Opposition Officially Signs Coalition Agreement And Reveals How It Will Work

[24KT]

Add your name to the growing list of Canadians in support of a progressive coalition

In 2008 the majority of Canadians voted for a prosperous, fair, and green Canada. Over 60% of voters cast their ballots for parties with progressive platforms. With 37% of the vote the Conservatives will effectively hold 100% of the power.

The Conservatives received 170,000 fewer votes than the last election, yet they won more seats. The Greens, who received 940,747 votes, are not represented at all.

Politics as usual is not working: the progressive majority in Canada is now ruled by a right-wing minority. If Canadians do not act we are going to watch Canada become more unequal, more irresponsible, and more out of step with a changing world.

We can change this. The Conservatives only secured 143 seats in Parliament while the NDP, Liberals, and Bloc Quebecois secured a combined 165 seats. These seats give the NDP, Liberals, and Bloc Quebecois the ability to form a coalition government. You don't have to give up your vision of Canada. The parties can work together to find common ground.

Canadians for a Progressive Coalition are asking the NDP, Liberals, and Bloc Quebecois to form a coalition government that includes counsel from the Greens.

What can you do?

• First, sign the petition for a progressive coalition government.
• Second, please forward this message to people that use email, and speak to the people that don't.
  
• Third, if you can, get involved every Thursday by phoning either your MP, or the President of the local Riding Association for the party you voted for, to ask them to support their party forming a coalition government.

Some Frequently Asked Questions

1) Is a minority Conservative government the only option?
2) What is a coalition government?
3) Why would we want all the parties to merge into one?
4) Why would they form a coalition government?
5) What is the history of coalition governments?
6) What about electoral reform?
7) What about the Bloc Quebecois?

1) Is a minority Conservative government the only option?

The Conservatives have 143 seats. Combined, the Liberals, NDP, and Bloc Quebecois have 165 seats. With that many seats the Liberals, NDP, and Bloc Quebecois are able to form a coalition government that would replace the Conservative minority government.

2) What is a coalition government?

A coalition government is a government composed of multiple formally cooperating parties. "Government" in this case means control over the Prime Minister's office, cabinet (whose members are in charge of government ministries), and the legislative agenda of Parliament.

The NDP, Liberals, and Bloc Quebecois can make a no-confidence vote against the Conservative government and ask Governor General Michelle Jean to form a coalition government. The coalition government will then replace the Conservative government.

There are many ways that a coalition government can be structured. Canadians for a Progressive Coalition want to leave it to the parties to decide the best way for them to work together. At a minimum, there would be a formal agreement on areas of common interest, and there would be some members from all the coalition parties appointed as ministers to cabinet.

3) Why would we want all the parties to merge into one?

We are not suggesting all of the parties "melt" into one mega-party. Instead, we would like the parties to work together to ensure that commonalities in the progressive parties' platforms, and hence the wishes of the majority (over 60%!) of Canadians, are represented. This is unlikely to happen if progressives instead focus on their differences, creating a divisive opposition incapable of representing the wishes of the majority of Canadians.

The coalition parties would compete with each other in elections. Canadians would get to choose the party that represented them best after vigorous debate. The results of those elections would then determine their relative strength in the coalition government. With a coalition government, smaller parties would have a major role in governing Canada.

4) Why would they form a coalition government?

More than 60% of Canadians voted for the NDP, Liberals, Bloc Quebecois and Greens. These four parties have progressive platforms. All four want balance between government and markets to make Canada a more prosperous, just, and responsible country. They certainly disagree on some issues. However, they have similar positions on many important issues including health care, foreign affairs, and the environment. These shared interests will be the foundation upon which a coalition government is formed.

We want to shift the focus away from divisive discussions of the differences between the parties, and to focus instead on the issues the Liberals, NDP, Bloc Quebecois and Greens largely agree on. Those are the issues that over 60% of voters cast their ballots for. By forming a coalition government the issues that the voters care about will have a chance to guide Canada into the 21st century.

5) What is the history of coalition governments?

Coalition governments are common throughout the world. In particular, the Nordic countries, Germany, Italy, Ireland, Turkey, Israel, Switzerland, Pakistan, and India often have coalition governments. Coalition governments have been an effective way to bring many different political perspectives to the table to develop a course of action that allows the country to go forward in a way that reflects more of their citizen's values.

Canada has a history of coalition governments. The last coalition government was the Union Government that governed from 1917-1920. The Union Government was composed of the Liberal and Conservative parties and was designed to foster national unity in the face of WWI. Before that, the Great Coalition governed the Province of Canada (present day Ontario and Quebec) from 1864-7. The Great Coalition broke a legislative gridlock that had lasted for decades and lead directly to Confederation. Without coalition governments Canada might not exist.

While Canada has had relatively little experience with coalition governments, some of Canada's most important social programs have come from cooperation between progressive parties. In the 1960s Lester B. Pearson's minority Liberal government worked with the NDP, who held the balance of power in Parliament, to bring about universal health care, the Canadian Pension Plan, and the Canada Student Loans program. Working together the NDP and the Liberals brought the 40 hour work week, 2 weeks of vacation a year, and a new minimum wage. Where would Canada be today without that cooperation? 

A more recent example of formal party cooperation occured in Ontario. After the 1985 election in Ontario the NDP and the Liberals developed an "accord" that ended 42 years of Conservative rule in that province. After cooperating to bring down the Conservative government through a non-confidence vote the NDP supported the Liberals for two years and the Liberals agreed to several progressive policies supported by the NDP. With support from the NDP the Liberals passed progressive legislation including pay equity laws.

6) What about electoral reform?

This group's goal is to facilitate the formation of a coalition government. The issues at stake are so important, and the world is changing so quickly, that we must act urgently to ensure that Canada becomes more prosperous, just, and responsible.

Many of the people in support of this cause are also interested in electoral reform. Electoral reform and coalition governments are complimentary. Indeed, it is difficult to imagine how a minority Conservative government could be persuaded to pass a law for proportional representation when that would give up the huge advantage they currently enjoy. Furthermore, coalition governments would be necessary to organize government after proportional representation was enacted.

Why? With proportional representation we can expect that there will be more parties and that parties will receive, on average, smaller shares of the total vote. In order to form a government parties will have to work together in a coalition. For example, in Germany the two largest parties almost never win majorities in elections with proportional representation and then govern by forming coalitions.

7) What about the Bloc Quebecois?

