Author Topic: 1993 - best ever!  (Read 102130 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #975 on: December 07, 2008, 07:50:43 AM »
 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #976 on: December 07, 2008, 07:52:27 AM »
 maybe this will help you not to deny real life:
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #977 on: December 07, 2008, 07:53:12 AM »
 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

yeah, its so fucking mythical lol

 ::) ::) ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #978 on: December 07, 2008, 07:54:01 AM »
we need a quote to prove it exists!!

 ??? ::) ::) ??? ::) ??? ::) ??? ::) ??? ::) ??? ::) ???
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #979 on: December 07, 2008, 07:54:50 AM »
 :'( ::) :'( ::) :'( ::) :P
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #980 on: December 07, 2008, 07:55:41 AM »
whats inside the circle? ??? ::) ??? ::) ??? ::) ??? ::) ??? ::) ??? ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

ASJChaotic

  • Guest
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #981 on: December 07, 2008, 07:56:02 AM »
 ;D




























Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #982 on: December 07, 2008, 07:56:37 AM »
but a reporter didn't comment on it so it can't be there~!!!

 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #983 on: December 07, 2008, 07:57:23 AM »
lol
Flower Boy Ran Away

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #984 on: December 07, 2008, 08:19:01 AM »
Serious Meltdown! LMFAO

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #985 on: December 07, 2008, 08:20:18 AM »
What do you expect....same guy that claims he eats 4-4500 calories per day for maintenance of his 170lb physique ha ha ha

Team Yates

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #986 on: December 07, 2008, 08:22:51 AM »
Horrible, horrible balance. No way in hell he can beat Dorian.

Team Yates

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #987 on: December 07, 2008, 08:22:54 AM »
What do you expect....same guy that claims he eats 4-4500 calories per day for maintenance of his 170lb physique ha ha ha



Looks like Ronnie's abs took a vacation.  No wonder he got beat by Gunter!    ;D  But hey, Ronnie was as dominant as Dorian, if not more so.  lol  ;)

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #988 on: December 07, 2008, 08:24:27 AM »
Horrible, horrible balance. No way in hell he can beat Dorian.



Hell, off season Yates has a way harder back!  Not mention that you can already see tell tale signs of Ronnie's left side starting to deteriorate. 

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #989 on: December 07, 2008, 08:26:30 AM »
Look at this garbage....at his supposed "best" too ha ha.....Ronnie looks like a blob of crap in 2003. Fat and bloated. NO proportions.

Team Yates

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #990 on: December 07, 2008, 08:28:33 AM »
He's got a few rolls forming! lol  In contest shape, no less!  How are you gonna explain that Huckster??? ??? ??? ???  OWNED!!  Stick an apple in Ronnie's mouth and stick a fork in him, he's done!

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #991 on: December 07, 2008, 08:29:01 AM »
BWAHAHAHAHAH....MONSTER CALVES lmfao....rollin on sticks baby  8)

Team Yates

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #992 on: December 07, 2008, 08:34:47 AM »
Self explanatory

Team Yates

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #993 on: December 07, 2008, 08:35:48 AM »
Self explanatory



Why complain?? Right Huckster?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79882
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #994 on: December 07, 2008, 09:11:48 AM »

 ::)

please explain how loose skin is "mythical"

its right here



Super Meltdown LMMFAO Hulkster you're always good for a laugh

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79882
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #995 on: December 07, 2008, 09:13:09 AM »
Serious Meltdown! LMFAO

