that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard in my entire life 
did you make that up. Well I hate to burst your bubble but your ignorance and emotions against someone that does not believe in evolution has clouded your perception, let me explain.... 7 billion people here and every single person believes in gravity yet there are over a billion people, and many smart, that believe evolution is wrong so cut the crap, your comment is childish and not intelligent at all, 
Now let's get on with it without the stupid meaningless gestures 
Neanderthals are pre-flood men who (because of different atmospheric conditions) were able to live longer, so certain bone features grew further then what we would see on modern man.
A date can be altered in catastrophic events. Depending on how big the event may be, in this case a world wide catastrophe, so caveman may date to 40 000 years but the dates are assuming regular and stable conditions. In an article in national geographic there where some seals that ended up dead after the result of some volcanic activity and their dead bodies yielded ages of up to 15 000 years.
''And what about all the ancient cave paintings in Africa and Europe....?'' Don't follow, what about them
Dinosaurs bones are never dated, never, nor will they ever be. The age of the dinosaur bones are established based on a huge myth the geologic column that is another fraud of your great theory.
Human where around 10 000 years ago Not one single document of a King, a general, an army, a civilization, a culture, a war, a monument, a city, Nothing, zip, zero, nada. To put things in perspective there are literally 1000's of documents of culture, civilizations, wars, king, generals and even religious figures dating to 3000 bc, go back another 1000 years to 4000 bc and there is NOTHING. I think it is foolish to think humans where around without leaving a single monument, statue, a pillar, or any type of written work at all and please don't bring up Gobekli tepe.
What I'm saying is not 'ignorant', my views are backed by almost all scientists, archaeologists, paleontologists, biologists and even astronomers who are
experts in their fields and devote their life to studying these issues.
The gravity analogy is valid in my view, the reason why anyone would argue against the evidence is if they had an ulterior motive such as backing up a religious text.
The majority of the worlds population live in poverty, are poorly educated and often live according to religious traditions.
It is doubtful whether evolution has ever even been brought to their attention.
With regards to the dinosaurs, they are often 50-100 million years old or possibly more and this corresponds with the surrounding layers of earth they're discovered in. The layers of earth are even often visible to eye if viewed in a cut-section.
There's also fossils of ancient plants, trees, shells etc.
How does one then explain the fossilization process...? The bones are fused within the rock.
You can't possibly be implying that dinosaur bones are relatively modern...?
I know there is a Creationist Theme Park in America which shows models of humans together with animatronic dinosaurs.
About documents surviving....well I doubt the cavemen would have been drawing up the Magna Carta or other important documents. That's why they painted pictures on the cavewalls which we can still see today and dated beyond 10 000 BC.
These exist. As well as stone tools and their bones.
If they did not have civilization or even the wheel then they wouldn't have been able to write.
Look at the blacks in Africa before Europeans arrived...?
None of anything they had would have survived besides a few spear or arrow tips. They lived in wooden huts and passed on their history via oral tradition. They didn't even have the wheel.
If they had all died out, then what would be left of them a few thousand years later....or 10, or 20, 30, 40 000 years?
Gobekli Tepe dates are also accepted by mainstream archaeologists so it is a valid example.
And back to the Neanderthals the mainstream view is now also that they lived side by side and competed with humans.
The only motivation to argue against evolution is because religious texts state that man was created approximately 6000 years ago.
