becuase a peak dorian beat a young ronnie, thats a desperate attempt to say why dorian is better.
it's like comparing a modern day arnold to gregg valentino and saying gregg was better, if you want contest results as reality which are not always the truth, ronnie has 8 mr O's and deserved all, dorian has 5, 3 of which are debated
Oh boy where should I begin? a young Ronnie?

NO Dorian beat Ronnie period , it's not Dorian's fault Ronnie wasn't good enough. again where did Ronnie improve the most from 1996/197 to 1998 ? conditioning , Sorry Dorian wrote the book on conditioning this isn not enough of an advantage to beat Dorian , especially when you consider the FACT ( I know you hate that word ) that at what Ronnie himself considers his best Olympia showing ever ( 1998 ) he just barely beat Flex Wheeler in one of the closest Mr Olympia contests in HISTORY ! , Flex BTW wasn't nearly as good as he was in 98 as he was in 93 and he drove Ronnie to the limit , Dorian absolutely crushed Flex 1993 , Dorian 1993 would have easily beaten Ronnie 1998 just based on that
I really laughed out loud when you typed Ronnie deserved all 8

and Dorian has SIX not 5 ( you're proving your ignorance again ) and 3 are ' debated ' if you mean ' debated ' as in people say he shouldn't have won allow me to school you on what others have said about Ronnies win
Shawn Ray said Ronnie 98 wasn't better than him or Flex , Flex said in 1999 he beat Ronnie , 2000 Kevin Levrone said he beat Ronnie , 2001 Even Ronnie thought he was second , 2002 Kevin again said he beat Ronnie , you still wanna talk about ' debate '
and your analogy about Arnold and Greg is retarded , Ronnie & Dorian competed in the same era , Ronnie just wasn't good enough