Rozz, I like you in a simian, pelican-nosed, Neanderthal-man-with-eyes-too-close-together- kinda way so I'm not looking to shit in your hat ...but:
You lied. You said it was 160 and now admit it's 135- which is respectable but a different ballpark. You're now saying it WOULD have been 160 IF you could choose one aspect of the test and omit another. That's not how it works. In fact, it goes against the whole purpose of an IQ test.
Carry on though..you're good fun.