Author Topic: Ronnie Coleman Posing - 2001 Arnold Classic - best ever (Read 38885 times)

Hulkster · « **Reply #50 on:** July 13, 2009, 06:44:02 PM »

Quote

2001 owns 1999 ALL PROVEN FACTS

you mean all proven WRONG:

still waiting for all the pics and vids showing how much better he was at the AC than in 99.

because if what McGough says is correct, they all would show it..

still haven't seen any yet..

probably never will either..

Hulkster · « **Reply #51 on:** July 13, 2009, 06:45:18 PM »

^

gee look at that!

as always 99>>AC

ND you should find another writer to blindly follow. McGough is on crack. that much is quite clear to anyone with eyes and a brain..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #52 on:** July 13, 2009, 06:46:50 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 13, 2009, 06:44:02 PM

you mean all proven WRONG:

still waiting for all the pics and vids showing how much better he was at the AC than in 99.

because if what McGough says is correct, they all would show it..

still haven't seen any yet..

probably never will either..

McGough , Perine , Merritt , etc ALL were in attendance in 1999/2001 were you?

you see what you want they saw reality

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #53 on:** July 13, 2009, 06:48:50 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 13, 2009, 06:45:18 PM

^

gee look at that!

as always 99>>AC

ND you should find another writer to blindly follow. McGough is on crack. that much is quite clear to anyone with eyes and a brain..

Ronnie Coleman | 1999

In his first defense of the Mr. O title, Coleman exhibited size, condition and sinew-splitting fullness he lacked a year earlier. At 257 pounds, he was so separated that he looked like a walking anatomy chart. That being said, I still think he achieved his best-ever physique for the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic.

Flex Magazine August 2003

Jim Schmatltz on Ronnie chances of winning six Olympias in a row

if he repeats his 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic form, he'll experience the joy of six.

Shawn Perine Ironage Dec 11, 2004

As much as I love Haney and my IA champs, I think Ronnie circa '98 or at the 2001 Arnold is pretty much untouchable. Except by Dorian Yates 6 weeks out from the '93 O as photographed by our own KMH. Both men, on those specific occasions carried so much dry muscle mass in good proportion and with good lines that it's almost unfair to compare them to others.

Sorry NOT only McGough and this isn't including the quote from Team Flex that Neo likes to post all the time

question were you there in 1999 and 2001? YEAH I THOUGHT SO ........................ .next

Hulkster · « **Reply #54 on:** July 13, 2009, 06:56:24 PM »

ND, what you don't get is that people may prefer his 2001 streamlined smaller look over his bigger, more full 99 look. as a matter of preference only, irregardless of whether or not he was in better shape.

your not smart enough to realize this.

because if he WERE in better shape in 2001, there wouldnt be so many shots of 99 blowing away the AC pics/vids, now would there?

of course not.

yet another lesson in bodybuilding taught by Hulkster to NarcasissticDaisy..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #55 on:** July 13, 2009, 07:05:39 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 13, 2009, 06:56:24 PM

ND, what you don't get is that people may prefer his 2001 streamlined smaller look over his bigger, more full 99 look. as a matter of preference only, irregardless of whether or not he was in better shape.

your not smart enough to realize this.

because if he WERE in better shape in 2001, there wouldnt be so many shots of 99 blowing away the AC pics/vids, now would there?

of course not.

yet another lesson in bodybuilding taught by Hulkster to NarcasissticDaisy..

It's a matter of preference based on the FACT he was harder and drier

you see what you want in pics and video I see 2001 looked peeled and hard as nails and 99 NOT which coincides with the people who were actually THERE live and in person which trumps anything internet-fany-boys type

so your lesson states you sitting at home looking at pics are going to tell the paid experts with years of experience who were in attendance of both said contests are indeed wrong and you're right LMFAO

go teach your ' lessons ' to the other mental challenged people

the experts agree 2001 KILLS 1999 thanks for playing , pics and video confirm this

Hulkster · « **Reply #56 on:** July 13, 2009, 07:34:20 PM »

Quote

the experts agree 2001 KILLS 1999 thanks for playing , pics and video confirm this

they do? thats news to all of us. show us ND, post the pics and videos that confirm this

.

we are all waiting.

in the mean time, enjoy the 1999 Olympia video again: it owns you and owns 2001

http://www.dailymotion.com/tag/Coleman/video/x3w9ak_ronnie-coleman-1999-mr-olympia-part_sport

