Author Topic: Obama: Corruption, Deception, Dishonesty, Deceit and Promises Broken  (Read 318047 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1000 on: August 19, 2011, 04:43:09 AM »
Federal Government Sells Forclosed Homes To Cronies To Collect Rent For HUD
RealMoney ^ | 8-18-2011 | Roger Arnold

Posted on Friday, August 19, 2011 1:25:35 AM by ExxonPatrolUs

A Huge Housing Bargain -- but Not for You
Roger Arnold
08/18/11 - 05:49 PM EDT





This column by Roger Arnold originally appeared on RealMoney on Aug. 11. For a free trial to RealMoney, follow .

NEW YORK () -- The largest transfer of wealth from the public to private sector is about to begin. The federal government will be bulk-selling the massive portfolio of foreclosed homes now owned by HUD, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to private investors -- vulture funds.


These homes, which are now the property of the U.S. government, the U.S. taxpayer, U.S. citizens collectively, are going to be sold to private investor conglomerates at extraordinarily large discounts to real value.


You and I will not be allowed to participate. These investors will come from the private-equity and hedge-fund community, Goldman Sachs(GS) and its derivatives, as well as foreign sovereign wealth funds that can bring a billion dollars or more to each transaction.


In the process, these investors will instantaneously become the largest improved real estate owners and landlords in the world. The U.S. taxpayer will get pennies on the dollar for these homes and then be allowed to rent them back at market rates.


On Wednesday, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Treasury Department issued a Request for Information (RFI) concerning the disposition of the inventory of foreclosed homes owned by the federal government.


An RFI is ostensibly a way for the federal government to get input from the private sector on how to accomplish the goals laid out in the request. But that's really just a facade, as the RFI was structured by the investors to begin with.


In reality, the RFI is a way for the members of Congress to find out if they can get away with bulk-selling these homes to private companies without incurring the wrath of their constituents, taxpayers and former owners of the properties.


Assuming taxpayers don't push back, the next step will be to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP). The RFP will be the bid and plan for these homes by investors.


The way to keep taxpayers from pushing back is to structure the RFI so that the real intention, the bulk sales, is masked by feel-good goals, such as stabilizing neighborhoods and increasing the supply of rental properties.


As intended, the mass media are playing their part in classic style. Every major newspaper in the U.S. has run articles discussing the plan as a rental conversion, allowing readers to assume that Fannie, Freddie and HUD will be renting the properties directly to families who need housing. And although there is an allowance for these kinds of rentals, it is a minor political facade to the obvious true goal of bulk-sale privatization of these homes.


The investors in this program have been waiting for this opportunity since the portfolio of homes owned by HUD began to spike in 2007, when foreclosures surged first in the "Rust Belt," principally Ohio and Michigan.


Since then, of course, the systemic collapse of housing has engulfed all of the major urban coastal regions of the U.S., as well as Phoenix and Las Vegas, and caused the homes owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are now under the direct control of the U.S. Treasury Department, to spike as well.


Even before this crisis occurred, HUD, i.e. the U.S. government, was the largest improved real estate owner in the world, because of its portfolio of foreclosed homes, which is classified as "real estate owned" (REO). The entire massive HUD REO Portfolio is quietly managed by a handful of private firms already, a group listed as Management and Marketing Contractors.


These M&M companies are principally owned by and employ former high-ranking government officials from the various germane agencies -- the Treasury, HUD, FHA and others. And they will provide the necessary access to the current government employees who are tasked with bringing this program to fruition. Once the privatization is complete, those government employees will move from their positions, and many will take up new employment at one of the M&Ms or the new vulture funds.


I am not currently aware of any way for retail investors to participate in this process.


It is probable, however, that once the privatization has occurred and the properties are generating rental income for the investors, the initial investors will cash out by forming real estate investment trusts (REITs), real estate operating companies (REOCs) or limited partnerships (LPs) that will be made available to retail investors.



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1001 on: August 19, 2011, 04:52:52 AM »

Obama Administration to Review All Deportation Cases, Apply DREAM Act-Style Criteria
By Judson Berger

Published August 19, 2011 | FoxNews.com




The Obama administration announced Thursday that it would launch a case-by-case review of illegal immigrants slated for deportation, in a move that could grant a reprieve to so-called DREAM Act beneficiaries and thousands of others.

The DREAM Act is a proposal in Congress to give illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children a chance at legal status if they complete two years of college or military service. Though the bill has not passed, supporters and critics alike suggested Thursday's announcement could serve to unilaterally carry out its provisions.

A spokeswoman with the Federation for American Immigration Reform described the new policy as "blanket amnesty."

But Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said in a letter to Senate Democrats that it would "enhance public safety" by focusing deportation efforts on those "who pose a threat."

Under the plan, DHS and the Department of Justice will review all cases in removal proceedings as well as any new cases to make sure those who are deported meet the kind of criteria established in a June 17 agency memo.

The memo from Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton instructed staff to consider 19 factors when exercising "prosecutorial discretion" -- or the discretion an ICE attorney has in deciding whether and how to pursue an immigration case. The list includes factors similar to those in the DREAM Act, like whether someone arrived in the U.S. as a "young child," is pursuing an education or has served in the military.

Thursday's announcement goes beyond the memo by establishing a process to flag and exempt certain illegal immigrants from deportation. A team of attorneys and officials will be tasked with reviewing the more than 300,000 cases in the system.

An ICE memo obtained by FoxNews.com said the effort would not provide "categorical relief for any group," but would try to prevent "low-priority" cases -- like those not involving convicted criminals -- from clogging the system.

Cecilia Munoz, White House director of intergovernmental affairs, wrote on the White House blog that the review would "clear out low-priority cases on a case-by-case basis and make more room to deport people who have been convicted of crimes or pose a security risk" -- while ensuring the low-priority cases are kept "out of the deportation pipeline in the first place."

Describing groups of people similar to those targeted in the DREAM Act, she said the low-priority list would include "individuals such as young people who were brought to this country as small children, and who know no other home," as well as "individuals such as military veterans and the spouses of active-duty military personnel."

She said that with more than 10 million people in the country illegally, the strategy is meant to focus limited resources on those who pose the greatest risk.

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid praised the decision.

"This new DHS directive will help prioritize our limited enforcement resources to focus on serious felons, gang members and individuals who are a national security threat rather than college students and veterans who have risked their lives for our country," Reid said in a statement. "I am especially pleased about the impact these new policies will have on those who would benefit from the DREAM Act. ... We lose a lot by sending them back to countries they do not know."

Reid said Congress should still pass immigration reform legislation.

Napolitano also stressed in her letter that the new process "will not alleviate the need for passage of the DREAM Act or for larger reforms."

But FAIR described the announcement as a complete overhaul of immigration law without approval by Congress.

"Having failed in the legislative process, the Obama administration has simply decided to usurp Congress's constitutional authority and implement an amnesty program for millions of illegal aliens," FAIR President Dan Stein said. "This step by the White House amounts to a complete abrogation of the president's duty to enforce the laws of the land and a huge breach of the public trust. ... In essence, the administration has declared that U.S. immigration is now virtually unlimited to anyone willing to try to enter -- and only those who commit violent felonies after arrival are subject to enforcement."

 Print     Close
URL

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/08/18/obama-administration-to-review-all-deportation-cases/



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/08/18/obama-administration-to-review-all-deportation-cases/#ixzz1VTUtVn5b


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1002 on: August 19, 2011, 05:19:13 AM »
OUTSIDE THE BOXAUGUST 19, 2011.Change for the Worse
Just as he promised, Obama has fundamentally transformed America..Article Comments (14) more in Opinion ».Email Print Save ↓ More .
.smaller Larger  By PETE DU PONT




The Standard & Poor's downgrade of U.S. debt is the latest fruit of the Obama administration's big-government policies. Ask Americans how the country is doing, and the response is a vote of no confidence. In August 2009, 34% of likely voters said the country was headed in the right direction. A month ago that proportion had declined to 25%, and last week only 16% thought so. Rasmussen's mid-August poll found that 4% of adults rate the economy as good or excellent, and 66% think we are doing poorly.

