Important: First movie of Interrogation in Guantanamo bay released

[youandme]

Epic inability to quote properly.

Anyway... This is not about hugs... It's about proving that person did in fact commit a crime... Unless the truth means that little to you.

epic inablity to read bold.

Giving civilian trials to enemy combatants is a bad idea. At least the executive branch gets to decide the punishment and where to put the criminal after the trial, and the place will be far worse off than club gitmo.

How about a tribunal of both?

Do you want to give them a blowjob as well?

[Stark]

How about a tribunal of both?

would be nice, in a nice and just world

[Mark Kerr]

To all of you defending this terrorist.

These fuckers killed 4000 innocent American civilians in 2001. We are in a war, have you forgotten this?

We are trying to do everything we can to find and punish the people behind the attacks.

They have enough evidence on this little f*cker to take him to trial for murdering an American soldier.

[Camel Jockey]

I'm not saying they're all innocent, infact most aren't. I just think that the process of them being detained should be a little more formal. And how should the innocent people who were detained get their lives back on track? Hear of a Canadian attorney of Syrian origin who was held in a CIA sercet prison for like 8 months? Why don't you go and look that up?

And this all goes back to the Iraq war. These idiots would be fucking themselves up if it weren't for the US invading Iraq to build bases around Iran and have closer strike distance to India and China.

[Mark Kerr]

So would you do the same to the US soldiers that killed the families "accidentally" (lol) in Iraq on many occasions?

We didn't start this war.

[Stark]

epic inablity to read bold.

Giving civilian trials to enemy combatants is a bad idea. At least the executive branch gets to decide the punishment and where to put the criminal after the trial, and the place will be far worse off than club gitmo.



Do you want to give them a blowjob as well?

You mean a POW right? cuz that;s what they are right? POW, this is another shit attempt by the Government to obscure a word
We all know soldiers being caputred as Prisoners of War, direct language, now we call them enemy combatents, it's bullshit they fought in their land on their terms at an engaging army, they are POW's

[Camel Jockey]

To all of you defending this terrorist.

These fuckers killed 4000 innocent American civilians in 2001. We are in a war, have you forgotten this?

We are trying to do everything we can to find and punish the people behind the attacks.

They have enough evidence on this little f*cker to take him to trial for murdering an American soldier.

No, we're not doing shit to catch the people who did it. We're buttbuddies with the largest terrorist financier Saudia Arabia. We're building bases all over the Middle East and climbing more and more in debt.

What a way to pay tribute to those losts in the Pentagon and Trade Center attacks  

[Stark]

We didn't start this war.

hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah
hahahahahahah


Oh god that was a good one

[tu_holmes]

To all of you defending this terrorist.

These fuckers killed 4000 innocent American civilians in 2001. We are in a war, have you forgotten this?

We are trying to do everything we can to find and punish the people behind the attacks.

They have enough evidence on this little f*cker to take him to trial for murdering an American soldier.

That's the point dude... I'm not trying to defend a dude who's committed murder.

If they have the evidence, then they can prove it and do whatever the hell they want to with his dead body as far as I'm concerned.

[Stark]

No, we're not doing shit to catch the people who did it. We're buttbuddies with the largest terrorist financier Saudia Arabia. We're building bases all over the Middle East and climbing more and more in debt.

What a way to pay tribute to those losts in the Pentagon and Trade Center attacks  

no a very small group (at that time at least) killed over 4k people for the US killed Millions to catch them and since when is the US
Government at war with children?

[tu_holmes]

We didn't start this war.

Well, we kinda did in Iraq to be honest... We should have stayed in Afghanistan and finished up with Bin Laden and his cohorts before we rolled into Iraq.

[Camel Jockey]

We didn't start this war.

You're really dumb.

If the US were to stop giving out US tax payer money to Israel and were to leave and abolist its bases in the Middle East this whol terrorist business wouldn't be an issue.

The US has done more to fuel Islamic terrorism than all the durka mullahs and imams put together

[Stark]

You're really dumb.

If the US were to stop giving out US tax payer money to Israel and were to leave and abolist its bases in the Middle East this whol terrorist business wouldn't be an issue.

