Author Topic: Suckmymuscle vs OneMoreRep - challenge with SuckMyMuscle being owned to oblivion  (Read 847987 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
This dude must be sweating bullets and smashing his keyboard.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

bike nut

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
  • Desperation is a stinky cologne
I wanted to be in the law suit!   I can then obtain discovery and depose this freak under oath with all 10k of his posts and find out what other sites he pollutes.  

Add me to the lawsuit Counselor....

I went out for dinner tonight at a nice restaurant and I could not order chicken....I am traumatized by the foul fowl rapes committed by Hindemburg Melao Jr., and I want to sue him for damages.

illwill

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 591
  • I'm not a playa. I'm just in them guts a lot





Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.






Dude must be committing hari Kari right now.

King Shizzo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34189
  • Ron crowned me King because I always deliver.
I knew he was crazy when he listed jeremy horn in his top ten mma fighters of all time.

illwill

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 591
  • I'm not a playa. I'm just in them guts a lot

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2486
rofllll this thread is better than porn
WTF is he doing there...??? ??? ??? ??? ???...is that part of his Special armed forces/Taekwondo/Kokashinkai/BJJ/Marathon/600lb bench-press/higher 225 IQ Test routine or something

Princess L

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13094
  • I stop for turtles
OMFG!  :o ::)  another bannable offense from the archives.  WTF?  ::) :-X

  Be careful, n.i.g.g.e.r, or I will fuck your daughter up the ass on her 12th birthday. Oh wait, I don't have sex with monkeys...ha ha ha ha!

SUCKMYMUSCLE
:

Krankenstein

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11310
  • quit·ter : a person can't finish a task
 Today my attorney refered me to another attorney who speciliazes on internet privacy and libel issues. Next week, I am going to meet him and we will come up with a plan of attack.

  I will spend a lot of money, but I will fuck Adonis no matter how long it takes or how much it costs. I will cause a lot of pain to Adonis for having violated my privacy and accused me of pedophilia no matter what. I would love to take a long hard look at his face when this is all over. The expression of regret he will have in his face will be priceless. I will make him suffer in a World where the pain is vey real.

  I hope you are enjoying all the giggles, Adonis. I hope it was worth it, because you are going to pay a very steep price for them.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

YOu have made legitimate death threats......you have said your desire is to "kill" another member..

