Author Topic: Dorian Yates 1992 guest posing, absolutely unbelievable. (Read 51391 times)

England_1 · « **on:** April 20, 2009, 01:31:15 AM »

No one has ever had this complete of a physique. Best ever. Be sure to watch in HD. Clearly the best back ever too.

johnny1 · « **Reply #1 on:** April 20, 2009, 01:41:22 AM »

Quote from: England_1 on April 20, 2009, 01:31:15 AM

No one has ever had this complete of a physique. Best ever. Be sure to watch in HD. Clearly the best back ever too.

Great find there, to me that shoes Dorians skeltral structure @ its best, of course his back and calves are outstanding but its the TOTAL balance of the skeltral structure thats most impressive even there in off season shape.

webcake · « **Reply #2 on:** April 20, 2009, 01:53:53 AM »

Good, but he ain't no Ronnie Coleman.

No doubt about it.

io856 · « **Reply #3 on:** April 20, 2009, 02:57:23 AM »

the great white hope

The_Hammer · « **Reply #4 on:** April 20, 2009, 03:47:49 AM »

Incredible bodybuilder.

That version of Dorian/'93 would give Ronnie at his best a run for his money no doubt about it. Without the muscle tears he was incredibly balanced.

honest · « **Reply #5 on:** April 20, 2009, 03:55:55 AM »

His shape in 93 is still the benchmark for the sport, he never repeated it, but no one not even Ronnie has surpassed his shape on that day, But Coleman at his best is definately the second best physique ever presented and better than Dorian in all his other Olympia wins, but Dorian 93 is the benchmark.

BIG_STI · « **Reply #6 on:** April 20, 2009, 06:57:32 AM »

Awaits the unemployed fag hulkster to post more shopped pics.

BayGBM · « **Reply #7 on:** April 20, 2009, 08:20:09 AM »

Now THAT'S a guest posing physique!

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #8 on:** April 20, 2009, 02:32:01 PM »

Quote from: johnny1 on April 20, 2009, 01:41:22 AM

Great find there, to me that shoes Dorians skeltral structure @ its best, of course his back and calves are outstanding but its the TOTAL balance of the skeltral structure thats most impressive even there in off season shape.

Great post as usual ! dead on the money total and complete from head to toe. encompasses ALL of the criteria , density & dryness , size , balance & proportion , posing

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #9 on:** April 20, 2009, 02:33:43 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on April 20, 2009, 01:31:15 AM

No one has ever had this complete of a physique. Best ever. Be sure to watch in HD. Clearly the best back ever too.

Great find. He is on another level from anyone even to this day . this is 17 fucking years ago and no one can touch this .

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10 on:** April 20, 2009, 02:36:19 PM »

Quote from: honest on April 20, 2009, 03:55:55 AM

His shape in 93 is still the benchmark for the sport, he never repeated it, but no one not even Ronnie has surpassed his shape on that day, But Coleman at his best is definately the second best physique ever presented and better than Dorian in all his other Olympia wins, but Dorian 93 is the benchmark.

QFT ! Dorian is the standard bearer to this day , after watching this ....the sport hasn't progressed , it's digressed .

mass 04 · « **Reply #11 on:** April 20, 2009, 02:36:40 PM »

If i see one Ronnie pic, you queers will be owned to next year!!

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12 on:** April 20, 2009, 02:38:16 PM »

Quote from: mass 04 on April 20, 2009, 02:36:40 PM

If i see one Ronnie pic, you queers will be owned to next year!!

Always count on trolls to be trolls

mass 04 · « **Reply #13 on:** April 20, 2009, 02:40:01 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 20, 2009, 02:38:16 PM

Always count on trolls to be trolls

lol if i see Hulkster counting Ronnies glute striations i'll throw up.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14 on:** April 20, 2009, 02:40:53 PM »

Quote from: mass 04 on April 20, 2009, 02:40:01 PM

lol if i see Hulkster counting Ronnies glute striations i'll throw up.

lol

The ChemistV2 · « **Reply #15 on:** April 20, 2009, 02:53:40 PM »

Looks really good there. Just a few weeks from his granite-like conditioning. 1992 and 93 are my favorite Dorian years.

Necrosis · « **Reply #16 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:02:52 PM »

his quads look weak from the front, no sweep, little speration compared to top pros.

tbombz · « **Reply #17 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:26:40 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 20, 2009, 02:33:43 PM

Great find. He is on another level from anyone even to this day . this is 17 fucking years ago and no one can touch this .

Quote from: honest on April 20, 2009, 03:55:55 AM

His shape in 93 is still the benchmark for the sport, he never repeated it, but no one not even Ronnie has surpassed his shape on that day, But Coleman at his best is definately the second best physique ever presented and better than Dorian in all his other Olympia wins, but Dorian 93 is the benchmark.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #18 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:28:58 PM »

Quote from: tbombz on April 20, 2009, 04:26:40 PM

Ronnie looks amazing there , easily his best showing but in terms of the complete package Dorian has em.

tbombz · « **Reply #19 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:34:17 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 20, 2009, 04:28:58 PM

Ronnie looks amazing there , easily his best showing but in terms of the complete package Dorian has em.

if you stand them next to each other, it would be obvious ronnie PWNS. however viewing them seperate, dorian may have an edge.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:37:37 PM »

Quote from: tbombz on April 20, 2009, 04:34:17 PM

if you stand them next to each other, it would be obvious ronnie PWNS. however viewing them seperate, dorian may have an edge.

Ronnie is 247 pounds there side by side Dorian would make him look small especially when he's offseason

tbombz · « **Reply #21 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:39:17 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 20, 2009, 04:37:37 PM

Ronnie is 247 pounds there side by side Dorian would make him look small especially when he's offseason

you are basing that off of what ? and your comparing dorian offseason during what year to ronnie in contest shape or ronnie offseason and what year?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #22 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:42:42 PM »

Quote from: tbombz on April 20, 2009, 04:39:17 PM

you are basing that off of what ? and your comparing dorian offseason during what year to ronnie in contest shape or ronnie offseason and what year?

Dorian offseason would make Ronnie at 247 pounds look small . Ronnie offseason he wouldn't

Dorian in this video vs Ronnie 01 ASC he would make him look small as well as incomplete

tbombz · « **Reply #23 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:44:15 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 20, 2009, 04:42:42 PM

Dorian offseason would make Ronnie at 247 pounds look small . Ronnie offseason he wouldn't

Dorian in this video vs Ronnie 01 ASC he would make him look small as well as incomplete

im not sure what you mean with the first part

however i do not think ronnie and dorian are in the same league in these two videos. side by side ronnie would easily win, in my opinion. what weight do you think dorian is, compared to ronnies '247' ? as you know bb'ers tend to greatly over exaggerate their weight.

Hulkster · « **Reply #24 on:** April 20, 2009, 04:48:49 PM »

same old dorian..

piss poor arms.

piss poor quads.

wide waist.

great back and calves.

same old story.

the arms clasped mm is the funniest thing I have ever seen- he flexes his arms and quads and nothing happens lol

they are so poor at that point they dont even 'pop'

and you nuthuggers are orgasming over this? why? his back looks hard and cut. the rest of him is hohum.

hell - look at how poor the side chest is!

sorry. but you are sad if you think that a man with arms and quads that bad is 'complete' LOL

honestly.

just because it is a new video does not mean it is any sort of standard.

ps I will refrain from posting shot of Ronnie that crush that.

but if you want I will.

92 dorian was no Ronnie Coleman at his peak..

Author Topic: Dorian Yates 1992 guest posing, absolutely unbelievable. (Read 51391 times)

io856