Author Topic: Bicep shape, what looks better to you? (Read 41561 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #75 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:06:46 PM »

Ronnie is incomplete compared to this

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #76 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:08:45 PM »

Quote from: Mr Nobody on October 25, 2010, 04:03:40 PM

Best ever end of thread.

Not even close , great peaked biceps , arms overall no dice his forearms and triceps were always lagging behind like Coleman

Wiggs · « **Reply #77 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:11:06 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 25, 2010, 04:08:45 PM

Not even close , great peaked biceps , arms overall no dice his forearms and triceps were always lagging behind like Coleman

Heath kills priest 100 out of 100 times in arms...

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #78 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:13:50 PM »

Quote from: Wiggs on October 25, 2010, 04:11:06 PM

Heath kills priest 100 out of 100 times in arms...

now you're overstating , maybe he does beat him but it's close than you're comfortable admitting and I would say Heath has better ARMS than Ronnie , better triceps/forearms not so much biceps but arms overall as well

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #79 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:16:17 PM »

Quote from: Xerxes on October 25, 2010, 04:13:49 PM

Priest has great complete arms but they are too short to be the best in history.

to short? they're legit over 20"

Wiggs · « **Reply #80 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:18:10 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 25, 2010, 04:13:50 PM

now you're overstating , maybe he does beat him but it's close than you're comfortable admitting and I would say Heath has better ARMS than Ronnie , better triceps/forearms not so much biceps but arms overall as well

Have you seen any of these guys in person? I've seen all three many times...

Ronald utterly destroys all three...
Please post pics of Ronald's lackluster forearms.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #81 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:18:59 PM »

Nd you try to make everythread a vs Coleman thread...
I've seen priest in person ... Not impressive he just has a big bbers arms on a midget body...
Best arm overall in my opion ronald dean Coleman no contest a lot of bber editors and photographers have him first too almost always no 1 on best arm ever list
no one caries Coleman size shape densitity and condition arm wise no one in bbing history
short bber arms priest dexter etc look impressive on their bodies because their arms so short it's easy to fill out like I said I've seen priest in person very short. Good arms yes greatest arms no
please stop turning every thread into a vs Coleman thread it's played out

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #82 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:22:00 PM »

Quote from: Wiggs on October 25, 2010, 04:18:10 PM

Have you seen any of these guys in person? I've seen all three many times...

Ronald utterly destroys all three...
Please post pics of Ronald's lackluster forearms.

thank you
I've seen priest in person
not blown away he is verrry short
short arms 18 inches on that short frame would look impressive
look past the bbing illusion every short midget guy has thick arms that's because well their arms are short

tbombz · « **Reply #83 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:23:24 PM »

ronnie's arms absolutely destroys preist's. no debate necessary.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #84 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:26:54 PM »

Another point ronnie Coleman doesn't have a detailed lateral head to his tri
but the size of his tris when he was in his prime destroys almost every other pro see cost of redemption and unbelievable... People have the weird misconception that ronnie had no tris wrong

Wiggs · « **Reply #85 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:27:21 PM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on October 25, 2010, 04:22:00 PM

thank you
I've seen priest in person
not blown away he is verrry short
short arms 18 inches on that short frame would look impressive
look past the bbing illusion every short midget guy has thick arms that's because well their arms are short

Correct, when I met Priest, I thought the arms were going to be alot bigger. Like stated by many others they are impressive but not even close to best ever...top 5 yes...

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #86 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:29:16 PM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on October 25, 2010, 04:18:59 PM

Nd you try to make everythread a vs Coleman thread...
I've seen priest in person ... Not impressive he just has a big bbers arms on a midget body...
Best arm overall in my opion ronald dean Coleman no contest a lot of bber editors and photographers have him first too almost always no 1 on best arm ever list
no one caries Coleman size shape densitity and condition arm wise no one in bbing history
short bber arms priest dexter etc look impressive on their bodies because their arms so short it's easy to fill out like I said I've seen priest in person very short. Good arms yes greatest arms no
please stop turning every thread into a vs Coleman thread it's played out

You're dead wrong as usual , do you even put any thought into what you type? honestly I tried to turn every thread into a vs Coleman? really?

lets take for example this thread first picture I posted was Marko did I mention him vs Ronnie? NO second pic Mike Mattarazzo did I mention him vs Ronnie? NO third pic Darrem Charles did I mention him vs Ronnie? NO fourth pic Larry Scott did I mention him vs Ronnie? NO fifth picture Darrem again did I mention him vs Ronnie? NO sixth picture Al Beckles did I mention him vs Ronnie? NO seventh picture Jean Paul did I mention him vs Ronnie? NO eight picture Lee Priest did I mention him vs Ronnie? NO ninth picture Paul Dillett did I mention him vs Ronnie? NO

shall I continue? I didn't mention Lee until YOU made a comment about no one coming close to Ronnie which is of course fantasy which I merely responded to

do yourself a favor and put some thought into your posts before you type and don't cry when someone doesn't have an opinion that doesn't coinside with yours

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #87 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:30:58 PM »

Quote from: Wiggs on October 25, 2010, 04:27:21 PM

Correct, when I met Priest, I thought the arms were going to be alot bigger. Like stated by many others they are impressive but not even close to best ever...top 5 yes...

would top 5 be close to the best ever?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #88 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:37:13 PM »

Quote from: Wiggs on October 25, 2010, 04:18:10 PM

Have you seen any of these guys in person? I've seen all three many times...

