ND can not produce a single picture showing that Dorian was "thicker" than Nasser because it's simply not true. It's just one of those excuses ND likes to use that can't be proven, similar to "Dorian had a graininess that you could only see in person and not in pictures."
And yes, Nasser beat Dorian in every bodypart from the front.
Now you're just being silly , I just posted a pic of Dorian with a clearly thicker back and YOU mention width
DENSITY trumps Volume , Nasser has a lot of volume in his back it's not dense , he's carrying more intramuscular fat than Dorian clearly evident in the lack of any depth , separation and detail
NO excuses needed Dorian's back is eons better than Nasser's it's not open for discussion Nasser said this himself , and Dorian's graininess can be seen on film , it shows up much better on black & white photos . so again wrong again
This is thickness personified