More Liberal Censorship

[Soul Crusher]

[Soul Crusher]

[Soul Crusher]

[illuminati]

Yet some mind numbed retards on here still believe the election
was fair & not interfered with 

Yep the man who hid under his table & didnt campaign broke every voting
record ever in the USA - 

[Soul Crusher]

Yet some mind numbed retards on here still believe the election
was fair & not interfered with 

Yep the man who hid under his table & didnt campaign broke every voting
record ever in the USA - 

They are in a cult

[illuminati]

They are in a cult

It appears that way - As any semblance of normal rational thinking
has been removed.

[Soul Crusher]

http://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2023/11/06/documents_shed_new_light_on_feds_collusion_with_private_actors_to_police_speech_on_social_media_990672.html

[Dos Equis]

February 6, 2024

Why Burn Books When You Can Bury Them? The White House Pressured Amazon to Target Dissenting Books

The House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government on Monday revealed yet another facet of the Biden Administration’s sprawling censorship system that targeted dissenting books. It appears that, as with social media companies, it succeeded in getting the company not to promote disfavored books.

Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan revealed on X that the White House was directly involved in the censorship campaign. That includes a 2021 email from one Biden official asking to discuss “the high levels of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation of [sic] Amazon?”

Amazon in turn appears to ask only how high the Biden White House wants it to jump on censorship: “s the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books, or are they more concerned about search results/order (or both)?”

After the meeting, Amazon confirmed in an email that it was actively doing what the government demanded in suppressing sales by not promoting disfavored books: “As a reminder, we did enable Do Not Promote for anti-vax books whose primary purpose is to persuade readers vaccines are unsafe or ineffective on 3/9, and will review additional handling options for these books with you.”

This effort notably parallels demands from Democratic leaders who have called for enlightened algorithms to frame what citizens access on the internet. In 2021, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) objected that people were not listening to the informed views of herself and leading experts. Instead, they were reading views of skeptics by searching Amazon and finding books by “prominent spreaders of misinformation.”

Warren blamed Amazon for failing to limit searches or choices: “This pattern and practice of misbehavior suggests that Amazon is either unwilling or unable to modify its business practices to prevent the spread of falsehoods or the sale of inappropriate products.” In her letter, Warren gave the company 14 days to change its algorithms to throttle and obstruct efforts to read opposing views.

It is important to keep in mind that these efforts at censorship targeted scientists who have been vindicated in many of their objections to policies and claims of the government. For example, a new scientific review by  12 researchers from leading universities found little support for the claims that masks reduced Covid exposures.

The Centers for Disease and Control Prevention (CDC) initially rejected the use of a mask mandate. However, the issue became a political weapon as politicians and the press claimed that questioning masks was anti-science and even unhinged. In April 2020, the CDC reversed its position and called for the masking of the entire population, including children as young as 2 years old.  The mask mandate and other pandemic measures like the closing of schools are now cited as fueling emotional and developmental problems in children.

The closing of schools and businesses was also challenged by some critics as unnecessary. Many of those critics were also censored. It now appears that they may have been right. Many countries did not close schools and did not experience increases in Covid. However, we are now facing alarming drops in testing scores and alarming rises in medical illness among the young.

Masks became a major social and political dividing line in politics and the media. Maskless people were chased from stores and denounced in Congress. Then-CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield said during a Senate hearing that “face masks are the most important powerful health tool we have.”

The head of the World Health Organization even supported censorship to combat what he called an “infodemic.”

A lawsuit opposing these efforts was filed by Missouri and Louisiana and joined by leading experts, including Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya (Stanford University) and Martin Kulldorff (Harvard University). Yet, universities joined social media companies and politicians in targeting dissenters and silencing opposing voices.

Bhattacharya previously objected to the suspension of Dr. Clare Craig after she raised concerns about Pfizer trial documents. Those doctors were the co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated for a more focused Covid response that targeted the most vulnerable population rather than widespread lockdowns and mandates. Many are now questioning the efficacy and cost of the massive lockdown as well as the real value of masks or the rejection of natural immunities as an alternative to vaccination.  Yet, these experts and others were attacked for such views just a year ago. Some found themselves censored on social media for challenging claims of Dr. Fauci and others.

