Author Topic: All things "Birther" Thread (Read 331217 times)

OzmO · « **Reply #650 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:49:38 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on April 08, 2011, 01:46:07 PM

Utter bullshit because the overwhelming nuimber of people with 042 are from CT and there are no people from HA eith that number rom 1961.

Not at all.

But that's not all.

blacken700 · « **Reply #651 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:50:50 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:44:23 PM

Before I lower the boom, let's review and add:

1. SSN's, by the admission of the http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html does not issue numbers based on "area numbers" the first 3 digits of a SSN:

2. Obama did live in Hawaii and attended school there form 5th grade until graduating in 1979. http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html

3. He applied for an SSN in 1977 PRIOR to getting a job at baskins robbins.

4. The zip form the address he applied form was: 96814

5. People applied via hand written mail back then.

Ready for number "6" or is it that it doesn't matter because you right and i am wrong and Obama is a Marxist devil destroying the country blah blah blah?

NICE JOB HOW LONG DID THAT TAKE YOU

OzmO · « **Reply #652 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:51:18 PM »

Remember in 1977, people inputted info, they weren't scanned like today.

#6

The zip code for Danbury, CT. was 06814

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #653 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:51:58 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:49:38 PM

Not at all.

But that's not all.

Really? Show me one person born in 1961 in HA given a 042 SS number?

OzmO · « **Reply #654 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:52:50 PM »

1. SSN's, by the admission of the http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html does not issue numbers based on "area numbers" the first 3 digits of a SSN:

2. Obama did live in Hawaii and attended school there form 5th grade until graduating in 1979. http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html

3. He applied for an SSN in 1977 PRIOR to getting a job at baskins robbins.

4. The zip form the address he applied form was: 96814

5. People applied via hand written mail back then.

6. The zip code for Danbury, CT. was 06814

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #655 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:53:21 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:51:18 PM

Remember in 1977, people inputted info, they weren't scanned like today.

#6

The zip code for Danbury, CT. was 06814

Ok - and why was Obama in Danbury in 1977 to apply for his SS number considering he claims the first time he himself stepped foot in the lower 48 was when he was 18 y/o?

OzmO · « **Reply #656 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:53:35 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:52:50 PM

1. SSN's, by the admission of the http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html does not issue numbers based on "area numbers" the first 3 digits of a SSN:

2. Obama did live in Hawaii and attended school there form 5th grade until graduating in 1979. http://archives.starbulletin.com/2004/03/21/news/story4.html

3. He applied for an SSN in 1977 PRIOR to getting a job at baskins robbins.

4. The zip form the address he applied form was: 96814

5. People applied via hand written mail back then.

6. The zip code for Danbury, CT. was 06814

Rub it flip it, throw it down oh noooooooooooooooo!

240 is Back · « **Reply #657 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:54:39 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:51:18 PM

Remember in 1977, people inputted info, they weren't scanned like today.

#6

The zip code for Danbury, CT. was 06814

So it could have just been simply mixing up a 0 and a 9 on the typewriter?

Sounds like a pinky finger slip. And obama has been accused of being a commie pinko bastard. The pieces are starting to fit...

OzmO · « **Reply #658 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:54:48 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on April 08, 2011, 01:53:21 PM

Ok - and why was Obama in Danbury in 1977 to apply for his SS number considering he claims the first time he himself stepped foot in the lower 48 was when he was 18 y/o?

Look at the numbers and sing that Sesame Street song.........

OzmO · « **Reply #659 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:56:02 PM »

Here's a follow up question:

On the typewriter are the "0" and "9" located near each other and are they pressed with a pinky?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #660 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:56:15 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:53:35 PM

Rub it flip it, throw it down oh noooooooooooooooo!

What does that prove at all? Nothing at all.

OzmO · « **Reply #661 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:57:39 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 01:54:39 PM

So it could have just been simply mixing up a 0 and a 9 on the typewriter?

Sounds like a pinky finger slip. And obama has been accused of being a commie pinko bastard. The pieces are starting to fit...

240 is Back · « **Reply #662 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:59:41 PM »

33, as a CTer, your best bet is NOT to roll eyes and change subject.

Rather, you should realize it's possible that point is a mistake on some secretary's part - concede that point to Oz - then move on to one other point which may prove obama wasn't born here.

Don't spend hours arguing something once you realize it's a lost point. Remember, you don't have to prove every lie - just ONE. If there's one official lie in the record, then you win. You don't have to find 100 mistakes.

Start with the book mistake - the pic of grandparents with the photosho lines - get Oz to concede it's probably a photoshop. Oz, you game? From there, 33, you as him to surmise the motivation for such a faked pic. Then you give your theory, and how it fits into the bigger lie.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #663 on:** April 08, 2011, 01:59:46 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 01:56:02 PM

Here's a follow up question:

On the typewriter are the "0" and "9" located near each other and are they pressed with a pinky?

Ha ha ha ha ha hah a!!!! So now its all a Typo when on his own bullshit COLB list the o42 number. I have really heard it all now. Especially considering the number he used on ih selective service registration.

