While I am glad for Milos that he has been vindicated somewhat, being that what he alleged has apparently turned out to be true. However, in going forward with allegations of this nature, one must follow a certain protocol.
People can opine that Milos would have received the same treatment regardless, but we really can't know that for sure. At one time or another, we've seen pro athletes in different sports federations receiving suspensions for airing complaints or allegations in a public way. This isn't terribly different. Going through proper channels to address the situation is par for the course in most sports leagues, regardless of the possible validity of the claims being brought forth. Unfortunately, by going about things as he did, and despite how one may even admire some of the fortitude in doing so, Milos has lost a great deal as a result. Upsetting, I'm sure, when one is trying to do the right thing, but not entirely hard to understand considering the chosen method of doing so.