Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
August 20, 2014, 11:20:24 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 75 76 [77] 78   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: All things "Birther" Thread  (Read 91453 times)
FarRightLooney
Getbig II
**
Posts: 213


View Profile
« Reply #1900 on: January 06, 2012, 12:51:36 PM »

Drip... drip... drip... So far, this has been a really great start to a new year. I almost feel hopeful again.

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHxKeT6rWz0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHxKeT6rWz0</a>

http://godfatherpolitics.com/2978/goon-squad-targeting-sheriff-joe-before-obama-eligibility-declared/
 JANUARY 5, 2012 by DA TAGLIARE

Goon Squad Targeting Sheriff Joe before Obama Eligibility Declared

Maricopa County, Arizona contains Phoenix and eight other cities with populations over 100,000.  The most populace county in the state with nearly four million people could have a significant impact on this year’s presidential election.

In Arizona, the county sheriff is responsible for verifying the eligibility of any candidate wanting to be placed on the ballot in their particular county.  In Maricopa County, that responsibility falls to Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Last year, Arpaio announced that he had instructed his Cold Squad unit to investigate Barack Obama’s eligibility to run for President.  In that announcement, he pretty much ordered the Obama administration to allow his officer’s access to the original birth documents in Hawaii that the President claims verify his US birth and right to run for the Oval Office.

Since that announcement, the President has launched one attack after another at Sheriff Joe.

First he instructed his loyal bird dog, Eric Holder to go after Arpaio and his department for their enforcement of state immigration laws.  The DOJ descended on the Maricopa County Sheriff’s department  like a flock of vultures on a dead carcass.  They swooped in and stripped Sheriff Joe and his detention officers of their federal badges that allowed them to enforce immigration laws.  They trumped up charges of illegal racial profiling to justify their actions.

But unlike most carcasses, Sheriff Joe isn’t dead yet and continues to stand his ground for what he believes is right and legal.

So now another liberal bird dog has moved into the area and is trying to launch a recall drive to get Sheriff Joe removed from office before his department can issue their results of the Obama eligibility investigation scheduled for release in February.

Randy Parraz is a radical leftist activist who has made a career of helping to launch community organized attacks on conservatives in the US and Canada.  His methods follow those of Jewish-American community activist Saul Alinsky who wrote the book Rules for Radicals.  His tactics of community organization resemble those used in 1917 Russia to rid the ruling monarchy and replace it with the communist party.

Last year, Parraz launched a community organized recall against Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce (R).  Using his Berkeley trained radial methods, Parraz rallied the huge Hispanic population to force Pearce from his prominent position in the state senate.

Now Parraz has set his Marxist tactics against Sheriff Joe in an effort to get him out of office before he can announce whether or not Obama’s name will be allowed on the ballot in Maricopa County.  In his announcement, Parraz said,

“Our focus right now is to hold Sheriff Arpaio accountable for what he has done – his abuse of power, the corruption, all the things he has done under his leadership.  We need to have a fresh start; we need to get him out.  The only way we can do this is to engage the citizens in a way in which they have never been engaged before.”

Responding to Parraz’s attack, Arpaio said,

“No way will I resign.”

Parraz is planning on going to the Maricopa Board of Supervisors to force the issue of Sheriff Joe.  He tried this in December, but was unsuccessful and we can only hope and pray that the board once again rejects his demands.

All this continues to make myself and others seriously doubt Obama’s legitimacy to hold the office of president.  If he had the proper documents, why won’t he release it and settle this matter?  No, instead, Obama would rather send his goon squad to destroy his opponents like Sheriff Joe.  When you examine Obama’s tactics, he’s no different than Venezuela’s Chavez or Libya’s former leader Khadafy.
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1901 on: January 07, 2012, 11:51:17 AM »

Georgia case could determine whether Obama's name may be placed on ANY 2012 state ballot!
Coach is Right ^ | 1/07/2012 | Doug Book




Americans have finally made the acquaintance of a judge who is willing to adhere to the demands of the Constitution and the laws he swore an oath to uphold upon taking office.

