Author Topic: Batman 'Dark Knight' Rises - Great movie or ???  (Read 56768 times)

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #50 on: July 19, 2012, 09:29:52 AM »

OneMoreRep

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14124
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #51 on: July 19, 2012, 09:32:55 AM »
Roger Ebert says it's not as good as the previous one  >:(

Truth be told, I could care less what a guy that looks like this thinks about movies..



In my eyes, he is a relic and completely past his time.  He probably would have done a better job playing a villain in the Batman movies than pretending to critique them.

"1"

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #52 on: July 19, 2012, 09:34:22 AM »
he looks like shit haha

nice one nails ahhahaah

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #53 on: July 19, 2012, 09:37:51 AM »
Getting panned by reviewers, then again I didnt think much of the 2nd one either, first is the best imho.Any getbiggers going to watch this in their home cinema?

one reviewer, who got death threats, meaningless story

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #54 on: July 19, 2012, 09:38:56 AM »
Reviewers only give 5-stars to movies like "The Piano" and "The Accidental Tourist".  Batman III looks as good as I and II, definitely better than Thor, Green Lamp, Fan 4  and Avengers.  Hope this helps.

wow, that's some informed shit right there

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #55 on: July 19, 2012, 09:39:25 AM »

Raymondo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6910
  • I broke Excel
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #56 on: July 19, 2012, 09:41:16 AM »
Truth be told, I could care less what a guy that looks like this thinks about movies..



In my eyes, he is a relic and completely past his time.  He probably would have done a better job playing a villain in the Batman movies than pretending to critique them.

"1"

I don't think anyone who's had their jaw removed due to cancer would look particularly attractive :)
Ebert is generally spot on with his reviews although I hope he's wrong this time. I suppose I'll find out in less than 24 hours!

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #57 on: July 19, 2012, 09:43:00 AM »
he looks like a puppet

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #58 on: July 19, 2012, 09:47:03 AM »
On a side note about movies.....

The Actor from Anchor Man (Ron Burgendy's boss) got caught pee-wee herman style, with his dick in his hands while out watching pornos at a theater


All the while, im sure there was a rapes or killer on the loose instead of a penis out in a porn theater, Tax money at work  ::)
Why would a cop go into a porn theater unless he wanted to see another guys dick






Fred Willard was arrested for lewd conduct last night in Hollywood when police allegedly caught him with his pants down in an adult movie theater ... TMZ has learned.

According to law enforcement sources, LAPD undercover vice officers went into the Tiki Theater in Hollywood and found the 78-year-old "Anchorman" star watching last night's feature ... with his penis exposed and in his hand.







We're told Willard was arrested around 8:45PM and booked for lewd conduct.

It was a quick release -- we're told he was out of police custody a short while later.

As for which movie Fred was watching -- there are 3 flicks in rotation at the theater ... "Follow Me 2," a XXX parody of "The Client List," and "Step Dad No. 2."

Willard is best known for his memorable roles in "Best in Show", "For Your Consideration", "American Wedding" and "Everybody Loves Raymond."

According to IMDB, Fred is "rumored" to be in pre-production for a movie entitled ... "The Yank."



Megalodon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7699
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #59 on: July 19, 2012, 09:50:07 AM »
,

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #60 on: July 19, 2012, 09:51:15 AM »

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #61 on: July 19, 2012, 09:58:43 AM »
I don't think anyone who's had their jaw removed due to cancer would look particularly attractive :)
Ebert is generally spot on with his reviews although I hope he's wrong this time. I suppose I'll find out in less than 24 hours!
x2       He gave it a 3-star review. That's certainly no pan. 

OneMoreRep

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14124
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #62 on: July 19, 2012, 10:04:46 AM »
I don't think anyone who's had their jaw removed due to cancer would look particularly attractive :)
Ebert is generally spot on with his reviews although I hope he's wrong this time. I suppose I'll find out in less than 24 hours!

Once you see the movie, come back and let us know your thoughts.  

I don't trust Ebert at all.  I was a bigger fan of Gene Siskel and found that upon Siskel's passing, most of Ebert's lackluster reviews reeked of sycophantic raves based off of other popular critics.

I would probably peg Ebert as a better writer than critic, but even that is up for debate.

Either way, I'd trust your review more than some boring old critic.  I find that critics today over analyze and take the fun away from the movie experience.

"1"

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #63 on: July 19, 2012, 10:05:35 AM »
2 hours 45min.... this is one movie i will leave the Girlfriend at home, she cant handle anything longer then an hour and a half,.... 