Separation is, clearly, not an area the parties agree on, and therefore would not be something a coalition government would pursue. However, the Bloc Quebecois platform is progressive. As one party in a divided opposition they currently have little power. Within a coalition government they would have a greater voice than they do now. The Bloc could become the representatives of francophone interests within a coalition government.

We are going to build momentum until we get a government that reflects the values that we voted for. In the last election we saw vote splitting on a massive scale. Today, we start stitching those votes back together.

Sign the petition   (<---- Please click the link to sign the petition)

Please contact us at:
campaign@progressivecoalition.ca

[Hedgehog]

If you form a big coalition, there is a big risk that the political debate and spirit will die off.

That will decrease the democracy.

Voting will decrease, since people will know that the election is already in the banks.

The risk of corruption increases, since the big coalition in power will be able to do whatever they want, and won't have to listen to their voters.

Very bad idea.

Short term, it's a very good idea.

But in the long term, it's bad.

Look at the USA, where there is only two parties, the political diversity is next to nil.

[24KT]

If you form a big coalition, there is a big risk that the political debate and spirit will die off.

That will decrease the democracy.

Voting will decrease, since people will know that the election is already in the banks.

The risk of corruption increases, since the big coalition in power will be able to do whatever they want, and won't have to listen to their voters.

Very bad idea.

Short term, it's a very good idea.

But in the long term, it's bad.

Look at the USA, where there is only two parties, the political diversity is next to nil.

Au contraire,  if a coalition is forged, there will be no need for another costly election.
On the contrary, ...they very much have to represent their voters interests and wishes otherwise the coalition unravels.

Coalitions can only form on common ground, ...on areas wherein all are in agreement and all voices are heard.
You then proceed on common ground. You can still voice your disagreements and campaign for your agendas, however where you move forward are the area within which you are in agreement.

The last coalition I saw was back in the 80's, and that succeeded beyond anyone's wildest imagination.
Ontario residents were so pleased with the results that they later went on to give both the architects of the accord subsequent individual majority mandates.

[bigdumbbell]

i'm joyous when conservatives lose

[Tapper]

Im actually interested to see how this works out. Who would your PM be?

[24KT]

Im actually interested to see how this works out. Who would your PM be?

We're all interested to see how this is going to work out.

So far, from what I understand, they worked out an agreement whereby Stephane Dion would be PM and hold 50% of the seats in the legislature, and all sensitive fiscal cabinet posts will be held by the Liberals. (Hahaha, I guess that's one thing Canadians can agree on, ...the Liberals know how to make Canada prosperous) Jack Layton's NDP members would hold 25% of the seats in the legislature, and the Bloc will support whatever legislation the Liberals and NDP propose. The Bloc trusts the Liberals and the NDP to do the right thing by Quebec, and they'll be there to make sure Quebec interests are represented. The Bloc Quebecois are an interesting bunch. They don't give a shit about Canada as a country, ...they only care about Quebec. They were up in arms over some fast moves Harper tried to pull 6 weeks ago. Their role in the Commons would simply be looking out for Quebec interests. The coalition also vows to take counsel from the Green Party as well. Infact, it was Stephane Dion of the Liberals who insisted the Green Party be allowed to participate in the national debates because he felt they represented something important to alot of Canadians. The NDP didn't want them there and threatened to boycott the debates. I think that's because Green Party members have a tendency to be very left, and layton wants all the left wing votes. He blinked at the last minute and attended along with the Greens.

I honestly have to say I'm not happy with it having to come to this... a legal political coup which is within their rights to do, ...but I blame Harper for this mess. Minority governments know that they can be toppled at any time, so you better move on what the people want. And when the only way you manage to get elected is because you are the only party representing the right, ...and the progressive vote is split four ways, and you only get 30 something % of the vote, you better damned well move in areas that the other 60% of the country agrees on. That would have been the smart thing to do, but harper has made it pretty plain he's not looking out for Canada's interests, he's scheming to position himself, and give himself a distinct advantage over his political opponents and ram a right wing agenda down the throats of a country where over 60% wanted progressive leadership.

I heard there is some dissent in the Liberal ranks tho, in that the two front runner candidates for leadership of the liberal party are in disagreement. Michael Ignatieff wants absolutely nothing to do with Bloc Quebecois support, and Bob Rae believes the coalition should accept Bloc support. This was why Dion was chosen as leader of the liberals. The Ignatieff & Rae camps were too far apart, and Dion had a history of working with both. Ignatieff supporters were Paul Martin supporters and the Rae supporters were supporters of Chretien. When Martin cross the rubicon and declared war on chretien, their supporters have never been able to get along, very few chretien cabinet members were welcomed into a Martin cabinet and Dion goes way back as a federalist who effectively fought the separatists and kept quebec in confederation. He's great with intellectuals and those who think things through, ...but the general public who make decisions based on a superficial beauty pageant, ...his nerdy geek factor and difficulty with english grammar don't help him very well.

It will be interesting to see how this turns out. I'd be happy if the liberals took over.

It would also be interesting to see if criminal charges get laid against the conservatives for wiretapping and or taping a NDP strategy conference call and leaking it's content to the press.

[24KT]

Opposition Officially Signs Coalition Agreement
And Reveals How It Will Work
Monday December 1, 2008
CityNews.ca Staff



There is an ancient Chinese curse that says "may you live in interesting times."

Few have been more interesting than the last few days in Canada, one of the strangest and most unusual in this country's storied history.

And it's far from over yet.

The latest bizarre series of events from Ottawa came late Monday afternoon, when the members of the would-be ruling coalition - the Liberals, the NDP and the Bloc Quebecois - all came together to sign the agreement they hope will create a new federal government in this country, just six weeks after we spent millions choosing the latest one.

We now know the details of what that new entity could look like as soon as next week.

As expected, it will feature a power base combining the numerical strength of the Liberals and the NDP with support from the Bloc Quebecois.

The leader of the new regime will apparently be Stephane Dion, whose defeat was so bad in last month's vote that he was forced to step down and will still be replaced next May.

But under the plan, he will be the new and perhaps the unlikeliest Prime Minister in Canadian history.

Dion knows the agreement, which will involve bringing down the Tories next week during a non-confidence vote, is controversial and that many Canadians aren't happy with this stunning turn of events.

But he believes it's the only way to save a sinking economy and a listing ship of state.

"Canadians elected 308 members of parliament in October, not just Stephen Harper," Dion intones. "This is the parliament they elected. We must try to make this parliament work.