The US has done more to fuel Islamic terrorism than all the durka mullahs and imams put together

hahah Germany didn't start the war either, that whole WW2 would have never happend if the Polish wouldn't have attacked us hahahah

[tu_holmes]

epic inablity to read bold.

Giving civilian trials to enemy combatants is a bad idea. At least the executive branch gets to decide the punishment and where to put the criminal after the trial, and the place will be far worse off than club gitmo.



Do you want to give them a blowjob as well?

So because I would like to treat people with fairness and prove crimes, I'm gay now.

What a big brain you have there.

[Camel Jockey]

hahah Germany didn't start the war either, that whole WW2 would have never happend if the Polish wouldn't have attacked us hahahah

No, and no. The French are responsible for starting WWII by hitting Germany with all of the costs of WWI.

The fucked Germany up to the point where Hitler's ideas started gaining power.

[Stark]

No, and no. The French are responsible for start WWII by hitting Germany with all of the costs of WWI.

The fucked Germany up to the point where Hitler's ideas started gaining power.

yep thanks 

[tommywishbone]

To all of you defending this terrorist.

These fuckers killed 4000 innocent American civilians in 2001. We are in a war, have you forgotten this?

We are trying to do everything we can to find and punish the people behind the attacks.

They have enough evidence on this little f*cker to take him to trial for murdering an American soldier.

Let me guess, Iraq had nuclear weapons too.

Think for yourself man. Really.

[Bluto]

thread reported

[youandme]

You mean a POW right? cuz that;s what they are right? POW

No, these are enemy combatants, not POWs they do not fall under the Geneva Convention.

People like Tu Holmes an ACLU and human rights activist, love to knock down this "re-wording" since we had to change the convention articles to suit such vile world criminals in order to not give them rights under the constitution, instead they go before a tribunal, and special orders are give with release to information since this is an ongoing war effort.

You're really dumb.

If the US were to stop giving out US tax payer money to Israel and were to leave and abolist its bases in the Middle East this whol terrorist business wouldn't be an issue.

The US has done more to fuel Islamic terrorism than all the durka mullahs and imams put together

No empirical evidence to support those claims, at all.

The united states has every world right to occupy and land lease those US bases since they have contracts to export X amount of supplies to that country or to contribute loans to those countries and or build certain infrastructures such as dams or energy plants.

United states does not and will not do what the middle east muslim extremists think the US should do, they should perish, why don't they?

[Mark Kerr]

no a very small group (at that time at least) killed over 4k people for the US killed Millions to catch them and since when is the US
Government at war with children?

You are very young.

[Stark]

thread reported

Good God somebody throw Bluto a cookie quickly

[Camel Jockey]

So youandme and is agreeing that the US should continue to do business with the world's largest terrorist financier(Saudia Arabia). Even though he didn't directly state it, he is pretty much implying it.

[tu_holmes]

No, these are enemy combatants, not POWs they do not fall under the Geneva Convention.

People like Tu Holmes an ACLU and human rights activist, love to knock down this "re-wording" since we had to change the convention articles to suit such vile world criminals in order to not give them rights under the constitution, instead they go before a tribunal, and special orders are give with release to information since this is an ongoing war effort.

Funny... Last I looked I wasn't a member of the ACLU.

People like Tu Holmes just believe that every human should have the basic rights of due process as they're being held by a country whose very basic legal premise is designed around those principles.

[Stark]

No, these are enemy combatants, not POWs they do not fall under the Geneva Convention.

People like Tu Holmes an ACLU and human rights activist, love to knock down this "re-wording" since we had to change the convention articles to suit such vile world criminals in order to not give them rights under the constitution, instead they go before a tribunal, and special orders are give with release to information since this is an ongoing war effort.

so simply because the Government decided to change the name for soliders caught in a combat situation they have no rights?

Sound pretty convenient too me

[youandme]

I'm gay now.

You said it not me.

So youandme and is agreeing that the US should continue to do business with the world's largest terrorist financier(Saudia Arabia). Even though he didn't directly state it, he is pretty much implying it.

Where is this evidence coming from?

People like Tu Holmes just believe that every human should have the basic rights of due process as they're being held by a country whose very basic legal premise is designed around those principles.

No, a country who's executive branch has one job, "to protect the citizens"

Not cater democracy to illegal combatants.