Author Topic: Chris faildo's conditioning (Read 105463 times)

Moosejay · « **Reply #275 on:** July 10, 2008, 02:53:47 AM »

Quote from: willl on July 10, 2008, 02:35:44 AM

its impossible to call a tiny man with good condition and few muscles unique and special

marketing lies shouldnt be that difficult , tells you something about how clueless he really is

no offence chris, just playing Your game

offtopic, too bad for the lack of quadsweep, u have an interesting well-developed physique

Yes...noone cares how HE looks and how HE eats.

They want to know "WIIFM"

What's In It For Me

Pecs · « **Reply #276 on:** July 10, 2008, 03:03:41 AM »

Quote from: temper35 on July 09, 2008, 08:28:00 PM

no you don't, lol. she is an olympic athlete, you are a bodybuilder that no one knows.

ouch! It might be more related if he is a top 5 Mr.O competitor....but well...

CQ · « **Reply #277 on:** July 10, 2008, 03:33:20 AM »

Quote from: chris faildo on July 09, 2008, 09:59:26 PM

Why don't I have any challengers? It's funny how all of you haters or non believers can talk the talk but sure can't walk it! Order the damn thing and I'll show you who's natural.

Chris, I am by no means a hater - but let's be real. Your challenge to getbiggers is to buy your DVD. Your idea of 'walking the walk' is to buy your DVD you're spamming?

MCWAY · « **Reply #278 on:** July 10, 2008, 05:31:17 AM »

Quote from: Van_Bilderass on July 09, 2008, 05:35:42 PM

Most of the guys in weight classes under middleweights at the Nationals must be clean too since they're so light. Lee Labrada was like 180lbs wasn't he? Must've been natural. Frank Zane the same. Zane was really strict with his diet and "researched" the best diets, as someone here put it, so no reason to think he juiced just to end up at a skinny 180lbs. When you take anabolics you automatically end up over 200lbs.

First of all, that "skinny 180 lbs" got him three Mr. Universe titles (one of them at the expense of one Arnold Schwarzenegger) and three Mr. Olympia titles.

Second of all, nobody said that the guys are natural, simply because they're middleweights (or smaller). The issue is why some folks claim that someone HAS TO TAKE DRUGS to be 165 lbs. ripped.

That's something that you apparently can't answer. There are guys who take drugs to bench press over 300 lbs. Does that automatically mean that if you can bench 300, you're taking everything but the kitchen sink? NO!! (or at least, I hope not).

DK II · « **Reply #279 on:** July 10, 2008, 05:36:25 AM »

Quote from: Van_Bilderass on July 06, 2008, 11:04:19 AM

Anything available over the counter is fair game. This is Chris's own definition from the positive board.

well, pharmacies have counter too, and mostly, they sell over it.

MCWAY · « **Reply #280 on:** July 10, 2008, 05:46:59 AM »

Quote from: CQ on July 10, 2008, 03:33:20 AM

Chris, I am by no means a hater - but let's be real. Your challenge to getbiggers is to buy your DVD. Your idea of 'walking the walk' is to buy your DVD you're spamming?

Exactly what else can he do? If he passes a polygraph, then it's "he's a good liar". If he takes urinalysis, then, it's "he just came off in time to pass that".

If he gets his blood tested....."Oh Substance XYZ can't be detected in blood" and/or "he took this or that to mask his (insert super-secret undetectable drug here) use".

If he's going to go through the trouble of explaining how he does things, why should he do so for free (especially since certain critics won't believe him, anyway)?

DK II · « **Reply #281 on:** July 10, 2008, 05:51:54 AM »

Chris, please send me your DVD and i will review it for all getbiggers.

Thank you very much.

mwbbuilder · « **Reply #282 on:** July 10, 2008, 07:26:24 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on July 10, 2008, 05:31:17 AM

There are guys who take drugs to bench press over 300 lbs. Does that automatically mean that if you can bench 300, you're taking everything but the kitchen sink? NO!! (or at least, I hope not).

