Author Topic: Ruhl vs. nasser (Read 24768 times)

Nails · « **Reply #25 on:** June 14, 2011, 05:30:08 PM »

Steroids..... JUST HE FINISHING TOUCH

BILL ANVIL · « **Reply #26 on:** June 14, 2011, 05:33:10 PM »

Masser

yates fan · « **Reply #27 on:** June 14, 2011, 05:34:23 PM »

nasser by a mile,ruhls best o. placing was 5th,nassers was 2nd and he was top 5 lots of times,both are freeks though!

kiwiol · « **Reply #28 on:** June 14, 2011, 06:21:03 PM »

Nasser has the better track record, but Ruhl from that crazy NOC pic or even his 2004 Mr Olympia version would be pretty hard for Nasser to beat. Marcus won't be outmassed, his back is 200% better than Nasser's and structurally he's not as bad as Kovacs or even Paco.

supernick · « **Reply #29 on:** June 14, 2011, 06:24:48 PM »

Quote from: poldaktalos on June 14, 2011, 03:15:58 PM

Nasser was very impressive and consistent until 1998 or so. Ruhl in 2002 was insane though.

This has got to be the freakiest bodybuilding pic of all time

JBGRAY · « **Reply #30 on:** June 14, 2011, 06:28:00 PM »

Ruhl by far the freakiest. Nasser would fare better in a bodybuilding contest.

the_swami · « **Reply #31 on:** June 14, 2011, 06:38:26 PM »

Nasser- no contest!

btw, i used to think Nasser was GH 15

after listening to Nasser's 2 latest interviews on VPX sports, shotgun radio episodes 13+14 i dont think Nasser is GH 15

Royalty · « **Reply #32 on:** June 14, 2011, 06:50:33 PM »

If Marcus Ruhl did not tear his tricep during the summer of 2003; he would've taken 3rd in the '03 Olympia (behind Ronnie and Jay)

Nassers best physique could not touch Ruhl in 2002, 2003, and 2004.

Unlike Nasser; Ruhl's back was very wide and very thick.. Ruhl would've won all the back poses.

Ruhl would have won the front lat spread, side chest, most muscular, and front double Bicep

Nasser probably would win the side tricep. The Ab/thigh would be a tie.... Or if not, Ruhl would get the nod.

kiwiol · « **Reply #33 on:** June 14, 2011, 06:52:50 PM »

Quote from: Royalty on June 14, 2011, 06:50:33 PM

If Marcus Ruhl did not tear his tricep during the summer of 2003; he would've taken 3rd in the '03 Olympia (behind Ronnie and Jay)

Nassers best physique could not touch Ruhl in 2002, 2003, and 2004.

Unlike Nasser; Ruhl's back was very wide and very thick.. Ruhl would've won all the back poses.

Ruhl would have won the front lat spread, side chest, most muscular, and front double Bicep

Nasser probably would win the side tricep. The Ab/thigh would be a tie.... Or if not, Ruhl would get the nod.

Spot on.

HugeAl · « **Reply #34 on:** June 14, 2011, 07:15:28 PM »

This is not even worthy of a comparison - and I like Ruhl. As bodybuilders they barely belong on the same stage. Peak Nasser was pure perfection: mass with good aesthetics, great conditioning, symmetry and harmonious overall development.

Markus was big and great fun but a world class bodybuilder, he was not.

Royalty · « **Reply #35 on:** June 14, 2011, 07:36:52 PM »

1999 British Grand Prix. Nasser won the Arnold earlier that year. Nasser was in his prime. this was Ruhl's 2nd year as a pro!! Ruhl is no where near his peak; yet he crushed Nasser

DK II · « **Reply #36 on:** June 14, 2011, 07:39:46 PM »

Quote from: gh15 on June 14, 2011, 03:09:47 PM

you gotta be nuts,, really

mr o top of the top ,,winner,, second place,, tight waist ...v taper,, wide delts,, what is there to compare? when was german marcus ever got into top o placing? dumb comparison friend

gh15 approved

Damn Nasser, it would be better to keep low profile for a while.

Just kidding, DJ, didn't want to insult you.

bladerunner · « **Reply #37 on:** June 14, 2011, 07:46:03 PM »

Quote from: poldaktalos on June 14, 2011, 03:15:58 PM

Nasser was very impressive and consistent until 1998 or so. Ruhl in 2002 was insane though.

where is the neck?

??

