you failed to get my point,
Let me try to explain it again
Currently modern science has as much to say about the existence of green unicorns in Pluto as about the existence of God. That is because both unicorns and god are things outside the realm of science. In case u still don't get it let me rephrase it : According to modern science the likelihood of the existence of unicorns in pluto and god is the same - everything is possible about unicorns like for god- so both those questions are uninteresting
unicorns- a mthycial creature, but in its mythology a biological creature nonetheless, not immortal, and bound to the same restrictions of mortality that other biological life forms are... ie- incapable of living on pluto, or anyother planet for that matter. pluto- from all images we have collected of it, no signs of life.. based on those things, a unicorn on pluto= highly unlikely
god- a term for the creator of the universe, if such a creator exists. we have no idea where the universe came from, if it came from anywhere at all. nothing in science says that creator is unlikely, nothing about the idea of god contradicts his existence... in fact certain scientific principles make the existence of god quite likely... for example, causality and ontology. based on these things.. gods existence= plausible but not certain.
