Author Topic: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!  (Read 30091 times)

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #200 on: January 31, 2010, 07:31:36 PM »
i am Canadian and I would like to say:


I DON'T GIVE A SHIT  8)


i would love for matt to have as much passion with canadian politics  8)

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61613
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #201 on: January 31, 2010, 07:37:07 PM »
i am Canadian and I would like to say:


I DON'T GIVE A SHIT  8)


i would love for matt to have as much passion with canadian politics  8)

When Canada has a black Prime Minister, then he will take more of an interest.

bcimagala

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #202 on: January 31, 2010, 08:09:39 PM »
Funny how Obama never released any transcripts from high school through college. Yet you feel at liberty to call Palin an idiot.

Just had to chime in on this one.

Obama was the president of the HARVARD LAW REVIEW.  He then went on to TEACH constitutional law.

And... you think he still needs to release high school and college transcripts to prove he is smarter than someone who attended Hawaii Pacific, North Idaho College, University of Idaho (twice) and Matanuska-Sustina College and got a Bachelor's in communications?

How delusional are you?

LATS

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #203 on: January 31, 2010, 08:10:41 PM »
we need to get one thing straight about "health care".. .. no one is having their foot amputated for lack of health care as marty stated.. or at least shouldnt.. anyone can go to the emergency room and show their ailment and will be taken care of.. they can not turn you away.. case in point, i work with a man who was diagnosed with cancer.. he has no insurance.. but he is getting care at barnes hospital and mayo clinic for his cancer.. he makes little money and they are taking great care of him.. he is now moving to texas to be with his daughter and he is going to be visiting the cancer institute down there.. he is considered a "hardship" case..
 
 tbombz i agree that mccain is not great.. but he would not be pushing this silly health care package nor a stimulus that was over 700 billion and did nothing .. that to me is enough to want him in that position instead of the goof we have now..


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61613
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #204 on: January 31, 2010, 08:18:58 PM »
Just had to chime in on this one.

Obama was the president of the HARVARD LAW REVIEW.  He then went on to TEACH constitutional law.

And... you think he still needs to release high school and college transcripts to prove he is smarter than someone who attended Hawaii Pacific, North Idaho College, University of Idaho (twice) and Matanuska-Sustina College and got a Bachelor's in communications?

How delusional are you?

Actually yes, pretty sure it's required. I personally don't give a shit what he was a teacher in or what he was the president of. He's desegregated the constitution like no one has ever before. Sometimes commonsense and actually succeeding in a Government position takes precedence over communist ideologies that I'm sure he was teaching. Again, he failed his own district in Illinois and now he's doing the same to the US. That being, yes, assuming you're referring to Palin......she's waaayy more qualified than that fuckwad.


delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #205 on: January 31, 2010, 08:22:07 PM »
Obama for the win.  I feel bad for him having to fight fiction with fact with an uneducated and ill-informed electorate who can`t discern the difference between the two.
its the ill informed and uneducated electorate that put him there.

bcimagala

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #206 on: January 31, 2010, 08:23:29 PM »
        i agree 100 percent. obama is the opposite of bush, he is well spoken and dignified, but that ain't getting the job done, i think we are worse off with obama in power. he is just a more well-spoken talking head.

He has been in office a year and some change.  Bush took 8 years to fuck up and get us where we are.  One cannot possibly expect ANYONE to fix all the problems in one year.

And to the increase in unemployment, and it being the highest ever - are you conservatives really blaming our current administration for the lost jobs?   He took office Jan, 2009.  Whatever new policies he instituted weren't until months after?  Do you REALLY think the new policies are responsible for the lost jobs/the economy in 9-10 months they've been in place???

Isn't it more logical to assume the incredible unemployment rate and enormous deficit is actually the result of the previous administration and its 8 years in office?

WTF?

bcimagala

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #207 on: January 31, 2010, 08:31:53 PM »
Actually yes, pretty sure it's required. I personally don't give a shit what he was a teacher in or what he was the president of. He's desegregated the constitution like no one has ever before. Sometimes commonsense and actually succeeding in a Government position takes precedence over communist ideologies that I'm sure he was teaching. Again, he failed his own district in Illinois and now he's doing the same to the US. That being, yes, assuming you're referring to Palin......she's waaayy more qualified than that fuckwad.



I provided specific answers to your question about comparing the INTELLIGENCE of Palin v. Obama.  We're talking smarts here -- not "success in politics."  Though you'll never admit it, I think I won that debate.  (Again, speaking specifically about who is smarter...)

Still, if we want to go there - HE IS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and leader of the free world! 

Palin quit as governor and is now a TV personality on Fox News.  (Didn't she criticize the media harshly not so long ago?)

