LOL @ Fox business channel advertising on MSNBC

[LurkerNoMore]

Lack of reading comprehension on your part doesn't constitute exposure on my part. 

But nice try.  Next time maybe read the thread you are attempting to reply to.

[LurkerNoMore]

Do I need to remind you of who you shill for???

Since I live in FL, I neither shill nor vote for Franks.  So add one more mark to your irrelevant post count.

Hope this helps.

[Soul Crusher]

Since I live in FL, I neither shill nor vote for Franks.  So add one more mark to your irrelevant post count.

Hope this helps.

Ha ha.  How is working at Taco Bell been for you.    

[LurkerNoMore]

Ha ha.  How is working at Taco Bell been for you.    

Beats being a teleterror I would say.

[Soul Crusher]

Beats being a teleterror I would say.

Ok. I'm already up 4k for the day on a deal I closed this morning that took me less than an hours' work, before 9:30 a.m. 

Taco Bell does not pay that well.   

[LurkerNoMore]

Good for you.  Maybe you will get something out of that 4K as a commission too.

I can only imagine the prestige you deliver and awe and respect when you introduce yourself to people and inform them that you are a bill collector.  Impressive!

[Soul Crusher]

Good for you.  Maybe you will get something out of that 4K as a commission too.

I can only imagine the prestige you deliver and awe and respect when you introduce yourself to people and inform them that you are a bill collector.  Impressive!

You know what idiot, my business is doing ok because i am good at what I do and get results.

I collected 1.2 million for a concrete contractor last week from a Chinese Bank based in Hong Kong.  Do you think that some idiot could pull that off who was simply a "bill collector"? 

         

[LurkerNoMore]

Goody for you.

Since you are such an esteemed and accomplished debt chaser, if the check I got for shooting the bachelorette party in Vegas last week bounces, I will turn it over to you.  Then you sic 'em over the phone for me.

[Soul Crusher]

Goody for you.

Since you are such an esteemed and accomplished debt chaser, if the check I got for shooting the bachelorette party in Vegas last week bounces, I will turn it over to you.  Then you sic 'em over the phone for me.

I go in person as well to collect debt as well. 

[LurkerNoMore]

I go in person as well to collect debt as well. 

That's even better (as well).  Because if they don't pay up, I have some pretty good photos (as well) of two of the bridesmaids (as well) in Tao that wouldn't go over well with their fiancees (as well).  So you could certainly recruit them to help put on the pressure (as well).

[Soul Crusher]

That's even better (as well).  Because if they don't pay up, I have some pretty good photos (as well) of two of the bridesmaids (as well) in Tao that wouldn't go over well with their fiancees (as well).  So you could certainly recruit them to help put on the pressure (as well).

Ha ha nice!  Facebook should be a good first start. 

[a_joker10]

I can't read that sentence, but mainly because you're the idiot who wrote it.

Of course you didn't say it was a red or blue thing.  *I* did.  And I posted links to show stats supporting it.

Your link is from 2006 correct? Was FL red or blue 2006?  NV?  Hmmm...?

You just got assraped by your own link again and it's really getting to be pathetic. 

You are a complete idiot.

I posted data from the US census. You moron.

Crime stats aren't related to state and I proved it.
Now you ignore it and make up stuff like related census data to state politics that's fine wasn't there a gubernatorial election in 2006.

I could go by the list of democratic governors or by Senators or Congressional districts.

It all proves the same thing Red and Blue states are about even on crime.

If you want to look into it farther you need to look at county demographics.

But this beyond your small mind to comprehend.

[LurkerNoMore]

Are you disputing the data contained in your own link?

If you are saying the data you referenced isn't related to states themselves then that would throw your entire argument itself out the window.  You can't debate me when you are clueless about the data you are attempting to use in the first place.  Nice way to pwn yourself once again.  You must have a tough time sorting the voices in your head out when arguing with yourself.

[a_joker10]

Are you disputing the data contained in your own link?

If you are saying the data you referenced isn't related to states themselves then that would throw your entire argument itself out the window.  You can't debate me when you are clueless about the data you are attempting to use in the first place.  Nice way to pwn yourself once again.  You must have a tough time sorting the voices in your head out when arguing with yourself.

I am not disputing anything. The data I posted was by state.

