Author Topic: Return to thick trunks that cover the ass and lose glutes from judging for good? (Read 11841 times)

TrueGrit · « **on:** October 10, 2009, 05:23:05 PM »

Look, bodybuilding will always have a sizeable gay following and that isn't going to change - and why should it anyway?

However, is it time to lose the spangly thong rolled up into the crack of the ass ? Is it time to stop assessing a man's ass cheeks?

People say that striated glutes are a sign of great conditioning...but so is a Christmas tree. Why do we need to see his butt, or is it childish to be prudish about what is simply a large muscle group worthy of the attention of male eyes?

So, should we return to the thick, flannel-type trunks of yesteryear or are men's asses, suggestive stares, props etc.. the way to go now?

Yea or nay?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #1 on:** October 10, 2009, 05:26:19 PM »

Quote from: TrueGrit on October 10, 2009, 05:23:05 PM

Look, bodybuilding will always have a sizeable gay following and that isn't going to change - and why should it anyway?

However, is it time to lose the spangly thong rolled up into the crack of the ass ? Is it time to stop assessing a man's ass cheeks?

People say that striated glutes are a sign of great conditioning...but so is a Christmas tree. Why do we need to see his butt, or is it childish to be prudish about what is simply a large muscle group worthy of the attention of male eyes?

So, should we return to the thick, flannel-type trunks of yesteryear or are men's asses, suggestive stares, props etc.. the way to go now?

Yea or nay?

MuscleMcMannus · « **Reply #2 on:** October 10, 2009, 05:27:30 PM »

I brought this up to Bob Chick before but he was adamantly against it. I understand why now.

Parker · « **Reply #3 on:** October 10, 2009, 05:29:22 PM »

Quote from: TrueGrit on October 10, 2009, 05:23:05 PM

Look, bodybuilding will always have a sizeable gay following and that isn't going to change - and why should it anyway?

However, is it time to lose the spangly thong rolled up into the crack of the ass ? Is it time to stop assessing a man's ass cheeks?

People say that striated glutes are a sign of great conditioning...but so is a Christmas tree. Why do we need to see his butt, or is it childish to be prudish about what is simply a large muscle group worthy of the attention of male eyes?

So, should we return to the thick, flannel-type trunks of yesteryear or are men's asses, suggestive stares, props etc.. the way to go now?

Yea or nay?

only for the men. For figure, fitness and bikini, thongs should be mandatory. The smaller the better.

mrusa85 · « **Reply #4 on:** October 10, 2009, 05:29:54 PM »

All it takes is for a few top pros to buy into it. There would be more amateurs joining the competitive ranks if the trunks weren't as skimpy too. Trunks like Triple H's in the WWE would be a different look that would be much more acceptable to the general public,

#1 Klaus fan · « **Reply #5 on:** October 10, 2009, 05:31:18 PM »

Why should they wear anything?

(semi serious)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #6 on:** October 10, 2009, 05:34:37 PM »

Quote from: #1 Klaus fan on October 10, 2009, 05:31:18 PM

Why should they wear anything?

(semi serious)

No homo

hazbin · « **Reply #7 on:** October 10, 2009, 06:04:52 PM »

i was actually thinking about this today. doubtfull i will ever compete again, but if i do i wonder how 'strange' i would look wearing trunks that cover my ass. cause no way i would wear a thong.

gordiano · « **Reply #8 on:** October 10, 2009, 06:08:01 PM »

Quote from: hazbin on October 10, 2009, 06:04:52 PM

i was actually thinking about this today. doubtfull i will ever compete again, but if i do i wonder how 'strange' i would look wearing trunks that cover my ass. cause no way i would wear a thong.

When was your last pageant? And did you wear the old school trunks then?

Chick · « **Reply #9 on:** October 10, 2009, 06:17:34 PM »

Quote from: mrusa85 on October 10, 2009, 05:29:54 PM

All it takes is for a few top pros to buy into it. There would be more amateurs joining the competitive ranks if the trunks weren't as skimpy too. Trunks like Triple H's in the WWE would be a different look that would be much more acceptable to the general public,

LOL...so you believe there are amateurs that DONT compete because of the trunks? Here is a hint: there are nothing that says you HAVE to wear skimpy trunks, hell, you can go out there with a pair of hotskins if you want...

As for being "accepted" by the general public...it has NEVER been accepted...even when the trunks were as big as boxers.

chaos · « **Reply #10 on:** October 10, 2009, 06:20:05 PM »

Quote from: Chick on October 10, 2009, 06:17:34 PM

LOL...so you believe there are amateurs that DONT compete because of the trunks? Here is a hint: there are nothing that says you HAVE to wear skimpy trunks, hell, you can go out there with a pair of hotskins if you want...

As for being "accepted" by the general public...it has NEVER been accepted...even when the trunks were as big as boxers.