Georgia State Office of Administrative Hearings Judge Michael M. Malihi ruled this week that, as stated in Georgia law, “every candidate for federal office shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (1)

In his ruling, Mahili stated quite simply that “the court finds that the defendant (Barack Obama) is a candidate for federal office who has been certified by the state executive committee of a political party and therefore must, under Code Section 21-2-5, meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.” (1)

The suits which resulted in Malihi’s ruling were brought in response to Obama’s inclusion on the 2012 Georgia State primary ballot. And one of these complaints in particular might cause problems for the acting President of the United States.

In October of last year, attorney Van R. Irion of the Liberty Legal Foundation filed lawsuits against the Democrat Party both in Tennessee and at the federal level, “…requesting injunctions prohibiting the Party from certifying that Obama is Constitutionally qualified to run for the office of President in the 2012 election.” (2)

It was this same complaint that comprises the Georgia case for which a hearing is scheduled on January 26th.

Irion’s action has nothing whatever to do with the validity of the birth certificate Obama’s minions posted online last year. And the attorney doesn’t care whether Obama was born in Hawaii or not.

“The only fact relevant to this case,” says Irion, “is the fact that the defendant’s father was not a U.S. citizen.” It is Irion’s contention that as Obama’s father was...


(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1902 on: January 08, 2012, 04:35:53 PM »

Breaking: Hawaii Judge Knowingly Schedules Next Hearing for Date Taitz Must be in Georgia
Post & Email ^ | 1/6/2012 | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on Friday, January 06, 2012 4:57:41 PM by GregNH

(Jan. 6, 2012)— At approximately 3:05 ET, Atty. Orly Taitz contacted The Post & Email following the hearing scheduled for today in Taitz v. Fuddy in the First Circuit Court in Honolulu with Judge Rhonda Nishimura. Astoundingly, although we are told that Nishimura was aware that Taitz was not available on January 26, 2012 because of a ballot challenge hearing in Atlanta, GA, she scheduled a hearing on the subpoena issued by the court in Georgia for the very same day.

Taitz said that because of the Motion for Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement filed with the Hawaii court, Judge Nishimura was aware that Taitz could not be in both Hawaii and Georgia on that day.


(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1903 on: January 08, 2012, 04:51:26 PM »

BARACK OBAMA UNABLE TO REGISTER FOR STATE PRIMARY AS ALABAMAREVIEWS HIS ELIGIBILITY
http://www.libertynewsonline.com/article_301_31406.php ^ | 1/7/2012




UPDATE: An Alabama Court has announced that it will hear arguments as to whether Barack Hussein Obama II is in fact eligible to appear on the State Presidential Primary Ballot.

Several Alabama citizens have filed a lawsuit within the Alabama Circuit Court to "prevent certification of President Barack Obama for 2012 Alabama ballot access pending final hearing based on factual evidentiary hearings."


(Excerpt) Read more at AmericansUnitedForFreedo m.org ...
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1904 on: January 09, 2012, 09:02:09 AM »

New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Dept of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara(Virginia' brother)
ObamaRelease YourRecords ^ | Wednesday, January 4, 2012; 5:02 PM




Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Duncan Sunahara

Lawsuit against the Hawaii Department of Health has been filed by Hawaii Attorney Gerald Kurashima on behalf of Duncan Sunahara, Virginia Sunahara's brother. The case has been assigned to Judge Nishimura. Dean Haskins of the Birther Summit will be making a public announcement about this case very soon. Stay tuned for further updates.



The case is listed as follows;





Flashback;
Hawaii Department of Health Funny Business Regarding Virginia Sunahara
Copy courtesy of www.ObamaReleaseYourReco rds -www.BirtherReport.com via butterdezillion.wordpres s.com


HDOH Denies Having Birth Record for Virginia Sunahara

Virginia Sunahara was born on Aug 4, 1961 and died the next day. Her death was announced in both theHonolulu Advertiser and the Star-Bulletin. Her name is in both the 1960-64 birth index and 1960-64death index.But when I asked for a non-certified copy of her abbreviated birth certificate the HDOH told me thatthey have no records responsive to my request. On previous requests for other COLB I had been told that I could not get a copy because I did not have a direct and tangible interest. But in this case they flat-out told me they don't have a birth record for Virginia. Even though their birth index says they do.

