since you dont see that nasser was better than dorian in these certain parts i am sure now you are a hopless case ..
anyway nasser's main greatness was the harmony between his diff. parts, he didn't have great “separate” parts like others.. for example ronnie's quads were huge but his tiny calves were killing the over all thing.. same with dorian’s deformed small arms that didn’t match his wide thick torso.. also he needed a bigger shoulders and chest to match his wide back.. on the other hand nasser was fully proportioned.. everything on him (even his back) was as big as the other parts.. he didn’t have anything extra big or extra small to harm the over all shape..
Did you miss the part where I said Nasser may be better than Dorian in PARTS of the criteria but as a whole he doesn't compare? please I'll understand if English is not your first language but even then my patience runs out
and Nasser I hate to break it to you was most certainly not ' fully proportioned ' as you like to claim , he was pretty well balanced his shortcomings include a long torso and short legs , and well as his forearms not being in proportion with his biceps/triceps ..not as bad as some but behind Dorian for sure who
s proportions AT HIS BEST despite what you claim are outstanding
in the end my point still stands all rounds are physique rounds so this is why Dorian dominates everyone Nasser included