Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
August 20, 2014, 02:06:46 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Did Rumsfeld intentionally thwart defenses to let the plane hit the Pentagon?  (Read 17493 times)
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #325 on: May 14, 2012, 09:17:23 AM »

OzmO, the truth cannot be pursued while departed from what can be reasonably known.  It can't be done.
Report to moderator   Logged

OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20619


Take Money Out of Politics!


View Profile
« Reply #326 on: May 14, 2012, 09:27:51 AM »

OzmO, the truth cannot be pursued while departed from what can be reasonably known.  It can't be done.

 Roll Eyes
Yet you use what "should have" been done or lack of  in your argument even though its unrealistic. 
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #327 on: May 14, 2012, 10:47:31 AM »

Roll Eyes
Yet you use what "should have" been done or lack of  in your argument even though its unrealistic. 

What is?  The concept of initiating any order or any action under such circumstance?
Report to moderator   Logged

OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20619


Take Money Out of Politics!


View Profile
« Reply #328 on: May 14, 2012, 11:37:36 AM »

What is?  The concept of initiating any order or any action under such circumstance?

So far, your suggestions as to what should have or what there as a lack of have been unrealistic, naive and ignorant.  Which is well highlighted in your fear and unwillingness to answer questions about them.

Do you believe everyone was just standing around waiting for Rumsfeld to order something?


I have misjudged you.

Jack, seriously, I am not just trying to insult you here, honestly are you in middle school?  because that is the level of your argument.  Beucase it translates to this:

"I am right and you can not ask any thing about it unless those questions support my argument and I also have the right change my story/angle anytime I want"
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #329 on: May 14, 2012, 01:47:40 PM »

Do you believe everyone was just standing around waiting for Rumsfeld to order something?

I know that Rumsfeld personally instructed his assistants to wait for him in the Crisis Management room, where he did not appear until approximately one hour later, after the destruction had taken place.
Report to moderator   Logged

OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20619


Take Money Out of Politics!


View Profile
« Reply #330 on: May 14, 2012, 01:55:41 PM »

I know that Rumsfeld personally instructed his assistants to wait for him in the Crisis Management room, where he did not appear until approximately one hour later, after the destruction had taken place.

Do you believe that if his 2 assistants were waiting for him, (on his instructions), that everyone else also was waiting for him to issue orders and therefore were doing nothing?


(Geez, your ignorance sure shows)
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #331 on: May 14, 2012, 04:51:56 PM »

Do you believe that if his 2 assistants were waiting for him, (on his instructions), that everyone else also was waiting for him to issue orders and therefore were doing nothing?

So you claim 'everyone else' behaved in a manner that would be expected, except Donald Rumsfeld.

What should this tell me?
Report to moderator   Logged

OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20619


Take Money Out of Politics!


View Profile
« Reply #332 on: May 14, 2012, 05:14:55 PM »

So you claim 'everyone else' behaved in a manner that would be expected, except Donald Rumsfeld.

Nope.

Quote
What should this tell me?

Maybe you shouldn't be so quick to conclude.

(Geez, your ignorance sure shows)
Report to moderator   Logged
The Abdominal Snoman
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 16408


^^^SURVEILLANCE TRIBE APPROVED^^^


View Profile
« Reply #333 on: May 14, 2012, 10:59:26 PM »

A lot of COINTELPRO techniques being used in this thread Undecided
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #334 on: June 16, 2012, 12:40:36 PM »

A lot of COINTELPRO techniques being used in this thread Undecided

I've done some looking since you posted this, Snoman.  It's enough to make an awake person wonder.

If you could find it in yourself to post some examples from this thread, it would provide a great read.
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #335 on: June 16, 2012, 12:42:19 PM »

Again, let me help.
The answer, is no. He did not.  Wink

Was sure I'd responded to this, Shockwave, but can't find any follow-up here.

I would really like to know your thoughts on the subject.

 Huh
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #336 on: June 21, 2012, 08:11:27 PM »

If he did...

