No amount of proof can overcome denial. If you want to be in denial, that is certainly your prerogative, but what exactly are you accomplishing by clinging to that? Do you have some emotional investment in his reputation? Why? Watching someone in denial is often more embarrassing than the exposure of the thing they are in denial about.
How about starting with any proof? guilty by association. You act like there are no heterosexual professional bodybuilders who ever entered the sport did well and retired without a blemish on their reputations You need everyone to be ' gay ' it fits your agenda
My agenda? What exactly is my agenda? Here is another question for you: what is the "agenda" of a man who trains for thousands of hours in the gym, eats like crazy, injects supplements to make his muscles grow unnaturally large (even to the point of risking his health) just so he can put on a thong and flex his muscles for an audience of men? Or do you still believe the guy who does this is doing it “for the ladies”? Is musclegallery.com for the ladies? Connect... the... dots... my friend. http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=248135.0
I`m not in denial at all,just because an author writes doesn`t mean it`s so.Besides Bay,you thrive on shit like this.......it reinforces your mythical belief that all bodybuilders are gay!
How do you think Arnold survived before coming to America?
All gay? Not at all. They just like to show off their bodies--to other men. Call it what you will. A rose by any other name would be just as schmoetastic!
All you have to do is see what these people did for a living and if they had a family with money who backed them. These guys with $100 in their pocket who fly to California to make it big with no job and no prospects and stay in cult almost 100% do shit like G4p to get by.
That is still not proof! He wants to see a photos and video of Steve in explicit relations with another man. And even THAT could be photoshopped or doctored.
That is still not proof! He wants to see photos and video of Steve in explicit relations with another man. And even THAT could be photoshopped or doctored. Hence there is no proof!
Or course it's not proof , it's proof because you have an agenda one reference in a book is all you need seriously your standards are low because you already drew your conclusion based on the seedy side of bodybuilding , again everyone is guilty by association , it's the exact same when people say he was on steroids without zero evidence what so ever , well they were ' around ' back then and guys today abuse them , and he was involved in bodybuilding so therefore he was ON
Not saying it's 100% nailed down but what would the reasoning be for Steve's mention. I doubt if there are a hundred thousand people alive who know who Steve Reeves is, it's hardly worth the mention from a publicity angle.
who knows , Reeves is big in the gay community maybe they want to make him one of their own. I just like how he is automatically outed because of one reference in some book. Like the guys who claim he was on steroids , they don't need much because it fits their agenda.
Oh yeah.....I can totally see how that would only be gay NOW......
Although he was talking about other photographs in another thread Gordiano’s quote makes the point rather well. It doesn’t take a 2012 perspective to see that so many of those photos from yesteryear were in fact gay. It is amusing to hear more than one of you insist on some kind of “proof” that these muscle/fitness heroes from years ago were swinging both ways. You call for “proof” as if bodybuilders peddling their muscles just started last year and prior to that homosexual behavior among bodybuilders never existed. This all goes back to Sandow and even before...
Bay what would you have done if you were born before the steroid era? With no larger than life muscle studs to satisfy your needs?Fat truckers and lumberjacks?
Think about it... anyone on this board can answer that question because we are all looking at the same men. Bear in mind, even in the old days there were still muscle studs. Our idea of what is huge today is different, but huge guys back then were considered huge compared to average Joes so they stood out and represented the apotheosis of the male form.