(See the birth index page at http://myveryownpointofview.wordpress.com/2011/05/15/attention-whores-moles-and-morethe-thief/ ).

Either the HDOH lied about having no records for her, or they queried her name and the computer no longer has that record under her name, even though it was under her name when they printed the 1960-64 birth index sometime around March of 2010. What happened to Virginia's birth record? Was the name on it changed to Barack Hussein Obama II so he could have her BC#? The HDOH needs to be audited, to find out what has happened with Sunahara's birth record. Here is the HDOH’s claim that they have no birth record for a girl listed on their birth index:

From: hdohinfo
To: Nellie
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:00 PM
Subject: RE: UIPA Request - non-certified abbreviated BC for Tomiyo
SunaharaAloha Ms. (redacted):We have no records responsive to your request. Hawaii Department of Health Public Information Office staff
Send mail to:State Department of Health
Office of Health Status Monitoring
Issuance/Vital Statistics Section/UIPA Request
Honolulu, HI 97801
hdohinfo@doh.hawaii.gov


Excerpted, more here at http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/new-lawsuit-filed-against-hawaii.html#comment-form



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1905 on: January 09, 2012, 09:05:49 AM »

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haiRCLItdEQ" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haiRCLItdEQ</a>
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1906 on: January 12, 2012, 09:35:40 AM »

Court: Obama must be ‘constitutionally’ eligible
WorldNet Daily ^ | 3 January 2012 | Bob Unruh




For the first time in dozens of court cases challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, a judge has ruled that Obama must, in order to be a candidate on the Georgia ballot for president in 2012, meet the constitutional demands for candidates for the office.

A hearing has been scheduled later this month for evidence on the issue that has plagued Obama and his presidency since long before he took office. At issue is the constitutional requirement that a president be a “natural-born citizen.” Some allege he was not born in the U.S. as he has claimed and, therefore, is not eligible.

Others, including top constitutional expert Herb Titus, contend that the term “natural-born citizen,” which is not defined in the Constitution, would have been understood when the document was written to mean the offspring of two U.S. citizens. That argument is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision

Under that standard, Obama could not qualify, because his father, as identified on the “Certificate of Live Birth” image released by the White House, was a foreign national who came from Kenya to study in the U.S. and never was a citizen.

The ruling came today from Judge Michael W. Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings.


(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Report to moderator   Logged
FarRightLooney
Getbig II
**
Posts: 213


View Profile
« Reply #1907 on: January 13, 2012, 12:26:56 PM »

A Georgia Judge has issued a subpoena demanding Barack Obama appear in court January 26 AND produce his original long form birth certificate, passport records, college registration records and more.

Any and all certified birth records including a long form birth certificate.

Certified school/university registration records. Certified immigration/naturalization records.

Certified passport records

Redacted certified Social Security card applications for each of the aliases and other legal names used by Barack Obama, including but not limited to his legal surname when adopted by step-father Lolo Soetoro.

In addition, Judge Malihi has reportedly also subpoenaed Hawaii Health Department officials and commanded them to produce an original certified copy of Obama's long form birth certificate.


Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1908 on: January 13, 2012, 12:33:55 PM »

Awesome!!!!      Finally we have a judge with balls.   

Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1909 on: January 15, 2012, 04:08:37 PM »

THREE MORE “OBAMA BALLOT CHALLENGES” REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN FILED IN ILLINOIS
Obama Ballot Challenge ^ | 1-15-2012 | Edward C. Noonan
Posted on January 15, 2012 4:36:49 PM EST by ednoonan7

THREE MORE “OBAMA BALLOT CHALLENGES” REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN FILED IN ILLINOIS

It has just been reported to me that three more nationwide challenges to Obama appearing on the upcoming primary ballots have been filed. This time, it is with the Illinois State Board of Elections.