Just before his election as president, Barack Obama declared that "we are five days from fundamentally transforming America." He has made good on that promise. Huge increases in federal spending—up 28% in just three years—were the beginning. Putting health care—17% of the American economy—under Washington's control was next. Government control of business is expanding too: 379 new government business rules were added in July alone, according to Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming. Federal government debt held by the public rose from $6 trillion (40% of GDP) in 2008 to $9 trillion (62%) in 2010, The Congressional Budget Office says it could reach 200% by 2037, if the economy doesn't collapse first.

Mr. Obama's original budget for fiscal 2012 would have more than doubled the debt held by the public, from 2010's $9 trillion to $19 trillion in 2021. Politico reports that by the 2013 inauguration, the government will have taken on addition debt to the tune of "$22,500 for every man, woman, and child in the nation" during Mr. Obama's tenure. Some 45 million Americans, or 1 in 7, receive food stamps, up from less than 30 million a few years ago. Finally, in the previous two years our annual economic growth after inflation has averaged only 1.3% annually, just about half our past 10-year average of 2.5%. In the first half of this year, it was running at an annual rate of 0.8%.

The White House says unemployment will decline to 8.25% this year, though it may well remain above 9%. Looking back at the past 50 years, no president has been re-elected when unemployment was higher than 7.2%.

One of the Obama administration's central (and most damaging) beliefs is that tax rates must be raised for what President Obama calls "millionaires and billionaires," which he defines to include individuals and small businesses making as little as $200,000. Interestingly, Christina Romer, who was chairman of Mr. Obama's Council of Economic Advisors, has done some research on the impact of tax increases, and concluded that increasing taxes by 1% of GDP for deficit-reduction purposes leads to a 3% reduction in GDP.

Raising taxes on affluent taxpayers is not just bad economics, it's unfair. The Tax Foundation has pointed out that in 2009 taxpayers earning over $200,000 paid half of all income taxes, even though they had earned just 25% of adjusted gross income. On the other hand, more that 58 million taxpayers, around 42% of tax filers, paid no income tax at all. Add in the money some of them receive in refundable child care tax credits, the Making Work Pay program and the Earned Income Tax Credit, and it is obvious that ratcheting up taxes on higher income taxpayers would just exacerbate this inequity.

Growing dissatisfaction, skyrocketing spending, a weak economy, and a real debate about tax hikes all suggest that the 2012 presidential election will be very different from the 2008 Obama victory. A recent Pew report finds that 41% of voters would like to see Obama re-elected, and 40% would prefer a Republican win in 2012. That one-point Obama lead was down from 11 points in May. The President's approval rating from January through June averaged 47%. Earlier this month, according to Gallup, it fell to 39%. Mr. Obama is unlikely to win re-election unless that number improves.

He faces three major challenge. The first is a rift with business leaders, who resent being scapegoated. They may work hard to raise campaign money for Mr. Obama's opponent.

The second is the increasing disappointment of independent voters, who are rightly unhappy with higher spending, higher taxes, ObamaCare, a lack of progress on trade, increased restrictions on the energy supply, and the near-commandeering of the auto and banking industries, all of which amount to an effort to Europeanize America, just as European welfare states are facing their own crisis

His latest challenge may well be from Texas Gov. Rick Perry's fresh presidential campaign speech: "The fact is, for nearly three years President Obama has been downgrading American jobs, he's been downgrading our standing in the world, he's been downgrading our financial stability, he's been downgrading our confidence and downgrading the hope for a better future for our children. That's a fact." Indeed it is, and it's a fact that bodes ill for the future of America.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903639404576515252974962700.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLETopOpinion


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1003 on: August 19, 2011, 06:10:56 AM »
August 19, 2011
The Anti-American President
By Boyd Richard Boyd



Obviously something is rotten on Pennsylvania Avenue; no intelligent American president would do the things Obama has done.  There has been talk of his inexperience,  incompetence, or just plain stupidity to explain his Bizarro-administration.  However, Obama is not incompetent; he is an intelligent anti-American president.  Obama is not a failure at his job -- his job is the failure of our country.

Liberty-minded folk have several reasons why we assume another person is incompetent rather than malicious.  One reason is our belief that a person is "innocent until proven guilty"; another is the natural presumption others are similar to ourselves.  Unfortunately, these ideas have been coupled with a pair of dangerously pragmatic moral equivalencies foisted upon us all: "Who am I to judge?" and "They couldn't possibly mean that."  As long as there is any possibility that Obama is just in over his head and doesn't mean what he says and does, many will excuse him on those grounds.

Every American must judge Obama and his ideas and understand he does mean what he says, and realize there is no excuse, save one -- Barack Obama is an anti-American in thought and deed.

Obama gets dreams from his socialist father.  His mother was a fellow traveler.  Obama lived in anti-American Indonesia as a child.  Later, granddad decided Obama needed a Communist mentor.  O got into Harvard on the recommendation of anti-Semitic Khalid al Mansour, an adviser to Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal.  In college O chose his friends carefully -- "the more politically active black students, foreign students, Chicanos, Marxist professors and structural feminists."  As a professor he taught Marxist Saul Alinsky tactics, and as a constitutional scholar he believed that there are fundamental flaws in the Constitution, such as restraint on governmental power.  As a community organizer and counsel he pushed sub-prime mortgages which helped buckle our economy.

He's a trench-mate with voter-fraudsters ACORN and quasi-commie SEIU.  He had house parties and sat on boards with an unrepentant, revolutionary communist, who probably ghostwrote one of O's autobiographies.  He attended the social-justice church of Jeremiah Wright, where he was preached at on collective salvation and black liberation.  Illinois state senator and communism-lover Alice Palmer, picked O as her chief of staff.   As a U.S. senator, he had the most leftist voting record.  His wife's only source of American pride came in her 40s as a result of O's own success.  He was endorsed by the Communist Party in 2004, and in 2008 Obama got CPUSA's endorsement again, basically running on the CPUSA platform.  (And yes, CPUSA have endorsed him again for 2012!)

And this was before the campaign and presidency.  Does his bio reflect incompetence or something more sinister?  Does his journey sound like one of an all-American or an anti-American?

In his own words, during the campaign:

Sept, 17 2007 to SEIU:

"[Y]our agenda's been my agenda[.]"

November 2007 to ACORN:

"I've been fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career."

December 2007 addressing ACORN and other community organizations:

"[W]e're going to be calling all of you in to help us shape the agenda, We're going to be having meetings all across the country with community organizations so that you have input into the agenda for the next presidency of the United States of America."

January 5, 2008 to SEIU

"I've been working with the SEIU before I was elected to anything ... We are going to paint the nation purple with SEIU. SEIU, I'm glad you are with me. Let's together change the country. SEIU! SEIU!"

January 17, 2008

"f somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can, it's just that it will bankrupt them...under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket."

May 16, 2008 in Oregon:

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK...That's not leadership. That's not going to happen."

June 3, 2008 in St Paul Minnesota

"This was the moment -- this was the time --when we came together to remake this great nation"

July 13, 2008 to La Raza:

"[W]e rise and fall together as one people...And together, we won't just win an election -- we will transform this nation."

October 12, 2008 to Joe the Plumber:

"I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."

October 30, 2008 at the University of Mississippi, Columbia:

"We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America[.]"

How many Marxist groups will he share agendas with before it's apparent?  How many times will he say he wants to change, remake, or fundamentally transform America before we believe he wants to?

Almost everything Obama says and does is a scripted, controlled, and choreographed event.  The man causes relentless instability, yet it is all planned.  We know where his ideas come from: the George Soros-funded, Hillary Clinton-founded Center for American Progress and Joel Rogers' Apollo Alliance with help from its ex-Weather Underground co-founder, among others.