I wonder if this might interest your lawyer

Here is the Federal Statute of the U.S. Code:
**********************************************************
TITLE 47 > CHAPTER 5 > SUBCHAPTER II > Part I > § 223
Prev | Next
§ 223. Obscene or harassing telephone calls in the District of Columbia or in interstate or foreign communications
How Current is This?
(a) Prohibited acts generally
Whoever—
(1) in interstate or foreign communications—
(A) by means of a telecommunications device knowingly—
(i) makes, creates, or solicits, and
(ii) initiates the transmission of,
any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass another person;
(B) by means of a telecommunications device knowingly—
(i) makes, creates, or solicits, and
(ii) initiates the transmission of,
any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, knowing that the recipient of the communication is under 18 years of age, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call or initiated the communication;
(C) makes a telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications device, whether or not conversation or communication ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the called number or who receives the communications;
(D) makes or causes the telephone of another repeatedly or continuously to ring, with intent to harass any person at the called number; or
(E) makes repeated telephone calls or repeatedly initiates communication with a telecommunications device, during which conversation or communication ensues, solely to harass any person at the called number or who receives the communication; or
(2) knowingly permits any telecommunications facility under his control to be used for any activity prohibited by paragraph (1) with the intent that it be used for such activity,
shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(b) Prohibited acts for commercial purposes; defense to prosecution
(1) Whoever knowingly—
(A) within the United States, by means of telephone, makes (directly or by recording device) any obscene communication for commercial purposes to any person, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call; or
(B) permits any telephone facility under such person’s control to be used for an activity prohibited by subparagraph (A),
shall be fined in accordance with title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(2) Whoever knowingly—
(A) within the United States, by means of telephone, makes (directly or by recording device) any indecent communication for commercial purposes which is available to any person under 18 years of age or to any other person without that person’s consent, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call; or
(B) permits any telephone facility under such person’s control to be used for an activity prohibited by subparagraph (A), shall be fined not more than $50,000 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
(3) It is a defense to prosecution under paragraph (2) of this subsection that the defendant restricted access to the prohibited communication to persons 18 years of age or older in accordance with subsection (c) of this section and with such procedures as the Commission may prescribe by regulation.
(4) In addition to the penalties under paragraph (1), whoever, within the United States, intentionally violates paragraph (1) or (2) shall be subject to a fine of not more than $50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of violation shall constitute a separate violation.
(5)
(A) In addition to the penalties under paragraphs (1), (2), and (5), whoever, within the United States, violates paragraph (1) or (2) shall be subject to a civil fine of not more than $50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of violation shall constitute a separate violation.
(B) A fine under this paragraph may be assessed either—
(i) by a court, pursuant to civil action by the Commission or any attorney employed by the Commission who is designated by the Commission for such purposes, or
(ii) by the Commission after appropriate administrative proceedings.
(6) The Attorney General may bring a suit in the appropriate district court of the United States to enjoin any act or practice which violates paragraph (1) or (2). An injunction may be granted in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
(c) Restriction on access to subscribers by common carriers; judicial remedies respecting restrictions
(1) A common carrier within the District of Columbia or within any State, or in interstate or foreign commerce, shall not, to the extent technically feasible, provide access to a communication specified in subsection (b) of this section from the telephone of any subscriber who has not previously requested in writing the carrier to provide access to such communication if the carrier collects from subscribers an identifiable charge for such communication that the carrier remits, in whole or in part, to the provider of such communication.
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), no cause of action may be brought in any court or administrative agency against any common carrier, or any of its affiliates, including their officers, directors, employees, agents, or authorized representatives on account of—
(A) any action which the carrier demonstrates was taken in good faith to restrict access pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection; or
(B) any access permitted—
(i) in good faith reliance upon the lack of any representation by a provider of communications that communications provided by that provider are communications specified in subsection (b) of this section, or
(ii) because a specific representation by the provider did not allow the carrier, acting in good faith, a sufficient period to restrict access to restrict access to communications described in subsection (b) of this section.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (2) of this subsection, a provider of communications services to which subscribers are denied access pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection may bring an action for a declaratory judgment or similar action in a court. Any such action shall be limited to the question of whether the communications which the provider seeks to provide fall within the category of communications to which the carrier will provide access only to subscribers who have previously requested such access.
(d) Sending or displaying offensive material to persons under 18
Whoever—
(1) in interstate or foreign communications knowingly—
(A) uses an interactive computer service to send to a specific person or persons under 18 years of age, or
(B) uses any interactive computer service to display in a manner available to a person under 18 years of age,
any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that is obscene or child pornography, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the communication; or
(2) knowingly permits any telecommunications facility under such person’s control to be used for an activity prohibited by paragraph (1) with the intent that it be used for such activity,
shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(e) Defenses
In addition to any other defenses available by law:
(1) No person shall be held to have violated subsection (a) or (d) of this section solely for providing access or connection to or from a facility, system, or network not under that person’s control, including transmission, downloading, intermediate storage, access software, or other related capabilities that are incidental to providing such access or connection that does not include the creation of the content of the communication.
(2) The defenses provided by paragraph (1) of this subsection shall not be applicable to a person who is a conspirator with an entity actively involved in the creation or knowing distribution of communications that violate this section, or who knowingly advertises the availability of such communications.
(3) The defenses provided in paragraph (1) of this subsection shall not be applicable to a person who provides access or connection to a facility, system, or network engaged in the violation of this section that is owned or controlled by such person.
(4) No employer shall be held liable under this section for the actions of an employee or agent unless the employee’s or agent’s conduct is within the scope of his or her employment or agency and the employer
(A) having knowledge of such conduct, authorizes or ratifies such conduct, or
(B) recklessly disregards such conduct.
(5) It is a defense to a prosecution under subsection (a)(1)(B) or (d) of this section, or under subsection (a)(2) of this section with respect to the use of a facility for an activity under subsection (a)(1)(B) of this section that a person—
(A) has taken, in good faith, reasonable, effective, and appropriate actions under the circumstances to restrict or prevent access by minors to a communication specified in such subsections, which may involve any appropriate measures to restrict minors from such communications, including any method which is feasible under available technology; or
(B) has restricted access to such communication by requiring use of a verified credit card, debit account, adult access code, or adult personal identification number.
(6) The Commission may describe measures which are reasonable, effective, and appropriate to restrict access to prohibited communications under subsection (d) of this section. Nothing in this section authorizes the Commission to enforce, or is intended to provide the Commission with the authority to approve, sanction, or permit, the use of such measures. The Commission shall have no enforcement authority over the failure to utilize such measures. The Commission shall not endorse specific products relating to such measures. The use of such measures shall be admitted as evidence of good faith efforts for purposes of paragraph (5) in any action arising under subsection (d) of this section. Nothing in this section shall be construed to treat interactive computer services as common carriers or telecommunications carriers.
(f) Violations of law required; commercial entities, nonprofit libraries, or institutions of higher education
(1) No cause of action may be brought in any court or administrative agency against any person on account of any activity that is not in violation of any law punishable by criminal or civil penalty, and that the person has taken in good faith to implement a defense authorized under this section or otherwise to restrict or prevent the transmission of, or access to, a communication specified in this section.
(2) No State or local government may impose any liability for commercial activities or actions by commercial entities, nonprofit libraries, or institutions of higher education in connection with an activity or action described in subsection (a)(2) or (d) of this section that is inconsistent with the treatment of those activities or actions under this section: Provided, however, That nothing herein shall preclude any State or local government from enacting and enforcing complementary oversight, liability, and regulatory systems, procedures, and requirements, so long as such systems, procedures, and requirements govern only intrastate services and do not result in the imposition of inconsistent rights, duties or obligations on the provision of interstate services. Nothing in this subsection shall preclude any State or local government from governing conduct not covered by this section.
(g) Application and enforcement of other Federal law
Nothing in subsection (a), (d), (e), or (f) of this section or in the defenses to prosecution under subsection (a) or (d) of this section shall be construed to affect or limit the application or enforcement of any other Federal law.
(h) Definitions
For purposes of this section—
(1) The use of the term “telecommunications device” in this section—
(A) shall not impose new obligations on broadcasting station licensees and cable operators covered by obscenity and indecency provisions elsewhere in this chapter;
(B) does not include an interactive computer service; and
(C) in the case of subparagraph (C) of subsection (a)(1) of this section, includes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet (as such term is defined in section 1104 [1] of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note )).
(2) The term “interactive computer service” has the meaning provided in section 230 (f)(2) of this title.
(3) The term “access software” means software (including client or server software) or enabling tools that do not create or provide the content of the communication but that allow a user to do any one or more of the following:
(A) filter, screen, allow, or disallow content;
(B) pick, choose, analyze, or digest content; or
(C) transmit, receive, display, forward, cache, search, subset, organize, reorganize, or translate content.
(4) The term “institution of higher education” has the meaning provided in section 1001 of title 20.
(5) The term “library” means a library eligible for participation in State-based plans for funds under title III of the Library Services and Construction Act (20 U.S.C. 355e et seq.).