"After these negotiations, I'm very pleased to announce that we are ready to form a new government that will address the best interests of the people instead of plunging Canadians into another inaction. This will be a Liberal-led government in collaboration with the New Democratic Party and with the support of the Bloc Quebecois."

NDP leader Jack Layton, who comes the closest he's ever been to a power broker under the arrangement, was also adamant this has to happen for the good of the country.

"We have not made these choices lightly," he assures. "Our decision was made in full seriousness and clear knowledge of what's at stake."

What will the new entity look like? It will have 18 Liberals and 6 NDP ministers, with the all important Finance Minister coming from the Grits. 

The Bloc, which will not have any representatives in the new cabinet, will support the new group until 2011.


The first order of business will be an economic stimulus, the missing element that the parties accuse the Harper government of omitting in their financial statement last week. It will contain help for the auto industry, forestry, public transit and more. 

What happens next is anything but assured.

The statement is supposed to come to a delayed vote next Monday. When it's rejected, the government will fall and this new triumvirate will head to the Governor General to ask her to allow them to rule.

Michaelle Jean  can grant their request or order another election - something taxpayers clearly don't want.

Despite the end run, there are a few options still open to Harper, all of them desperation ploys. He's already put off the confidence vote for a week, and can prorogue Parliament, delaying things further, or stage a surprise end run and try and call another election himself - with the Governor General's approval.

Jean, the other main player in this endless drama, is still on tour in Europe and is due back next week. She's been briefed on what's going on and the day she returns may tell the tale about which maneuvering will win the day in this bizarre game of chicken.


Harper was clearly rattled during Question Period as he was attacked from all sides, and at one point accidentally referred to the Speaker as "Prime Minister" to great guffaws from the House.

Just a little over a month after winning back an increased minority government, Harper now faces the almost unbelievable fate of losing power - and perhaps, his post.


"This is a gross miscalculation by Stephen Harper and the Conservatives," suggests CityNews Political Specialist Richard Madan. "[There was] no need to put in the public financing in the economic update that threw parliament upside down. And saying this was a poison pill, another gross miscalculation ... An unimaginable situation from just six weeks ago and certainly internally the knives are out for Harper."

Madan describes the atmosphere in Ottawa as "chaotic" and "toxic."

And everyone is choosing up sides.

"My constituents have spoken and the marching orders is to take them down," declares Liberal Jim Karygiannis.

But Tory MP Pierre Poilievre begs to differ. "They're engaged in a power grab to reverse the results of the election," he fumes. "They have been planning this for months."

The Tories vow they'll do everything in their power - while they still retain any power - to head off what they call an "irresponsible and undemocratic" act. That includes proroguing Parliament until January, when their next budget is due.

Canada has only had one other coalition government in its history and to find it, you have to go back almost a full century. It came in 1917, and centered on a conscription plan for World War I.

Now there's a war of a different kind but this is less the Battle of Hill 60 and more like the Battle of Parliament Hill.

And no one knows who's going to win.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How did we get into this mess?

Coalition Conundrum: Timeline Of A Political Crisis



The Conservatives are hanging on to their minority for dear life while what they call the 'unholy alliance' of the Liberals, the NDP and the Bloc plot to assume power in Ottawa.

How did we ever get to this point in one of the strangest cases of political brinksmanship in modern memory? Here's a look at the roadmap that has taken a lot of twists and turns to wind up at the House of Commons.

August 17th

It's not even the end of summer yet and rumours start spreading in Ottawa that Prime Minister Stephen Harper plans to call an election for the fall. It's the first time the words "dysfunctional Parliament" are heard in the land, after a summer when MPs were off on their break.

September 7

It's the weekend after the long Labour Day holiday, but Harper isn't taking the day off. Instead, he finally pulls the plug on his own government, visiting the Governor General to dissolve Parliament and call an election.

It's a move fraught with controversy. Polls indicate most Canadians have no appetite for another federal vote just 31 months into the Tories' minority mandate. And critics point out he's breaking his own word, because he set up a fixed election date that can only be negated with a non-confidence vote in the House, which never happens.

But Harper insists that "dysfunctional Parliament" referred to during the summer means the Conservatives can't get their agenda passed, even though the weakened Liberals have already given in to every controversial piece of legislation the Tories have brought in.

The election will be held on October 14th - one day after the Thanksgiving long weekend and also on a Jewish holiday, which sparks some complaints from those affected.

October 14

After weeks of promising, cajoling and considering, Canadians make up their minds, voting in another Harper minority - albeit slightly larger than last time. The Liberals, reeling from a rejected Green Shift plan presented by a perceived lacklustre leader in Stephane Dion, lose seats, while the NDP gain. The Green Party is once again shut out of Parliament. 

October 15

The election nobody wanted is over, and it's clear the public wasn't much in the mood for it. Voter turnout winds up at just 58 per cent - the lowest in Canadian history. Analysts believe it's a sign of anger at a process that cost millions of taxpayer dollars and a dissatisfied electorate who didn't like any of the choices.

October 20

After the worst defeat in the party's history, pressure mounts on lame duck Leader Dion to step down. He finally agrees he will - but not until the Grit leadership convention to be held next May in Vancouver.

November 18

Parliament finally resumes in Ottawa, with all sides pledging they're planning a kinder and gentler session ahead, after Canadians express their displeasure with the way politicians have been acting. Like many political promises, it won't last the month.

November 27 - 4pm

As the economy reels, the Big 3 Auto Makers flirt with bankruptcy and the stock markets ride a roller coaster, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty rises in the House of Commons to deliver an economic statement. By the time he's finished, his pronouncements have triggered an all out war of words and actions that spawns a situation that's almost unprecedented in the history of Canada.

The Tories pledge to cut the $2-per-vote subsidy each party receives to help them fund their activities. They say the economic statement is a matter of confidence, which means if the other parties vote it down, the government will fall, triggering another election just six weeks after Canadians went to the polls.

The announcement results in an uproar amongst the opposition. They accuse the well funded Conservatives of trying to eliminate any challengers and vow they won't take it lying down. They also insist the fact there's no stimulus package to deal with the faltering economy proves the Tories are unfit to govern.

And they confirm they'll all be voting against the statement the following Monday night, as fears grow of yet another nationwide vote.