You are trying to relate an issue to by state voting pattern. When its not.
Which I proved by counting your state totals.

Crime is regional and is based on social and economic factors.

This is exactly the same thing Body was saying about marketing. Its regional and not based by state.

You don't understand this because your an idiot.

Hope this Helps.

[LurkerNoMore]

If you put as much effort into reading and keeping up with the thread as you do backpedaling after your own post has been used against you, you wouldn't be pwned so much.

Perhaps start back over on page 1 and try again.

[a_joker10]

If you put as much effort into reading and keeping up with the thread as you do backpedaling after your own post has been used against you, you wouldn't be pwned so much.

Perhaps start back over on page 1 and try again.

Back pedaling, What.

I have said since the stat that crime is not red or blue state.

You ignore that fact and instead try to prove your own crazy theory that isn't true.

Oh well.

[GigantorX]

FAUX trying to attract smarter viewers?  Ironic considering they wouldn't watch FAUX anyway.

[LurkerNoMore]

My "theory" of red states in relation to blue states for those stats had data linked to them.  They were supported.  Even by your own link.   

Instead, you try to backpedal and split hairs as if that changes anything remotely what I have posted about since Page 1. 

Again, a little bit of effort in comprehending at the start will save you a lot more effort of nonsense at the end.

[LurkerNoMore]

After reading that well thought post and dazzling display of in depth debate skills, I can conclude you are a FAUX viewer yourself.

People who (ab)use  the little emoticons are generally those with nothing to say worthwhile in the first place.

[Soul Crusher]

After reading that well thought post and dazzling display of in depth debate skills, I can conclude you are a FAUX viewer yourself.

People who (ab)use  the little emoticons are generally those with nothing to say worthwhile in the first place.

INCLUDE ME IN THAT GROUP. 

 

[LurkerNoMore]

INCLUDE ME IN THAT GROUP. 

 

I already did.

You Repubs seem to have a common trait amongst yourself with constantly rehashing redundant material and posting methods.

[Soul Crusher]

I already did.

You Repubs seem to have a common trait amongst yourself with constantly rehashing redundant material and posting methods.

What, like not wanting to become a communist dictatorship under ZERO?

[body88]

After reading that well thought post and dazzling display of in depth debate skills, I can conclude you are a FAUX viewer yourself.

People who (ab)use  the little emoticons are generally those with nothing to say worthwhile in the first place.

You where exposed to know little to nothing about Fox's core audience.  You even thought, state derived "data" had something to do with it. Ha-ha!

[a_joker10]

My "theory" of red states in relation to blue states for those stats had data linked to them.  They were supported.  Even by your own link.   

Instead, you try to backpedal and split hairs as if that changes anything remotely what I have posted about since Page 1. 

Again, a little bit of effort in comprehending at the start will save you a lot more effort of nonsense at the end.

your an idiot that can't read. I said that that the it wasn't a red or blue state thing.

As you can well see, Washington is a blue state and is leading in property crime. Of the top 5 listed 3 are blue states.
As for violent crime Florida, Nevada, DC, Maryland, Delaware all were blue states 50-50.
That information is directly from the US census not some slanted publisher.

There are no incest stats you moron.

You moved the yardsticks by not including Florida or Nevada, yet they are blue states in 2008.

How about governors
http://www.economicexpert.com/a/List:of:United:States:Governors.htm
All democrats in 2006 TN, Louisiana, Delaware, New Mexico, DC (Virginia)
Looks like 50-50 to me.

You came up with a theory that has been disproved many times. Its alright to be wrong.

so

STFU

[Soul Crusher]

You moved the yardsticks by not including Florida or Nevada, yet they are blue states in 2008.

How about governors
http://www.economicexpert.com/a/List:of:United:States:Governors.htm
All democrats in 2006 TN, Louisiana, Delaware, New Mexico, DC (Virginia)
Looks like 50-50 to me.

You came up with a theory that has been disproved many times. Its alright to be wrong.

so

STFU

I really dont think looking at states is the issue.  Instead, we should be looking at counties since there are red states where the crime is highly solely because of massive crime in "blue" areas. 

For example, in my state of NY, most of the crime is committed in areas dominated by liberals.  Yet, there are tons of areas that are run by GOP leaders.