Author Topic: Flex v Heath. Back shot  (Read 24916 times)

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20489
  • Biscuit
Flex v Heath. Back shot
« on: August 29, 2012, 11:16:58 AM »
From my FB page. Very similar. Structure, density, shape, everything. Who ya got?
a

Karpaasi

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 325
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2012, 11:31:02 AM »
Front&back double biceps are Phil's best poses by far. In that comparison they are pretty equal. In my opinion Flex's any top shape(93, 98, 99) is better than we've seen on Phil.


ChristopherA

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7060
  • Getbig!
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2012, 11:34:24 AM »
Front&back double biceps are Phil's best poses by far. In that comparison they are pretty equal. In my opinion Flex's any top shape(93, 98, 99) is better than we've seen on Phil.


But do you consider the whole package? Flex's hams and glutes are squishy as fuck where Phil is hard from top to bottom. Phil wins easy

PJim

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3951
  • Strike another match, go start anew
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2012, 11:36:07 AM »
I prefer Flex, but Phil would probably beat him from the judges standpoint.

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19936
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2012, 11:37:00 AM »
They both do not look strong, therefore they should not be mr O....

hope this helps

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2012, 11:41:08 AM »
But do you consider the whole package? Flex's hams and glutes are squishy as fuck where Phil is hard from top to bottom. Phil wins easy
Actually no, that pic was from the 93 Arnold, I found it in a magazine, posted it here, it was a pic I used to show that flex didn't have "calf implants".
You are comparig that quality of photo from 93 to a sharper quality photo of today's era.
Flex was about 216 and dry as all get out.

Flex from the back beats him, and from the front as well. Phil would win the front lat spread,
but Flex had cross-striated quads. Hams would go to Phil, Arms would be a toss up.

Ronnie Rep

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10117
  • Getbig!
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2012, 11:54:52 AM »
Front&back double biceps are Phil's best poses by far. In that comparison they are pretty equal. In my opinion Flex's any top shape(93, 98, 99) is better than we've seen on Phil.


That!

bigmikecox

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14159
  • SAY MY NAME!!!!
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2012, 12:06:50 PM »
Flex in 1993 was unreal! I was at that Arnold and it wasnt even close with him and Labrada.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #8 on: August 29, 2012, 12:43:37 PM »
Heath is bigger and in better shape, where is the comparison?

Stark

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22988
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #9 on: August 29, 2012, 01:05:02 PM »
better calves on flex tho

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #10 on: August 29, 2012, 01:58:29 PM »
From my FB page. Very similar. Structure, density, shape, everything. Who ya got?

I remember making this comparison years ago. That was 1993 AC Flex vs. 2008 Ironman Phil.

ChristopherA

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7060
  • Getbig!
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #11 on: August 29, 2012, 02:07:10 PM »
Actually no, that pic was from the 93 Arnold, I found it in a magazine, posted it here, it was a pic I used to show that flex didn't have "calf implants".
You are comparig that quality of photo from 93 to a sharper quality photo of today's era.
Flex was about 216 and dry as all get out.

Flex from the back beats him, and from the front as well. Phil would win the front lat spread,
but Flex had cross-striated quads. Hams would go to Phil, Arms would be a toss up.
Actually no what? In what way does Flex beat him from the back? Even if one photo is better than the next, Flex's fat ass is right there for you to see. Health is hard as a rock top to bottom. Flex is tight top only, regardless how dry he is. His calves are pathetic while Health's are great. it's no contest from the back which is what the thread asked for, I wont address anything else

cephissus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7596
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #12 on: August 29, 2012, 02:14:24 PM »
Actually no what? In what way does Flex beat him from the back? Even if one photo is better than the next, Flex's fat ass is right there for you to see. Health is hard as a rock top to bottom. Flex is tight top only, regardless how dry he is. His calves are pathetic while Health's are great. it's no contest from the back which is what the thread asked for, I wont address anything else

what the hell are you talking about, there are clearly visible striations on flex's ass, homo ::)

cephissus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7596
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #13 on: August 29, 2012, 02:14:58 PM »
They both do not look strong, therefore they should not be mr O....

hope this helps


x2

ChristopherA

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7060
  • Getbig!
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #14 on: August 29, 2012, 02:19:47 PM »
what the hell are you talking about, there are clearly visible striations on flex's ass, homo ::)
Guess I didnt look hard enough.  ::)

claymore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2916
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #15 on: August 29, 2012, 03:53:09 PM »
This is gotta be a joke....FLEX destroys Phil

OTHstrong

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14122
  • Jasher
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #16 on: August 29, 2012, 04:19:25 PM »
The lines on Flex are way deeper, the comparison is not fare either way, a shitty old unfocused pic vs a clear pic? I give the nod to Flex, he has bigger muscle bellies and more dense, although Phil is thicker.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #17 on: August 29, 2012, 04:23:44 PM »
Actually no what? In what way does Flex beat him from the back? Even if one photo is better than the next, Flex's fat ass is right there for you to see. Health is hard as a rock top to bottom. Flex is tight top only, regardless how dry he is. His calves are pathetic while Health's are great. it's no contest from the back which is what the thread asked for, I wont address anything else
Flex has striations in his lower back---he is complete up and down. Phil has him on the hams, back arm, delts, goes to Flex.

I wouldn't say Flex had a "fat" ass, because he was measured at...
And so the meme goes on...

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15195
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #18 on: August 29, 2012, 04:26:30 PM »
Phil is thicker, and his entire lower body (glutes, hams,) blows that oilbag away (too bad for Flex you can't inject oil in your hamstrings and glutes)

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #19 on: August 29, 2012, 04:28:08 PM »
Phil is thicker, and his entire lower body (glutes, hams,) blows that oilbag away (too bad for Flex you can't inject oil in your hamstrings and glutes)
This was before the oil.

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #20 on: August 29, 2012, 05:24:43 PM »
This was before the oil.

Flex and Kevin(among others) used boatloads of esceline. Flex admitting years ago to having over 100 injection sites. Jay cuter the same.

Bevo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18687
  • Middle Urinal
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #21 on: August 29, 2012, 06:25:43 PM »
Actually no what? In what way does Flex beat him from the back? Even if one photo is better than the next, Flex's fat ass is right there for you to see. Health is hard as a rock top to bottom. Flex is tight top only, regardless how dry he is. His calves are pathetic while Health's are great. it's no contest from the back which is what the thread asked for, I wont address anything else

You have to excuse Parker he has a hard on for flex as he is his "idol."

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #22 on: August 29, 2012, 06:40:59 PM »
flex wins
choice is an illusion

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #23 on: August 29, 2012, 07:45:49 PM »
You have to excuse Parker he has a hard on for flex as he is his "idol."
I can admit that Phil is thicker (he weighs more), and better in certain areas.

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Flex v Heath. Back shot
« Reply #24 on: August 29, 2012, 09:13:36 PM »
They both do not look strong, therefore they should not be mr O....

hope this helps

LMFAO !  YUP, INSANELY MUSCULAR DUDES FROM TOP TO BOTTOM, DONT LOOK STRONG AT ALL !  ;D  ;D ;D YOU GOT TO BE FUCKING KIDDING ME