So why did Bush tell the country the exact opposite of the CIA's determination that IRaq presented no threat to the US?
And why did the Bush office rewrite the conclusions of the CIA in a white paper distributed to the Congress (It's a summary) that was packed full of exaggerations and lies?
See I think Bush's active fraud is enough to show that he took this country to war under false pretenses.
Did Congress have access to the CIA papers? Yes. Was Congress lazy in relying on the president's word/paper? Yes.
Does that somehow absolve Bush of his active fraud in going to war? No.
In my opinion congress is culpable for what happened. Both Republican and Democrat.
They are supposed to be the ones keeping checks on these organizations.
I feel the same about FEMA.
It wasn't the president cutting out the levees to build a bridge to nowhere.
It has been far too long that the president has been accountable for things that congress and the senate does or doesn't do.
This includes pork barreling, spending mismanagement, tax increases/decreases, security, intelligence, etc.
In the end congress has every right and duty to legislate and the President has every right and responsibility to over see it.
But the president can't make law only veto it.