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
OMFG!  :o ::)  another bannable offense from the archives.  WTF?  ::) :-X


Nice catch.    Hey Himdenpedo - go f yourself!  

el numero uno

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9405
  • Clean your room, bucko.
I'm going to bed right now, I'm guessing this thread will be around 95-100 pages by 10 am.  8)

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2486
OMFG!  :o ::)  another bannable offense from the archives.  WTF?  ::) :-X

>:(filthy lowlife >:(

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
 Today my attorney refered me to another attorney who speciliazes on internet privacy and libel issues. Next week, I am going to meet him and we will come up with a plan of attack.

  I will spend a lot of money, but I will fuck Adonis no matter how long it takes or how much it costs. I will cause a lot of pain to Adonis for having violated my privacy and accused me of pedophilia no matter what. I would love to take a long hard look at his face when this is all over. The expression of regret he will have in his face will be priceless. I will make him suffer in a World where the pain is vey real.

  I hope you are enjoying all the giggles, Adonis. I hope it was worth it, because you are going to pay a very steep price for them.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
I am going to keep enjoying the giggles Hindemburg Melão Jr. aka Pedro Coderch.  I want you to take a long hard look at my face, that is as soon as I am done removing the boot from your neck.

Raymondo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6736
  • I broke Excel
Nobody's denying that Pedro Coderch is SMM. The only question remains: Why would anyone with a self-perceived high social status use his real name on a site like marksimpson.com?