This is proably the very best arguing point I ever heard made about this "he's on drugs" and "no one can do/look like that" issue.

Good job, McWay!

mwbbuilder · « **Reply #283 on:** July 10, 2008, 07:30:58 AM »

Quote from: Moosejay on July 10, 2008, 01:25:00 AM

Order it?

How is it 'unique and special"?

None of you jokers know how to market yourselves

Moosejoy..what do you do for a living, old man? (besides post on a massage board night and day?)

nukkaready · « **Reply #284 on:** July 10, 2008, 07:33:05 AM »

There is a certain look a physique can only assume with the intake of anabolic steroids. Chris Faildo has that look. Period. End of this BS.

njflex · « **Reply #285 on:** July 10, 2008, 07:52:37 AM »

Quote from: nukkaready on July 10, 2008, 07:33:05 AM

There is a certain look a physique can only assume with the intake of anabolic steroids. Chris Faildo has that look. Period. End of this BS.

12 PGS AND COUNTING........

Fatpanda · « **Reply #286 on:** July 10, 2008, 08:26:51 AM »

Quote from: ATHEIST on July 09, 2008, 05:38:34 PM

- never said you were not within your rights , your comprehention needs work.
- your opinion is not as valid as mine being that
   a) youre using perspective to come to a conclusion about a subject youre not
   familiar with, its a no win situation, setting yourself up for failure.
   b) my statement and conclusion is based on your admitted "uneducated" perspective,
   my argument comes full circle.

You clearly lack the ability to reason, or even understand what you are trying to say. You claim i am making judgements from an uneducated perspective. How can you claim to know about my education? perhaps you are making an uneducated judgement?

You claim my opinion is not as valid as yours because:
a) I am unfamiliar with the subject - again, how do you know what i am and am not familiar with, and what gives you supreme knowledge in this matter?

b) Your statement is based on my admitted 'uneducated' perspective - interesting to note that for someone who claims i have little comprehension skills you yourself lack the ability to detect sarcasm.

I will make this clear for you. I was willing to believe that Chris has not taken steroids, however i did feel he must have taken diuretics or thyroid medication to help obtain such a physique. However the more he talks, the more i think he is lying.

Oh and by the way you're syntax, spelling and grammar need a lot of work, before you should comment on other peoples education level.

####.

Van_Bilderass · « **Reply #287 on:** July 10, 2008, 08:56:50 AM »

Quote from: MCWAY on July 10, 2008, 05:31:17 AM

Second of all, nobody said that the guys are natural, simply because they're middleweights (or smaller). The issue is why some folks claim that someone HAS TO TAKE DRUGS to be 165 lbs. ripped.

You can be 165lbs ripped without drugs. I don't care about the stats on paper. Like I said I'm just looking at the pics. If you have been following bodybuilding for decades and have seen thousands of natural and unnatural physiques you get an eye for what is totally pharmaceutical free and what is not. I don't think anyone who has been immersed in the bodybuilding culture for a long time would think the physique Chris sports in those pics is totally natural - no fat burners, no hormones, no nothing, EVER. I'm confident that if you'd get someone like Bob Chick's opinion off the record he wouldn't bet on Chris being lifetime chemical free. That's why he says there's no such thing as natural bodybuilding. If some "authority" says he thinks Chris is chemical free it's either because he uses a creative interpretation of natural or he doesn't want to piss Chris off - you know, let him do his thing, no use getting in a pissing match.

FTR Chris looks fucking amazing even if he's full of drugs. Those pics by Lift are crazy. So crisp. And the conditioning looks different, better, than it did even when he was way younger. No, I don't think it's just "muscle maturity."

