Author Topic: Ben Pakulski - Getting ready for 2012  (Read 19571 times)

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #25 on: December 26, 2011, 07:55:09 PM »
Why would you do that when his legs  already overpower his upper body  ???
Maybe because he's training for a fuckin show...???!!!

Oh brother...sooo many experts on this board...ridiculous!

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #26 on: December 26, 2011, 07:56:04 PM »
I started working with Ben Pakulski 2 weeks ago. He's preparing for the Flex Pro and the Arnold Classic and I train him in giant set style. Stay tuned and get ready for some crazy giant set workout videos at flexonline.com! Coming soon!!!

and he cant hok you up with the gh? that fela swim SWIM in gh ,,gh is his middle name

ben gh paklolisky

tell him to pay with gh ,,

gh15 approved
fallen angel

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #27 on: December 26, 2011, 07:57:59 PM »
Whats the point -reason behind giant sets?? you're talking milos style giant sets??
Getting into the best possible shape in the shortest time possible... And yes.

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #28 on: December 26, 2011, 07:58:33 PM »
and he cant hok you up with the gh? that fela swim SWIM in gh ,,gh is his middle name

ben gh paklolisky

tell him to pay with gh ,,

gh15 approved
;D

I don't need GH now...

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #29 on: December 26, 2011, 07:59:10 PM »
i know, i know, i always show this when his name comes up
lol look how long he been on consistant gh ,, lol 2005 2006 1007 2008 2009 2010 2011 ,, legit legit legit lol and you wonder he i sprofesional? lol

a d d i c t s but hey im one of them  

gh15 approved
fallen angel

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #30 on: December 26, 2011, 07:59:33 PM »
Maybe because he's training for a fuckin show...???!!!

Oh brother...sooo many experts on this board...ridiculous!

Exactly retard , isn't  symmetry and  proportions  part of the judging criteria?

 I forgot this is modern bodybuilding ::)

L.L

  • Guest
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #31 on: December 26, 2011, 08:00:42 PM »
Getting into the best possible shape in the shortest time possible... And yes.

correct me if i m wrong...lets say 10 exercises of 10 reps performed back to back no rest in between  and repeat for 3-4 giants sets???

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #32 on: December 26, 2011, 08:02:23 PM »
Exactly retard , isn't  symmetry and  proportions  part of the judging criteria?

 I forgot this is modern bodybuilding ::)
U forgot u don't know shit about working out...

We did like 500 reps in 60 min...do u think we're tryin to make his legs bigger???

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #33 on: December 26, 2011, 08:03:05 PM »
correct me if i m wrong...lets say 10 exercises of 10 reps performed back to back no rest in between  and repeat for 3-4 giants sets???
That's a good example

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #34 on: December 26, 2011, 08:05:00 PM »
lol look how long he been on consistant gh ,, lol 2005 2006 1007 2008 2009 2010 2011 ,, legit legit legit lol and you wonder he i sprofesional? lol

a d d i c t s but hey im one of them  

gh15 approved

he was 253 lb.  in 2007.  he is much bigger now. do you think his actual weight is higher, or just more quality,same weight makes him look larger?

L.L

  • Guest
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #35 on: December 26, 2011, 08:05:24 PM »
That's a good example

last question because i like to vary my workouts...this is done just to get in shape , it has nothing to do with adding size,correct??

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #36 on: December 26, 2011, 08:08:13 PM »
he was 253 lb.  in 2007.  he is much bigger now. do you think his actual weight is higher, or just more quality,same weight makes him look larger?
The bodyweight doesn't matter...but I think he's gonna be around 270 onstage. And he's like 5'8"-5'9".

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #37 on: December 26, 2011, 08:09:05 PM »
he was 253 lb.  in 2007.  he is much bigger now. do you think his actual weight is higher, or just more quality,same weight makes him look larger?
dont knoe,, all i know is that fella been on gh for so long that if he take 2 month off he is out of the pro ranks,,  he has some serious time on gh and realy consistancy with dosages ,, his physiqe opened up seperated itself very well due to gh consistancy ,, it is some serious money he put in gh there or if not money then good good conect,,just consistancy with top gh ,,he is great quality then again its all gh ...

gh15 approved
fallen angel

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #38 on: December 26, 2011, 08:09:31 PM »
last question because i like to vary my workouts...this is done just to get in shape , it has nothing to do with adding size,correct??
I wouldn't do it in offseason, but if u eat enough and use enough drugs u gonna grow anyway...

