Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
April 18, 2014, 01:59:43 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Did Rumsfeld intentionally thwart defenses to let the plane hit the Pentagon?  (Read 16223 times)
syntaxmachine
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 2332



View Profile
« Reply #350 on: June 27, 2012, 12:28:07 AM »

I'm not interested in arguing against it. I'm interested in what you're going to do with this important knowledge in the real world independent of this message board, hence my interjection into the thread in the first place.

I think I may understand your mindset, wanting to possess special knowledge that the masses lack. It helps one feel special and it can be fun to obsess over such theories. However, I know you don't genuinely believe it, because to genuinely believe a thing is to act as if it is true . You're not acting as if this particular theory is true, because if it were there would be a lot of important stuff to do, like present the evidence to scholars/experts for analysis, help convince the unwashed masses of this important fact, and trying to discover a plausible explanation as to why Rumsfeld would do such a thing.

Hence, your presence here is constitutive of your not really believing the theory at hand. You want to obsess and argue and that's fine; just don't confuse this with genuine belief, which would entail actually behaving as if this conspiracy were true, not just talking about it.
Report to moderator   Logged
Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3251


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #351 on: June 27, 2012, 11:06:38 AM »

I think I may understand your mindset, wanting to possess special knowledge that the masses lack. It helps one feel special and it can be fun to obsess over such theories.

Maybe you are projecting someone else's feelings onto me.

However, I know you don't genuinely believe it, because to genuinely believe a thing is to act as if it is true . You're not acting as if this particular theory is true, because if it were there would be a lot of important stuff to do, like present the evidence to scholars/experts for analysis

The evidence is not hidden.

help convince the unwashed masses of this important fact, and trying to discover a plausible explanation as to why Rumsfeld would do such a thing.

There is an extremely plausible explanation...just one, in fact.
Report to moderator   Logged

Big Karma
Getbig I
*
Posts: 3

Kona Kona


View Profile
« Reply #352 on: September 21, 2012, 10:54:51 AM »

.
Report to moderator   Logged

Flyin' Hawaiian
Big Karma
Getbig I
*
Posts: 3

Kona Kona


View Profile
« Reply #353 on: December 16, 2012, 02:11:40 PM »

If there was a 2 hour period between the WTC 2 and the pentagon we would have removed BUSH, Rumsfeld and bunch of other people soon afterwards and held them for failing their duties.

What's the difference between the 2 hours that you use as a hypothetical, and the 34 minutes that it was in reality (if there wasn't communication anyway)?
Report to moderator   Logged

Flyin' Hawaiian
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20038


Take Money Out of Politics!


View Profile
« Reply #354 on: December 16, 2012, 08:33:45 PM »

What's the difference between the 2 hours that you use as a hypothetical, and the 34 minutes that it was in reality (if there wasn't communication anyway)?

There wasn't identified threats and overall situational confusion.
Report to moderator   Logged
Big Karma
Getbig I
*
Posts: 3

Kona Kona


View Profile
« Reply #355 on: January 17, 2013, 06:24:53 PM »

There wasn't identified threats and overall situational confusion.

Did you mean to use this as an answer to my question you quoted? (Maybe you looked at the wrong question?)
Report to moderator   Logged

Flyin' Hawaiian
OzmO
Moderator
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 20038


Take Money Out of Politics!


View Profile
« Reply #356 on: January 19, 2013, 09:48:37 AM »

Did you mean to use this as an answer to my question you quoted? (Maybe you looked at the wrong question?)

Yes, unless I have misunderstood what you are asking or meaning.

Report to moderator   Logged
Roger Bacon
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 17650


"Big" Roger F. Neegars


View Profile
« Reply #357 on: January 20, 2013, 03:54:58 AM »

lol gimmick account vs gimmick account in this thread  Cool
Report to moderator   Logged

Jack T. Cross
Getbig IV
****
Posts: 3251


Using Surveillance for Political Subversion(?)


View Profile
« Reply #358 on: February 14, 2013, 09:35:09 AM »

lol gimmick account vs gimmick account in this thread  Cool

Interesting theory.
Report to moderator   Logged

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!