As president he's appointed the following foxes as hen house guards:

A former SEIU member who kind of agrees with Mao...as manufacturing czar.               
A former commissioner of Socialist International, eco-profiteer, and CAP board member...as global warming czar.
An ACORN defender and Obama's private attorney...as ethics and transparency czar.
A revolutionary communist...as green jobs czar.                               
A power-lusting control freak longing to delimit choices...as regulatory czar.
An anti-capitalist Chicken Little peddling junk science...as science czar.
A man who thinks terrorists represent the legitimate needs and grievances of ordinary people...as counter-terrorism czar.
An anti-Israel "poverty breeds terrorism" theorist...as U.S. ambassador to the U.N.
A woman who believes that Congress can abridge free speech and another who thinks the court of appeals is where policy is made...as Supreme Court justices.
An SEIU VP, activist for the Working Families Party, and political director for Bertha Lewis, the head of ACORN's New York chapter...as director of the office of public affairs to help push the president's agenda.
A man who gives guns to drug cartels while allowing them to smuggle drugs in, who refuses to protect our borders while litigating any state which tries to defend its own as and turns a blind eye to voter intimidation...as attorney general.
A woman worried about white right-wing extremists while she has Grandma groped at the airport...as homeland security chief.
A woman who proposes that the U.S. has the right to protect "Palestine" from Israel...as a foreign policy adviser.
SEIU president and Marxist Andy Stern and the AFL-CIO's Dick Trumka are/were two of the most frequent White House guests.  Obama directs NASA's chief to perform Muslim outreach.  The EPA will handle cap and trade after Congress said no.  The borders won't be secured until O gets amnesty for millions of potential voters with no allegiance to America.  O imposed a drilling ban for oil, then said the judge could fly a kite when the judge lifted the ban.  Brazil purchased some of those rigs, and Obama wants to be a big consumer of Brazil's oil.  His administration may have facilitated the murder of a border agent and is trying to suppress second-amendment rights, as a result.

His Tea Party mockery, the takeover of industries, the contortions of  Obamacare, the slow response to BP's oil spill, the tens of thousands of new regulations, the aggressive deficit spending, the Fed's printing sprees, bowing to and borrowing from anti-Americans -- all are part of the blueprint.  Even his petulance, arrogance, constant golfing, and "let them eat cake" attitude are part of the plan.  Obama understands how grating such behavior is to any American who doesn't worship strongmen.  His glaring at Netanyahu after throwing Israel under the bus, his browbeating the Supreme Court during the SOTU, and of course, his Mussolini-like poses with his chin touching the ceiling are all calculated to intimidate some into a cult of personality and alienate others.  And he has done so much more.

Obama has never stood for individualism, capitalism, or liberty.  Everything he does has the reek of statism, collectivism, and tyranny, but not because he is an incompetent bumbler -- though he may be in many areas, sans TOTUS -- it's because he is a statist and a collectivist and the citizens of our country naïvely gave the reins of power to a tyrant.

To paraphrase the Wizard of Oz, an honest Obama would say to us, "Oh, no, my fellow world citizens, I'm a very good anti-American president.  I'm just a very bad American president."

Boyd Richard Boyd blogs as the Cold Hearted Patriot at www.catwyp.com and is the author of America Vs. Anti-America.  E-mail: coldheartedpatriot@yahoo.com.  Twitter: @ColdHartPatriot.


Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2011/08/the_anti-american_president.html

 at August 19, 2011 - 08:09:07 AM CDT

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1004 on: August 19, 2011, 06:34:40 AM »
This isn't really just ObaMA.  Its our whole fucking government, house, and all. 

This started with BUSH and then Obama stooged the presidency to a whole new level

Wrong, liberal.

Things were awesome until Jan 20, 2009.  That's when everything changed. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1005 on: August 19, 2011, 09:40:58 AM »
Obama HHS caught campaigning for Democrats ("Blatant violation of the Hatch Act, among other laws")
Washington Examiner ^ | 8/18/2011 | Conn Carroll




New documents obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act request show that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) spent over one million taxpayer dollars promoting Obamacare in coordination with the 2010 mid-term elections.

The documents include correspondence between HHS officials and representatives from The Ogilvy Group, the public relations firm hired to drive web traffic to an HHS site promoting Obamacare as "the Affordable Care Act."

On October 25, 2010, HHS New Media Communications Director Julia Eisman sent an email to Ogilvy Senior Vice President Imani Green, reading, "Given the high performance, we're wondering if we should we consider reallocating resources from the lesser performing words and put more $$ to ‘Obamacare’ - at least for the next 7 days." Seven days from October 25, 2010, was November 2nd, Election Day.

"There is nothing special about November 2nd other than the fact that it was Election Day," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton told The Examiner. "What possible reason could the Obama HHS have for maximizing their propaganda dollars in the seven days before Election Day other than to elect Democrats? This seems to be a blatant violation of the Hatch Act, among other laws. Congress needs to get on the ball and investigate," he concluded.



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1006 on: August 19, 2011, 10:50:45 AM »
Obama to Improve Ethiopian Education Ministry Office Conditions
U.S. Trade & Aid Monitor ^ | Aug. 19, 2011 | Steve Peacock




The Ethiopian Ministry of Education headquarters is getting an upgrade, courtesy of U.S. taxpayers via the Obama Administration. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) today issued a presolicitation notice (#SOL-663-11-000007) alerting interested contractors about the refurbishment project, which seeks to improve office conditions for the Ministry's Planning and Resource Mobilization Directorate staff at Arat Killo.

Specifically, the initiative seeks to:

Create an open floor space plan for teams; increase the number of workstations; and new office spaces such as a meeting room, a kitchen, and an archive by office partitioning; supply modern office furniture and sanitary fixtures; refurbish the toilet facilities; and establish new data-tele connectivity.

USAID did not provide an estimated cost. A more detailed proposal will be issued at a later, unspecified date.



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1007 on: August 19, 2011, 11:55:53 AM »
Economist Jeffrey Sachs Hits Obama: "There's Never Been A Plan"
Real Clear Politics Video ^ | August 19,2011




Economist Jeffrey Sachs slammed President Obama on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Friday.

"We're almost three years into this administration, and there's never been a plan. And that's what everybody feels. And the president didn't lead. He waited. The quintessential image, sadly, of an administration that I supported and hoped for much better, is the president waiting by the phone to hear what Congress calls to tell him. It doesn't work in this country that way. It's not a matter that it's August. It's a matter that it's August 2011. So we've been drifting for a very long time. And we've been drifting down. And we had a short-term plan that failed. A short-term stimulus that was supposed to get the economy back on track, but it failed.

And now we have nothing behind it. And we have no agreements, and we have no leadership. And, frankly, I do think it's pretty odd the president's on vacation right now. Normally I wouldn't care about such things, but the world markets are in deep crisis. It's no joke. This isn't just an up-and-down little blip. This is a very serious situation."


(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22841
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1008 on: August 19, 2011, 11:56:51 AM »
Plan = bail bail bail...hope for the best.   Next, they will be giving everyone free grain.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1009 on: August 19, 2011, 01:16:39 PM »
What a frigging mess. 




Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1010 on: August 20, 2011, 04:10:55 AM »
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Obama accuses Congress of holding back recovery
Reuters ^
Posted on August 20, 2011 6:58:40 AM EDT by Sub-Driver

Obama accuses Congress of holding back recovery Photo 6:04am EDT

By Laura MacInnis

VINEYARD HAVEN, Massachusetts (Reuters) - A vacationing President Barack Obama accused Congress on Saturday of holding back the U.S. economic recovery by blocking "common sense" measures he said would create jobs and help growth.

In remarks recorded on Wednesday on his campaign-style bus tour in Illinois and aired during his holiday in Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, Obama said the stalled construction, trade and payroll tax bills could give a boost to the economy.

