« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??  (Read 6664 times)

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15229
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« on: July 31, 2012, 03:42:19 PM »
Sure, ugly as hell. But dude had serious size and conditioning.

Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 03:51:18 PM »
He was like if someone spliced Roland Cziorlock and That other German (I forgot his name, the one wh worked for Audi and had flat top---damn, I forgot), and left a huge gut on the result.

I thought he would do better.
Logged

Schmoff

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 03:54:38 PM »
you mean ugliness?

yes, he is

 :-X
Logged

michael arvilla

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21827
  • facebook.com/michael.arvilla
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2012, 04:19:03 PM »
                                  Heiko!!!!
Logged

Moen

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2863
  • Getbig!
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2012, 05:38:52 PM »
Wat happened to the Berlin Wall anyway  ???
Logged

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2012, 06:00:51 PM »
He was an avid fan of synthol
Logged

jaejonna

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14944
  • Head Asian of Getbig
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2012, 06:32:09 PM »
No

Huge gut, oil, a symmetrical as a Picasso but worth 5 bucks..
Logged
L

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19432
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #7 on: July 31, 2012, 09:34:04 PM »
Back in the day he was freaky and schmoetastic!
Logged

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #8 on: July 31, 2012, 09:37:31 PM »
The oil turned on him
Logged

Megalodon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7699
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #9 on: July 31, 2012, 10:14:03 PM »
Heiko actually had bad conditioning. He had very unhealthy looking vascularity that covered up a lack of striations.

Munzer had conditioning. Compare chests. All the striations should converge to the armpit area where the pectoral muscles are inserted into the humerus.
That's very clear on Munzer. On Heiko it's hard to tell what's going on. Compare deltoids, etc....

The veins mean very little. Some fat ladies have thick swirly varicose veins in their legs. It doesn't look good.  Stallone developed sickly looking veins in one side of his chest when he tore a muscle. Something was blocked resulting in poor circulation. That kind of vascularity is a sign that something is unhealthy. The muscular striations...the separated muscle fibers are what's important.
Logged

Dr Kincaid

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 867
  • Ice machine broken
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #10 on: July 31, 2012, 11:31:15 PM »
A good easy to achieve everyday look.
Logged

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #11 on: July 31, 2012, 11:34:26 PM »
im pretty sure he injected steroids at some stage in life
Logged

Anglo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1173
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #12 on: August 01, 2012, 02:07:20 AM »
.
Logged

Mitch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4050
  • Team Succulent Ham of Peace
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #13 on: August 01, 2012, 02:12:56 AM »
Quote from: BayGBM on July 31, 2012, 09:34:04 PM
Back in the day he was freaky and schmoetastic!
I saw dead beefs which were looking more healthy :-\

Quote
He had very unhealthy looking vascularity that covered up a lack of striations.
This. All veins, no muscle separation.
Logged

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19936
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #14 on: August 01, 2012, 02:33:14 AM »
Quote from: affeman on July 31, 2012, 03:42:19 PM


Is he participating in this year's Olympics ?
Logged

Super Natural

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1962
  • Repent of Soy liberalism.
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #15 on: August 01, 2012, 02:58:33 AM »
Quote from: affeman on July 31, 2012, 03:42:19 PM
Sure, ugly as hell. But dude had serious size and conditioning.



Looks good for a natural.
Logged

bic_staedtler

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1209
  • That is all.
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #16 on: August 01, 2012, 03:18:30 AM »
I remember this fucking nightmare monstrosity of a human being.  Ugly that goes right down to the bone. 
Logged

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23397
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #17 on: August 01, 2012, 04:02:02 AM »
Logged
.

falco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18279
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #18 on: August 01, 2012, 08:13:05 AM »
Quote from: Megalodon on July 31, 2012, 10:14:03 PM
Heiko actually had bad conditioning. He had very unhealthy looking vascularity that covered up a lack of striations.

Munzer had conditioning. Compare chests. All the striations should converge to the armpit area where the pectoral muscles are inserted into the humerus.
That's very clear on Munzer. On Heiko it's hard to tell what's going on. Compare deltoids, etc....

The veins mean very little. Some fat ladies have thick swirly varicose veins in their legs. It doesn't look good.  Stallone developed sickly looking veins in one side of his chest when he tore a muscle. Something was blocked resulting in poor circulation. That kind of vascularity is a sign that something is unhealthy. The muscular striations...the separated muscle fibers are what's important.

Munzer looked "healthy" (lol) but that didn't stoped him to die from steroid abuse.
Logged

Megalodon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7699
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #19 on: August 01, 2012, 09:07:09 AM »
Quote from: falco on August 01, 2012, 08:13:05 AM
Munzer looked "healthy" (lol) but that didn't stoped him to die from steroid abuse.

Munzer didn't die of steroid abuse.

Take Arnold, for example, but there are thousands of bodybuilders with visible pectoral/deltoid muscle fibers/striations. Munzer is the most extreme, but yeah, his death clouds the issue. ;D








Logged

Moen

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2863
  • Getbig!
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #20 on: August 01, 2012, 09:34:35 AM »
We need pics of Heiko wearing high heels! Don't even try and convince me he never did!
Logged

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19432
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #21 on: August 01, 2012, 09:38:00 AM »
Quote from: Mitch on August 01, 2012, 02:12:56 AM
I saw dead beefs which were looking more healthy :-\
This. All veins, no muscle separation.

Tier 2 at his peak!  ;D
Logged

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15229
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #22 on: August 01, 2012, 02:30:03 PM »
Quote from: Megalodon on July 31, 2012, 10:14:03 PM
Heiko actually had bad conditioning. He had very unhealthy looking vascularity that covered up a lack of striations.

Munzer had conditioning. Compare chests. All the striations should converge to the armpit area where the pectoral muscles are inserted into the humerus.
That's very clear on Munzer. On Heiko it's hard to tell what's going on. Compare deltoids, etc....

The veins mean very little. Some fat ladies have thick swirly varicose veins in their legs. It doesn't look good.  Stallone developed sickly looking veins in one side of his chest when he tore a muscle. Something was blocked resulting in poor circulation. That kind of vascularity is a sign that something is unhealthy. The muscular striations...the separated muscle fibers are what's important.

What about this guy??

Logged

Moen

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2863
  • Getbig!
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #23 on: August 01, 2012, 02:38:29 PM »
Quote from: affeman on August 01, 2012, 02:30:03 PM
What about this guy??



Would look great wearing high heels as well  :P
Logged

Megalodon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7699
Re: Was HEIKO underrated as a pro??
« Reply #24 on: August 01, 2012, 03:05:21 PM »
Quote from: affeman on August 01, 2012, 02:30:03 PM
What about this guy??

He'd be unbeatable if his circulatory system were a little more obstructed. ;D
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »