Not at all, dumbo. You are the one who has no clue about science or facts. Do you know anything from personal experience as to whether protein works or not? Of course you don't - that much is evident from your pic.To clarify what I've said, I used to work as a personal trainer part-time while I was studying at Uni a few years ago. I've trained over 1000 people, which is good enough a sample size, statistically speaking. Nearly all of the guys I trained wanted to increase their muscularity and they did exactly that when I recommended they add 2 shakes (that would add about 80 gm protein to their overall daily intake) while also increasing their intake of meat and other animal products that are high in protein. I should add that I made them lift heavier and more intensely than they had been doing up until that point.Plus I know people who own supplement stores and they do have a lot of members coming back for protein cause they all see results. Sure, not all supplements work and it's BS for someone to claim that taking protein or any other supplement alone will make you look like Mr Olympia or something close. Even discounting the placebo effect, there is no denying that increased protein consumption does lead to increased recovery, strength, performance and results.And I studied Environmental Engineering and Molecular Biology at University. Did tons of Biochemistry during the latter course and during the 90s, I was obsessed with bodybuilding enough to read as much as I could on things like nutrition and what have you. So I'm not completely clueless like you probably imagine. But even that takes a backseat to the fact that I'm basing my claim that protein does help you get bigger and stronger based on my personal experience and have results to back it up. Can you say the same?
The whole point im making is in these claims you are saying. (specifically, the results you got from people whom you recommended to consume high levels of protein) Ok, i "get" what you are saying about being a personal trainer and having clients, that would definitely be as realistic as testing your theories can get, real human beings.... BUT, say me and you were to do a test each. Group A and Group B. Your group is 1000 people who consume say 1.5-2g's of protein per day. My group, B, consumes .7-1g per day. However, we have to take into account the other sources of nutrients (carbs & fats). So for arguments sake, ill say your group was low carb, high protein.
My group is low protein (relatively - im not claiming protein is not required - it is. And meat is the best choice, it contains all 9 amino acids... yada yada), but my group also has high carbs. (Both groups eating SAME food sources, clean no junk very strict diet, lean meats complex carbs, good fats only)The only difference is the quantity of nutrients. both groups have same workout regimen.
My claim would be that my group would have a much better workout because A- they have tons of energy from the carbs. Not lethargic, etc.
So, after a year long study, you REALLY think your group would have much more lbm just due to a few more pieces of chicken or shakes a day?
That just does not make any sense. I suggest you eat 5-7 meals a day, but, its OK not to eat 2 lbs of chicken breast or red meat a day.
BTW- this is all assuming one is natural. If you are on gear - then its totally different. eat more protein