"The only thing preventing us from passing these bills is the refusal by some in Congress to put country ahead of party. That's the problem right now. That's what's holding this country back," the president said in his weekly radio address, which is also transmitted on the Internet.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...





Lmfao!    Fucking moron. 

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1011 on: August 20, 2011, 04:26:42 AM »

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1012 on: August 20, 2011, 10:33:43 AM »
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/getting-ready-for-a-wave-of-coal-plant-shutdowns/2011/08/19/gIQAzkZ0PJ_blog.html#



Here it comes.     Wave after wave of treason , depression, job losses, inflation, etc



again whoever voted for this asshole I hope you suffer a long slow dying painful death for what you have done. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1013 on: August 20, 2011, 06:24:14 PM »
New EPA rule could lead to rolling blackouts in Texas, PUC chairwoman says
star telegram ^ | Aug. 19, 2011 | Jack Z. Smith
Posted on August 20, 2011 7:12:50 PM EDT by george76

The head of the Texas Public Utility Commission expressed concern Friday that a new federal air quality rule, set to take effect Jan. 1, will cause disruptions in electric service.

If implementation of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule is not delayed, "I have no doubt in my mind that this rule will result in reliability issues and rolling outages in Texas," Donna Nelson said at the start of the commission's meeting.

...

The company says the industry's standard time frame for installing emission controls is several years, but the rule requires compliance in six months. So Luminant, a subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings, has said it may have to shut down some coal-fired power plants in East Texas.

"Curtailing plant and/or mine operations will be the only option" if the 1,323-page rule goes into effect as planned, Luminant said.

(Excerpt) Read more at star-telegram.com ...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1014 on: August 20, 2011, 06:25:24 PM »
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Exxon fighting regulatory “pirates” in Gulf of Mexico
Hot Air ^ | August 20,2011 | ED MORRISSEY   
Posted on August 20, 2011 2:23:47 PM EDT by Hojczyk

ExxonMobil, and its Norwegian partner Statoil made the biggest discovery of all — a field worth a billion barrels of oil — 7,000 feet below sea level in its “Julia” field in 2007.

Exxon tried to keep its discovery secret to keep marauders away. Sadly, the pirates in this instance are U.S. regulators — and their aim is to stop them.

That’s right: Instead of marvel at the continuing treasures of the New World, or hail the human ingenuity that made retrieval of so much oil possible, or simply quantify how this discovery will boost U.S. energy security, Interior Department bureaucrats moved instead to snatch Exxon’s permits and shut the whole thing down.

Employing an extreme technicality, these regulators claimed that Exxon’s request in 2008 for a short suspension of activity to upgrade and make safer its drilling operation amounted to an abandonment of three of its five permits, simply because Exxon hadn’t signed a contract with another partner, Chevron, by the time the suspension was completed. …

Exxon is now fighting the permit action in a federal court in Lake Charles, La., calling it “arbitrary,” “capricious” and “an abuse of law.” It’s also a textbook case of the anti-business climate fostered by the Obama administration which should be bending over backward to help Exxon create jobs and profits.

So let’s look at what the Obama administration is trying to accomplish, and what it’s costing you as a result.

Well, it’s going to cost us jobs in the Gulf, and not just there, either. As IBD points out, drilling requires a lot more support than just people working on the rig. The rigs have to be built, and then the heavy machinery has to be manufactured — “in places like Youngstown, Ohio,” at a steel plant

S

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1015 on: August 20, 2011, 06:40:40 PM »
Aug. 19, 2011 |(52) COMMENTS

Plugged In

Energy writer Thomas Content keeps you current as you adapt to changes in the world of energy, climate change and efforts to build a greener economy.


Utilities: Rule to curb air pollution will hike power rates (62)
LED merger: Cree pays $525 million to acquire Ruud Lighting (17)
CEO: Biofuels initiative 'plays into strong suit for Virent'
View All Blog Posts

Two state utilities said this week new federal pollution rules will lead to higher electricity costs come January.

Wisconsin Public Service Corp. of Green Bay said its residential customers can expect an increase of more than $4 a month next year, including about $2 linked to the new rules designed to limit air pollution from coal-fired power plants.

The utility said it would see higher costs of about $32.6 million in 2012 from the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule that was finalized recently by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. That will result in rates going up by 6.8% instead of 3.4%, the utility said.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency last month finalized stronger regulations for Wisconsin and 26 other states aimed at curbing air pollution from long-distance sources.

Environmental groups praised the new rule because it would reduce acid rain and air pollution as well as help curb health effects from dirty air linked to coal plants. The EPA projected the rule will save up to 34,000 lives a year and prevent more than 400,000 asthma attacks as well as 19,000 admissions to hospitals.

Nationwide, the EPA estimated that utilities are projected to spend $800 million on the rule in 2014, in addition to $1.6 billion a year that's been spent to satisfy an earlier version of the regulations.

But the EPA estimates the nation will see $120 billion to $280 billion in annual health and welfare benefits beginning in 2014.

The new rule has been in development for several years but the first phase of compliance hits utilities in 2012. WPS said it won't have time to install pollution controls by next year at its plants, but will be able to comply by purchasing credits from other utilities that have cut emissions.

The utility also said it plans to operate its coal plants less next year than it otherwise would have, and will buy more power from the Midwest wholesale power market as a result, a move that it said is also a factor in higher costs for customers.

"This is the best option we have to meet power supply needs for 2012 and comply with the new EPA rule at this time," said Karen Kollmann, WPS director of fuels management in a statement.

On Thursday, Wisconsin Power & Light Co. of Madison said it would face an additional $9 million in costs linked to the air pollution rule. With the change, the utility is now seeking an increase in 2012 of $20 million, or 2%, utility finance manager Martin Seitz said in a filing with state regulators.

Todd Stuart, executive director of the Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group, criticized the increases, and he noted that large energy users like paper mills will see higher than average increases, compared with homeowners and small businesses. Paper mills served by WPS could see a 9% hike, he said.

"The EPA's new rules have directly resulted in a major new cost for struggling homeowners and manufacturers," Stuart said in a statement. "Members of Congress should be taking a very hard look at the significant compliance costs of EPA's new mandates."

"Industry always cries wolf whenever EPA tries to reduce air pollution," said Katie Nekola, lawyer with the conservation group Clean Wisconsin. "The fact is, the new rule will affect old, inefficient, unnecessary coal plants that should have been shut down long ago. The continued operation of those old units is costing ratepayers money, but you don't hear industry complaining about that."


http://www.jsonline.com/business/128109718.html



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1016 on: August 20, 2011, 06:56:46 PM »
Skip to comments.

A Politicized Justice Department Strikes Again
National Review ^ | August 17, 2011 | Hans A. von Spakovsky
Posted on August 20, 2011 9:48:54 PM EDT by rhema

The Department of Justice is now prosecuting a 79-year-old grandfather. The reason: Richard Retta walks alongside women on the sidewalk outside a Planned Parenthood abortion facility and offers women hope that they can carry their babies to term.

“They go in and they’re kind of sullen in what they’re doing, and I’m sure there’s a lot of sorrow there,” Retta says in a short video by Pro-Life Unity. “But when they change their mind, most of the times they’re smiling, they’re happy. And they’re willing to talk to us,” he says.

This is the first time, in over a decade of sidewalk counseling, that anyone has sued him for obstruction. (Last month, however, he was pepper-sprayed for his efforts by a woman walking into the clinic who apparently didn’t want him talking to her.)

Retta estimates that he and other volunteers have helped more than 1,300 women change their minds about abortion. But that kind of success seems to be too much for this administration. It is so committed to the agenda of abortion groups that it threatened to shut down the entire government during the budget debate earlier this year to preserve more than $300 million in federal funds for Planned Parenthood. It also has threatened to cut off Medicaid funds to states like Indiana that ban state grants to the organization.

