Once again, your pentulence for buffoonery is on prime display. You claim your question isn't in reference to a flood. Yet your question is, "Where is proof that the FLOOD was caused by God?"
No, my question is in regards to the
PROOF. Hell, I clear as day highlighted the word
PROOF in there. Not flood. Unlike you did with your pathetic little deflection attempt. Which failed. Just like your attempt to dig up some
PROOF that God caused the flood.
Instead of answering the question, you flail around flapping your gums with non-answers.
That, Einstein, is a reference to a flood, THE Flood, as a matter of fact.
No it wasn't. If it were, then I would have bolded the word flood. But it isn't. What word is bolded?
PROOF. You are either very very stupid or very very persistent at trying to appear stupid. I can't tell which it is.
Wrong again!! The answers are there, along with the links and references to back it. When you're done with the "Hooked on Phonics" session, take a test run.
No they are not. Maybe in your mind they are, but then again as we all see, your mind is simply unattached from reality and clear thinking. Please post a link where this
PROOF that God created this flood can be found.
This coming from someone who claims a question about the Flood isn't a reference to the Flood? Too funny!! BTW, genius, Moses didn't build the Ark. It's Noah!!!
No, this is coming from someone who asked a question about
PROOF God created the flood. Sorry the question isn't the question you want it to be or want to answer, but lack of answer is actually an answer in itself. Really, simple questions are beyond your scope. Does becoming a religious nut make you stupid or do you already have to be stupid to become a religious nut in the first place? What was your experience? Because, obviously you are quite stupid.
And whether Moses, Noah, Johnny Appleseed or whatever, when dealing with a bullshit story like the Bible, it doesn't really matter what their names are.