You mean a POW right? cuz that;s what they are right? POW
No, these are enemy combatants, not POWs they do not fall under the Geneva Convention.
People like Tu Holmes an ACLU and human rights activist, love to knock down this "re-wording" since we had to change the convention articles to suit such vile world criminals in order to not give them rights under the constitution, instead they go before a tribunal, and special orders are give with release to information since this is an ongoing war effort.
You're really dumb.
If the US were to stop giving out US tax payer money to Israel and were to leave and abolist its bases in the Middle East this whol terrorist business wouldn't be an issue.
The US has done more to fuel Islamic terrorism than all the durka mullahs and imams put together
No empirical evidence to support those claims, at all.
The united states has every world right to occupy and land lease those US bases since they have contracts to export X amount of supplies to that country or to contribute loans to those countries and or build certain infrastructures such as dams or energy plants.
United states does not and will not do what the middle east muslim extremists think the US should do, they should perish, why don't they?