ha ha ha, oh brother! The quote is from the 03 Mr. Olympia review issue and explicitly mentions "biggest." Ronnie competed at his heaviest weight at the 03 Mr. Olympia. Use your lone brain cell for once. Then maybe you won't look like an idiot.
the quote is from the 03 Mr. Olympia review issue and uses the present tense "now."
again, the quote is from the 03 Mr. Olympia review issue and uses the present tense when referring to Ronnie.
f*ck me, you're so stupid. This sentence is as self-explanatory as it gets.
"Just like Dorian Yates did in 1993 when he set a new standard, Ronnie has now taken it even further"
"presented a physique that has never been seen" and "could not possibly be equaled" means nobody in history or the foreseeable future can match let alone exceed him.
Shawn Ray explicitly calls Ronnie "unbelievable." Since the term "unbelievable" describes something that defies belief, it's safe to assume Shawn meant Ronnie presented an overall package of size, definition, and symmetry that had never been seen before.
ha ha ha, everyone knows the judges heavily favor size over conditioning. Jay wasn't the most conditioned bodybuilder when he won the Mr. Olympia, and neither was Ronnie or Lee Haney.
muscular = pertaining to the muscles. Muscular bulk = size of the muscles. Hope this helps.
have you ever heard a person say "look at that conditioning. He must have separations and striations?"
I never claimed that Ronnie was better solely due to muscular shape. This, in combination with other criteria, is why I believe Ronnie would beat Dorian.
oh yeah? How?
show me another quote from an IFBB judge that explicitly defines balance. I'm simply going by what is given.
Dorian Yates - Flex, October 2006
"Balance means the mass of one side is equal to that of the other"
ha ha ha, oh brother! The quote is from the 03 Mr. Olympia review issue and explicitly mentions "biggest." Ronnie competed at his heaviest weight at the 03 Mr. Olympia. Use your lone brain cell for once. Then maybe you won't look like an idiot.
I don't care if it says it was his biggest no where does it say 2003 is Ronnie's best overall showing even the Joe Weider and the Team Flex quotes all mention different years they feel Ronnie is at his best and 2003 isn't it you're the idiot who constantly claims things to the contrary , in fact I don't thing I've seen single quote saying 2003 was his best overall showing , I've seen plenty from 2001/1998
the quote is from the 03 Mr. Olympia review issue and uses the present tense "now."
ha ha ha when in doubt try and play with words , get the fuck out of here with your garbage , I'll take your opinion seriously when you can find me multiple credible sources that claim 2003 was his best overall showing and I wont be waiting for them either
again, the quote is from the 03 Mr. Olympia review issue and uses the present tense when referring to Ronnie.
yeah present tense directly related to his previous showings where he lost or came very close to losing , which are examples of Ronnie NOT being at his ' best ' it has nothing to do with his overall showing in 1998 and 2001 once again another example of you taking liberties because you can't find any quotes to support your 'argument' because you can't anyone to validate your ' opinion ' outright and explicitly
Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004
As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others.
see how its done? Shawn Perine is a credible source this quote is post 2003 Olympia and he specifically mentions 1998 & 2001 as being his best
Peter McGough Flex Magazine August 2005
Personally, the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia) was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig) at 244 pounds. Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable and would make any criticisms as redundant as a chocolate squat rack.See how its done dummy? its a post 2003 Olympia quote , it says specifically what version is his best and why , thats how its done .
f*ck me, you're so stupid. This sentence is as self-explanatory as it gets.