The media has quietly acknowledged the science questioning mask efficacy and school closures without addressing its own role in attacking those who raised these objections. Even raising the lab theory on the origin of Covid 19 (a theory now treated as plausible) was denounced as a conspiracy theory. The science and health reporter for the New York Times, Apoorva Mandavilli,  even denounced the theory as “racist.”

Again, the objection to the censorship system is not that all of these views are correct, but that the public was being actively hampered in reading or hearing opposing views.

The new emails also show direct federal efforts supporting censorship. I testified at the first hearing by the special committee investigating the censorship system. I warned that there was ample evidence of a system based on “censorship by surrogate” where government agencies used academic and media allies to silence those with opposing views.

Despite the determined opposition by Democratic members and the Biden Administration, the investigation has revealed a wide array of grants to academic and third party organizations to create blacklists or to pressure advertisers to withdraw support for conservative sites. The subjects for censorship ranged from election fraud to social justice to climate change.

Now we can add private demands to target dissenting books to suppress sales. It is far more appealing to certain sensibilities than banning publications or removing copies.  After all, why burn books if you can bury them?

https://jonathanturley.org/2024/02/06/why-burn-books-when-you-can-bury-them-the-biden-administration-pressured-amazon-on-suppressing-sales-on-dissenting-books/

[Soul Crusher]

And liberals have the shameless nerve to accuse others of fascism.   

February 6, 2024

Why Burn Books When You Can Bury Them? The White House Pressured Amazon to Target Dissenting Books

The House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government on Monday revealed yet another facet of the Biden Administration’s sprawling censorship system that targeted dissenting books. It appears that, as with social media companies, it succeeded in getting the company not to promote disfavored books.

Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan revealed on X that the White House was directly involved in the censorship campaign. That includes a 2021 email from one Biden official asking to discuss “the high levels of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation of [sic] Amazon?”

Amazon in turn appears to ask only how high the Biden White House wants it to jump on censorship: “s the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books, or are they more concerned about search results/order (or both)?”

After the meeting, Amazon confirmed in an email that it was actively doing what the government demanded in suppressing sales by not promoting disfavored books: “As a reminder, we did enable Do Not Promote for anti-vax books whose primary purpose is to persuade readers vaccines are unsafe or ineffective on 3/9, and will review additional handling options for these books with you.”

This effort notably parallels demands from Democratic leaders who have called for enlightened algorithms to frame what citizens access on the internet. In 2021, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) objected that people were not listening to the informed views of herself and leading experts. Instead, they were reading views of skeptics by searching Amazon and finding books by “prominent spreaders of misinformation.”

Warren blamed Amazon for failing to limit searches or choices: “This pattern and practice of misbehavior suggests that Amazon is either unwilling or unable to modify its business practices to prevent the spread of falsehoods or the sale of inappropriate products.” In her letter, Warren gave the company 14 days to change its algorithms to throttle and obstruct efforts to read opposing views.

It is important to keep in mind that these efforts at censorship targeted scientists who have been vindicated in many of their objections to policies and claims of the government. For example, a new scientific review by  12 researchers from leading universities found little support for the claims that masks reduced Covid exposures.

The Centers for Disease and Control Prevention (CDC) initially rejected the use of a mask mandate. However, the issue became a political weapon as politicians and the press claimed that questioning masks was anti-science and even unhinged. In April 2020, the CDC reversed its position and called for the masking of the entire population, including children as young as 2 years old.  The mask mandate and other pandemic measures like the closing of schools are now cited as fueling emotional and developmental problems in children.

The closing of schools and businesses was also challenged by some critics as unnecessary. Many of those critics were also censored. It now appears that they may have been right. Many countries did not close schools and did not experience increases in Covid. However, we are now facing alarming drops in testing scores and alarming rises in medical illness among the young.