Skeletor · « **Reply #38 on:** June 14, 2011, 07:48:03 PM »

dyslexic · « **Reply #39 on:** June 14, 2011, 08:02:06 PM »

Why did the SJ's fuck up so bad in Nassers rear delt injections?

I mean, why did they get all infected and jizzed up? I understand hitting a vein or using a dirty needle, but why was it such a catrosphe for him?

Not joking, really curious.

Reminds me of Valvolino...

Maybe it was just the whole "abscess" thingy. Maybe plenty of guys get away with it. I usually just notice it in "bee-sting" side delts.

I remembe seeing so many guys at the Sac and the Contra ABOUT 5 YEARS AGO - EVEYONE WAS DOIN IT- then tne judges decided to start marking down for it. Now its done more "tactfully" and deeper-not quite so obvious

Aerian · « **Reply #40 on:** June 14, 2011, 08:57:16 PM »

Quote from: io856 on June 14, 2011, 03:17:22 PM

This right here would trump anything Nasser ever brought to the stage

gh15 · « **Reply #41 on:** June 14, 2011, 09:20:29 PM »

Quote from: Aerian on June 14, 2011, 08:57:16 PM

This right here would trump anything Nasser ever brought to the stage

backn in 90s,, every one on the stage could have be mr o ,, it wasa not only 1 fella,,everyone were extremly good,, no one from the 2000s would be able to do anything against the fellas from 90s,,our muscle was real ,,our muscle wasnt only blow up from the inside out ,,it was foundation that on top of that we had the hormones blowing it all up but the right way!

anabolics andddddddddddd then... gh in a moderate to mega dose usage with limited insulina

not mega dose gh mega dose insulina and then some anabolics lol

gh15 approved

BayGBM · « **Reply #42 on:** June 14, 2011, 09:34:44 PM »

Nasser was tier 1; Ruhl was tier 2

SF1900 · « **Reply #43 on:** June 14, 2011, 09:41:01 PM »

Quote from: BayGBM on June 14, 2011, 09:34:44 PM

Nasser was tier 1; Ruhl was tier 2

Ruhl looks just as good in that pose as does Nasser. Ruhl tier 2? Hmmm, not too sure about that

Meso_z · « **Reply #44 on:** June 14, 2011, 09:42:27 PM »

Nasser during his prime..

BayGBM · « **Reply #45 on:** June 14, 2011, 09:46:33 PM »

Quote from: SF1900 on June 14, 2011, 09:41:01 PM

Ruhl looks just as good in that pose as does Nasser. Ruhl tier 2? Hmmm, not too sure about that

I am. Tier 2 is still very respectable!
$3000- $4000 club (tier 2)
Atwood, D. Ball, K. Green, M. Kjellstrom, Z. Khan, Kovacs, J. Long, V. Martinez, Ruhl, Scholz,

but it's not tier 1!

SF1900 · « **Reply #46 on:** June 14, 2011, 09:51:58 PM »

Quote from: BayGBM on June 14, 2011, 09:46:33 PM

I am. Tier 2 is still very respectable!
$3000- $4000 club (tier 2)
Atwood, D. Ball, K. Green, M. Kjellstrom, Z. Khan, Kovacs, J. Long, V. Martinez, Ruhl, Scholz,

but it's not tier 1!

What makes one bodybuilder tier 1 and another bodybuilder tier 2? What tier would Goodrum fall under?

bigbobs · « **Reply #47 on:** June 14, 2011, 09:54:00 PM »

I like Ruhl, but the minority here who think Ruhl > Nasser must also believe that the compeition during Ruhl's prime was much much more difficult than during Nasser's prime? Why else are Nasser's top placings top tier while Ruhl's are second tier?

as gh15 said, mass with class:

cross-of-iron · « **Reply #48 on:** June 14, 2011, 10:08:35 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on June 14, 2011, 09:54:00 PM

I like Ruhl, but the minority here who think Ruhl > Nasser must also believe that the compeition during Ruhl's prime was much much more difficult than during Nasser's prime? Why else are Nasser's top placings top tier while Ruhl's are second tier?

as gh15 said, mass with class:

For holding that much size his stomach was tight. I miss the 90's.

the_swami · « **Reply #49 on:** June 14, 2011, 10:49:21 PM »

again Nasser was and is still is the only 280 pound BB on stage, shredded with a tiny waist, no gut distension, great V taper , shape, symmetry+ aesthetics.

truly blazed a new trail that many tried to emulate but never could.