My source of this information is http://obamaballotchallenge.com/3-obama-ballot-challenges-in-illinois-now. Here the OBAMA BALLOT CHALLENGE group links directly to the Illinois State Board of Elections where the three petitioners are shown:

[See image here]

What is curious is that two dates for “objection” be to filed is past. The Freeman file expired on the 10th, and the Jackson and Meroni’s date of final objection time is the 13th. This would have been last Thursday… so what gives? Will the Obama people still be able to object even though the date has come and gone?

You can also read more about the Article II matter at: http://www.art2superpac.com/index.html

Edward C. Noonan NBC President 2012
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1910 on: January 17, 2012, 02:34:20 PM »

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqtbPG25G0k" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqtbPG25G0k</a>
Report to moderator   Logged
FarRightLooney
Getbig II
**
Posts: 213


View Profile
« Reply #1911 on: January 26, 2012, 12:27:22 PM »

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/the-current-ins-officially-recognizes-a-delineation-between-natural-born-and-native-born/

The Current INS Officially Recognizes A Delineation Between Natural-Born and Native-Born.

I was just made privy to a very important piece of research I had not previously been aware of. It comes by way of a comment forwarded to me by the author of the h2ooflife blog:

“I had presumed that the idiom “natural born citizen” appeared nowhere in U.S. Law other than A2S1C5, but I found it in administrative law and it is contrasted with native and naturalized citizenship. I’ve never seen any mention of this fact before and wonder how many are aware of it in the ineligibility camp. Here’s the quotes:
http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45104/0-0-0-48602.html

He then quoted two provisions from the link provided, but there’s actuallythree at the official INS “.gov” site which establish official recognition by the federal government that native-born and natural-born should be separately delineated. When you visit the suggested link to the Immigration and Naturalization service, it brings you to “Interpretation 324.2 Reacquisition of citizenship lost by marriage.”

Interpretation 324.2 (a)(3) provides:

“The repatriation provisions of these two most recent enactments also apply to a native- and natural-born citizen woman who expatriated herself by marriage to an alien…” (Emphasis added.)

Then, Interpretation 324.2(a)(7) provides:

“(7) Restoration of citizenship is prospective . Restoration to citizenship under any one of the three statutes is not regarded as having erased the period of alienage that immediately preceded it.

The words “shall be deemed to be a citizen of the United States to the same extent as though her marriage to said alien had taken place on or after September 22, 1922″, as they appeared in the 1936 and 1940 statutes, are prospective and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.” (Emphasis added.)

And again, Interpretation 324.2(b) provides:

“The effect of naturalization under the above statutes was not to erase the previous period of alienage, but to restore the person to the status if naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen, as determined by her status prior to loss.” (Emphasis added.)

http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45077/0-0-0-48438.html

Three times in this official INS Interpretation – currently published by the Obama Administration – native-born and natural-born are given separate consideration. And in the third example – from Interpretation 324.2(b) – the INS clearly states that each delineation, “naturalized, native, or natural-born citizen“, is a separate status.

The INS includes the following explanation of Interpretations:

“Interpretations were created to supplement and clarify the provisions of the statute and regulations as interpreted by the courts. These materials usually are not included in the regulations because they deal generally with procedural matters and do not deal directly with application and benefit requirements. They are still a useful tool to help you understand how the DHS Bureaus performs their different immigration services and enforcement functions. Users of the Operation Instructions and Interpretations should always consult the relevant regulations and manuals in conjunction with these materials. As the DHS Bureaus have grown, the trend has been towards inclusion of more materials in the regulations and field manuals, and the Operations Instructions and Interpretations have been updated less frequently.”

I am rather rocked by this find, having never seen it before, and it certainly comes to the attention of the nation at a critical moment, one day before the Georgia POTUS eligibility hearings. I do have a policy of only printingcomments from attorneys, but I did say in the comment rules that I would be happy to read messages from anyone. Since this research is new to me, and directly relevant to a proper analysis of the natural-born citizen clause, I have made an exception in posting this comment.