"Just like Dorian Yates did in 1993 when he set a new standard, Ronnie has now taken it even further"
Same shit with you all the time kid , you reaching as usual. Ronnie did set a new standard in 2003 for size with acceptable conditioning no one is arguing to the contrary , NO WHERE does it say 2003 is his best overall showing more of you and YOUR reading comprehension skills or lack thereof , see how its done above
and again who the fuck is Ryan Mackie? his opinion is about as right as yours
"presented a physique that has never been seen" and "could not possibly be equaled" means nobody in history or the foreseeable future can match let alone exceed him.
lmmfao like Hulkster I can always count on your for a laugh. who cares if he presented a physique that has never seen seen? that has NOTHING to do with if it was his personal best overall showing and NO MORON another example of the lack of your reading comprehension skills NO it most certainly doesn't mean EVERYONE is history you're such a fan-boy with these dumb statements ' could not possibly be equaled ' means BY THE FUCKING PEOPLE HE WAS COMPETING WITH AT THAT CONTEST you dummy , Ronnie 2001 or Dorian doesn't have to equaled that physique to beat that physique , its already established 2003 wasn't his best overall showing because his balance & proportion were off as well as his conditioning , he's already down in parts of the criteria and you think extra ' soft ' size can compensate for his lacking in other areas more fan-boy ignorant train of thought
Shawn Ray explicitly calls Ronnie "unbelievable." Since the term "unbelievable" describes something that defies belief, it's safe to assume Shawn meant Ronnie presented an overall package of size, definition, and symmetry that had never been seen before.
More examples of you taking liberties in quotes because you don't have anything to work with , pure speculation on your behalf and nothing more find me a quote from Ray saying 2003 is better than 2001/1998 specifically and then you'll be working with something but these attempts by you of trying to connect the dots are an exercise in failure as usual , see Ronnie calves are comparable to Jay in 03 therefore they'd be comparable to Dorians LMFAO your posts are always good for a laugh riddled with poor comprehension , assumptions , ignorance , quotes from ' fans ' lol
ha ha ha, everyone knows the judges heavily favor size over conditioning. Jay wasn't the most conditioned bodybuilder when he won the Mr. Olympia, and neither was Ronnie or Lee Haney.
Yeah you're right thats why Greg Kovacs was Mr Olympia and Rhul always placed at the top of the heap and Art Atwood crushed everyone LMMFAO you're to simple , no its true Jay wasn't the most conditioned as well as Ronnie and Haney however dummy what you still can't seem to grasp is ALL ROUNDS ARE PHYSIQUE ROUNDS meaning its the guy who meets all of the criteria the best is the winner
You are still to this day IGNORANT of how contests are judged , seriously you can't be involved in a debate when you don't have a fucking clue on how it works , you can't even get the basics right. You have this idea on what wins contests and what you;re talking about and you're constantly proven wrong and you're to stupid and to proud to admit you're wrong you go to elaborate lengths to bend everything to fit your prospective and you always fail
muscular = pertaining to the muscles. Muscular bulk = size of the muscles. Hope this helps.
Again size of ALL muscles not certain ones , a guy 260 pounds is carrying more muscular bulk than a guy 247 pounds , I hope this helps and we're referring to conditioned muscular bulk NOT soft muscular bulk and entertaining your stupidity carrying more muscular bulk at the expense of balance & proportion , density & dryness is an empty advantage and why? because All Rounds are Physique Rounds so your back to square one
have you ever heard a person say "look at that conditioning. He must have separations and striations?"
stop playing with words it gets old already , you think you accomplish anything by trying to toy with words it just exposes your ignorance , you already proven you don't know the basics of competitive bodybuilding you know like balance & proportion , density & dryness , all rounds are physique rounds , judges heavily favor size over conditioning LMMFAO run along with your ignorance
I never claimed that Ronnie was better solely due to muscular shape. This, in combination with other criteria, is why I believe Ronnie would beat Dorian.
lmfao he doesn't beat Yates in the other criteria so your point is moot
show me another quote from an IFBB judge that explicitly defines balance. I'm simply going by what is given.
Dorian Yates - Flex, October 2006
"Balance means the mass of one side is equal to that of the other"
No you're not going by what is given , what was given is Dorian saying specific to the debate of Ronnie , he has better balance he's an IFBB judge and his word is Gold , its well established you're ignorant , so when Yates says he has better balance for all intents & purposes he has better balance , so either way YOU want to take the quote have at it , he still says he has better balance and his opinion will always crushes yours