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #39 on: December 26, 2011, 08:10:00 PM »
[quote author=Steve Namat link=topic=407009.msg5816092#msg5816092 date=1324958543
U forgot u don't know shit about working out...

We did like 500 reps in 60 min...do u think we're tryin to make his legs bigger???
[/quote]

Sorry man I forgot that part , high reps for cuts and , low reps for mass ,Oh brother  ::)

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #40 on: December 26, 2011, 08:10:35 PM »
The bodyweight doesn't matter...but I think he's gonna be around 270 onstage. And he's like 5'8"-5'9".
corect bodyweight mean nothing,, you have some fellas in amatur walk on stage 5'9 190 and look SO GOOD you give them 220 easy,, weight doesnt mean anything unless it is conditioned size,,
ofcourse with his weight...the way he cary it it is conditioned size...btu its also lots of gh and CONSISTANCY ,, this fela know his hormones and know them well

gh15 approved
fallen angel

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #41 on: December 26, 2011, 08:14:05 PM »
[quote author=Steve Namat link=topic=407009.msg5816092#msg5816092 date=1324958543
U forgot u don't know shit about working out...

We did like 500 reps in 60 min...do u think we're tryin to make his legs bigger???


Sorry man I forgot that part , high reps for cuts and , low reps for mass ,Oh brother  ::)
I bet he can do sets of squats with 500 easily...but with me he can't use more than 185-225.

hazbin

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5750
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #42 on: December 26, 2011, 08:18:11 PM »
corect bodyweight mean nothing,, you have some fellas in amatur walk on stage 5'9 190 and look SO GOOD you give them 220 easy,, weight doesnt mean anything unless it is conditioned size,,
ofcourse with his weight...the way he cary it it is conditioned size...btu its also lots of gh and CONSISTANCY ,, this fela know his hormones and know them well

gh15 approved

see, that's what i am trying to figure out. not alot of guys are over 250 at his height so i thought his improvements were more quality than quantity.

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #43 on: December 26, 2011, 08:19:58 PM »
no offense but I don't see why he would turn to you, a smaller and less conditionned pro, to train him ?


won't change shit

CT_Muscle

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2648
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #44 on: December 26, 2011, 08:20:22 PM »
U forgot u don't know shit about working out...

We did like 500 reps in 60 min...do u think we're tryin to make his legs bigger???

Steve can you give us some examples of what you guys did for legs?

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #45 on: December 26, 2011, 08:24:41 PM »
no offense but I don't see why he would turn to you, a smaller and less conditionned pro, to train him ?


won't change shit
Maybe because he wanted to train in giant set style, he lives in Tampa and I'm the only one in Tampa who knows this training style...because I was training with Milos for more than 8 weeks straight.

StanZoLOL

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1682
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #46 on: December 26, 2011, 08:26:20 PM »
no offense but I don't see why he would turn to you, a smaller and less conditionned pro, to train him ?


won't change shit

you don't think the giant sets of squats with 185 will radically change his physique? :D

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #47 on: December 26, 2011, 08:27:42 PM »
Steve can you give us some examples of what you guys did for legs?
Last time we did 7 exercises in the first rotation, 10-15 reps each, 3 rounds, not more than 10 seconds rest between exercises. Then 6 more exercises, 10-30 reps, 3 rounds.

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #48 on: December 26, 2011, 08:29:36 PM »
Maybe because he wanted to train in giant set style, he lives in Tampa and I'm the only one in Tampa who knows this training style...because I was training with Milos for more than 8 weeks straight.

You are the only one, in the whole city, who knows how to pick up a few exercises and do them one after another without any rest ?


Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Ben Pakulski 2012
« Reply #49 on: December 26, 2011, 08:31:07 PM »
you don't think the giant sets of squats with 185 will radically change his physique? :D

it's a great way to train, in train like this pretty often, it's just that it won't change shit in his physique