Now, you answer, SPECIFICALLY -

- How has Obama "desegregated" The Constitution?  (Did you mean denigrated or even degraded -- or do you think Obama some how... united The Constitution, which was once in separate parts???)

- How did Obama fail his district in Illinois?  Again, specifically - what actions of his, what policies, etc. led to the downfall of his district?

- Specifically, how is Palin more qualified?  (Note: Alaskans were successful/happy with her as governor is NOT specific.  Also, please consider that Alaska's limited (and largely homogenous) population, wealth in natural resources (oil) make it a unique state; arguable one much easier to manage than, say, California or Illinois.)

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61613
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #208 on: January 31, 2010, 09:02:59 PM »
He has been in office a year and some change.  Bush took 8 years to fuck up and get us where we are.  One cannot possibly expect ANYONE to fix all the problems in one year.

And to the increase in unemployment, and it being the highest ever - are you conservatives really blaming our current administration for the lost jobs?   He took office Jan, 2009.  Whatever new policies he instituted weren't until months after?  Do you REALLY think the new policies are responsible for the lost jobs/the economy in 9-10 months they've been in place???

Isn't it more logical to assume the incredible unemployment rate and enormous deficit is actually the result of the previous administration and its 8 years in office?

WTF?

Alright dude, you're obviously part of the "blame Bush for everything" crowd, admittedly Bush's biggest fuck ups came the last 2-3 months of his presidency (and if you REALLY want to get started on Iraq I'm ready) AT THE END of Bush's term we were somewhere around 6-7% unemployment, Obama promptly took it to, at one point, over 10%, during his speech for the $787billion debacle he promised it wouldn't go beyond 8%, that's when it became his baby and no one else's. If it was as bad as he made it out to be then why did he make it worse? FYI, most of Bush's policies are still in place even though he was going to reverse them.....MMmmm, I wonder why, maybe because they work? 

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #209 on: January 31, 2010, 09:12:08 PM »
Alright dude, you're obviously part of the "blame Bush for everything" crowd, admittedly Bush's biggest fuck ups came the last 2-3 months of his presidency (and if you REALLY want to get started on Iraq I'm ready) AT THE END of Bush's term we were somewhere around 6-7% unemployment, Obama promptly took it to, at one point, over 10%, during his speech for the $787billion debacle he promised it wouldn't go beyond 8%, that's when it became his baby and no one else's. If it was as bad as he made it out to be then why did he make it worse? FYI, most of Bush's policies are still in place even though he was going to reverse them.....MMmmm, I wonder why, maybe because they work? 
dude, you keep owning these bitches!!!

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #210 on: January 31, 2010, 09:16:42 PM »
Alright dude, you're obviously part of the "blame Bush for everything" crowd, admittedly Bush's biggest fuck ups came the last 2-3 months of his presidency (and if you REALLY want to get started on Iraq I'm ready) AT THE END of Bush's term we were somewhere around 6-7% unemployment, Obama promptly took it to, at one point, over 10%, during his speech for the $787billion debacle he promised it wouldn't go beyond 8%, that's when it became his baby and no one else's. If it was as bad as he made it out to be then why did he make it worse? FYI, most of Bush's policies are still in place even though he was going to reverse them.....MMmmm, I wonder why, maybe because they work? 

do you understand that if you cause a splash on one side of a pool the wave from that splash does not reach the other side of the pool immidiately?

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61613
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #211 on: January 31, 2010, 09:23:35 PM »
Is this Bush's fault too.......




As President Obama prepares to unveil his $3.8 trillion budget for fiscal year 2011, which begins Oct. 1, the White House is projecting the current fiscal year will end with a $1.6 trillion deficit, congressional sources confirmed to Fox News.

Next year's budget will have a nearly $1.3 trillion debt, according to those sources, dropping to just over half that -- $700 billion in fiscal year 2013 -- before jumping back up to $1 trillion in 2020, the furthest out that budgeters will predict.

A $1.6 trillion deficit would represent more than 10 percent of the gross domestic product, but the White House says over the next 10 years, the average deficit will represent only 4.5 percent of GDP annually. Last year's deficit was $1.42 trillion.

The numbers come as the president and congressional Democrats have pivoted from preparing a $1 trillion health care proposal to focusing on jobs and the deficit. Speaking at the State of the Union last week, Obama told a joint session of Congress that he wants to freeze spending -- beginning in 2012 -- on discretionary spending except the military, veterans and homeland security. The president said that would save $250 billion over 10 years.

"There's a three-year discretionary spending freeze and that is to say there is a three-year cap on domestic discretionary spending," said Obama senior adviser David Axelrod on CNN. "Within that cap we're going to have to prioritize just like every business or every family would, so we're going to have to do away with the things that we don't need in order to pay for the things that we do."