November 27 -7pm

Just hours after Flaherty's statement is out, a bombshell announcement emerges from Ottawa. The Liberals and the NDP, with the backing of the separatist Bloc Quebecois, vow to use their collective numbers to form a coalition that will oust Stephen Harper and his party from power. Stephane Dion, whose loss was so massive just a month before, seems poised to become the new P.M., at least on a temporary basis.

It's an unprecedented threat that escalates with each passing hour.

For now, though, the Tories stand firm, insisting they won't back down.

November 28 -5:40pm

As the coalition train gathers steam, a defiant Prime Minister Harper accuses the opposition of trying to seize power, get into bed with a separatist entity trying to break up the country and install a leadership Canadians didn't vote for. "The opposition has every right to defeat the government," he intones. "But Stephane Dion does not have the right to take power without an election."

November 28 -8pm

The dust has barely settled on Harper's comments when he makes a move to save his minority. The Conservatives will put off the confidence vote for another week, trying to buy time in this ultimate political chess match.

November 29 - morning

It's Saturday in Ottawa, a day when government is normally closed down for the weekend. But no one's resting in the nation's capital as the Tories try a new tactic, confirming they won't be making the subsidy matter part of the confidence vote, but that it will eventually be introduced somewhere down the line.

November 29 - afternoon

The Tories, now watching the coalition express come heading down the track, finally blink in this game of chicken, agreeing to scrap their plan to end the subsidy for political parties altogether. 

It's still not enough for the opposition, who now say their objections are really because the Conservatives aren't doing enough for the wilting economy. They vow to press on with their coalition fight.

November 30 - early afternoon

Flaherty announces the Tories are advancing the date of their budget to January 27th instead of February or March. They've long insisted it makes no sense to propose any changes until they know what new U.S. President Barack Obama has in mind, and he won't be sworn in until January 20th. This gives the Tories a week to see what he proposes - if they're still in power by then. 

But the opposition, apparently smelling blood in the water, says it's not enough and the coalition plan remains a go.

November 30 - late afternoon

The plot thickens, when a Tory is accidentally sent a code number to join an NDP phone conference the day before.

The party member tapes the meeting on Saturday and its explosive contents are revealed the next day. It seems to show NDP leader Jack Layton admitting to his party that he planned this coalition move well in advance of the crisis, because it wouldn't have been possible to pull so many disparate entities together so quickly.

"This whole thing wouldn't have happened if the moves hadn't been made with the Bloc to lock them in early because you couldn't put three people together in three hours," a voice identified as Layton's is heard saying. "The first part was done a long time ago."

The Conservatives accuse the NDP and the Bloc of planning it all along, calling them hypocrites waiting for an excuse to pull off a coup no matter what the reason and usurping the choices of Canadians.

The NDP denies the charge and insists the Tories broke the law by monitoring their private conversations.

December 1

On the day that the economic statement should have been voted on, all three party leaders sign a historic agreement outlining how the coalition will work, with Dion assuming the Prime Minister's post and Layton getting 6 of the 24 ministers. As Harper contemplates what to do next, all eyes turn to the December 8th vote - and whether the Governor General will give her permission. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Text Of Letter To Canadians From Dion, Layton and Duceppe

To our fellow citizens,

Canada is facing a global economic crisis. Since the recent federal election, it has become clear that the government headed by Stephen Harper has no plan, no competence and, no will to effectively address this crisis. Therefore, the majority of Parliament has lost confidence in Mr. Harper's government, and believes that the formation of a new Government that will effectively, prudently, promptly and competently address these critical economic times is necessary.

The contrast between the inaction of Mr. Harper's government and the common action taken by all other Western democracies is striking. We cannot accept this.

A majority of Canadians and Quebecers voted for our parties on October 14, 2008. Our Members of Parliament make up 55 percent of the House of Commons.

In light of the critical situation facing our citizens, and the Harper government's unwillingness and inability to address the crisis, we are resolved to support a new government that will address the interests of the people.

Today we respectfully inform the Governor General that, as soon as the appropriate opportunity arises, she should call on the Leader of the Official Opposition to form a new government, supported as set out in the accompanying accords by all three of our parties.

Respectfully,

Hon. Stéphane Dion
Leader, the Liberal Party of Canada

Hon. Jack Layton
Leader, the New Democratic Party of Canada

Gilles Duceppe
Leader, the Bloc Quebecois


===========================================================


This is looking like a done deal. The Conservative are running scared and Harper was so rattled by these turn of events he couldn't even properly address the Speaker of the House during yesterday's Question Period.

Prime Minister Harper Visibly Flustered during Question Period - (PM for only another 6 days) 

[24KT]

Conservative's move to take advantage of economic crisis to position themselves strategically, and overtip their hand with regards to their secret agenda to attack Canadian values and to attack democracy in Canada

Jim Flaherty's Economic Update Poisons the well

[24KT]

It's all up to the woman dubbed "Le petite Reine du Canada" (Canada's little Queen) to decide:

Do Harper's conservatives get thrown out, with the Liberals heading a coalition to form the new government?

Or will Canadians be forced to spend another $300 million dollars for another election nobody wants?

Methinks, we're getting a coalition headed by the Liberal Party of Canada.

BREAKING NEWS: ...Michaelle Jean has cut short her trip to Europe and is rushing back to Ottawa


The Liberals are taking over!
The Liberals are taking over!
Neener, neener, neeee-ner!



It's all up to this woman now

[24KT]

The Three Opposition Leaders forming the coalition hold a joint press conference and answer various questions from reporters.

There's a really funny wtf moment 6:19 in, when a pinhead from the Sun Media (who clearly doesn't understand the Parliamentary process) asks a question so stupid, other reporters literally do a wtf doubletake.

[a_joker10]

This makes me sick.
You have no idea how this will play out outside of Toronto.

This is one the biggest mistakes the liberals will have ever made. This only helps out the NDP and will cause tension  in the rest of the country.
What a bunch of crass and stupid moves on all parts.

Hopefully we have another election sooner then later.

[24KT]

This makes me sick.
You have no idea how this will play out outside of Toronto.

Anyone who was around in Ontario in 1985 is familiar with this process, and understand it's constitutionality. It's the voters in Alberta who will be pissing mad and spitting fire over this. The news media here in Toronto is doing a lot of spinning, and acting like this isn't part of the constitutional process, and a contingency within our constitution. They act like it's a military coup d'état without the tanks, generals, bloodshed, and genocide. This is Canadian politics!

