again you have to resort to insults.
look at the pics,
ronnie is bigger in all of them
ronnie is deeper and in better condition in all of them
ronnie is not missing any bodyparts in any of them
how do the pictures not prove ronnies superiority?
"the pictures don't count" is just an excuse you can't just refute all pictures with an excuse, eventually you just have to admit what you see and favorites aside ronnie is better
Im insulting you because its like banging my head against a wall. You think you know how a contest is judged looking at the pics, but you dont know what the fuck youre talking about, and youre on here trying to tell us (People that KNOW how contests are judged) whats up, when you think "striations" = conditioning.
And somehow I always let you bait me into arguing with you when every time im reminded of just how ignorant you are to things like conditioning.
I look at those pics, I see Dorian being drier, denser, thicker, and equal seperations, if not more, theyre just not as deep as Rons. (deep separations do not = conditioned either FYI) I see a Dorian at his peak that is better balanced, in better conditioning, and is just as larger except for 03, in which Ronnies conditioning was so bad (relatively speaking) that unless the judges went for pure size he would lose.
To you those pics prove Ron winning, because your Judging them on what you like? Why cant you wrap your head around this? I feel like im arguing with someone who got into bb a year ago.
FYI when I got into BB I thought Ron was the greates of all time, and I couldnt understand how people could think Dorian would beat him, but unlike you, I actually got off my ass and started looking things up and figuring out what the judging criteria was, and looked at people who were considered to have the best conditioning ever, and then it made sense to me. You just sound like an ignorant child.