Obama’s DOJ claims that Retta’s sidewalk counseling violates the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, enacted by Congress in 1994. In a July 2011 complaint, the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division says that Retta violated federal law because he “walks very closely beside patients” as they enter the clinic. It also claims that Retta follows them when they leave.

But FACE permits Retta to walk beside patients, coming or going, on a public sidewalk. And the First Amendment protects his right to speak to them. In fact, the FACE Act (18 U.S.C. § 248) forbids only physical obstruction, intimidation, or the use or threat of force. The FACE Act protects the activity that Retta engaged in: The statute specifically states that it does not “prohibit any expressive conduct (including peaceful picketing or other peaceful demonstration).”

DOJ’s allegation that Retta physically blocked patient access is dubious. On Jan. 8, 2011, he supposedly “physically obstructed a patient from entering the clinic” by standing in front of her. The DOJ complaint alleges that, as she then entered the building, Retta yelled, “Don’t go in there. Don’t let them kill your baby.”

Retta was not dressed in a black paramilitary uniform, he was not carrying a nightstick, and he was not yelling racial epithets or blocking the entrance to a polling place. Yet this is the same Justice Department that dismissed a voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panther party, whose members engaged in exactly that behavior. Somehow the behavior and speech of a 79-year-old sidewalk counselor violates federal law against intimidation, but the speech and behavior of the New Black Panthers in Philadelphia in 2008 was just fine, according to the skewed perspective of the liberals who inhabit the Civil Rights Division these days.

As a result, DOJ is demanding that Retta pay a $10,000 civil penalty for violating FACE and $15,000 in fines to his alleged victims. It also wants Retta — and everyone “acting in concert” with him — to be prohibited from standing within 20 feet of the Planned Parenthood gate.

Retta was shocked to learn that DOJ had brought charges against him. The department’s doubtful claim is also brought into question by Retta’s history. He doesn’t just counsel women on the sidewalks about the tragic consequences of abortion; he has also taught sidewalk-counseling classes for about a decade.

He prints a homemade, 22-page training manual that teaches volunteers how to conduct themselves. Item number two on his list of “don’ts”: “DO NOT block the woman’s path.”

Retta also instructs counselors to “[a]void being intimidating in any way.”

Nearly 350 women have kept their children because of conversations Retta personally had with them. He deserves thanks for saving hundreds of lives and making abortion rarer. Proponents of abortion claim that one of their goals is to reduce the number of abortions, yet Retta is being attacked by the Obama Justice Department because of his very success in persuading women to make life-giving choices.

The circumstances of this case cast great doubt on the legitimacy of the DOJ complaint, which describes Retta as “among the most vocal and aggressive anti-abortion protestors [sic] outside of the Clinic.” Of course, even “vocal and aggressive” speech is protected by the First Amendment — or so the Justice Department claimed when it dismissed the New Black Panther case. Retta’s real problem appears to be political: He offers women an authentic choice, in a one-option zone.

Thomas E. Perez, assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division, is unconcerned about the free-speech rights implicated here. Instead, he focuses on the questionable allegations of physical obstruction. “Individuals who seek to obtain or provide reproductive health services have the right to do so without encountering hazardous physical obstructions,” he said. An elderly man is apparently “hazardous” in the view of Perez, but two threatening, racist hate-mongers blocking a polling place are not.

The attorneys who filed this lawsuit — Aaron Zisser and Michelle Leung — were recently hired as career attorneys by the Obama administration. When Zisser worked for Human Rights First, he blogged from Guantanamo about his concern over America’s supposed denial of rights to terrorists. Leung has worked as co-counsel with the ACLU of Northern California and the ACLU of Texas. Her résumé describes her work, as an ACLU intern, in getting a school district to eliminate an “unconstitutional dog-sniffing policy that discriminated against African-American students.”

Zisser and Leung seem more interested in protecting terrorists than citizens, and apparently consider Americans’ freedom from being sniffed by dogs to be more important than their freedom of speech.

From the Planned Parenthood office where Retta counsels women, the White House is visible down the street. The Obama administration offers extensive federal support to abortion advocates and organizations, while using federal resources to target pro-lifers. It should come as no surprise that this politicized Justice Department is willing to abuse federal law to suppress anti-abortion views.

It forgets that compassionate sidewalk counselors, too, have rights — including the right to be free from government intimidation when engaging in free speech.

— Hans A. von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation (www.heritage.org) and the former counsel to the assistant attorney general for civil rights at the Justice Department.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1018 on: August 21, 2011, 06:10:53 AM »
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/usda-spends-28-million-more-taxpayer-dol



(CNSNews.com) – The U.S. Department of Agriculture is paying $112 million in tax money to farmers and ranchers in 11 Western states to restore the habitat of the Sage Grouse, a bird that has not been listed as either threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species law because the government says there are too many of them.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced last week that the USDA would dedicate $21.8 million to pay eligible ranchers and farmers in the state of Wyoming to encourage conservation practices that preserve the numbers of Sage Grouse.

That will bring to $112 million the total amount that the USDA has distributed over the last two years to eligible farmers and ranchers in 11 states as part of its Sage Grouse Initiative.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1019 on: August 21, 2011, 06:17:41 PM »
President Obama's Deferral Proposal: Hamstringing American Companies, Reducing American Jobs (video)
Youtube ^ | May 11, 2009 | Cato Institute/Dan Mitchell
Posted on August 21, 2011 8:26:04 PM EDT by Nachum

President Obama's proposal to severely restrict "deferral" will cause a significant tax increase on American companies trying to earn market share in other nations. For all intents and purposes, the White House plan is protectionism, but the target is American companies rather than their foreign rivals. This Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation video explains why this misguided policy will reduce exports from America and reduce jobs in America. For more information: www.freedomandprosperity .org

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2767034/posts



Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1020 on: August 22, 2011, 05:06:00 AM »
Attorney General of N.Y. Is Said to Face Pressure on Bank Foreclosure Deal
By GRETCHEN MORGENSON
Published: August 21, 2011


 
Eric T. Schneiderman, the attorney general of New York, has come under increasing pressure from the Obama administration to drop his opposition to a wide-ranging state settlement with banks over dubious foreclosure practices, according to people briefed on discussions about the deal.


Eric T. Schneiderman has objected to elements of the settlement for months.

In recent weeks, Shaun Donovan, the secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and high-level Justice Department officials have been waging an intensifying campaign to try to persuade the attorney general to support the settlement, said the people briefed on the talks.

Mr. Schneiderman and top prosecutors in some other states have objected to the proposed settlement with major banks, saying it would restrict their ability to investigate and prosecute wrongdoing in a variety of areas, including the bundling of loans in mortgage securities.

But Mr. Donovan and others in the administration have been contacting not only Mr. Schneiderman but his allies, including consumer groups and advocates for borrowers, seeking help to secure the attorney general’s participation in the deal, these people said. One recipient described the calls from Mr. Donovan, but asked not to be identified for fear of retaliation.

Not surprising, the large banks, which are eager to reach a settlement, have grown increasingly frustrated with Mr. Schneiderman. Bank officials recently discussed asking Mr. Donovan for help in changing the attorney general’s mind, according to a person briefed on those talks.

In an interview on Friday, Mr. Donovan defended his discussions with the attorney general, saying they were motivated by a desire to speed up help for troubled homeowners. But he said he had not spoken to bank officials or their representatives about trying to persuade Mr. Schneiderman to get on board with the deal.

“Eric and I agree on a tremendous amount here,” Mr. Donovan said. “The disagreement is around whether we should wait to settle and resolve the issues around the servicing practices for him — and potentially other A.G.’s and other federal agencies — to complete investigations on the securitization side. He might argue that he has more leverage that way, but our view is we have the immediate opportunity to help a huge number of borrowers to stay in their homes, to help their neighborhoods and the housing market.”

