" for terrorist rights.

I don't see that anyone here is "fighting" for terrorists rights.  I do see some people here, me included "arguing" for everyone's inalienable rights.

Quote
The prison concept applies to Guantanamo in my opinion as well. Basing it on the fact that some guys are POSSIBLY innocent is foolish. It's already documented that a number of these so called "innocent" guys that were picked up on the battlefields go right back to what they were doing when they were captured. The world isn't fair. It's a pretty raw deal that these so called "innocent" guys are still there despite the dozens of jihadists already released. It pales in comparison to spending 30 years in jail for a murder you didn't commit. But no one cares about that, because they're American. It's sad.

I think you are gravely mistaken because their families can with-in the system file for appeals.  Many do get released and i believe it's unfortunate that many innocent people are still incarcerated and i hate to think, that America with all it's ideals about freedom and justice, don't walk the walk when they don't have to, and that the supreme court must step in and make them.

Quote
And let's be honest, the governments information gathering abilities blows mine and yours out of the water.

That's an interesting statement considering that the "information gathering abilities blows mine and yours out of the water" got the WMD thing totally wrong.

Quote
Can you honestly tell me you think any of those guys still there are truly innocent? They've released 420 people already. I'm sure that after all these years they would have been able to determine who is innocent and who isn't. I'd rather err on the side of caution and believe that the 270 left there are probably the worst of the worst. It's not like our government is trying to deny they imprisoned innocent people, so why would they still be holding them? Unless of course it's due to the fact that these other countries don't want to take their citizens back. Life isn't fair.

I am in  no way suggesting we should just release them.  Here's what Beachbum says:

I have previously said foreign suspected terrorists shouldn't be entitled to habeas and I still believe that, but if the alternative is you leave them in prison indefinitely without charges, then to that extent I agree with the Supreme Court's decision and disagree with McCain.  What we've been doing is Kafkaesque. 

I disagree with him alot, but for the most part, unless he's f-ing around with his stalkers, he does make some sense.

Quote
Frankly, I'd rather see everyone put this effort into freeing innocent Americans, but no one gives a shit about that because it has nothing to do with George Bush. Just like most people care more about dogs than humans.

Much is put there.  Can we do more?  Yes.



Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #85 on: June 14, 2008, 02:48:52 PM »
That was a good post.

I'm actually going to take back what I said. They should be charged or released. However, if they were to disappear onto CIA prison ships or something along those lines, I would also have no problem with that. Like BB said, I have a problem with people arguing that they should be entitled to habeas, which shouldn't be the case. There is absolutely no reason to give enemy combatants caught in the act of war habeas.

CQ

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7018
  • TGT
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #86 on: June 14, 2008, 02:54:56 PM »
It pales in comparison to spending 30 years in jail for a murder you didn't commit. But no one cares about that, because they're American. It's sad.

I do, I've had epic meltdowns on that also. I actually object to the death penalty 99% of the time anyway. Don't get me started there >:(

Just like most people care more about dogs than humans.

Honestly, I have also found this quite weird myself.

[Good post above btw, the longer one, well said]

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #87 on: June 14, 2008, 02:57:30 PM »
That was a good post.

I'm actually going to take back what I said. They should be charged or released. However, if they were to disappear onto CIA prison ships or something along those lines, I would also have no problem with that. Like BB said, I have a problem with people arguing that they should be entitled to habeas, which shouldn't be the case. There is absolutely no reason to give enemy combatants caught in the act of war habeas.

Imagine giving everyone in WW2 we took prisoner Habeas.   yikes.  That would still be going on today.

Held with out charges.  wasn't that one of our bones of contention with england in 1776?

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #88 on: June 14, 2008, 03:04:12 PM »
Imagine giving everyone in WW2 we took prisoner Habeas.   yikes.  That would still be going on today.

Held with out charges.  wasn't that one of our bones of contention with england in 1776?

Yeah, when I think about that it's a little deranged. But I care about American safety first and foremost. Knowing that a legal loophole or some other bullshit could get one of these guys back out into the battlefield to kill more Aomericans just isn't my cup of tea. But, they should be charged or released. However, I look at that Kuwaiti guy who deserted the Kuwait army, got captured in Afghanistan, released from Guantanamo and then blew himself up in the middle of 30 Iraqi policemen and it just leads me to believe that the guys still in there are likely the baddest of the bad. 


youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11063
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #89 on: June 14, 2008, 06:23:39 PM »
If you think punishing innocent people is the right thing just say so.

What makes you think they are innocent? Are they not in prison for a reason?

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #90 on: June 14, 2008, 06:31:15 PM »
What makes you think they are innocent? Are they not in prison for a reason?

Innocent people never mistakenly go to prison?

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11063
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #91 on: June 14, 2008, 06:33:59 PM »
Innocent people never mistakenly go to prison?

What, you think that trained soldiers mistook the grenades and a stash of bombs for pencils, and an ice cream maker?


OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #92 on: June 14, 2008, 06:41:39 PM »
What, you think that trained soldiers mistook the grenades and a stash of bombs for pencils, and an ice cream maker?



They all had grenades and a stash of bombs?

You were personally at every capture i take it?  Impressive. 

I'm surprised you are not being actively recruited into Delta Force.   

Or maybe you already are.    hmmmmmm.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #93 on: June 14, 2008, 08:34:48 PM »
Then why is the focus only on American troops?
I say pull the media out of Iraq, this will be over soon enough. Leave the media there, it drags on forever.

30 days dude..30 days..first u burn all population records and then bounce the media...we could leave in 3 months.
L

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #94 on: June 14, 2008, 08:36:44 PM »
First asshole I come across who asks for his lawyer gets smoked.  ;D
L

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #95 on: June 14, 2008, 08:52:46 PM »
The bottom line is... if the American way is the right way, ...it should be able to withstand the war on terror.

If your system cannot handle it, ...if you must resort to the way of the terrorists, ...what does that say about the American system. If you adopt terrorist tactics, ...the terrorists win, ...because they will have destroyed America's way of life, and the American system.
w

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #96 on: June 14, 2008, 09:25:33 PM »
The bottom line is... if the American way is the right way, ...it should be able to withstand the war on terror.

If your system cannot handle it, ...if you must resort to the way of the terrorists, ...what does that say about the American system. If you adopt terrorist tactics, ...the terrorists win, ...because they will have destroyed America's way of life, and the American system.

Unfortunately, no one adopted that system in WW2.  It's impractical in war.  This is a war. 

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #97 on: June 14, 2008, 10:46:41 PM »
Unfortunately, no one adopted that system in WW2.  It's impractical in war.  This is a war. 

Seems to be if a system is sound, it should be practical both in peacetime and in war.
w

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #98 on: June 14, 2008, 10:52:20 PM »
Seems to be if a system is sound, it should be practical both in peacetime and in war.

Seems you have no clue as to the enormity of war.

In WW2 alone there were: 425,000 held by the USA alone.  Yeah, 425,000 thousand full trials.  right.   ::)

Typical Ultra lib thing to do, over complicate a simple issue and suggest wasting billions and years of time.

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Guantanamo inmates 'have rights'
« Reply #99 on: June 14, 2008, 11:07:45 PM »
Seems you have no clue as to the enormity of war.

In WW2 alone there were: 425,000 held by the USA alone.  Yeah, 425,000 thousand full trials.  right.   ::)

Typical Ultra lib thing to do, over complicate a simple issue and suggest wasting billions and years of time.

How many of those 425,000 were kidnapped and sold to the USA?

I was neither suggesting overcomplicating anything, nor wasting billions and years of time,
...that's the neocon approach.  ;D
w