Did you catch todays shouting match in Question Period?     Poor Milliken 

This is one the biggest mistakes the liberals will have ever made. This only helps out the NDP and will cause tension  in the rest of the country.
What a bunch of crass and stupid moves on all parts.

Hopefully we have another election sooner then later.

It unfortunately just might come to that. 

As I've said all along, Jack Layton is a political opportunist who's first priority is the survival of the NDP,
...but at the same time, there's no question Harper's shot across the bow was the straw that broke the camel's back. He overplayed his hand and everyone had had enough.

I find this hypocrisy on his part rather interesting though. He asked the RCMP to investigate a minister which the RCMP was then obligated to do despite no suspicion of any wrong-doing, then used those same moves to become prime minister, teaming up with the NDP, and the Bloc to get rid of Paul Martin, citing the fact that a minister was under investigation by the RCMP. If it was good enough for him to assume the PM's office after losing an election, why isn't it good enough for Dion?

Rumour has it that it may not be as cut-n-dry as the Constitution says it can be though.
People are pointing to Michaelle Jean's premature return from the Czech republic as an indicator that it could get tricky. The thought being if she stayed in the Czech Republic, and didn't return until Sat, it'd be cut n dry. But her early return could mean trouble.     we'll see...

If it does come down to an election, I have a feeling Harper will sorely regret his words yesterday where he said he didn't want to be Prime Minister governing the economy while being at the behest of a veto from the Bloc. Well Dah! This is Canada, and that's the position you're in! You don't want it... fine... let the coalition, who are willing to rise to the challenge and who represent 60% of the Canadian public form the government.

I just realized the further implications of this. If the coalition goes though, our next Prime Minister will be from Toronto. After Dion goes, ...it will either be Michael Ignatieff or Bob Rae. Oh man I'm just salivating. 

[Tapper]

If this was the conservatives forming this coalition instead of the libs and ndp and separtists, Jag would be calling the UN right now. She would be going on and on about how the voters rights are being ignored, democracy is being held hostage,etc,etc,etc(you know how silly she gets).

But since its the left thats staging a coup d'etat in Canada, she will say and do anything to make it sound like the greatest thing in the world. Typical Jag.

 

[24KT]

If this was the conservatives forming this coalition instead of the libs and ndp and separtists, Jag would be calling the UN right now. She would be going on and on about how the voters rights are being ignored, democracy is being held hostage,etc,etc,etc(you know how silly she gets).

But since its the left thats staging a coup d'etat in Canada, she will say and do anything to make it sound like the greatest thing in the world. Typical Jag.

 

Actually Tapper, ...this is exactly what Harper attempted to do early in Paul Martin's parliament.
He joined with the NDP and the Bloc and forced a non-confidence vote, ...even tried to bribe a dying MP to do it. He lost. Then he teamed up with the NDP and the Bloc to force another non-confidence vote topple parliament and become the PM. You didn't hear me screaming treason or coup d'état then. I realized it is within the opposition's right to topple parliament in a minority government. that's how it works. For Harper to pretend like he's never heard of this before is disengenuous.

[Hereford]

Jag, Serious question...

Can you explain the canadian party system? Do you have a lib vs conservative, 2 party-type system too?

Thanks

[24KT]

Jag, Serious question...

Can you explain the canadian party system? Do you have a lib vs conservative, 2 party-type system too?

Thanks

No, we have a multiple party system, and canadians vote for a policy platform that best represents their wishes for Canada. In this past election, there were 5 main candidates, 4 of which held progressive platforms, and only 1 party representing a right wing agenda. The majority of the country voted progressive, only 30% voted conservative. The progressive vote got split 4 ways. Harper won by default, but ever since taking office he has tried to govern as if he held a majority mandate, and he has rammed an agenda that the country clearly doesn't want through Parliament while every step of the way daring the opposition to do something about it if they don't like it.  The opposition finally did.

No one is trying to steal power. Each one of the opposition MPs was duly elected by the citizens of Canada to sit in the House of Commons and form Parliament. What the opposition members are saying is that Harper has done nothing to address the economic crisis. The entire economic update has nothning in it for Canadians, it was a strictly partisan effort to re-inforce conservative power. They've demonstrated they are unfit to govern, and the opposition members have no confidence in their ability to do so. therefore they are requesting the ability to lead the nation out of the worldwide crisis we find ourselves in.  Harper initially said "We're not changing one thing, if you don't like what we propose ...topple parliament on monday dec 1". The coalition said "ok we will". Then over the weekend Harper withdrew every single contentious item one by one, then postponed the vote til monday dec 8th. The coalition said ok, we'll vote on it on dec 8th. Now Harper wants to suspend Parliament until Jan... essentially requesting a do-over. To prorogue parliament, essentially means to suspend it, and every single motion or piece of legislation that has been proposed but not yet passed disappears as if it never existed to begin with It's like a fresh start. He's begging for a do-over. It's a wimp move. This is the real world, not a game of go fish. There should be no do-overs!

[24KT]

How Do Coalition Governments Work?
Wednesday December 3, 2008
By Nancy Macdonald, Maclean's Magazine

So the Liberals and NDP have ironed out the dirty details behind their Stephane Dion-led coalition in waiting. Broadly, both believe in stimulus over belt-tightening. But how do coalition governments work, anyway?

For starters, they plan ahead. If -and that's a big if - Prime Minister Stephen Harper doesn't pull the procedural fire alarm by proroguing Parliament, and the Conservative government is defeated in a confidence motion on Dec. 8, Harper will seek the dissolution of Parliament and ask Governor General Michaelle Jean for another election.

"She'll say no," says constitutional expert Paul Thomas, with the University of Manitoba. Given that the would-be coalition government has a 24-member cabinet, a legislative agenda that includes a multi-billion dollar stimulus package for Canada's troubled economy and an agreement with the Bloc Québécois to support it for 18 months, Thomas predicts the Governor General would grant it the opportunity to lead; that way, Canada would also avoid the uncertainty-and $300-million expense-of an election.

Constitutional expert Ned Franks agreed with Thomas in an interview with The Globe and Mail, citing British and Canadian and precedents, including the 1985 accord with the NDP that allowed Ontario Liberal leader David Peterson to take power after Frank Miller's minority Progressive Conservative government went down in defeat.

We'd then be sailing into "uncharted territory," says historian Desmond Morton, a professor emeritus at McGill University.

