you never answered my question.
so which is it, dumbass? If seeing them in person is more accurate, then Ronnie is better since he is on record for saying that. If videos are good enough to change one's mind 16 yrs later, then they are good enough to judge physiques. It's one or the other.
hahaha, poor ND is too stupid to realize when he's lost. You're so hung up on putting me in 'check' that you failed to realize I 'checkmated' you with all the quotes saying Ronnie at his best is unbeatable.
what objective, visual criteria are you using?
again, the only way your defense would be believable is if you admit you like to reply to older posts by quoting and responding to the most recent one, in which case that would make you a retard.
you never answered my question.
so which is it, dumbass? If seeing them in person is more accurate, then Ronnie is better since he is on record for saying that. If videos are good enough to change one's mind 16 yrs later, then they are good enough to judge physiques. It's one or the other.
I answered you and as usual YOU don't like the answer because it exposes your weak position and ironically you're the guy who changed my quote around totally ignoring , so don't be a hypocrite an claim people aren't answering you , I respond to everything you type and correct it
hahaha, poor ND is too stupid to realize when he's lost. You're so hung up on putting me in 'check' that you failed to realize I 'checkmated' you with all the quotes saying Ronnie at his best is unbeatable.
Sure you have which is exactly why you're in another Dorian Yates thread trying to prove Ronnie is better
when you have all the quotes from IFBB judges saying Ronnie would beat Dorian then you might be working with something but as usual you have nothing but a popular opinion
i.e. weak logic an appeal to numbers , You're obsessed with me hence why I'm in your sig , why you tried that pathetic internet-challenge LMFAO and why you're in another Dorian Yates thread trolling , if it was checkmate the game would be over but low and behold here you are
what objective, visual criteria are you using?
You mean what objective criteria are they using?
again, the only way your defense would be believable is if you admit you like to reply to older posts by quoting and responding to the most recent one, in which case that would make you a retard.
You changed my quote and never responded keep trying to distance yourself from this