And Alisa Finelli, a spokeswoman for the Justice Department. said: “The Justice Department, along with our federal agency partners and state attorneys general, are committed to achieving a resolution that will hold servicers accountable for the harm they have done consumers and bring billions of dollars of relief to struggling homeowners — and bring relief swiftly because homeowners continue to suffer more each day that these issues are not resolved.”

Terms of the possible settlement under consideration center on foreclosure improprieties like so-called robo-signing and submitting apparently forged documents to the courts to speed up the process of removing troubled borrowers from homes. Negotiations on this deal have been led by Thomas J. Perrelli, associate attorney general of the United States, and Tom Miller, the attorney general of Iowa.

An initial term sheet outlining a possible settlement emerged in March, with institutions including Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo being asked to pay about $20 billion that would go toward loan modifications and possibly counseling for homeowners.

In exchange, the attorneys general participating in the deal would have agreed to sign broad releases preventing them from bringing further litigation on matters relating to the improper bank practices.

The banks balked at the $20 billion figure. And the talks seemed to stall over the summer, as Mr. Schneiderman and a few other attorneys general — Beau Biden of Delaware and Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, for example — questioned aspects of the deal.

Mr. Schneiderman began objecting a few months ago to the proposed releases barring future litigation, declining to participate as long as they were included.

“The attorney general remains concerned by any attempt at a global settlement that would shut down ongoing investigations of wrongdoing related to the mortgage crisis,” said Danny Kanner, the spokesman for Mr. Schneiderman. His office has opened several inquiries into mortgage practices during the credit boom.

Representatives for the four big banks declined to comment. Mr. Schneiderman has also come under criticism for objecting to a settlement proposed by Bank of New York Mellon and Bank of America that would cover 530 mortgage-backed securities containing Countrywide Financial loans that investors say were mischaracterized when they were sold.

The deal would require Bank of America to pay $8.5 billion to investors holding the securities; the unpaid principal amount of the mortgages remaining in the pools totals $174 billion. Lawyers representing 22 institutional investors, including the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, BlackRock and Pimco, contended that the deal was favorable.

This month, Mr. Schneiderman sued to block that deal, which had been negotiated by Bank of New York Mellon as trustee for the holders of the securities. The lawsuit contends that the deal could “compromise investors’ claims in exchange for a payment representing a fraction of the losses” experienced by investors and that it had been negotiated without the knowledge of all of the holders of the securities.

The lawsuit angered Bank of New York Mellon, and as Mr. Schneiderman was leaving the memorial service last week for Hugh Carey, the former New York governor who died Aug. 7, an attendee said Mr. Schneiderman became embroiled in a contentious conversation with Kathryn S. Wylde, a member of the board of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York who represents the public. Ms. Wylde, who has criticized Mr. Schneiderman for bringing the lawsuit, is also chief executive of the Partnership for New York City. The New York Fed has supported the proposed $8.5 billion settlement.

Other investors in the Countrywide mortgage pools who were not part of the settlement talks between Bank of New York Mellon and Bank of America have called the terms inadequate.

Characterizing her conversation with Mr. Schneiderman that day as “not unpleasant,” Ms. Wylde said in an interview on Thursday that she had told the attorney general “it is of concern to the industry that instead of trying to facilitate resolving these issues, you seem to be throwing a wrench into it. Wall Street is our Main Street — love ’em or hate ’em. They are important and we have to make sure we are doing everything we can to support them unless they are doing something indefensible.”

Mr. Schneiderman declined to comment on the encounter.

Mr. Schneiderman has opened an investigation into Wall Street’s mortgage machinery, especially examining whether loan documents were provided to the trusts as required under securitization contracts.

The New York attorney general’s office has hired Lynn E. Turner, former chief accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission, as a consultant on the investigations, people briefed on the inquiries said.

Damon A. Silvers, associate general counsel for the A.F.L.-C.I.O., is also serving as a special counsel on a pro bono basis. Both men declined to comment.


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/22/business/schneiderman-is-said-to-face-pressure-to-back-bank-deal.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&pagewanted=all&adxnnlx=1314014404-QRiTZ8QYz5phJVbcBwyg0A




Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1021 on: August 22, 2011, 05:30:44 AM »
The EPA’s giant green jobs-killer
By MICHAEL A. WALSH

Last Updated: 12:33 AM, August 22, 2011




Get ready for the sacrifice of tens of thousands more American jobs (at least) to feed the fantasy of “clean energy.” Even as the “green jobs” promise proves to be a lie, the Obama administration is getting set to force the shutdown of countless power plants across half the nation.


The Environmental Protection Agency’s new Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, announced last month, will affect coal-fired electric plants in at least 27 midwestern and eastern states. Set to take effect next year, the rule could shutter up to a fifth of the nation’s generating capacity.


With coal providing 45 percent of the nation’s energy, utility companies warn of an economic “train wreck” if the regulations -- based on Bush-era EPA proposals that the federal courts threw out in 2008 -- take effect. One Wisconsin utility says its costs would jump $32.6 million next year, while the head of the Texas Public Utility Commission says the rules could lead to rolling blackouts -- especially given the short time the utilities have to comply with Washington’s iron fist.


Steve Miller, president and CEO of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, warns of job losses totaling 1.4 million over the next eight years and a 23 percent jump in electric rates in states dependent on coal-fired plants.

With unemployment still sky-high, new jobless claims routinely hitting 400,000 a week and consumer prices rising, is this really the time to hobble the nation’s reeling economy further?


Absolutely, says autocratic EPA chief Lisa Jackson -- who could possibly be against improving the air quality for up to 240 million Americans? “Just because wind and weather will carry air pollution away from its source at a local power plant doesn’t mean that pollution is no longer that plant’s responsibility.”


Fine -- but wouldn’t it be nice if the EPA could prove real health effects before forcing the shutdown of so many plants?


Environmental extremists cheer the new rules because closing “dirty” coal plants is part of their fantasy of “clean energy” and green jobs. But the reality is otherwise. Even backed by stimulus funds, “green” business after business has flopped or folded, costing taxpayers millions.


In Seattle, a plan called Retrofit Ramp-Up sucked up $20 million in federal grants to make houses more energy efficient. The result: so far, only three homes retrofitted and just 14 jobs “created.” California got $186 million for a similar program and has spent just over half of it -- with just 538 new full-time jobs to show for it.


Costco recently announced that it’s yanking out some 90 electric-car chargers at 64 of its stores, mostly in California -- because nobody uses them. The discount retailer also rejected the offer of a $2.3 million upgrade by the California Energy Commission. “Why should we have anybody spend money on a program that nobody’s thought through?” said one regional manager.


So let’s get this straight: At the same time it’s spending millions of taxpayer dollars in pursuit of a chimera, the Obama administration is attacking the wellsprings of US prosperity, throwing people out of work and raising consumer costs. This isn’t just insane; it’s malevolent.


Nobody’s in favor of dirtier air or water, of childhood asthma or killing puppies. But progressives often seem to think that there’s never any cost for their crackpot notions, that no amount of money can ever possibly be too much, even if we have to borrow or print it. If people are thrown out of work in the process, tough.


Worst of all is the increasingly arbitrary reach of the regulatory state. President Richard Nixon created the EPA by executive order in 1970, in a hasty response to an oil spill near Santa Barbara. “The 1970s absolutely must be the years when America pays its debt to the past by reclaiming the purity of its air, its waters and our living environment,” he said.


That was 41 years ago. The nation’s air and water have noticeably improved since then -- but they’ll never be clean enough to satisfy some. To people like Lisa Jackson, we need to keep on paying -- even if it kills us.



Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/the_epa_giant_green_jobs_killer_KdfsWk1XtxOu1souIABLFM#ixzz1VlBlzlFV




Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1022 on: August 22, 2011, 07:38:25 AM »

Obama: Circling back to the iceberg
By Ralph R. Reiland
Monday, August 22, 2011
About the writer





Ralph R. Reiland is an associate professor of economics at Robert Morris University and a local restaurateur. He can be reached via via e-mail.