Please see the rest of this article entitled: How do Coalition Governments Work

=========================

In my opinion, a Canadian Coalition government would prove far more democratic and representative of the people than what we have currently have in this session of Parliament.

[24KT]

Coalition Government Rallies Across Canada


St. John’s, NL
Thursday, December 4th 7 p.m. St. Theresa’s Hall
Mundy Pond Road
Mary Shortall CLC Rep
1-709-685-8105

Halifax, NS
Thursday, December 4th 5:30 p.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Maritime Hall – Halifax Forum
Windsor & Almon Street
(enter off Almon Street)
Tony Tracy, CLC Rep 1-902-223-9489

Charlottetown, PE
Thursday, December 4th 7 p.m.
Murphy’s Community Centre
Richmond Street
Jean-Claude Basque, CLC Rep 1-506-862-9182

Moncton, NB
Thursday, December 4th 7 p.m.
Moncton City Hall Front Lawn
Main Street
Dee Dee Daigle, CLC Rep 1-506-866-9661

Regina, SK
Thursday, December 4th 7 p.m.
Speakers @ 7:30 p.m.
Education Auditorium
University of Regina
David Winter, Director, 1-306-536-7703

Edmonton, AB
Thursday, December 4th 6 p.m.
Winston Churchill Square
Downtown Edmonton central
Les Steel, CLC Rep 1-780-405-2756

Winnipeg, MB
Thursday, December 4th
7 p.m. Marlborough Hotel
331 Smith Street
Ballroom (Room for 600)
Deb Jamerson, CLC Rep 1-204-781-2249

Vancouver, BC
Thursday, December 4th Doors open @ 5 p.m.
Speakers @ 6 p.m.
Vancouver Trade & Convention Centre
Ballroom “A”
David Rice, Director 1-604-230-3708

Montréal
Saturday, Dec. 6 12 noon
Complexe Guy-Favreau
Réné Levesque at Berri

Toronto, ON
Saturday, December 6th 12 p.m. - 1 p.m. City Hall
Nathan Phillips Square
Kelly Hayes, Director 1-416-725-5704

Ottawa, ON
Thursday, December 4th Noon
Parliament Hill
Bertrand Begin, CLC Rep 1-613-799-9894

[24KT]

Harper Reportedly To Confirm He'll Be Asking
Governor General To Prorogue Parliament In Speech
Wednesday December 3, 2008
CityNews.ca Staff



It's something you see all the time in the U.S., where the president goes on air during primetime to address the American public.

You almost never see it in Canada and certainly not from a Prime Minister who normally avoids the press as if it were a Liberal convention.

And that's what makes Stephen Harper's address to the country Wednesday night so extraordinary.

The Conservative leader is apparently ready to confirm that he'll be asking Governor General Michaelle Jean to prorogue Parliament, in order to stop the alliance of the Liberals, the NDP and the Bloc from removing his minority Tories from power.

But even the request doesn't mean it's a done deal. Jean will have to decide if the united front of Stephane Dion, Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe is a better choice for the country than Harper. Or she can order that a new election be held just 7 weeks after taxpayers shelled out $300 million for the last one.

If Jean does allow Parliament to be put on hold, the Tories could return as if the economic statement that caused this standoff never happened, and introduce an early budget as soon as January 7th, foiling the opponents' plans. 

Citytv will broadcast Harper's address at 7pm, followed by the opposition's response at 7:30pm. Your response will follow in an hour-long special.

-------------------------

Governor General Michaelle Jean's plane just touched down on the runway from Slovenia.

[Tapper]

No, we have a multiple party system, and canadians vote for a policy platform that best represents their wishes for Canada. In this past election, there were 5 main candidates, 4 of which held progressive platforms, and only 1 party representing a right wing agenda. The majority of the country voted progressive, only 30% voted conservative. The progressive vote got split 4 ways. Harper won by default, but ever since taking office he has tried to govern as if he held a majority mandate, and he has rammed an agenda that the country clearly doesn't want through Parliament while every step of the way daring the opposition to do something about it if they don't like it.  The opposition finally did.

No one is trying to steal power. Each one of the opposition MPs was duly elected by the citizens of Canada to sit in the House of Commons and form Parliament. What the opposition members are saying is that Harper has done nothing to address the economic crisis. The entire economic update has nothning in it for Canadians, it was a strictly partisan effort to re-inforce conservative power. They've demonstrated they are unfit to govern, and the opposition members have no confidence in their ability to do so. therefore they are requesting the ability to lead the nation out of the worldwide crisis we find ourselves in.  Harper initially said "We're not changing one thing, if you don't like what we propose ...topple parliament on monday dec 1". The coalition said "ok we will". Then over the weekend Harper withdrew every single contentious item one by one, then postponed the vote til monday dec 8th. The coalition said ok, we'll vote on it on dec 8th. Now Harper wants to suspend Parliament until Jan... essentially requesting a do-over. To prorogue parliament, essentially means to suspend it, and every single motion or piece of legislation that has been proposed but not yet passed disappears as if it never existed to begin with It's like a fresh start. He's begging for a do-over. It's a wimp move. This is the real world, not a game of go fish. There should be no do-overs!

EXACTLY the answer I knew I would get from you. The old "They did it so we're going to do it" reply.

Harper wants a "Do over". The shit you come up with and the way you word it can only be learned from years of practice as a scam artist. I just love it.

[Tapper]

Uh-oh!

Jag has been writing personal messages trying to have posts changed again! Tsk Tsk, Jag!

I thought your days of having people's posts censored were behind you? You remember how that turned out for you on the GT board, right?

 

[Bindare_Dundat]

These politicians are so busy trying to fuck over one another that the needs of the citizens and tax dollars get tossed into the shitter.

[24KT]

These politicians are so busy trying to fuck over one another that the needs of the citizens and tax dollars get tossed into the shitter.

That's EXACTLY why we're seeing this reaction to the Conservative economic update,
and why Harper is desperately seeking to proprogue parliament. In this day and age, at this moment in time, instead of getting on with things and facing the music, he wants to shut down parliament, doing nothing for 2 months, so he can try again, ...or spend another $300 million on another election after the last one just 6 weeks ago... an election nobody wanted but him... now he wants to waste another $300 million dollars when there is a viable government ready to go? 

Proroguing parliament is used when the business of parliament has finished early, ...not in an economic crisis when there's still business on the table. He is showing he just wants to save his own job, not the jobs of Canadians.

Anytime someone can get all the opposition members united like this... you know they screwed up big time!

