Not accurate at all , we have multiple eyewitnesses Kevin Horton and Peter McGough who have both said his conditioning at that weight ( and higher ) hasn't been replicated to this day
did they personally feel Dorian's glutes? How can they objectively say Dorian had better conditioning at that weight than anone else? It's not like putting two objects side by side and objectively saying object A is bigger than B. Also, I can post quotes saying Ronnie at 287 lbs was more shredded and had better quality mass than anyone else. Does that make it true? You need to come up with something better than hearsay
Still don't need the precontest photos his competition photos illustrate my point just as well , without the quotes.
Dorian was much smaller in his competition photos than his precontest pics. Any size advantage would be lost in the back double biceps
Phil excellent conditioning , not on Yates level in terms of conditioning and size.
in other poses? Yes. In the bdb? I'm not so sure about that. Phil has bigger arms, delts, and legs than Dorian. The only thing Dorian has over Phil is a wider back. However, that would be negated by the illusion of size due to Phil's much, much smaller waist