Only 26 percent of the public approve of President Barack Obama's handling of the economy in the latest Gallup poll, conducted Aug. 11-14, while a whopping 71 percent disapprove.

That's down from Obama's previous low point of 35 percent approval on this top issue.

The public's growing dissatisfaction shouldn't be surprising. Going back to 1890, reports the National Bureau of Economic Research, the only U.S. president with a worse record than Obama in job creation in his first two-and-a-half years in office, measured in terms of percentage change, was Herbert Hoover, presiding over the emergence of the Great Depression.

"Official unemployment is 9.1 percent," stated a New York Times editorial on Aug. 15, decrying the nation's jobs picture, "but it would be 16.1 percent, or 25.1 million people, if it included those who can only find part-time jobs and those who have given up looking for work."

"Keeping the economy going and making sure jobs are available is the first thing I think about when I wake up in the morning," Obama said back in March. "It's the last thing I think about when I go to bed each night."

Now, nearly six months later, the White House reports that Obama is working on a new strategy for job creation that will be unveiled after he returns from vacation.

The task of coming up with a jobs plan that works shouldn't be all that terribly difficult. All Mr. Obama has to do is reverse what he's done and change what he thinks.

First, by the government's own numbers, small businesses have created 64 percent of the net new jobs in the U.S. economy over the past 15 years.

In fact, that understates the role of small business, since the vast majority of America's medium-sized and large businesses began as small businesses. The Heinz corporation began when 16-year-old Henry Heinz grated piles of horseradish at home, using his mother's recipe, and sold the bottled product door-to-door in Sharpsburg out of a wheelbarrow.

Yet since Obama took office, employment at federal regulatory agencies has jumped 13 percent while private-sector jobs shrank by 5.6 percent.

Second, 39 percent of small-business owners said in a Chamber of Commerce survey in July that ObamaCare was either their greatest or second-greatest obstacle to new hiring.

The president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Dennis Lockhart, concurs, stating that "prominent" among the obstacles to hiring is the "lack of clarity about the cost implications" of ObamaCare.

"We've frequently heard strong comments," reported Lockhart, "to the effect of, 'My company won't hire a single additional worker until we know what health insurance costs are going to be.'"

Additionally, 84 percent of small business owners in the survey said the economy is on the wrong track, 79 percent view the current regulatory environment as unreasonable, and 79 percent believe Washington should get out of the way of small business, rather than offering a helping hand (14 percent).

In its first 26 months, reports The Heritage Foundation, the Obama administration imposed new regulatory rules that will cost the private sector $40 billion. In July alone, reports Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., federal regulators imposed a total of 379 new rules that will add some $9.5 billion in new costs.

Bottom line: What's required from Obama is a complete about-face, the shelving of his flawed economic philosophy and a reversal of his counterproductive policy prescriptions


Read more: Obama: Circling back to the iceberg - Pittsburgh Tribune-Review http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_752463.html#ixzz1VliC0TPq


________________________ ________________________ ____


And like lemmings, the obama kneepad crew is still blind to what many have been saying from Day 1 on this horrible Admn.

BUSINESSES WILL NOT HIRE ANYONE UNTIL OBAMACARE IS REPEALED. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1023 on: August 24, 2011, 08:11:58 AM »
Source: Huffington Post



INDIANAPOLIS -- A new survey from a large benefits consultant says nearly one of every 10 mid-sized or big employers expects to stop offering health coverage to workers once federal insurance exchanges start in 2014.

Towers Watson says an additional 20 percent of the companies it surveyed last month are unsure about what they will do. The remaining 71 percent expect to continue offering benefits.

Exchanges were devised under the health care overhaul and aim to provide a marketplace for people to buy insurance that can be subsidized by the government based on income levels.

Benefits experts say retailers and companies that pay low wages are most likely to drop coverage for their workers. But they also caution that companies are far from making a final decision on this.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/24/health-insuran...


________________________ _____________________

Wonder if Mal is still going to cheer Bama "giving health care to 30 million people" ? ? / 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41756
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Admn: The worst Presidency this nation has ever had to endure.
« Reply #1024 on: August 24, 2011, 12:27:21 PM »
The Five Most Catastrophic Hidden Costs of the Obama Presidency
Pajamas Media ^ | August 24, 2011 | Kyle- Anne Shiver





Deep prices waiting to pounce



We well remember candidate Barack Obama’s ’08 throngs laying in breathless wait for the “Lightworker” to appear and speak as “sort of like God” from his teleprompter on high. Now, with nearly everything this president has touched lying in shambles, a shrunken Obama whines from town to town, transported in a taxpayer-purchased bus that resembles a big, fat hearse — the perfect symbol for the harbinger of economic death that Obama’s presidency has become.

It’s painfully apparent now that the American people were scammed in ’08 by Barack the Bamboozler in what will be known historically as the most audacious scheme of fraudulent branding the world has ever seen.

I would just love to see a crackerjack team of litigation attorneys put together a class action suit with a dollar amount on both the tangible and intangible “pain and suffering” costs of the Obama presidency. In fact, if I were a Republican strategist, I would commission a legal team to devise such a case and put it in a PowerPoint presentation for voters by next fall.

The all too apparent costs, of course, are those numbers economists lob forth every day, to a mouths-agape public:

The staggeringly high unemployment rate – 9.1%, not counting the Americans who have given up looking for work or who are underemployed.

The still-tumbling housing values, now worse than the Great Depression.
The inflation indicators, with uncounted sharp inflation in food and gasoline.
The debt and the deficit, now too big to even fathom without an advanced degree in mathematics.
The unfunded future liabilities –Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, public worker pensions, and the like.

When the S&P downgrade is thrown into this cliff-hanging mix, our fiscal situation goes from bad to worse.
But as all litigators worth their salt wind up telling every claims-award jury, the most catastrophic costs to victims are those which are less tangible and remain hidden from cursory view. We recognize this litigious category as “pain and suffering.”

So, on behalf of my fellow Americans, here is my list of the 5 most horrendous hidden costs of the Obama presidency:

5. President Obama’s pass-the-buck, blame-it-on-the-other-guy, it-was-just-bad-luck performance as a no-account “leader” sends a horrible message to our youth.

His is an example so bad that it will reverberate for a generation at incalculable cost.



Well, should we really have expected more from a guy who freely admitted to doing “blow” and smoking “weed,” who never released a single transcript from a single school he attended, who never wrote a law review article, who voted “present” over 130 times as a state legislator, and who thought listening to hate-whitey political speeches qualified as going to “church”? Probably not.




But these were the facts intentionally glossed over by fraudulent brander David Axelrod and his client, Barack Obama. These were the facts given short shrift by a mainstream media with tingles up their legs and pants-crease fetishes. These were the facts hidden from view by the hope, hype, hoopla, glitter, glamour, and celebrity poppycock.

When the president of the United States cannot accept responsibility for his own decisions (or lack thereof), then he sends a message to every young person in this country that “the dog ate my homework” is an acceptable excuse for doing nothing.

Yes, the president’s own blame game in his own heralded “new era of responsibility” has become so ubiquitous that Investor’s Business Daily is waiting for the expectable Obama excuse: “Bo Ate My Recovery.” From IBD’s list of already-worn-very-thin Obama excuses we remember the blame targets: 24/7 Bush did it – all of it; ATMs steal jobs; Republicans stole the cookies; businesses that “sit on piles of cash” and refuse to hire are the bad guys; “splintered” media not totally under Obama’s control confuses people. And, finally, last week, the fallback excuse of no-accounts throughout the ages: “a run of bad luck.”

The cost to this country for electing a man with the work ethic of character Maynard G. Krebs is truly incalculable, not only in terms of work undone and opportunities lost, but also in the message of non-accountability hammered home to a whole generation of American youth.

4. ObamaCare Lawsuits by more than half the states at a combined hidden cost of thousands of dollars per hour – per hour!


