I will post why ND's judging argument is wrong logically, I thought this was obvious but he keeps spouting bullshit so I might as well.
Judging cannot be extrapolated through years. It is a thing of the moment decided by "objective criteria" and only if you were ready to admit that the IFBB has any sort of objectivity you can defend this.
If you do, as the ignorant Dorian fanboys do, you will pressed to admit then than Branch Warren is, at least, a physique on par with Kevin and Flex, both of which never won an O and have AC's.
If you do, youd be hard pressed to admit then that Cutler is a physique on par with Dorian, as, supposedly, there was objective criteria applied to both physiques by the "objective" pannel of judges the IFBB chooses. This of course, is a factual matter, which by the way, has been impoied and explicitated by both parties of this discussion, we have all said how shitty the IFBB judges are, this is NOT up to debate.
Lastly, you point of comparison Flex vs Dorian vs Coleman implicilty implies a judgement out side of the criteria for you have provided no reason why Dorian is better than Flex on 93 other than saying that Dorian won, you are basically saying Dorian won because Dorian won, which is tautological and of no value to the discussion.
GOD DAMN IM GOOD.