Masks became a major social and political dividing line in politics and the media. Maskless people were chased from stores and denounced in Congress. Then-CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield said during a Senate hearing that “face masks are the most important powerful health tool we have.”

The head of the World Health Organization even supported censorship to combat what he called an “infodemic.”

A lawsuit opposing these efforts was filed by Missouri and Louisiana and joined by leading experts, including Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya (Stanford University) and Martin Kulldorff (Harvard University). Yet, universities joined social media companies and politicians in targeting dissenters and silencing opposing voices.

Bhattacharya previously objected to the suspension of Dr. Clare Craig after she raised concerns about Pfizer trial documents. Those doctors were the co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated for a more focused Covid response that targeted the most vulnerable population rather than widespread lockdowns and mandates. Many are now questioning the efficacy and cost of the massive lockdown as well as the real value of masks or the rejection of natural immunities as an alternative to vaccination.  Yet, these experts and others were attacked for such views just a year ago. Some found themselves censored on social media for challenging claims of Dr. Fauci and others.

The media has quietly acknowledged the science questioning mask efficacy and school closures without addressing its own role in attacking those who raised these objections. Even raising the lab theory on the origin of Covid 19 (a theory now treated as plausible) was denounced as a conspiracy theory. The science and health reporter for the New York Times, Apoorva Mandavilli,  even denounced the theory as “racist.”

Again, the objection to the censorship system is not that all of these views are correct, but that the public was being actively hampered in reading or hearing opposing views.

The new emails also show direct federal efforts supporting censorship. I testified at the first hearing by the special committee investigating the censorship system. I warned that there was ample evidence of a system based on “censorship by surrogate” where government agencies used academic and media allies to silence those with opposing views.

Despite the determined opposition by Democratic members and the Biden Administration, the investigation has revealed a wide array of grants to academic and third party organizations to create blacklists or to pressure advertisers to withdraw support for conservative sites. The subjects for censorship ranged from election fraud to social justice to climate change.

Now we can add private demands to target dissenting books to suppress sales. It is far more appealing to certain sensibilities than banning publications or removing copies.  After all, why burn books if you can bury them?

https://jonathanturley.org/2024/02/06/why-burn-books-when-you-can-bury-them-the-biden-administration-pressured-amazon-on-suppressing-sales-on-dissenting-books/

[Dos Equis]

Tucker Carlson claims he was banned from speaking at his prep school Alma Mater despite offering to provide armed guards amid fears 'people could be killed'
Tucker Carlson was banned from attending his Alma Mater to speak to students
Staff from St George's School said that if he came to campus, 'people could be killed'
Carlson spoke to students on Zoom and recorded the session which has been shared online
By EMMA RICHTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED:  1 April 2024
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13258643/tucker-carlson-st-georges-prep-school-killed-banned.html

[Soul Crusher]

[illuminati]

WTF - Ah Diddums must'n upset the easily triggered Leftists
Bring back the quiet rooms & counsellors 

[Dos Equis]

There was a time when networks and newspapers just reported the news.  Those days are gone.  The media has now openly admitted that they have an obligation to insert their opinions. 

[Dos Equis]

Parents Sue School Board After School Suspends Student For Saying ‘Illegal Aliens’
HAILEY GOMEZ
GENERAL ASSIGNMENT REPORTER
May 07, 2024
https://dailycaller.com/2024/05/07/davidson-county-board-education-lawsuit-suspension-christian-mcghee-illegal-aliens-liberty-justice-center/?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=offthepress&utm_campaign=home

[illuminati]

Parents Sue School Board After School Suspends Student For Saying ‘Illegal Aliens’
HAILEY GOMEZ
GENERAL ASSIGNMENT REPORTER
May 07, 2024
https://dailycaller.com/2024/05/07/davidson-county-board-education-lawsuit-suspension-christian-mcghee-illegal-aliens-liberty-justice-center/?utm_source=referral&utm_medium=offthepress&utm_campaign=home

It is absolute Fucking idiocy & Madness - I detest these Khvnts banning / prosecuting folk for
Using Fucking words they deem the don't like.