MAXX · « **Reply #288 on:** July 10, 2008, 09:05:54 AM »

Quote from: CQ on July 08, 2008, 04:25:34 PM

Not saying he is lying, but professionally speaking he is way better of saying he is natural. Can be his 'niche'. Not dissing the guy, but at 165lbs obviously he won't be winning any shows or even picking up any big name sponsors. Being natural is in his far better interest.

yup. it's all about the $$$$$$

Chick · « **Reply #289 on:** July 10, 2008, 09:20:52 AM »

Quote from: Van_Bilderass on July 10, 2008, 08:56:50 AM

You can be 165lbs ripped without drugs. I don't care about the stats on paper. Like I said I'm just looking at the pics. If you have been following bodybuilding for decades and have seen thousands of natural and unnatural physiques you get an eye for what is totally pharmaceutical free and what is not. I don't think anyone who has been immersed in the bodybuilding culture for a long time would think the physique Chris sports in those pics is totally natural - no fat burners, no hormones, no nothing, EVER. I'm confident that if you'd get someone like Bob Chick's opinion off the record he wouldn't bet on Chris being lifetime chemical free. That's why he says there's no such thing as natural bodybuilding. If some "authority" says he thinks Chris is chemical free it's either because he uses a creative interpretation of natural or he doesn't want to piss Chris off - you know, let him do his thing, no use getting in a pissing match.

FTR Chris looks fucking amazing even if he's full of drugs. Those pics by Lift are crazy. So crisp. And the conditioning looks different, better, than it did even when he was way younger. No, I don't think it's just "muscle maturity."

Actually, your wrong...my point wasn't to make a statement as to whether or not Chris is natural or not...I couldn'r care less either way. My point was to explain that different people have different interpretations of what constitutes "natural"....personally, I find nothing natural about using supplements (especially TRYING to mimick "steroid like effects")...

Chris looks great, has claimed natural status for many years now...and has passed numerous tests for steroids, etc....

Jeffro · « **Reply #290 on:** July 10, 2008, 09:29:37 AM »

Quote from: Chick on July 10, 2008, 09:20:52 AM

Actually, your wrong...my point wasn't to make a statement as to whether or not Chris is natural or not...I couldn'r care less either way. My point was to explain that different people have different interpretations of what constitutes "natural"....personally, I find nothing natural about using supplements (especially TRYING to mimick "steroid like effects")...

Chris looks great, has claimed natural status for many years now...and has passed numerous tests for steroids, etc....

You know how easy that is to do though. He would have to be some kind of freak of nature to look like that at 40 naturally. He must be the most genetically gifted bodybuilder in history to be natural looking as he does.

Van_Bilderass · « **Reply #291 on:** July 10, 2008, 09:36:20 AM »

Quote from: Chick on July 10, 2008, 09:20:52 AM

Actually, your wrong...my point wasn't to make a statement as to whether or not Chris is natural or not...I couldn'r care less either way. My point was to explain that different people have different interpretations of what constitutes "natural"....personally, I find nothing natural about using supplements (especially TRYING to mimick "steroid like effects")...

Chris looks great, has claimed natural status for many years now...and has passed numerous tests for steroids, etc....

Am I wrong though? If you were betting you would bet on him never having touched any hormones? Come on now.

Actually don't answer. I don't think you can say what you really think on the record. Confidentially to a trusted friend the answer would probably be a bit different.

MuscleMcMannus · « **Reply #292 on:** July 10, 2008, 09:48:07 AM »

Quote from: Chick on July 10, 2008, 09:20:52 AM

Actually, your wrong...my point wasn't to make a statement as to whether or not Chris is natural or not...I couldn'r care less either way. My point was to explain that different people have different interpretations of what constitutes "natural"....personally, I find nothing natural about using supplements (especially TRYING to mimick "steroid like effects")...

Chris looks great, has claimed natural status for many years now...and has passed numerous tests for steroids, etc....

And I'm sure these test results are on his "DVD" that he keeps touting?

I wonder what his testosterone levels are. Are they supraphysiological? Or are they in the normal range?