If you're talking to me, syntaxmachine, I would ask you to please be more specific.
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #337 on: June 23, 2012, 07:51:35 PM »

Please become at least passingly familiar with the discussion itself, including the opposition to the thread title, which you should know was changed mid-conversation.
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #338 on: June 24, 2012, 01:09:39 AM »

No, I will not read 14 pages of posts

Then I wouldn't know what to say to a person who would be so uninterested.

Maybe someday you will become interested, or really bored, and everything will change.

, especially since it is exceedingly obvious what I'm driving at despite my not having done so. Let me reformulate my previous post so that its larger point cannot be dodged by any further obstructionism: "If your favored theory regarding what happened on 9/11 were correct, what would you do about it?"

Do you see the problem with this approach?
Report to moderator   Logged

OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20619


Take Money Out of Politics!


View Profile
« Reply #339 on: June 24, 2012, 07:12:00 PM »

Please become at least passingly familiar with the discussion itself, including the opposition to the thread title, which you should know was changed mid-conversation.

Lol how is that?
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #340 on: June 25, 2012, 08:40:04 PM »

Lol how is that?

Not sure what 'that' you mean.
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #341 on: June 25, 2012, 08:41:33 PM »

The question remains: what will you do if your theory about Rumsfeld's behavior - with its rather serious implications and all - ends up being correct?

It is correct.

If you would like to indicate doubt, please tell me how to reasonably assume otherwise.  
Report to moderator   Logged

OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20619


Take Money Out of Politics!


View Profile
« Reply #342 on: June 26, 2012, 11:43:03 AM »

Not sure what 'that' you mean.



Quote
Please become at least passingly familiar with the discussion itself, including the opposition to the thread title, which you should know was changed mid-conversation.

How was opposition to the thread title changed mid conversation?
Report to moderator   Logged
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20619


Take Money Out of Politics!


View Profile
« Reply #343 on: June 26, 2012, 02:48:22 PM »

Lol, this guy is on a different wavelength than us, and I don't think he is acting like this just to troll. His reading comprehension is shot or otherwise  he will ignore half the points you make and focus on a single phrase you say. It's liike talking with a malfunctioning robot, or rather, getting talked at by a malfunctioning robot (since it doesn't recognize anything you say)!


Yeah, that's pretty much the way it is with him.  I guess you read some of the pages.   Smiley
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #344 on: June 26, 2012, 04:20:59 PM »

How was opposition to the thread title changed mid conversation?

Ozmo, it is the thread title that was changed.
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #345 on: June 26, 2012, 04:23:12 PM »


So...while claiming that you "will not read" the thread, you nonetheless find yourself passively hanging in the background, attempting to suggest doubt.

If you have reasons that go beyond "they wouldn't dare", please express them directly.
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #346 on: June 26, 2012, 06:04:33 PM »

Worry not, I'll not be 'passively hanging' any longer. The reason I posted at all was to posit a sensible question, one that I see you refuse to address. So, you can now remain here all by yourself and mull over your amazing theory into old age, free from interference. Best of luck!

Thanks for playing.
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #347 on: June 26, 2012, 06:05:15 PM »

Truth always defeats a lie.
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #348 on: June 26, 2012, 06:34:13 PM »

I'm a government operative sent to these boards (and others) to downplay foolproof, obviously true theories like your own. But you have managed to outwit me and I'm admitting this now because I'm extremely impressed by your logical rigor and analytical abilities. Just know that we are now monitoring your communications and tracking your movements because of what you're saying. Notice any vehicles with tinted windows lately?  Grin

For you and your loved ones' safety, try not to talk about this theory (which is obviously true) in public venues too overtly.

Thanks for playing.

You sound frustrated.
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3533


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #349 on: June 26, 2012, 10:18:51 PM »

Your logic and knowledge of politics has single-handedly trumped all the relevant experts and witnesses of the events in question, so of course I'm jealous and hence frustrated! You need to get started on your book and not limit your insights to internet message boards; this could be a big deal if it ever gets out.

Yet you're unable to argue against it.

Perhaps you could borrow from some of the "experts" to get started.
Report to moderator   Logged

Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!