"We don't expect this is going to be easy," Fox Business Network reported White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer saying. Pfeiffer added that the White House proposed cuts last year but Congress funded programs anyway.

But keeping budget deficits where they are currently projected will happen only if tax cuts passed in 2001 and 2003 expire as scheduled at the end of this year. The White House calculates tax hikes would generate $1.2 trillion in revenue over 10 years.

"We just did an 84 percent increase in a very short period of time of all this new spending. Democrats, since they took over Congress, increased domestic discretionary spending by $1.4 trillion," Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said on "Fox News Sunday."

"We don't think taking all this money out of the private economy up to Washington and spending it through Washington is the way to create jobs. We believe we should keep that money in the economy," Ryan added.

Congressional sources say Obama's new budget will propose extending the popular middle-class tax breaks of $400 per individual and $800 per couple through 2011. They were due to expire after this year.

It also calls for $250 payments to 57 million Social Security recipients to bolster their finances in a year when they are not receiving inflation-pegged, cost-of-living increases because the consumer price index is so low.

In the president's budget, Obama is going to set aside $160 billion for the war in Afghanistan and ongoing operations in Iraq.

Fox News' Major Garrett and Chad Pergram contributed to this report.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #212 on: January 31, 2010, 09:26:02 PM »
why are we in debt JME? is it because of all obama's "national defense" spending? i forgot about all those trillions obama unnecessarily shipped over to the middle east

marty31672

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1390
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #213 on: January 31, 2010, 09:26:09 PM »
Alright dude, you're obviously part of the "blame Bush for everything" crowd, admittedly Bush's biggest fuck ups came the last 2-3 months of his presidency (and if you REALLY want to get started on Iraq I'm ready) AT THE END of Bush's term we were somewhere around 6-7% unemployment, Obama promptly took it to, at one point, over 10%, during his speech for the $787billion debacle he promised it wouldn't go beyond 8%, that's when it became his baby and no one else's. If it was as bad as he made it out to be then why did he make it worse? FYI, most of Bush's policies are still in place even though he was going to reverse them.....MMmmm, I wonder why, maybe because they work? 

the stimulus spending pervented the economy from getting even worst...

bcimagala

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #214 on: February 01, 2010, 05:37:51 AM »
Alright dude, you're obviously part of the "blame Bush for everything" crowd, admittedly Bush's biggest fuck ups came the last 2-3 months of his presidency (and if you REALLY want to get started on Iraq I'm ready) AT THE END of Bush's term we were somewhere around 6-7% unemployment, Obama promptly took it to, at one point, over 10%, during his speech for the $787billion debacle he promised it wouldn't go beyond 8%, that's when it became his baby and no one else's. If it was as bad as he made it out to be then why did he make it worse? FYI, most of Bush's policies are still in place even though he was going to reverse them.....MMmmm, I wonder why, maybe because they work? 

I don't blame Bush nearly for as much as you blame Obama.

Still, let's look at facts:

Pre-Bush: US engaged in 0 wars; Budget surplus; 0 attacks on US soil since Pearl Harbor

Bush: US engaged in 2 wars; huge defecit; 9-11.

...

What Obama owns is the growth in the last quarter, the largest in 6 years.  THAT was largely due to the stimulus package that you so abhor. 

...

When are you going to answer my specific questions instead of just copying and pasting from rightwing websites and OpEds?

bcimagala

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #215 on: February 01, 2010, 05:39:08 AM »
do you understand that if you cause a splash on one side of a pool the wave from that splash does not reach the other side of the pool immidiately?

Bump for one of the most on-point things in this thread.

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #216 on: February 01, 2010, 05:48:00 AM »
Mon, Feb 01, 2010
AsiaOne 
       
 
 
WASHINGTON, Feb 1, 2010 (AFP) - US President Barack Obama's administration acknowledged Monday that the government budget deficit will swell to a record 1.556 trillion dollars (2.19 trillion Singapore dollars) in the current fiscal year to September.

The White House had earlier forecast a budget gap of 1.502 trillion dollars in fiscal 2010 as the administration poured resources into the economy to contain a serious financial crisis that plunged the nation into recession.

Figures released Monday under Obama's government budget for the 2011 fiscal year, which begins October 1, show that the 2010 deficit shattered the record deficit of 1.413 trillion dollars for 2009.


You can blame Bush for 2009.....even 2010, if you want, but the 2011 is all Obama's and there is no sign of the Clinton deficit control.  They guy is a complete sham, yet some of you still defend him like you are dating him.

 

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24727
  • SC è un asino
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #217 on: February 01, 2010, 06:33:30 AM »
He has been in office a year and some change.