? Is that test result on his DVD? And you personally know he's passed "numerous" tests for steroids? LOL.

noworries · « **Reply #293 on:** July 10, 2008, 09:52:49 AM »

Maybe Chris can send us all a copy of the DVD and if we like it then we will send him the money. That sounds better than his deal.

The ChemistV2 · « **Reply #294 on:** July 10, 2008, 10:00:58 AM »

I'm going to repeat this once again, because I think it's valid. I believe that Chris has only taken "legally available" supplements , that you could obtain at many health food stores. Anyone who has done a hormonal profile knows there is a range of what's considered normal. Some people are on the low end, some are in the middle and some are on the high end. The best herbal test booster and anti-aromotase supplements will do, is put you in the high end of normal.
Pro-hormones have the capability of taking you above the normal range, which is when enhanced muscle building and hardness come in. So the question is, has he taken Pro-hormones? I, personally would think he has. Having said that, how many people out there could take these supplements and look like Chris? Very few, if any. Let's not dismiss all the discipline and hard work that he has put in.

Bast000 · « **Reply #295 on:** July 10, 2008, 10:05:04 AM »

Quote from: Zaphod on July 09, 2008, 08:30:33 PM

You need to buy it to find out.

Check it out at http://www.faildo.com/

i don't care that much.

MuscleMcMannus · « **Reply #296 on:** July 10, 2008, 10:07:56 AM »

Quote from: The ChemistV2 on July 10, 2008, 10:00:58 AM

I'm going to repeat this once again, because I think it's valid. I believe that Chris has only taken "legally available" supplements , that you could obtain at many health food stores. Anyone who has done a hormonal profile knows there is a range of what's considered normal. Some people are on the low end, some are in the middle and some are on the high end. The best herbal test booster and anti-aromotase supplements will do, is put you in the high end of normal.
Pro-hormones have the capability of taking you above the normal range, which is when enhanced muscle building and hardness come in. So the question is, has he taken Pro-hormones? I, personally would think he has. Having said that, how many people out there could take these supplements and look like Chris? Very few, if any. Let's not dismiss all the discipline and hard work that he has put in.

Ummmm being on the high end of a testosterone level is not the same thing as being supraphysiolgical. I.e. the laboratory tests they use take into account normal human testosterone ranges. That's why it's such a broad range. Testing out in the 1000's is not natural for any human being.

MuscleMcMannus · « **Reply #297 on:** July 10, 2008, 10:08:55 AM »

Quote from: The ChemistV2 on July 10, 2008, 10:00:58 AM

I'm going to repeat this once again, because I think it's valid. I believe that Chris has only taken "legally available" supplements , that you could obtain at many health food stores. Anyone who has done a hormonal profile knows there is a range of what's considered normal. Some people are on the low end, some are in the middle and some are on the high end. The best herbal test booster and anti-aromotase supplements will do, is put you in the high end of normal.
Pro-hormones have the capability of taking you above the normal range, which is when enhanced muscle building and hardness come in. So the question is, has he taken Pro-hormones? I, personally would think he has. Having said that, how many people out there could take these supplements and look like Chris? Very few, if any. Let's not dismiss all the discipline and hard work that he has put in.

Sorry but pro hormones do not give you that type of vascularity and dryness.

Bast000 · « **Reply #298 on:** July 10, 2008, 10:13:12 AM »

Faildo does have a motive to lie, to sell photos and dvds from his poorly designed website. Maybe if he actually sold some he would have a better one.

The ChemistV2 · « **Reply #299 on:** July 10, 2008, 10:19:46 AM »

Quote from: MuscleMcMannus on July 10, 2008, 10:08:55 AM

Sorry but pro hormones do not give you that type of vascularity and dryness.

Well, I've heard of some that convert to pure trenbolone. In fact Gaspari made one a few years back called Methyl-dienolone.(Methy-trenbolone precursor) If you took enough, why couldn't you get that look?