However, I must stress that I do not agree with some things at theh2ooflife blog. While I haven’t had the time to examine everything there, I must point out the following, and zealously dispute it:

“The First U.S. Congress included in the 1790 Immigration & Naturalization Act language to alert the State Department to the fact that Americans born abroad are (“natural born” citizens”  and are not to be viewed as foreigners due to foreign birth.  They were not granted citizenship via that US statute, rather their automatic citizenship was stated as a fact that must be recognized by immigration authorities.  They were not citizens by any other means than natural law, and statutory law was written to insure that their natural citizenship was recognized.”

This is not a reasonable explanation. It fails to recognize that Congress only has powers over naturalization. Congress has no power to define “natural born Citizen”, which has nothing to do with naturalization. Furthermore, if Congress wants to tell the State Department something, they don’t have to enact legislation to do it.

But more important is that all of the following naturalization acts, 1795, 1802, etc., were also passed to naturalize the children of U.S. citizens born abroad. And the words “natural born” were repealed in the 1795 Naturalization Act and never returned again.

In Rogers. v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815 (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that persons born abroad are not covered by the 14th Amendment, and therefore, their citizenship can be stripped from them by Congress, whereas Congress cannot strip citizenship from a 14th Amendment citizen, whether born or naturalized here:

“Mr. Justice Gray has observed that the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment was “declaratory of existing rights, and affirmative of existing law,” so far as the qualifications of being born in the United States, being naturalized in the United States, and being subject to its jurisdiction are concerned. United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S., at 688 . Then follows a most significant sentence:

 ”But it [the first sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment] has not touched the acquisition of citizenship by being born abroad of American parents; and has left that subject to be regulated, as it had always been, by Congress, in the exercise of the power conferred by the Constitution to establish an uniform rule of naturalization.”

Thus, at long last, there emerged an express constitutional definition of citizenship. But it was one restricted to the combination of three factors, each and all significant: birth in the United States, naturalization in the United States, and subjection to the jurisdiction of the United States. The definition obviously did not apply to any acquisition of citizenship by being born abroad of an American parent. That type, and any other not covered by the Fourteenth Amendment, was necessarily left to proper congressional action…

Further, it is conceded here both that Congress may withhold citizenship from persons like plaintiff Bellei and may prescribe a period of residence in the United States as a condition precedent without constitutional question.

Thus we have the presence of congressional power in this area, its exercise, and the Court’s specific recognition of that power and of its having been properly withheld or properly used in particular situations.” Rogers v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815, 830-831. (Emphasis added.)

Naional law has always required persons born abroad to be naturalized, whether born of citizen parents or not. Furthermore, those born abroad to citizen parents are subject to conditions precedent which Congress may impose upon them in order for them to remain U.S. citizens, whereas Congress has no such power over natural-born citizens, native-born citizens, or citizens naturalized in the U.S.

Again, not only are children of citizens born abroad not natural-born, the Supreme Court has held that their citizenship is subject to being stripped by Congress, since the Constitution does not directly provide for their citizenship, as it does for those born or naturalized in the United States.

I do not appreciate the author’s argument on this point. It is definitely wrong.

Regardless, the research provided as to the INS Interpretations is superb and greatly appreciated. Well done, sir.

Adding these official Interpretations of the INS, published at the official “.gov” site, to the Supreme Court’s opinion from Minor v. Happersett, the true Constitutional definition of  a natural-born citizen, as one born in the country to citizen parents, is further reinforced.

Like the Obama administration’s prior scrubbing of the Foreign Affairs Manual, on August 21, 2009, the INS web site appears due for a cut and die at the salon.

Leo Donofrio, Esq.
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1912 on: January 26, 2012, 10:30:01 PM »

This was from the earlier thread just mentioned:

Read more at: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138. By Craig Andresen.

Court is called to order.

Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.

Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.

Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.

Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.

June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.

Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.

It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.

The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.

Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.

Carl Swinson takes the stand.

Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.

2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.

Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.

Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.

RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.

DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.

Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.

Dreams From My Father entered.

Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.

Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.

This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.