Let's assume for a minute that Pedro is in fact that Melao guy. Why should he write such incriminating bullshit on marksimpson.com under his Melao name instead of Pedro Coderch? If he would post as Hindemburg Melao Jr., anyone could look him up with a single google search and dismantle him. Wouldn't it be much smarter to just create a random pseudonym that appears real??

Now to the connection between SMM and HMJr: Why would SMM mention the Sigma Society, which was founded by Hindemburg Melao Jr., on this board a couple of times and claim to know the solution to one of the most difficult problems on that site (claims to be one of only three guys on earth to solve that problem correctly)? It's such a tiny little society, founded in Brasil, by a narcissistic madman, that only a handful of people have heard of... yet it is mentioned on this forum multiple times.

Why would SMM share so many interests with that Hindemburg guy? Isn't that at least suspicious?

You're ignoring a simpler explanation, maybe the guys are friends? Did you ever consider that?

And the argument, that this Hindemburg guy only speaks portugues... it's laughable... why would he claim an oxford university degree on linkedin? Why is he a fan of monty python? Why did he join all those english speaking groups on linkedin? This guy obviously knows english... it's ridiculous to assume he doesn't only because he's not boasting about it on his site.

No, it's not. Look at Hindemburg's CV. There are a few blatant grammatical errors and a curious choice of words. They indicate a person who is not a master of English, unlike Pedro Coderch who has obviously lived a number of years in the U.S. and is a fluent speaker.

Regarding the oxford university claim, Maleo claims he was given an "honorary" degree, not that he studied there. Personally, I think it's bullshit.

You guys don't see any similarities whatsoever?

I just don't understand why people have a hard time grasping the concept of using many false identities in order to protect the real identity...

You're reaching. Remember Occam's razor.

Raymondo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6736
  • I broke Excel
I'm going to bed right now, I'm guessing this thread will be around 95-100 pages by 10 am.  8)

I just woke up and first thing I did was turn on my smartphone to see how this thread progressed. It's about a page per hour!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
I am going to keep enjoying the giggles Hindemburg Melão Jr. aka Pedro Coderch.  I want you to take a long hard look at my face, that is as soon as I am done removing the boot from your neck.

TA, if he sues you, you can implead other defendants and we all can demand discovery.  

Raymondo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6736
  • I broke Excel
TA, if he sues you, you can implead other defendants and we all can demand discovery.  

What's discovery? You've mentioned it a few times.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
I just woke up and first thing I did was turn on my smartphone to see how this thread progressed. It's about a page per hour!


Why would HimdenPEDO threaten to sue TA if it wasn't him in these photos and videos? 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
What's discovery? You've mentioned it a few times.

The defendants get to demand and obtain all sorts of docs and depose the Plaintiff under oath about all sorts of shit.   

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
TA, if he sues you, you can implead other defendants and we all can demand discovery.  
Indeed.  He also does not realize that there is a bit of information which was obtained that has been held back thus far.  A type of "Smoking Gun" that is potentially life/career/freedom ending.

Raymondo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6736
  • I broke Excel

Why would HimdenPEDO threaten to sue TA if it wasn't him in these photos and videos?  

He started threatening to sue a few days before the Hindemburg connection appeared. He's Pedro Coderch and he's a mate of Hindemburg Melao Jr in my opinion. To be honest it's a pity this last guy was involved and called a pedo and all that, but he's got his mate to blame for that.

The defendants get to demand and obtain all sorts of docs and depose the Plaintiff under oath about all sorts of shit.  

Is this like a full background check?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Indeed.  He also does not realize that there is a bit of information which was obtained that has been held back thus far.  A type of "Smoking Gun" that is potentially life ending.

oh come on - you can't do that!!!!   Life ending?    No wonder he is melting down knowing something real bad is out there.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
He started threatening to sue a few days before the Hindemburg connection appeared. He's Pedro Coderch and he's a mate of Hindemburg Melao Jr in my opinion. To be honest it's a pity this last guy was involved and called a pedo and all that, but he's got his mate to blame for that.

Is this like a full background check?

EVERYTHING.   Every single post on this board of his and every single claim comes in from the beastiality, to the false impersonation of military, etc.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
He started threatening to sue a few days before the Hindemburg connection appeared. He's Pedro Coderch and he's a mate of Hindemburg Melao Jr in my opinion. To be honest it's a pity this last guy was involved and called a pedo and all that, but he's got his mate to blame for that.

Is this like a full background check?

Pedro Coderch is not a real person!