[Gym Rat]

[Skeletor]

Why did both state and regime apparatus try to hide this manifesto when in other cases where the killer suited their agenda's profile better the information was released instantly? This is an interesting 1st Amendment case too.

Judge sets hearing over alleged leak of Nashville school-shooter info to conservative outlet



 Tennessee judge has ordered a conservative news organization to appear in court over publishing details from allegedly leaked documents about a 2023 Nashville school shooting, while the outlet sues for the same kind of records to be released to the public.

On June 10, Nashville Chancellor I’Ashea Myles set a June 17 hearing for Star News Digital Media and editor-in-chief Michael Patrick Leahy to explain why their recent work on The Covenant School shooter has not violated court orders that could subject them to contempt proceedings and sanctions. She cited the “alleged publication of certain purported documents and information” under seal with the judge in the public-records case.

The Tennessee Star, a Star News publication, says the claim that the Star violated a court order is inaccurate. In part, it reasoned in a story June 11 that it didn’t publish any of the actual leaked images or documents — only some information contained within them.

The shooter who killed three 9-year-old children and three adults in March 2023 at Covenant, a private Christian school, left behind at least 20 journals, a suicide note and an unpublished memoir, according to court filings. Despite the ongoing lawsuits, the documents had already been the subject of leaks.

A few pages of one journal were leaked to a conservative commentator who posted them to social media in November. Part of the interest in the records stems from the fact that the shooter, who police say was biologically female, may have been a transgender man.


https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/post/judge-sets-hearing-over-alleged-leak-of-nashville-school-shooter-info-to-conservative-outlet/

[Moontrane]

Why did both state and regime apparatus try to hide this manifesto when in other cases where the killer suited their agenda's profile better the information was released instantly? This is an interesting 1st Amendment case too.

Judge sets hearing over alleged leak of Nashville school-shooter info to conservative outlet



 Tennessee judge has ordered a conservative news organization to appear in court over publishing details from allegedly leaked documents about a 2023 Nashville school shooting, while the outlet sues for the same kind of records to be released to the public.

On June 10, Nashville Chancellor I’Ashea Myles set a June 17 hearing for Star News Digital Media and editor-in-chief Michael Patrick Leahy to explain why their recent work on The Covenant School shooter has not violated court orders that could subject them to contempt proceedings and sanctions. She cited the “alleged publication of certain purported documents and information” under seal with the judge in the public-records case.

The Tennessee Star, a Star News publication, says the claim that the Star violated a court order is inaccurate. In part, it reasoned in a story June 11 that it didn’t publish any of the actual leaked images or documents — only some information contained within them.

The shooter who killed three 9-year-old children and three adults in March 2023 at Covenant, a private Christian school, left behind at least 20 journals, a suicide note and an unpublished memoir, according to court filings. Despite the ongoing lawsuits, the documents had already been the subject of leaks.

A few pages of one journal were leaked to a conservative commentator who posted them to social media in November. Part of the interest in the records stems from the fact that the shooter, who police say was biologically female, may have been a transgender man.


https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/post/judge-sets-hearing-over-alleged-leak-of-nashville-school-shooter-info-to-conservative-outlet/

The Pentagon Papers were classified top secret and were leaked to the NY Times, which published them.  A SCOTUS decision affirmed the Times’ right to publish them.

I don’t see how the judge can make a legal objection to the publication of excerpts of the manifesto.

[Dos Equis]

Elon Musk is hilarious.     He shared a Kamala Harris AI video.  Gavin Newsom got butt hurt and threatened an unconstitutional response, in typical leftist/fascist form.  This is Musk's response. 



Here is the video:

https://x.com/MrReaganUSA/status/1816826660089733492

[Dos Equis]

The most chilling words today: I’m from NewsGuard and I am here to rate you
BY JONATHAN TURLEY, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR - 07/27/24
https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/4795501-newsguard-censorship-conservative-speech/

[Skeletor]

Elon Musk is hilarious.     He shared a Kamala Harris AI video.  Gavin Newsom got butt hurt and threatened an unconstitutional response, in typical leftist/fascist form.  This is Musk's response. 