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #64 on: July 19, 2012, 10:05:44 AM »

manuelsonn

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1021
  • Team BAN CREATINE!
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #65 on: July 19, 2012, 10:31:31 AM »
Hahaha this why I fkn love getbig - you guys are killing me  ;D

1. Don't worry I lost my virginity when I was 14 by banging my uncle on the fold-up pool table in my garage, and then having to cut a section of the cloth out where I couldnt wash off the blood spot oh brother (good times though)

2. It was something myself and my boyfriend decided to do when we were dating/got engaged - had both been with various bears during our teens/20's and wanted to make it something to remember. (The feeling I had when I busted all over his beard on the wedding night was ridiculously good hahaha)

3. I think what you are all trying to say, is that when the Turkish Forces invaded northern cyprus, instead of taking my family, olives, and donkeys and running like the rest of the greeks to the south, I laid on the highway, cleverley disguising myself as a normal man, to guarantee at least 5 turkish tea bags before sundown, and ensured that my mouth was facing away from mecca to secure maximum tongue to bumhole leverage.

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #66 on: July 19, 2012, 11:04:26 AM »
Once you see the movie, come back and let us know your thoughts.  

I don't trust Ebert at all.  I was a bigger fan of Gene Siskel and found that upon Siskel's passing, most of Ebert's lackluster reviews reeked of sycophantic raves based off of other popular critics.

I would probably peg Ebert as a better writer than critic, but even that is up for debate.

Either way, I'd trust your review more than some boring old critic.  I find that critics today over analyze and take the fun away from the movie experience.

"1"
Actually, it's not. He's a won a Pulitzer for his work. Not many movie reviewers can claim that. If you're looking for a solid review, I'd take him any day over the myriad rubber-stampers the studios have on retainer. 

Raymondo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6910
  • I broke Excel
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #67 on: July 19, 2012, 11:12:10 AM »
Once you see the movie, come back and let us know your thoughts.  

I don't trust Ebert at all.  I was a bigger fan of Gene Siskel and found that upon Siskel's passing, most of Ebert's lackluster reviews reeked of sycophantic raves based off of other popular critics.

I would probably peg Ebert as a better writer than critic, but even that is up for debate.

Either way, I'd trust your review more than some boring old critic.  I find that critics today over analyze and take the fun away from the movie experience.

"1"

haha, thanks! You're right, Ebert's writing skills tend to overshadow his critical side. Strange, I had never considered that before.

OneMoreRep

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14124
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #68 on: July 19, 2012, 11:12:22 AM »
Actually, it's not. He's a won a Pulitzer for his work. Not many movie reviewers can claim that. If you're looking for a solid review, I'd take him any day over the myriad rubber-stampers the studios have on retainer.  

Not too many, but I'd pick Wesley Morris over Ebert any day.  I can probably also think of about 3-4 more movie critics that got the pulitzer way after Ebert who are slightly more deserving.  

Didn't Ebert get his Pulitzer back in the 70's?  Like I said, way past his prime (This coming from someone born in the 60's).

"1"

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #69 on: July 19, 2012, 11:47:07 AM »
Not too many, but I'd pick Wesley Morris over Ebert any day.  I can probably also think of about 3-4 more movie critics that got the pulitzer way after Ebert who are slightly more deserving.  

Didn't Ebert get his Pulitzer back in the 70's?  Like I said, way past his prime (This coming from someone born in the 60's).

"1"
Fair enough. I like Anthony Lane. He's informative and fun. And, I'm a 60's baby, too. Oh brother.   ;D 

POB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3350
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #70 on: July 19, 2012, 12:04:32 PM »
Truth be told, I could care less what a guy that looks like this thinks about movies..



In my eyes, he is a relic and completely past his time.  He probably would have done a better job playing a villain in the Batman movies than pretending to critique them.

"1"

Lol,he'd be perfect with a sinister laugh ;D. What happened to his jaw?did he chew tobacco?

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #71 on: July 19, 2012, 12:15:37 PM »







King Shizzo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34351
  • Ron crowned me King because I always deliver.
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #72 on: July 19, 2012, 12:18:25 PM »
We're both christians (but not the hyprocrital kind) strongly believe that marriage is an institution from God Himself, and sex is something that is only for married couples  ;D :D
Outed.

King Shizzo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34351
  • Ron crowned me King because I always deliver.
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #73 on: July 19, 2012, 12:20:13 PM »
It will probably still be a decent movie, but I can't help to notice how gay Bane and Catwoman look in this movie.

King Shizzo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34351
  • Ron crowned me King because I always deliver.
Re: So the new Batman movie is supposed to suck
« Reply #74 on: July 19, 2012, 12:23:17 PM »
Truth be told, I could care less what a guy that looks like this thinks about movies..



Thats fucked up One!  ;D