ObamaCare mandates are forcing states to sue to protect their own solvency. While most of the media attention, of course, is on the unconstitutionality of ObamaCare’s individual mandate, 27 states – more than half! – are actively entwined in a lawsuit to stop this debt-forcing law. As the Heritage Foundation documents, the future funding forced upon every state in its provisions for Medicaid will quite frankly push many states into either bankruptcy or a shutdown of basic services.

While ObamaCare will pay for all of the benefit expansion for the first three years of the law, and 90% of it after that, ObamaCare never pays for any of the state administrative costs for adding those 18 million Americans to their welfare rolls. That amounts to billions in unfunded federal mandates the states must absorb. That is why 33 Republican governors signed a letter to the White House and Congress making an emphatic appeal that ObamaCare’s Medicaid provisions be repealed.


Look carefully at the list of states. They are not all “Red” states. It’s not political; it’s fiscal. In fact, 11 of the 27 states suing over ObamaCare voted for the president in 2008: Florida, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maine, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Colorado, Washington, and Nevada. Harry Reid’s own state – Nevada! — is on the list, having filed suit a mere two months after passage of ObamaCare.

The point here is that lawsuits are very, very expensive. And state taxpayers are footing the bill for all of this hidden cost of the Obama presidency. As the president glibly dismisses the Tea Party with ridicule and says they “ought to be thanking him,” the real costs mount at an alarming rate.



Obama thinks he is cute to mock those disputing the constitutionality of his big-bleeping-deal health-care law. Last week on his campaign bus tour, the president declared that it is fine for folks to call it “Obama cares.” “I do care,” he affirmed, though failing to mention that he “cares” with other people’s money. He concluded this folksy little chit-chat with his even-cuter punch line: “If the other side wants to be the folks who don’t care, that’s fine with me.” He comes off sounding like the dependent spouse berating the family breadwinner for stinginess when her credit card bills threaten the family with homelessness and starvation.

If Obama had had an ounce of responsible forethought he and his cabal of Democrat enablers would have thought through the health-care bill instead of marching on without a care in the world except their highfalutin, shallow claims to “care.” The cost is already in the billions and that’s before a single act of real “caring” comes to pass.





3. Obama’s federal regulations, growing like kudzu in uncontrolled, maniacal frenzy, form a stranglehold on American business.

Once again, we turn to Investor’s Business Daily for the heavy-lifting on Obama’s wretched big government stranglehold. From John Merline’s detailed IBD article last week, we learn that one of the very few “businesses” actually booming in Obamaland is the “Regulation” industry, which has seen its combined budgets grow by a whopping 16% since 2008. This meteoric rise in regulatory budgets coincided with a pitiful increase of only 5% in overall economic growth.

Employment at these regulatory government behemoths has grown a staggering 13%, while private-sector jobs shrank by 5.6%.

Merline puts this picture into pitch-perfect perspective for even economics-challenged citizens like me:


If the federal government’s regulatory operation were a business, it would be one of the 50 biggest in the country in terms of revenues, and the third largest in terms of employees, with more people working for it than McDonald’s, Ford, Disney and Boeing combined.

The obvious take-away from this profoundly disturbing reality is that while McDonald’s, Ford, Disney, and Boeing create real products/services for real people, and have the added advantage of self-sufficiency as opposed to being supported by taxpayers, the federal regulatory “do it like this” pencil-pushers actually cost us not only their bloated salaries and benefits but also cost the businesses they regulate billions more to ensure “compliance.” Every dollar spent by business to follow federal busybodies’ new rules is a dollar passed on to consumers.

In Obama’s America, big government is running its own protection racket aimed at consumers and taxpayers. They play; we pay.




2. The specter of uncertainty haunts every American in Obama’s Changeopoly Blitzkrieg.

Overwhelming uncertainty sits there quietly as the ever-present silent partner in big-ticket spending decisions, business start-up meetings, and hiring discussions. The S&P downgrade merely said aloud what all sentient Americans already knew quite well. The only change Obama brought to Washington was bigger government, higher deficits, and even less will to strive for a balanced budget.


My favorite brief summation of business uncertainty came from a new member of Congress, Rep. Renee Ellmers (R-NC), speaking to Treasury Secretary Geithner in June:

Overwhelmingly, the businesses back home and across the country continue to tell us that regulation, lack of access to capital, taxation, fear of taxation, and just the overwhelming uncertainties that our businesses face is keeping them from hiring. They just simply cannot. (Emphasis added.)

Due to uncertainty as to what cockamamie, economy-killing idea will strike the feds next, consumer confidence is in the tank – at its lowest since President Carter’s infamous “stagflation” years. These things don’t just happen and no, it isn’t the fault of “bad luck.”


The elephant in the room of all this despair and uncertainty is the president himself. Everywhere Obama goes with his whiny “me-myself-and-I” excuses tour, it becomes more and more obvious that the president himself is oblivious to real economics. The man is completely out of touch and out of his depth on the reality of American enterprise. Yet, it is in his own powerful hands that the entire behemoth federal government lies and from his own lips that agencies take their marching orders. This is a recipe for disaster and the people know it, which is why every homemaker, breadwinner, business owner, and entrepreneur has overwhelming uncertainty as his Obamaland unwelcome bedfellow.






The Great Demoralization of America under Obama.
If Barack Obama were a football coach, rather than president, his glaring lack of leadership skills would be contained to a single 100-yard field once a week. But a president who thinks highfalutin speechifying substitutes for genuine leadership has put a pall of demoralization over the citizenry, from coast to coast and in every hamlet in between. The agony of Obama’s defeated economic policies has become a palpable presence throughout the country.

While president and Mrs. Obama have partied hardy, running up exorbitant tabs for such public folderol as useless foreign travel, vacations to Martha’s Vineyard, Hawaii, and Spain, and celebrity fests at the White House, the American people have become more and more demoralized by the profligate spectacle. As the president goes from one golf course to another, making light of real Americans’ suffering under the yoke of his own policies, the people have become discouraged, resentful, and downright angry.

How much has this ubiquitous “downgrade” in the national psyche cost us in terms of recovery unrealized? How might the first couple’s putting their “own skin in the game” have helped the country to get back on our feet? Boy-oh-boy, would I love to see some zealous lawyers put a price tag on the Great Demoralization factor of this presidency. It might actually come close to the national debt number.

Oddly enough, Barack Obama presciently explained in his book, The Audacity of Hope, why he should not be elected – though no one in the mainstream media paid attention to it. Writing on the mess in D.C., Obama declared:


Moreover, most people who serve in Washington have been trained either as lawyers or as political operatives – professions that tend to place a premium on winning arguments rather than solving problems.

President Obama – the lawyer – has proven his own theory beyond all possible measure in his utter failure to solve a single problem and in his unwavering insistence upon shackling America’s genuine problem-solvers with overwhelming regulations and class-warfare demagoguery.

In President Obama’s very first meeting with then-minority Republican congressional leaders, efforts at real bipartisanship were met by Obama’s gleeful assertion, “I won.”

And Obama’s thrill of victory has become America’s agony of defeat. Can anyone anywhere put a dollar figure on this mountainous hidden cost? I would love to see someone try. In fact, I’m quite certain that you readers can think of vast uncounted costs I haven’t even thought of.

Now, what does our Community Organizer in Chief do to quell the roiling flood waters? He pouts and goes out to play golf at the Vineyard. Have we actually seen the moment when the real sea of debt began to stop its threatening rise? In a word, No. In two, hell no.


Obama lied; hope died.

You just can’t put a price tag on so many opportunities lost.

I’m closing this piece with the very best Obama-debt analysis I’ve seen to date. This video comes from the down-to-earth Political Math genius who explains astronomical numbers to math-challenged people like me. Don’t deny yourself the opportunity of seeing this National Debt Road Trip in full. It’s worth your gas – pun fully intended.