Ronald utterly destroys all three...
Please post pics of Ronald's lackluster forearms.

his forearms are huge , however they are shaped like bowling pins and insert higher analogous to having high calves , they are not in proportion with his massive biceps/triceps either more to great ARMS than just big peaked biceps , needless to say besides being huge his triceps weren't special either but as long as his arms are HUGE that's means they're the best

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #89 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:39:44 PM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on October 25, 2010, 04:26:54 PM

Another point ronnie Coleman doesn't have a detailed lateral head to his tri
but the size of his tris when he was in his prime destroys almost every other pro see cost of redemption and unbelievable... People have the weird misconception that ronnie had no tris wrong

he had huge triceps but were they balanced? were all heads fully developed and complimentary to each other? did they have great shape? how well did they mate up to his biceps? and forearms? you're equating biggest as best and there is obviously more to it which you're willing to over look

Wiggs · « **Reply #90 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:43:27 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 25, 2010, 04:39:44 PM

he had huge triceps but were they balanced? were all heads fully developed and complimentary to each other? did they have great shape? how well did they mate up to his biceps? and forearms? you're equating biggest as best and there is obviously more to it which you're willing to over look

How about this, you can continue believing Lee has the best and the rest of cause can continue knowing Ronnie does...Jeez man between this and Yates vs. Ronnie get your fuckin' eyes checked...Are you Ronnie's illegitimate kid that he didn't pay child support for and you're trying to make him pay in some other way?...

Get your head checked...

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #91 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:48:04 PM »

Quote from: Wiggs on October 25, 2010, 04:43:27 PM

How about this, you can continue believing Lee has the best and the rest of cause can continue knowing Ronnie does...Jeez man between this and Yates vs. Ronnie get your fuckin' eyes checked...Are you Ronnie's illegitimate kid that he didn't pay child support for and you're trying to make him pay in some other way?...

Get your head checked...

meltdown

Wiggs · « **Reply #92 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:50:25 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 25, 2010, 04:48:04 PM

meltdown

You drive me fucking nuts with this shit...WTF is your problem?...Thank god in real life Yates isn't whispered in the same breath as Ronald.

Hulkster · « **Reply #93 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:52:07 PM »

Quote

Please post pics of Ronald's lackluster forearms.

here they are. truly lackluster.

ND is the biggest tool on this board.

TrueGrit · « **Reply #94 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:52:51 PM »

Damn.. I love this site but how the fuck can some of you guys spend so much of your lives arguing about men's bodies and bodyparts.. Jimbo has better quad separation than Nate and Will owns Ricky on abductors.. haha, wtf.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #95 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:53:19 PM »

Quote from: Wiggs on October 25, 2010, 04:50:25 PM

You drive me fucking nuts with this shit...WTF is your problem?...Thank god in real life Yates isn't whispered in the same breath as Ronald.

for the record I didn't turn this into Yates V Ronnie

why does it bother you so much someone doesn't share your opinion? you're taking this shit WAY to seriously

Ronnie knows Dorian would trample him in real life I know this pains Ronnie fans but hey

Hulkster · « **Reply #96 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:54:05 PM »

Quote from: tbombz on October 25, 2010, 04:23:24 PM

ronnie's arms absolutely destroys preist's. no debate necessary.

yup. but ND always goes against what is obvious. a very sad individual.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #97 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:54:46 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 25, 2010, 04:52:07 PM

here they are. truly lackluster.

ND is the biggest tool on this board.

hahahaha thanks for proving my point fanboy

see above as well his forerarms sucked compared to his biceps/triceps

Wiggs · « **Reply #98 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:58:01 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 25, 2010, 04:53:19 PM

for the record I didn't turn this into Yates V Ronnie

why does it bother you so much someone doesn't share your opinion? you're taking this shit WAY to seriously

Ronnie knows Dorian would trample him in real life I know this pains Ronnie fans but hey

It's not that someone else doesn't share my opinion....Think of it like this...Ronald is so dominant, he takes away the "subjective" part of it...Your only argument is..."look at his calves" or his "ugly abs"

::)Or posting a pic from 2002 Mr. O...
And despite that he still won 8 mr. Os and the most shows of all time...I'll never change your mind and that's not my intention but I don't believe you know how ridiculous you sound.

Parker · « **Reply #99 on:** October 25, 2010, 04:59:05 PM »

I actually started this thread about bis, not the whole arm or tris. Short peaked vs closer to the elbow and full. Although, one can have a extremely short bicep insertion like Kamali and have effed up bis as a result.

In terms of biceps, Ronnie nudges Priest out, due to Ronnie having double peak bis, which is rare---Boyer Coe, Marko, are among the few. Melvin Anthony shares a destinction of having even rarer biceps. One of his biceps has a double peak and the other does not.