At this point, the judge takes a recess.

The judge returns.

David Farrar takes the stand.

Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.

Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.

Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.

State Licensed PI takes the stand.

She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.

Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.

Next witness takes the stand.

This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.

Linda Jordan takes the stand.

Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.

Next witness.

Mr. Gogt.

Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.

Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.

States this is a product of layering.

Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.

Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.

Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.

Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.

Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.

Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.

Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.

Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.

Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.

Taitz takes the stand herself.

Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.

Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.

Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.

And with that, the judge closes the hearing.

Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1913 on: February 01, 2012, 10:40:22 AM »

Obama Ballot Challenge in Illinois Jackson Hearing Feb 2
Obama Ballot Challenge ^ | Feb 1, 2012 | Pamela Barnett

Posted on Wednesday, February 01, 2012 11:39:42 AM by ednoonan7

A Feb. 2 hearing will be held to determine whether Illinois State Board of Elections will allow Barack Obama on the Illinois Presidential ballot even though he is NOT a NATURAL Born Citizen according to Supreme Court precedent Minor v. Happersett (1875)

Hearings are open to the public. Please attend to support the objectors if you can.

See PDF file - http://www.scribd.com/doc/80058127/Obama-Ballot-Challenge-Illinois-Jackson-Hearing-Feb-2


(Excerpt) Read more at obamaballotchallenge.com ...
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1914 on: February 02, 2012, 04:39:37 PM »

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw</a>
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1915 on: March 01, 2012, 01:23:38 PM »

http://www.abc15.com/generic/news/live-video


BBBBOOOOMMMM!!!!!!
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1916 on: March 02, 2012, 06:56:00 AM »

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY</a>
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1917 on: March 02, 2012, 10:38:49 AM »

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012/02/vital-records-indicate-obama-not-born_29.html


Report to moderator   Logged
FarRightLooney
Getbig II
**
Posts: 213


View Profile
« Reply #1918 on: March 02, 2012, 11:46:04 AM »

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1wiGDYPALI" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1wiGDYPALI</a>
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1919 on: April 10, 2012, 07:05:09 PM »

http://puzo1.blogspot.com


Great!   
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1920 on: April 10, 2012, 07:12:35 PM »

Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Update on New Jersey Obama Ballot Access Objection
Natural Born Citizen - A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers ^ | 04/10/2012 | Mario Apuzzo
Posted on April 10, 2012 8:11:27 PM EDT by TexasVoter

We argued that Mr. Obama has not met his burden of showing that he is eligible to be on the New Jersey primary ballot by showing that he is a “natural born Citizen.” We argued that he has not presented any evidence to the New Jersey Secretary of State showing who he is and that he was born in the United States. We also argued that as a matter of law, Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” because he was born to a father who was not a U.S. citizen.

Obama’s attorney made a motion to dismiss the Objection in its entirety. ... Judge Masin denied Obama’s motion to dismiss and the case proceeded to trial.

(snip! - excerpts being what they are...)

Judge Masin will be contacting counsel today or tomorrow morning either by telephone or email as to his decision, stating “yes” or “no” on both issues. He will then provide his written decision to the Secretary of State no later than Wednesday, April 11, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.

(Excerpt) Read more at puzo1.blogspot.com ...
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1921 on: July 01, 2012, 05:26:11 PM »

Sheriff Joe set to release more Obama 'shockers' Arpaio sched. another news conf. on eligibility
wnd ^ | July 1, 2012 ;58 mins ago
Posted on July 1, 2012 7:16:52 PM EDT by Red Steel

Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse investigating Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have been promising more major revelations since their March 1 press conference, and now another event has been scheduled to unveil new information.

Arpaio told WND a press conference will be held July 17 at 2:30 p.m. local time at the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office in Phoenix, Ariz.

WND will once again provide live Web streaming of the event.

The evidence will include information gathered in the posse’s recent investigative trip to Hawaii as well as an update on the ongoing investigation.

At the March 1 conference, as WND reported March 1, Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse announced there is probable cause that the document released by the White House in April 2011 purporting to be Obama’s original, long-form birth certificate is a forgery. The posse said it also found probable cause that Obama’s Selective Service registration form is fraudulent.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1922 on: December 27, 2012, 09:27:11 AM »

Skip to comments.