Mr.1derful · « **Reply #57 on:** July 13, 2009, 08:12:07 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 13, 2009, 07:05:39 PM

It's a matter of preference based on the FACT he was harder and drier you see what you want in pics and video I see 2001 looked peeled and hard as nails and 99 NOT which coincides with the people who were actually THERE live and in person which trumps anything internet-fany-boys type

so your lesson states you sitting at home looking at pics are going to tell the paid experts with years of experience who were in attendance of both said contests are indeed wrong and you're right LMFAO

go teach your ' lessons ' to the other mental challenged people

the experts agree 2001 KILLS 1999 thanks for playing , pics and video confirm this

I agree.

YoungBlood · « **Reply #58 on:** July 13, 2009, 08:35:42 PM »

Man, I wonder how many of ND's 27k post, and Hulksters 18k posts, are the two of them arguing back and forth about Ronnie's best shape and/or Dorian being better than Ronnie.....

....if they had a nickel for every time the argument cropped up or one of them hi-jacked a thread about the aforementioned subjects....fuck they could have a Derek Anthony G4P session!

DeketheCreep · « **Reply #59 on:** July 13, 2009, 08:56:53 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 13, 2009, 06:42:22 PM

That was funny today

i saw Bruno today,so i had to post that
''My shtinkenholler would look like Louis Armstrong doing a trumpet solo''

WillGrant · « **Reply #60 on:** July 13, 2009, 11:17:34 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 13, 2009, 07:54:48 AM

well, I have long maintained that he was better at the 99 olympia,

despite the fact that the nuthuggers (ie ND) love to shove a quote from Peter McGough claiming otherwise down our throats

most people on all the boards say the same thing when shown the two clips. less of a gut, bigger, just as hard etc.

compare ronnie AC to the 99 olympia prejudging and its quite clear he was better and bigger in 1999:

http://www.dailymotion.com/tag/Coleman/video/x3w9ak_ronnie-coleman-1999-mr-olympia-part_sport

Obsessed much

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #61 on:** July 13, 2009, 11:29:46 PM »

He looks better than Dorian ever did in both contests...just sayin

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #62 on:** July 14, 2009, 01:22:08 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 13, 2009, 07:34:20 PM

they do? thats news to all of us. show us ND, post the pics and videos that confirm this .

we are all waiting.

in the mean time, enjoy the 1999 Olympia video again: it owns you and owns 2001

http://www.dailymotion.com/tag/Coleman/video/x3w9ak_ronnie-coleman-1999-mr-olympia-part_sport

Oh the 99 video posted by Bizzy who Kevin Horton BUSTED

Hulkster's M.O.

make a contradictory claim
deny the experts who were there
posts pics and say ' see '
use personal attacks

you're so stupid and predictable . there is a very good reason why the experts agree 2001 is Ronnie's best showing you have a long history of denial & ignorance so keep spouting your nonsense I;ll keep correcting it and pointing it out

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #63 on:** July 14, 2009, 01:27:10 AM »

Quote from: YoungBlood on July 13, 2009, 08:35:42 PM

Man, I wonder how many of ND's 27k post, and Hulksters 18k posts, are the two of them arguing back and forth about Ronnie's best shape and/or Dorian being better than Ronnie.....

....if they had a nickel for every time the argument cropped up or one of them hi-jacked a thread about the aforementioned subjects....fuck they could have a Derek Anthony G4P session!

Unlike Hulkster I'm not a one trick pony , I post on a lot of other topics he doesn't , his whole GetBig career is bashing Yates , sucking Ronnie's balls and chasing me around .

Hulkster · « **Reply #64 on:** July 14, 2009, 05:01:22 AM »

Quote from: Groink on July 13, 2009, 11:29:46 PM

He looks better than Dorian ever did in both contests...just sayin

obviously. its only those who have no clue (the few nuthugggers) who think otherwise..

Hulkster · « **Reply #65 on:** July 14, 2009, 05:56:09 AM »

Quote from: Mr.1derful on July 13, 2009, 08:12:07 PM

I agree.

you agree with ND on everything. you are his bitch.

