Ronnie Coleman Posing - 2001 Arnold Classic - best ever

[NarcissisticDeity]

the comparisons in this thread a fantastic example of how talk is cheap and most of it is total bullshit.

thank god reality trumps human verbal bullshit every single time

IRONY alert

talk is cheap especially coming from internet-fan-boys who were NEVER at either contest 

to quote Bob Chick

Bob Chick GetBig Jan 15 , 2007

The judges made their decision based on what they saw live and in person. Pictures mean nothing as they can be deceiving...

[Hulkster]

I find ND's avoidance of comparisons between the two contests quite telling.

he knows damn well all the comparisons show that the words of a few are wrong.

and here is another one for you, just another in an endless string of comparisons, all showing the same thing:

[YoungBlood]

Unlike Hulkster I'm not a one trick pony , I post on a lot of other topics he doesn't , his whole GetBig career is bashing Yates , sucking Ronnie's balls and chasing me around .

You don't have to worry about that, at least with me. I fully realize the situation, and who is/does what.
I'm beginning to think that Hulkster is either Ronnie himself, or certainly a man that lives vicariously through Ronnie.

[Hulkster]

IRONY alert

talk is cheap especially coming from internet-fan-boys who were NEVER at either contest 

to quote Bob Chick

Bob Chick GetBig Jan 15 , 2007

The judges made their decision based on what they saw live and in person. Pictures mean nothing as they can be deceiving...

no, one or two sets of comparisons can be deceiving

but countless sets and both videos? come on!

thats being incredibly naive. and stupid.

if 2001 KLLS 99 as you say, it would be damn obvious in almost all the comparisons and vids.

and it isnt.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I find ND's avoidance of comparisons between the two contests quite telling.

he knows damn well all the comparisons show that the words of a few are wrong.

and here is another one for you, just another in an endless string of comparisons, all showing the same thing:

perfect example of what I'm talking about , Hulkster the dummy hand selecting a pic to TRY and make it seem 2001 he sucked LMFAO how sad especially considering how many high quality 2001 pics there are but then again you're so desperate to TRY and prove the experts wrong you need to sink to these levels

[NarcissisticDeity]

no, one or two sets of comparisons can be deceiving

but countless sets and both videos? come on!

thats being incredibly naive. and stupid.

if 2001 KLLS 99 as you say, it would be damn obvious in almost all the comparisons and vids.

and it isnt.

yes exactly which is why 1999 Mr Olympia is considered by ALL the experts to be Ronnie's best showing ever , it's a general consensus , hey wait NO IT"S NOT LMFAO

you don't know what you're talking about , you ONLY think you do

experts own Hulkster 

[NarcissisticDeity]

You don't have to worry about that, at least with me. I fully realize the situation, and who is/does what.
I'm beginning to think that Hulkster is either Ronnie himself, or certainly a man that lives vicariously through Ronnie.

lol he's on Ronnies payroll , wait no that's Ronnie's balls he's on 

[NarcissisticDeity]

A Hulkster comparison

" See look at all the overwhelming evidence it's clear as day " 

pics are deceiving , NOTHING replaces real life and all the experts agree 2001 is better than 1999

thanks for playing Hulkster

[Meso_z]

[Hulkster]

whats really hilarious about all this, is that we actually have VIDEOS from both contests..LOL

and what do they show? well, I think its quite clear..LMAO

[TrapsMcLats]

why do we still not have the pro-shot vid of ronnie's 01 AC form up on youtube?

[Hulkster]

probably because it shows he wasn't as good as he was in 1999

[Mr.1derful]

probably because it shows he wasn't as good as he was in 1999

You're utterly clueless.  Why is it so preposterous to believe that the 01 Arnold showing was more conditioned than the '99 Olympia, considering that contest reports stated that Ronnie's condition at the 98 Olympia was dryer than '99?  That serves as one more example where his '99 form was not heralded as his best ever, by people who saw him firsthand.  Though I'll readily admit, that pics from the '01 Arnold, nor any contest can compare to your typical sharpened offerings.    

[Hulkster]

Why is it so preposterous to believe that the 01 Arnold showing was more conditioned than the '99 Olympia

because all the pics and videos show that he wasn't. granted, he was not far off, but he was also smaller. and with a bigger gut. hence, the 99 look is better overall.

its that simple.

there is no magic to this.

if Ronnie was way softer in 99 than at the AC, you would see it IMMEDIATELY in comparing the pics and videos, just like you do in every other comparison in the history of the sport when someone is not in the best shape compared to another showing.

why are you guys insisting that this particular comparison between the two contests is somehow different than any other comparison? LOL

 

[Hulkster]

You're utterly clueless.

this coming from Flowerboy's shadow aka bitch

do you even read ND's posts before blindly agreeing with them? LOL

 

[TrapsMcLats]

The reason people liked ronnie's 01 form was because he had a slight layer of water (hear me out), and when he posed/flexed, amazing things happened.  It was like night and day between relaxed and flexed, so it had a very dramatic effect. that's what lead people ot think so highly of his 01 form.  Only a guy of ronnie's ability could make being off (relatively speaking) seem like such a cool effect, but that is the reality of it.  Just watch that video.  it is quite plain to see that ronnie goes from smooth to striated when flexing.  very neat to watch, but not as sharp as he had previously been.  99 0 was his best, its not that hard to see.  I've been to a few pro shows in my day, pics don't lie that much.... and not at all when it comes to conditioning.  Pics only lie when it comes to dimension (which is why the nasser lovers don't get why dorian and ronnie destroyed him from a judging criteria... i'll admit nassers aesthetics in certain poses are impressive, but there's more to judging than aesthetics), but certainly not when it comes to conditioning. 