[24KT]

Stephen Harper To Visit Governor General
On Thursday To Stop Coalition
Wednesday December 3, 2008
CityNews.ca Staff



It seems almost certain that Prime Minister Stephen Harper will be asking Governor General Michaelle Jean to prorogue Parliament in order to stop the coalition of Stephane Dion, Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe from usurping his role as this country's leader.

His office has confirmed that the Tory boss has an appointment with Jean at 9:30am Thursday, when he'll make his unprecedented request to stop the opposition from pulling the rug out from his government.

In an historic address to the nation on Wednesday night, the P.M. insisted the entire affair is one of fundamental fairness - and democracy.

Sitting against a backdrop of two Canadian flags, the Conservative boss was alternately forceful and calm as he talked about the almost unheard of plan to depose him from power, sparked by last week's divisive economic statement.

"I pledge to you that Canada's government will use every legal means at our disposal to protect our democracy, protect our economy, and to protect Canada," he vows.

But he stopped short in his address of officially talking about going to Jean with his request, although his office confirmed the appointment about an hour later.

The Governor General returned to Ottawa on Wednesday evening, cutting short a trip to Europe to be back to make an agonizing decision to end the crisis.

She can grant Harper's request, allow the opposition alliance to proceed or call an election that will cost taxpayers another $300 million. It's a tough choice and many are wondering if she's up to making the right decision.

Harper has no doubt about what it is. "The opposition does not have the democratic right to impose a coalition with the separatists," he proclaims. "They promised it would never happen."

In his speech, the Tory boss reiterated all the accomplishments and plans of his government and what he still intends to do if the opposition allows it.

And if they don't?

"Let me be very clear," he states emphatically. "Canada's government cannot enter into a power-sharing coalition with a separatist party. At a time of global economic instability, Canada's government must stand unequivocally for keeping the country together.

"At a time like this, a coalition with separatists cannot help Canada. And the opposition does not have the democratic right to impose a coalition with the separatists they promised voters would never happen." 

Although it's a frequent practice for U.S. presidents to request primetime television to address a nation, it almost never happens in Canada.

Harper's speech was expected to last some 10 minutes, but he was brief, going on for only about three.

It follows another extraordinary day in Ottawa, where a war of words got louder and the Tories unveiled yet another new strategy in the war on their foes - invoke the name of high profile Quebec sovereignty supporter Jacques Parizeau and use the word 'separatist' as often as possible - a reference to Dion and Layton's deal with Duceppe for his support.

"This government will stand against the separatist coalition!' screamed Harper during Question Period. "They must walk away from this deal with Jacques Parizeau and the separatists!

"If the Liberal party continues down this path, those images will never be forgotten by the Canadian people!"

Layton charged back. "Why does the prime minister care more about his own job than allowing the parliament to save the jobs of Canadians?" he demands.

"Just for the record, the Bloc Quebecois has supported this Conservative government at least 140 times, including 14 confidence votes," added Liberal MP Ralph Goodale.

Stockwell Day, the Minister of International Trade, fielded that fastball. "My DNA would never allow me to do a coalition with socialists and my heart would never allow me to do a deal with separatists."

The word 'separatists' came out of the mouths of every Tory MP who rose to speak and the term continued outside of the House, where the tense atmosphere continued.

"I think it's cheap politics," claims Liberal MP Ruby Dhalla. "This is really about the economy. It is about democracy."

On Thursday, that 'democracy' is expected to play out at the office of the Governor General. What she decides involves the weight - and now the wait - of an entire nation. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's address to the nation about the coalition

Text Of Harper's Speech

"Good evening,

"Canadians take pride in our history as one of the world's oldest continuous democracies.  During the past 141 years, political parties have emerged and disappeared, leaders have come and gone, and governments have changed.

"Constant in every case, however, is the principle that Canada's Government has always been chosen by the people.  And following the light of this democratic tradition, Canadians have built one of the most peaceful and prosperous countries the world has ever known - a land of hope and opportunity that inspires others around the globe, and has drawn millions as new immigrants to our country.

"On October 14, for the 40^th time since Confederation, Canadians voted in a national general election.   We are honoured that you returned our Government to office with a strengthened mandate to lead this great country through the most difficult global economic crisis in many decades.  Canada's Government is acting to deal with the crisis, right now.

• "Further personal and business tax reductions are coming into effect;
• We are doubling spending on infrastructure;
• We are ensuring credit for businesses and consumers by injecting liquidity into financial markets;
• We are helping seniors who rely on RRIF income;
• And securing pension plans.

"We are implementing the Automotive Innovation Fund and, working with the Government of Ontario, we are undertaking due diligence on any further requests for assistance from the auto industry.  We are increasing support and incentives for manufacturers, the forestry sector, and others to pursue business opportunities.  We are implementing agreements with the provinces to enhance labour mobility. 

"And, next month on January 27, we will bring in a budget which will contain additional measures to boost Canada's economy, while making sure we avoid a long term structural deficit in Canada's finances.

"In preparation for that budget we are consulting widely with Canadians, meeting with premiers of our provinces and territories, and working in collaboration with our international partners in G20.  The Minister of Finance will be consulting with the business community and interest groups.

"We are consulting with, and expect to hear more from, the opposition parties in Parliament.  We hope they bring forward specific proposals - we have invited them to do so.  In fact, we have already changed some of our proposals to meet their concerns.

"Unfortunately, even before the Government has brought forward its budget, and only seven weeks after a general election, the opposition wants to overturn the results of that election.

"Instead of an immediate budget, they propose a new coalition which includes the party in Parliament whose avowed goal is to break up the country.  Let me be very clear:  Canada's Government cannot enter into a power-sharing coalition with a separatist party. 

"At a time of global economic instability, Canada's Government must stand unequivocally for keeping the country together.  At a time like this, a coalition with the separatists cannot help Canada.  And the Opposition does not have the democratic right to impose a coalition with the separatists they promised voters would never happen.

"The Opposition is attempting to impose this deal without your say, without your consent, and without your vote.  This is no time for backroom deals with the separatists; it is the time for Canada's government to focus on the economy and specifically on measures for the upcoming budget.  This is a pivotal moment in our history.

"We Canadians are the inheritors of a great legacy, and it is our duty to strengthen and protect it for the generations still to come.  Tonight, I pledge to you that Canada's Government will use every legal means at our disposal to protect our democracy, to protect our economy, and to protect Canada.