Here is the video:

https://x.com/MrReaganUSA/status/1816826660089733492

Hahaha!

"Renowned world authority, Professor Suggon Deeznutz"

[Dos Equis]

Leftists are unable to just operate on a level playing field and let their ideas win the day.  They have to suppress and demonize opposing viewpoints to gain traction. 

Earlier this week, Breitbart News reported it was discovered that Google had “hidden autocomplete suggestions related to the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump”:

Breitbart News tested Google’s search bar on Sunday, finding that typing in the words “assassination attempt” resulted in autocomplete suggestions of “truman,” “reagan,” “fidel castro,” “slovakia,” “bob marley,” “lenin,” “gerald ford,” “teddy roosevelt,” “saudi arabia,” “john paul ii,” and “franklin roosevelt.”

Taking it a step further by typing in “assassination attempt trum” — omitting only the last letter of President Trump’s surname — resulted in autocomplete suggestions of “truman,” “president truman,” and “harry truman.”

Two days later Google claimed “auto-complete is currently not working as intended” and that they are “working on improvements.”

Nolte: Trump Blasts Google and Facebook for ‘Rigging Election’ with Shooting Cover-Up
JOHN NOLTE
30 Jul 2024
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/07/30/nolte-trump-blasts-google-facebook-rigging-election-shooting-cover-up/

[illuminati]

Leftists are unable to just operate on a level playing field and let their ideas win the day.  They have to suppress and demonize opposing viewpoints to gain traction. 

Earlier this week, Breitbart News reported it was discovered that Google had “hidden autocomplete suggestions related to the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump”:

Breitbart News tested Google’s search bar on Sunday, finding that typing in the words “assassination attempt” resulted in autocomplete suggestions of “truman,” “reagan,” “fidel castro,” “slovakia,” “bob marley,” “lenin,” “gerald ford,” “teddy roosevelt,” “saudi arabia,” “john paul ii,” and “franklin roosevelt.”

Taking it a step further by typing in “assassination attempt trum” — omitting only the last letter of President Trump’s surname — resulted in autocomplete suggestions of “truman,” “president truman,” and “harry truman.”

Two days later Google claimed “auto-complete is currently not working as intended” and that they are “working on improvements.”

Nolte: Trump Blasts Google and Facebook for ‘Rigging Election’ with Shooting Cover-Up
JOHN NOLTE
30 Jul 2024
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/07/30/nolte-trump-blasts-google-facebook-rigging-election-shooting-cover-up/

Fuck Google & Facebook both Corrupt & traitorous

[Dos Equis]

Leftists do not tolerate opposing viewpoints.


Curtis Houck
@CurtisHouck
The Washington Post’s Cleve Wootson: “One more,
@ElonMusk
 is slated to interview [@realDonaldTrump] tomorrow — tonight on — on @X

. I don't know if the president is going to — feel free to say if he is or not — but I — I think that misinformation on Twitter is not just a campaign issue. It's a — you know, it's an America issue. What role does the White House or the President have any sort of stopping that or stopping the spread of that or sort of inter — intervening in that. Some of that was about campaign misinformation, but you know it's a wider thing, right?”

KJP: “Yeah, no, I mean, you've heard us talk about this many times from here about the responsibilities that social media platforms have when it comes to misinformation, disinformation. I don't have anything to read out from here about specific ways that we're working on it, but we believe that that they have the responsibility. These are private companies, so we're also mindful of that too, but look — it is — I think it is incredibly important to call that out as you're — you're doing. I just don't have any specifics on what we have been doing internally as it relates to the interviews, not something that I'm tracking, and I'm sure the President's not tracking it either.”

https://x.com/CurtisHouck/status/1823068701240758626

[Dos Equis]

God Bless America.  Although if the left has its way, this is coming to America.

HORRIBLE: British man sentenced to 3 years in prison for posting MEMES
AUG. 16, 2024 BY THE RIGHT SCOOP
https://therightscoop.com/horrible-british-man-sentenced-to-3-years-in-prison-for-posting-memes/