My sentiments exactly lol

nuclear

BuffD

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 406
  • Getbig!
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #996 on: December 07, 2008, 09:18:28 AM »
The loose skin has more to do with how the pose is hit.  I use to have the same issue but on a rear double or back lat spread if you roll your hips forward it's not there.  Dorian doesn't seem to do this where Ronnie does. That's why in the pics posted of Ronnie relaxed from the back he has the loose skin and when he poses he rolls his hips so he doesn't have it.  The bottom line is both were great, but they are different types of physiques.  Comparing them is tough. Ronnie can make the claim to be the best due to having more Sandows.  Dorian could as well since he beat Ronnie time and time again.  Hell why not say Haney is the best.  He is tied for the most sandows and beat Dorian.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79882
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #997 on: December 07, 2008, 09:27:27 AM »
The loose skin has more to do with how the pose is hit.  I use to have the same issue but on a rear double or back lat spread if you roll your hips forward it's not there.  Dorian doesn't seem to do this where Ronnie does. That's why in the pics posted of Ronnie relaxed from the back he has the loose skin and when he poses he rolls his hips so he doesn't have it.  The bottom line is both were great, but they are different types of physiques.  Comparing them is tough. Ronnie can make the claim to be the best due to having more Sandows.  Dorian could as well since he beat Ronnie time and time again.  Hell why not say Haney is the best.  He is tied for the most sandows and beat Dorian.

I get your point and nice analogy about Haney !!

the whole point is Dorian has NO loose skin that's him the freaking moron reaching for an angle that someone created , he's bound to this stupidity and can;t retract out of fear of being exposed as the complete moron he already is , he went as far as to now claim the lines on the back of Dorian's triceps are loose skin as well LMFAO the kid is retarded

if he has any loose skin it would be clearly evident in this pose and nothing but highly defined razor sharp super dry muscle

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4943
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #998 on: December 07, 2008, 09:36:30 AM »
The much heralded Ronnie of 2003 looks unbelievably smoothHe's holding water and fat.  1997 Yates, which is hardly Dorian's best, is still exponentially harder and better conditioned.  Ronnie even has rolls in his lower back in the "relaxed" pose!  Ronnie looks like a giant smooth potato. The fat lady is clearing her throat, Huckster. ;)

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: 1993 - best ever!
« Reply #999 on: December 07, 2008, 10:03:16 AM »
yes it does. Find me an obese person with separations and striations. Likewise, find me a shredded person with no separations or striations. Definition is directly correlated with conditioning (i.e. as body fat and water levels drop, definition increases).

  You already got owned in the truce thread by yours truly in this exact debate, and I can see that you're back for more. Striations and separations correlate with low bodyfat and water levels, but genetics is also a factor. Andreas Munzer had more striations than anyone else onstage, even though the other competitors had as little subcutaneous fat and water as he did. Munzer was at the 93' Olympia and he destroyed Dorian in terms of striations, even though Dorian was at the lowest bodyfat and water levels a Human can go before entering rigor mortis. Riddle me that? ;)

Quote
if they are genetic, then explain what anatomical factor is responsible for the lack of definition at extreme conditioning levels.

  Irrelevant. The fact that different boybuilders exibit different levels of definition and striations at the same bodyfat indicates that there are other factors besides subcutaneous fat and water responsible for definition and striations. I don't need to actually know what factors these are for my point to stand on solid logic.

Quote
nope. Dorian said himself that he genetically has very thin skin. This disproves your theory that thin skin is the result of conditioning.

  Both play a part. Maybe Dorian's thin skin is responsible for his ultra-hard look - coupled with years of training to failure -, but he had other physiological factors that precluded him from showing lots of striations.

Quote
so you concede that Andreas Munzer had better conditioning? Gotcha.

  It depends on how you define conditioning. If you define it as definition and striations, then yes, he did have better conditioning. However, I define conditioning as having low bodyfat and water levels. Why? Because as you get to extremely low bodyfat and water levels, your body will express conditioning in a myriad of different ways. Depending on your genetic and physiological type, you can either become striated like Munzer and Dexter Jackson or acquire that granite look with less striations like Dorian and Branch Warren. So I concede that all of these things are indicators of conditioning: definition, striations and hardness. All Human Beings will express some or the other as they drop their bodyfat and water levels to extremely low levels, but why some show more striations while others show more hardness is down to individual physiology. They all correlate with low bodyfat and water levels, but the correlation is not perfect due to genetic factors.

SUCKMYMUSCLE