Anyone who thinks hulksters videos are sharpened needs to check out the dvd, there's nothing altered about them at all.  the only thing unnatural about that video is how peeled ronnie is. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

because all the pics and videos show that he wasn't. granted, he was not far off, but he was also smaller. and with a bigger gut. hence, the 99 look is better overall.

its that simple.

there is no magic to this.

if Ronnie was way softer in 99 than at the AC, you would see it IMMEDIATELY in comparing the pics and videos, just like you do in every other comparison in the history of the sport when someone is not in the best shape compared to another showing.

why are you guys insisting that this particular comparison between the two contests is somehow different than any other comparison? LOL

 

All the experts disagree kid as usual you don't know what you're talking about you only think you do 

Hulkster you can NEVER EVER speak on what good conditioning is and isn't , why? because you simply don't know what you're talking about . YOU claimed Dorian at among his absolute best lost to a less conditioned Flex in 1993 PROOF POSITIVE you don't know what conditioning is

YOU have stated Dorian was never as ' grainy ' as Ronnie Coleman was in 1999 lmmfao PROOF POSITIVE you don't know what great conditioning is

YOU have stated Dorian's conditioning was nothing more than a ' myth ' PROOF POSITIVE you don't know what great conditioning is

as usual YOU are in complete denial of all the experts who were there , another arm chair quarterback who thinks he knows what he's talking about.

[NarcissisticDeity]

You're utterly clueless.  Why is it so preposterous to believe that the 01 Arnold showing was more conditioned than the '99 Olympia, considering that contest reports stated that Ronnie's condition at the 98 Olympia was dryer than '99?  That serves as one more example where his '99 form was not heralded as his best ever, by people who saw him firsthand.  Though I'll readily admit, that pics from the '01 Arnold, nor any contest can compare to your typical sharpened offerings.    

He is clueless , he's flat out wrong as usual another internet-fan-boy who thinks he's figured it all out from his PC hahahahahahah he can't get one single person to say 1999 is his best showing , hell Ronnie even said he was better conditioned in 1998 and you guessed it Hulkster the fan-boy dismissed him too lmfao

Hulkster has a long history of being wrong and being proven wrong , what's he gonna say? he has to stick to this story remember when he claimed 1999 Grand Prix Coleman was his best ever until he found out it was just the complimentary lighting lmfao now we don't hear much from him on that show anymore

[NarcissisticDeity]

this coming from Flowerboy's shadow aka bitch

do you even read ND's posts before blindly agreeing with them? LOL

 

This is know when you have Hulkster when he resorts to personal attacks because he can't counter your argument , that's when you fold and admit you're just an internet-fan-boy

if anyone is my bitch it's you for getting abused for years 

[Hulkster]

99 0 was his best, its not that hard to see.  I've been to a few pro shows in my day, pics don't lie that much....

exactly. are you reading this Flowerboy?

Anyone who thinks hulksters videos are sharpened needs to check out the dvd, there's nothing altered about them at all.  the only thing unnatural about that video is how peeled ronnie is. 

thank you.

are you reading this Flowerboy?

ND is now on suicide watch.

 

[Hulkster]

The reason people liked ronnie's 01 form was because he had a slight layer of water (hear me out), and when he posed/flexed, amazing things happened.  It was like night and day between relaxed and flexed, so it had a very dramatic effect. that's what lead people ot think so highly of his 01 form.  Only a guy of ronnie's ability could make being off (relatively speaking) seem like such a cool effect, but that is the reality of it.  Just watch that video.  it is quite plain to see that ronnie goes from smooth to striated when flexing.  very neat to watch, but not as sharp as he had previously been.  99 0 was his best, its not that hard to see.  I've been to a few pro shows in my day, pics don't lie that much.... and not at all when it comes to conditioning.  Pics only lie when it comes to dimension (which is why the nasser lovers don't get why dorian and ronnie destroyed him from a judging criteria... i'll admit nassers aesthetics in certain poses are impressive, but there's more to judging than aesthetics), but certainly not when it comes to conditioning. 

Anyone who thinks hulksters videos are sharpened needs to check out the dvd, there's nothing altered about them at all.  the only thing unnatural about that video is how peeled ronnie is. 

read carefully Flower Boy and bitches.

[Immortal_Technique]

IRONY alert

talk is cheap especially coming from internet-fan-boys who were NEVER at either contest 

to quote Bob Chick

Bob Chick GetBig Jan 15 , 2007

The judges made their decision based on what they saw live and in person. Pictures mean nothing as they can be deceiving...

Were you at these shows? Sorry I didn't realise.

[Hulkster]

99 0 was his best, its not that hard to see.

it is if your blind and easily influenced, like ND..apparently.

 

[Hulkster]

if Peter McGough argued that the sky was purple, ND would argue to the death that he was correct, regardless of what he saw when he looked outside..

that much is quite clear..

so sad.

[affeman]

Best arm/delt separation on any human ever. Look how the delts are sticking out lateral