OzmO · « **Reply #664 on:** April 08, 2011, 02:00:54 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on April 08, 2011, 01:56:15 PM

What does that prove at all? Nothing at all.

It destroyed the SSN conpriacy theory. Provided a reasonable explanation highlighted by an incredible valid coincident.

You have no choice now but to either just stubbornly dispute it to save face or just agree you got nothing.

240 is Back · « **Reply #665 on:** April 08, 2011, 02:01:46 PM »

or, 33, show a pattern of a dozen SS numbers - all off by 'one digit', and ask ozmo to compute the likelihood that 12 separate secretaries all made the 'pinky error' on them.

If it happened once, it's a poor mistake for a person to make, but it can happen. If he was purposefully fudging a digit every time, that's some serious shit.

Which is it, cowboy?

Dos Equis · « **Reply #666 on:** April 08, 2011, 02:03:13 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on April 08, 2011, 01:56:15 PM

What does that prove at all? Nothing at all.

That's a 40 minute clip. Cliff's Notes?

OzmO · « **Reply #667 on:** April 08, 2011, 02:03:43 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 01:59:41 PM

33, as a CTer, your best bet is NOT to roll eyes and change subject.

Rather, you should realize it's possible that point is a mistake on some secretary's part - concede that point to Oz - then move on to one other point which may prove obama wasn't born here.

Don't spend hours arguing something once you realize it's a lost point. Remember, you don't have to prove every lie - just ONE. If there's one official lie in the record, then you win. You don't have to find 100 mistakes.

Start with the book mistake - the pic of grandparents with the photosho lines - get Oz to concede it's probably a photoshop. Oz, you game? From there, 33, you as him to surmise the motivation for such a faked pic. Then you give your theory, and how it fits into the bigger lie.

You know me 240, i am game, and have conceded and admitted being mistaken often.

On this one particular point of the 042 SSN i think it's a pretty reasonable explanation.

Now about all the others.... I guess we can get there in the next few days or whatever..

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #668 on:** April 08, 2011, 02:03:58 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on April 08, 2011, 01:59:41 PM

33, as a CTer, your best bet is NOT to roll eyes and change subject.

Rather, you should realize it's possible that point is a mistake on some secretary's part - concede that point to Oz - then move on to one other point which may prove obama wasn't born here.

Don't spend hours arguing something once you realize it's a lost point. Remember, you don't have to prove every lie - just ONE. If there's one official lie in the record, then you win. You don't have to find 100 mistakes.

Start with the book mistake - the pic of grandparents with the photosho lines - get Oz to concede it's probably a photoshop. Oz, you game? From there, 33, you as him to surmise the motivation for such a faked pic. Then you give your theory, and how it fits into the bigger lie.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha- yeah - speculation is proof? Funny, especially coming from OZ who champions himself as the board skeptic.

OzmO · « **Reply #669 on:** April 08, 2011, 02:05:12 PM »

Another FYI, for 33333,

I would love nothing better to get that ASS HAT out of office. But I can't allow myself to fall into fantasy about stuff like this.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #670 on:** April 08, 2011, 02:05:48 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:00:54 PM

It destroyed the SSN conpriacy theory. Provided a reasonable explanation highlighted by an incredible valid coincident.

You have no choice now but to either just stubbornly dispute it to save face or just agree you got nothing.

You offered an alternative theory which so far have never been offered by even obama himself for the fact that heis using a CT SS# number. So your alleged debunking now admits to speculating that the clerk made a typo mistake? Am I correct in your assertion?

OzmO · « **Reply #671 on:** April 08, 2011, 02:07:09 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on April 08, 2011, 02:03:58 PM

Ha ha ha ha ha ha- yeah - speculation is proof? Funny, especially coming from OZ who champions himself as the board skeptic.

I like being a skeptic, but i wouldn't call myself that. Others here are far more skeptic about things than me. Hell, i believe in UFO's and little green men. In fact, i even moderate a CT board.

kcballer · « **Reply #672 on:** April 08, 2011, 02:08:52 PM »

WOW that was awesome! The SSN being blown up like that. Epic work!

333 why are you melting so badly? Seriously dude get some objectivity already.

240 is Back · « **Reply #673 on:** April 08, 2011, 02:09:43 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on April 08, 2011, 01:59:46 PM

Especially considering the number he used on ih selective service registration.

Tell us about that one - let's conceded the baskin robbins 9/0 typo.

What's this one about? Another one-digit miss? That would be a win for you, if he shows a pattern of minor fudging numbers.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #674 on:** April 08, 2011, 02:10:05 PM »

Quote from: OzmO on April 08, 2011, 02:07:09 PM

I like being a skeptic, but i wouldn't call myself that. Others here are far more skeptic about things than me. Hell, i believe in UFO's and little green men. In fact, i even moderate a CT board.

No, I like debating with you since it ups my game. I'm just trying to get to the bottom of this. Additionally, like you you, we were both probabl given SS# at or near birth. I really never heard of someone who was born in the USA never getting a SS until they were 17. How did he register for HS?