Hulkster · « **Reply #66 on:** July 14, 2009, 10:05:51 AM »

Quote

so your lesson states you sitting at home looking at pics are going to tell the paid experts with years of experience who were in attendance of both said contests are indeed wrong and you're right LMFAO

LOL so now everything the experts say must be automatically true, even if real life shows otherwise.

okay ND, that means in your fantasy world:

ronnie was never injured
ronnie should have won the 2007 olympia
Flex Wheeler really had 0.00% bodyfat and arms bigger than his waist
Dorian's torn bi made no overall difference
dorian was harder precontest than ronnie ever was
etc.

need I go on?

its amazing you can type shit this stupid..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #67 on:** July 14, 2009, 12:38:06 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 14, 2009, 10:05:51 AM

LOL so now everything the experts say must be automatically true, even if real life shows otherwise.

okay ND, that means in your fantasy world:

ronnie was never injured
ronnie should have won the 2007 olympia
Flex Wheeler really had 0.00% bodyfat and arms bigger than his waist
Dorian's torn bi made no overall difference
dorian was harder precontest than ronnie ever was
etc.

need I go on?

its amazing you can type shit this stupid..

What's amazing is how stupid you sound when you type ' real life ' you weren't there , therefore you have absolutely NO perspective on real life

YOU are always in stark and direct opposition on what the experts say , always... you are consistently wrong in your opinions which means the obvious..you don't know what the fuck you're talking about ( old news ) and then have the audacity to say those who do are wrong despite never once being at any event anywhere anytime LMFAO

I'll leave your stupidity to stand on it's own to legs

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #68 on:** July 14, 2009, 12:41:43 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 14, 2009, 05:56:09 AM

you agree with ND on everything. you are his bitch.

No , no YOU are my bitch

which is exactly why YOU follow me around just like one I hurt

Hulkster · « **Reply #69 on:** July 14, 2009, 12:56:34 PM »

still waiting for the pics and vids ND.

show us how much better Ronnie was in 01 than at the 99 Olympia LOL

it should be pretty easy to do.

something tells me we will be waiting here a loooooonnggg time LOL

you cant produce as always.

how sad.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #70 on:** July 14, 2009, 12:59:43 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 14, 2009, 12:56:34 PM

still waiting for the pics and vids ND.

show us how much better Ronnie was in 01 than at the 99 Olympia LOL

it should be pretty easy to do.

something tells me we will be waiting here a loooooonnggg time LOL

you cant produce as always.

how sad.

Did you read the title of this thread? 2001 BEST EVER lmfao stick 1999 up your ass kid

I'm still waiting Hulkster for the avalanche of quotes all hailing 1999 as Ronnie's best showing ever LMFAO I asked for these years ago and I'm still waiting

the paid experts agree 2001 murders 1999 , Ronnie even said his best Olympia was 1998 HE DOESN'T EVEN AGREE WITH YOU

owned

Hulkster · « **Reply #71 on:** July 14, 2009, 01:01:43 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 14, 2009, 12:38:06 PM

What's amazing is how stupid you sound when you type ' real life ' you weren't there , therefore you have absolutely NO perspective on real life

YOU are always in stark and direct opposition on what the experts say , always... you are consistently wrong in your opinions which means the obvious..you don't know what the fuck you're talking about ( old news ) and then have the audacity to say those who do are wrong despite never once being at any event anywhere anytime LMFAO

I'll leave your stupidity to stand on it's own to legs

actually, as always, real life is in stark contrast to what McGough and a few others say about 2001.

this might help you see reality:

as always, 99 is far better:

Hulkster · « **Reply #72 on:** July 14, 2009, 01:02:43 PM »

^

lol look at the lack of detail in 2001 compared to 99.

this is just so damn easy.

will there EVER be any proof that Ronnie was better in 01 than in 99?

answer: fuck no.

Hulkster · « **Reply #73 on:** July 14, 2009, 01:03:52 PM »

the comparisons in this thread a fantastic example of how talk is cheap and most of it is total bullshit.

thank god reality trumps human verbal bullshit every single time

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #74 on:** July 14, 2009, 01:06:39 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 14, 2009, 01:01:43 PM

actually, as always, real life is in stark contrast to what McGough and a few others say about 2001.

this might help you see reality:

as always, 99 is far better:

were you at the 1999 Mr Olympia and the 2001 Arnold Classic? let me answer for you NO

don't talk about reality dummy , run along and make up some more bullshit like Ronnie was grainer than Dorian