"Thank you, and goodnight."

[24KT]

Dion To Harper: Facing A Vote Of Confidence
Is The Right Thing To Do
Wednesday December 3, 2008
CityNews.ca Staff



It probably won't surprise you to know that Stephane Dion, the would-be Prime Minister-in-waiting, wasn't impressed by what his arch rival Stephen Harper had to say on Wednesday night. 

The outgoing Liberal leader responded to the Conservative leader's rare primetime address by trying to explain the motive of his coalition colleagues, Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe, insisting they aren't involved in a 'power grab.'

He maintains he's simply trying to take Canada through some rough economic seas, while the unfit captain of the ship of state is calling it a mutiny.

"Stephen Harper still refuses to propose measures to stimulate the Canadian economy," he insists. "His mini-budget last week demonstrated that his priority is partisanship and settling ideological scores ...

"The Harper Conservatives have lost the confidence of the majority of Members of the House of Commons. In our democracy, in our parliamentary system, in our Constitution, this means that they have lost the right to govern.

"Canadians don't want another election, they want Parliamentarians to work together. That's our job. Canadians want their MPs to put aside partisanship and focus on the economy."

Dion says all sides have to work together to get through the tough times, and it doesn't matter if they're socialists, conservatives or even those who would take the country in another direction, like the Bloc Quebecois.

He also notes even the Green Party is behind the coalition plan.

And he reminds voters that coalitions aren't all that unusual and that they work in all areas of the world - and Canada should be no exception. 

With that in mind, he's also made his own appeal to Michaelle Jean. "Earlier today I wrote Her Excellency the Governor General," he reveals. "I respectfully asked her to refuse any request by the Prime Minister to suspend Parliament until he has demonstrated to her that he still commands the confidence of the House.

"If Mr. Harper wants to suspend Parliament he must first face a vote of confidence. In our Canada, the government is accountable for its decisions and actions in Parliament. In our Canada, the government derives its legitimacy from an elected Parliament."

He concluded by promising the Canadian people that if he's allowed to serve as Prime Minister, "I will work day and night to combat this economic crisis, to do what it takes to minimize its effects on Canadians, to protect jobs and to create jobs.

"I will serve my country until my time to serve is at an end."

The question remains whether that 'end' will be later - or right now. And only Jean has the answer.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liberal leader Stéphane Dion responds to Stephen Harper's statement to the nation
regarding the push for a coalition government.

Text of Dion's Address

"Canada is facing the impacts of the global economic crisis. Our economy is on the verge of a recession. Canadians are worried about losing their jobs, their homes, their savings. Every economist in the country is predicting increased job losses and deficits for the next few years.

"The federal government has a duty to act and help Canadians weather this storm.

"Stephen Harper still refuses to propose measures to stimulate the Canadian economy. His mini-budget last week demonstrated that his priority is partisanship and settling ideological scores.

"The Harper Conservatives have lost the confidence of the majority of Members of the House of Commons. In our democracy, in our parliamentary system, in our Constitution, this means that they have lost the right to govern.

"Canadians don't want another election, they want Parliamentarians to work together. That's our job. Canadians want their MPs to put aside partisanship and focus on the economy.

"The Liberal Party and the New Democratic Party are ready to do this. Jack Layton and I have agreed to form a coalition government to address the impact of the global economic crisis. The Bloc has agreed to support this government on matters of confidence. The Green Party has also agreed to support it.

"Our system of government was not born with Canada. It is ancient. There are rules that govern it and conventions that guide it.

"Coalitions are normal and current practice in many parts of the world and are able to work very successfully. They work with simple ingredients: consensus, goodwill and cooperation. Consensus is a great Canadian value. In this spirit, we Liberals have joined in a coalition with the NDP. We have done so because we believe we can achieve more for Canadians through cooperation than through conflict. We believe we can better solve the challenges facing Canada through teamwork and collaboration, rather than blind partisan feuding and hostility.

"Our coalition is a consensus to govern with a well-defined program to address the most important issue facing the country: the economy. It is a program to preserve and create jobs and to stimulate the economy in all regions of the country. The elements of the program need to be spelled out and this is what we will do if we are allowed to present it to the House of Commons.

"We share the frustration Canadians have about a political crisis that has been allowed to take prominence over the more important economic challenges we face. Elsewhere in the world, leaders are working to cope with the recession, to bring forward the kinds of investments that will help their people and their economies. Politicians are working together. Rivals are working together.

"Mr. Harper's solution is to extend that crisis by avoiding a simple vote. By suspending Parliament and continuing the confusion. We offer a better way. We say settle it now and let's get to work on the people's business. A vote is scheduled for next Monday. Let it proceed. And let us all show maturity in accepting the result with grace and the larger task of serving Canadians in mind.

"Within one week, a new direction will be established, a tone and focus will be set. We will gather with leaders of industry and labour to work, unlike the Conservatives, in a collaborative, but urgent manner to protect jobs.

"To stimulate the economy and create good well-paid jobs we will not only accelerate already planned investments, but invest significantly more in our country's infrastructure. Helping our cities like Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Montreal or Halifax build modern, efficient public transit systems.

"Investing in our rural communities so that cherished ways of life are protected for future generations. We can stimulate our economy through investments in clean energy, water and our gateways.

"We will invest in our manufacturing, forestry and automotive sectors to protect and create jobs. We believe that in these tough economic times the government has a role to play to ensure that those who are doing their share for the prosperity of our country can continue to provide for the wellbeing of their families.

"In times like this our compassion as a country is tested. We believe it is imperative that the government offers Canadians who have already lost their job, whether in the factories of South Western Ontario or the forests of Eastern Quebec and British Columbia, the support they need to live in dignity and develop new skills.

"That is precisely what we intend to provide.

"Earlier today I wrote Her Excellency the Governor General. I respectfully asked her to refuse any request by the Prime Minister to suspend Parliament until he has demonstrated to her that he still commands the confidence of the House.

"If Mr. Harper wants to suspend Parliament he must first face a vote of confidence.

"In our Canada, the government is accountable for its decisions and actions in Parliament.

"In our Canada, the government derives its legitimacy from an elected Parliament.

"Allow me to end tonight on a personal note. If I am entrusted with the role of Prime Minister for the next months that I have left to serve, I will work day and nights to combat this economic crisis, to do what it takes to minimize its effects on Canadians, to protect jobs and to create jobs.

"I will serve my country until my time to serve is at an end."