Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
October 22, 2014, 01:18:42 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Did Rumsfeld intentionally thwart defenses to let the plane hit the Pentagon?  (Read 18214 times)
syntaxmachine
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 2532



« Reply #350 on: June 27, 2012, 12:28:07 AM »

I'm not interested in arguing against it. I'm interested in what you're going to do with this important knowledge in the real world independent of this message board, hence my interjection into the thread in the first place.

I think I may understand your mindset, wanting to possess special knowledge that the masses lack. It helps one feel special and it can be fun to obsess over such theories. However, I know you don't genuinely believe it, because to genuinely believe a thing is to act as if it is true . You're not acting as if this particular theory is true, because if it were there would be a lot of important stuff to do, like present the evidence to scholars/experts for analysis, help convince the unwashed masses of this important fact, and trying to discover a plausible explanation as to why Rumsfeld would do such a thing.

Hence, your presence here is constitutive of your not really believing the theory at hand. You want to obsess and argue and that's fine; just don't confuse this with genuine belief, which would entail actually behaving as if this conspiracy were true, not just talking about it.
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3564


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


« Reply #351 on: June 27, 2012, 11:06:38 AM »

I think I may understand your mindset, wanting to possess special knowledge that the masses lack. It helps one feel special and it can be fun to obsess over such theories.

Maybe you are projecting someone else's feelings onto me.

However, I know you don't genuinely believe it, because to genuinely believe a thing is to act as if it is true . You're not acting as if this particular theory is true, because if it were there would be a lot of important stuff to do, like present the evidence to scholars/experts for analysis

The evidence is not hidden.

help convince the unwashed masses of this important fact, and trying to discover a plausible explanation as to why Rumsfeld would do such a thing.

There is an extremely plausible explanation...just one, in fact.
Report to moderator   Logged

OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20663


Take Money Out of Politics!


« Reply #352 on: December 16, 2012, 08:33:45 PM »

What's the difference between the 2 hours that you use as a hypothetical, and the 34 minutes that it was in reality (if there wasn't communication anyway)?

There wasn't identified threats and overall situational confusion.
Report to moderator   Logged
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20663


Take Money Out of Politics!


« Reply #353 on: January 19, 2013, 09:48:37 AM »

Did you mean to use this as an answer to my question you quoted? (Maybe you looked at the wrong question?)

Yes, unless I have misunderstood what you are asking or meaning.

Report to moderator   Logged
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 21019


Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails


« Reply #354 on: January 20, 2013, 03:54:58 AM »

lol gimmick account vs gimmick account in this thread  Cool
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3564


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


« Reply #355 on: February 14, 2013, 09:35:09 AM »

lol gimmick account vs gimmick account in this thread  Cool

Interesting theory.
Report to moderator   Logged

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!