Yes, and in that year, he's basically accomplished nothing, despite having a majority in the house and senate.

Unemployment is higher than his administration said it would be without the stimulus.

In other words, what trend do you see that gives you any confidence he will be able to accomplish anything he campaigned on?
Y

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #218 on: February 01, 2010, 07:11:26 AM »
Matt, the title is foolish.  You are a blinded Obama worshiper, party-liner.

Glad the president had the talk with the republican house but it highlighted the fact that republican proposals have been shot down over and over by Reid & Pelosi.  They took full advantage of the supermajority.  We can see why 1 party rule is bad for the country.  We need a balance.

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #219 on: February 01, 2010, 07:18:45 AM »
"funny how obama hears about how he has tripled the debt but cleverly diverts the discussion as a "talking point" for the other side but doesnt get in deep enough to even explain his rhighteousness as he so needs it.  you see obama takes credit for anything good, he is justified saying there was a debt when bush left, but obama has tripled that and also obama blames washington YET wants more government control on the other hand lol"
--------------------
Good post Johnny.  Obama certainly isn't all bad but his solution is a big government solution, he is a progressive liberal despite his campaign calls for us to come together and perhaps be a centrist.  We can't come together if Reid, Pelosi and Obama insists on the hard progressive agenda.

bcimagala

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #220 on: February 01, 2010, 08:57:53 AM »
Yes, and in that year, he's basically accomplished nothing, despite having a majority in the house and senate.

Unemployment is higher than his administration said it would be without the stimulus.

In other words, what trend do you see that gives you any confidence he will be able to accomplish anything he campaigned on?

It amazes me that people expect the clean up to be so quick -- especially when the problem was festering for so long.

It's like the fatfuck middle aged woman who put on 80 lbs since high school and expects to get down to her fighting weight in a month.

Here's a confidence-boosting sign: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-29/u-s-economy-growth-jumps-5-7-fastest-pace-in-six-years.html

I know, I know.  That's not what Fox News is saying, though...

bcimagala

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 112
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #221 on: February 01, 2010, 09:02:50 AM »
Matt, the title is foolish.  You are a blinded Obama worshiper, party-liner.

Glad the president had the talk with the republican house but it highlighted the fact that republican proposals have been shot down over and over by Reid & Pelosi.  They took full advantage of the supermajority.  We can see why 1 party rule is bad for the country.  We need a balance.

I agree that we need bipartisanship, and I think Obama is encouraging that among Republicans AND Democrats.

However, it's interesting that when the GOP was in charge, there were no calls for "balance" or "compromise."  Politics has always been winner take all.  I'd like to -- and hope to -- see it change, but I'd also like a billion dollars...

Lastly, how is it that people think the GOP now has the upper hand?  Yes, the Dems lost the SUPERmajority, but they still have the majority - 59 to 41.  It's a big blow to lose Mass, but all they need is ONE Republican vote to get shit passed. 

Top Dog

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1040
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #222 on: February 01, 2010, 09:08:06 AM »
It amazes me that people expect the clean up to be so quick -- especially when the problem was festering for so long.

It's like the fatfuck middle aged woman who put on 80 lbs since high school and expects to get down to her fighting weight in a month.

Here's a confidence-boosting sign: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-01-29/u-s-economy-growth-jumps-5-7-fastest-pace-in-six-years.html

I know, I know.  That's not what Fox News is saying, though...
Fox is to Conservatives what MSNBC is to Liberals.  Everyone screams about Fox, but they just do what MSNBC has been doing for years.

Top Dog

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1040
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #223 on: February 01, 2010, 09:10:19 AM »
Um his approval rating is actually up! Holla! :P
Let's face it.....his ratings are down. At least be honest whether you like him or not.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61613
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Obama OWNS Republicans on Live TV for a full hour in Q&A session!
« Reply #224 on: February 01, 2010, 09:16:44 AM »
I agree that we need bipartisanship, and I think Obama is encouraging that among Republicans AND Democrats.

However, it's interesting that when the GOP was in charge, there were no calls for "balance" or "compromise."  Politics has always been winner take all.  I'd like to -- and hope to -- see it change, but I'd also like a billion dollars...

Lastly, how is it that people think the GOP now has the upper hand?  Yes, the Dems lost the SUPERmajority, but they still have the majority - 59 to 41.  It's a big blow to lose Mass, but all they need is ONE Republican vote to get shit passed. 

Thats because for the most part, Bush knew how to compromise in a bi-partisan way with the dems, there was no strong arming, no shutting out the dems during discussions. Alot of the Bush policies that are in place now were passing with democratic approval and no one had to be bribed.