Obama Family: "Barack Obama Sr Married Anna Toot in Hawaii" "Their union produced B. Obama Jr."
All Africa ^ | 15 August 2004 | John Oywa
Posted on April 27, 2010, 7:35:01 PM EDT by bushpilot1

"According to the family, Obama's father travelled to America to study at the University of Hawaii in 1959.

While there, he worked for an oil company and married his second wife, a white woman, named Anna Toot, and their union produced Barack Obama Jr.

Obama's book says Obama Snr left his family in Hawaii after winning a scholarship to study in Harvard when his son was two years old.

The marriage later broke up after Anna's father opposed it, according to Mama Sarah.

"Anna's father was furious about the marriage and threatened to have Obama Snr expelled from the university. Our son sent us letters, pleading that we intervene to save the marriage," remembers Sarah."

(Excerpt) Read more at allafrica.com ...
Report to moderator   Logged
andreisdaman
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 11008


View Profile
« Reply #1923 on: December 28, 2012, 05:14:13 PM »

Skip to comments.

Obama Family: "Barack Obama Sr Married Anna Toot in Hawaii" "Their union produced B. Obama Jr."
All Africa ^ | 15 August 2004 | John Oywa
Posted on April 27, 2010, 7:35:01 PM EDT by bushpilot1

"According to the family, Obama's father travelled to America to study at the University of Hawaii in 1959.

While there, he worked for an oil company and married his second wife, a white woman, named Anna Toot, and their union produced Barack Obama Jr.

Obama's book says Obama Snr left his family in Hawaii after winning a scholarship to study in Harvard when his son was two years old.

The marriage later broke up after Anna's father opposed it, according to Mama Sarah.

"Anna's father was furious about the marriage and threatened to have Obama Snr expelled from the university. Our son sent us letters, pleading that we intervene to save the marriage," remembers Sarah."

(Excerpt) Read more at allafrica.com ...


sigh..and how is thei relevant?HuhHuhHuhHuh....you really hurt yourself when you bump your old idiotic threads
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 8164


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #1924 on: January 19, 2013, 04:44:27 PM »

Breaking: 1940 Census Shows Obama Alias Harrison Bounel Born 1890; Ties To Connecticut
 BirtherReport.com ^ | January 19, 2013 | Unattributed/Orly Taitz

Posted on Saturday, January 19, 2013 11:42:17 AM by Seizethecarp

As reported here back in May of 2011 skip-tracer and debt collector Al Hendershot uncovered an alias tied to Barack Obama's Connecticut social security number and Michelle Obama.

Dr. Orly Taitz found the 1940 New York Census at Ancestry.com. The image below is taken from that census which list Harry Bounel and also shows he was born in 1890. That is the same year connected to Obama's social security number. It's also reported Bounel lived in Connecticut at one point. Obama's social security number is a number reserved for CT applicants.

Here are some excerpts from Dr. Taitz's blog on her research efforts in regards to Bounel:

According to 1940 census Harry Bounel was born in Russia in 1890. This is the date of birth on some of Lexis records associated with the Social Security number 042-68-4425, worked as a helper in a store.

Also, we had some records showing Harry Bounel residing with Robinson family in CT in 1910.

We see Bounel residing in CT in 1910. The Social Security was issued in 1977 in CT. He was 87 at that time. There was a hospital next to Newton. It was a Newtown psychiatric hospital, where some elderly without family resided their last days.

I see Newtown is right next to DANBURY (where you had placed the switched identities Obama and his Connecticut Social Security number. You had surmised that the identity was taken from someone at a local Danbury NURSING HOME.

What we found out that in 1976-1977, when new SSN laws were adopted, when this CT SNN 042-68-4425 was issued either in Danbury or in Stamford CT Social Security office (both near the hospital) elderly individuals needed to get a SSN in order to get medicare benefits.


(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ...
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 ... 75 76 [77] 78   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!